"2A Didn't Kill Anybody"

Florida's Republican governor is a smart guy. He doesn't “knuckle under” to political pressure like most politicians do. Rick Scott refused to order a special session in the state legislature to “debate gun laws” after the Orlando killings, saying, “The Second Amendment didn't kill anybody.” What goes unsaid is that the usual run of “gun laws” HAVE killed people, by disarming honest people in the face of increasing danger from ILLEGAL gun-wielding “bad guys.”The anti-gun fools seem to think it did, because it advocates guns in the hands of honest people, to oppose the ILLEGAL guns in the hands of criminals and other bad guys. They seem to think, in their stupidity, that guns in the hands of good guys are a danger. I agree. But they're only a danger to BAD GUYS with ILLEGAL guns! I used to be one of those “good guys with a gun,” and I never killed anybody over a trifle like a fender-bender. Obama is importing some of those “:bad guys” by the hundreds of thousands (Islamic immigrants, including many Muslim terrorists) while, at the same time, trying his best to make us DEFENSELESS against them when they come to kill us. I have my own ideas about why he does that, but that's a discussion for another day. Meanwhile it grows more and more dangerous to be an American while our president tries hard to disarm us. That's a fact, and Rick knows it, even if other politicians don't. (Guns)

Concealed Carrier Stops Shooting

A concealed carrier stopped a mass shooting at a South Carolina night club, just days after a similar shooting in Orlando that killed 49 people and wounded as many more. Thus proving me right again, when I say that armed concealed carriers in the crowd DO stop such shootings. This guy started shooting because of an argument. But then he began spraying bullets into the crowd. His shooting spree was ENDED abruptly by a concealed carrier in the crowd who shot him. The gun carried by the “mass shooter” was illegally carried, which again proves that all their vaunted anti-gun laws do NOTHING to stop such people from carrying guns. The concealed carrier was meant to be his fourth victim, but he got a bullet, instead. Why the fools who make all those USELESS “gun laws” never see these things, is a mystery. At least, it is to many people. But not to me. They don't care about facts, they just want to disarm us, for their own reasons. (Guns)

Gabby And Her gun

I recently saw Gabby Giffords, one of the most militant anti-gun fools, holding an “automatic weapon” in her efforts to make them illegal. At least, unlike Sen. Feinstein, she didn't have her finger on the trigger while others in the room cowered, hoping she doesn't kill them. But the picture was so ridiculous, I had to share it here. The picture illustrated her campaign to keep gays from being able to defend themselves after the mass killings of gays in Orlando. Meanwhile gays, who seem to be smarter than she is, are buying guns in large numbers, today, So when the next Islamic terrorist comes to execute them, maybe they can execute HIM. (Breitbart)

Banning Guns Is Useless

I've said, many times, that banning guns was a useless endeavor, because it only applies to HONEST people while the very people they're supposed to inhibit in using guns in a malevolent manner IGNORE them, and get their guns ILLEGALLY, either buying them on the black market, or simply stealing them. But the anti-gun fools insist on making more and more of them, even though they've been proven (all of them) to be ineffective in keeping guns away from criminals, crazies, or Islamic terrorists. In Turkey, where that have all but BANNED gun ownership to ALL their citizens, three Islamic terrorists brought their guns (where did they get 'em?) into an airport and started killing people. They didn't get very far, but they killed about 50 or more people in the process. All where guns are not allowed to be in the possession of anybody but cops and government agents. What gives? I thought lack of legal guns would stop stuff like this. You mean it doesn't? Golly! (AmmoLand)

Trying A New Tack

The anti-gun fools don't give up. They have suffered many failures lately in their efforts to take away our guns and make us defenseless as Obama imports hundreds of thousands of Islamic terrorists who want to kill us or force us to “convert” to their phony religion. They just can't get it through their thick skulls that the American people aren't going to let them disarm us as more and more criminals, crazies, and Islamic terrorists get more and more ILLEGAL guns to use in killing us. So now they're trying a new tack. They're urging their brain-dead accomplices to have “sit-ins” in various places, like the one THEY did in Congress. One that failed because they didn't want to miss their vacations. They want their fools to do want they couldn't finish. But it ain't gonna work, as it didn't work in Congress. The American people are too dead set against being disarmed in the face of increasing gun threats. (Star Tribune)

Anti-Gun Senator Arrested

Anti-gun senator Jamila Nasheed got sloppy drunk and was arrested. And guess what she had in her possession when arrested? A nine-millimeter GUN and extra clips! I've always thought anti-gun fools were not only fools in what they push, but are armed, too. They all think they have a “special right” to be armed, while us peasants do not. She's not the only anti-gun fool that goes armed. Sen. Feinstein, one of the most vitriolic anti-gunners, carries her own gun, in addition to her ARMED security people that follow her around like puppies. Some time ago, an anti-gun columnist caught a naked swimmer in his private pool, came out with gun in hand, and shot at him. The news reports don't mention the kid being hit, so the columnist must be a lousy shot, as well as a hypocrite. Anti-gun politicians, as a rule, don't go around armed, They can afford (with our money) to HIRE people to carry their guns FOR them, so they don't need it. This happened in Ferguson, MO, where they're still ignoring facts and protesting the killing of Michael Brown, who was killed as he tried to take a cop's gun. One of these days they might get it. But I have my serious doubts. They're apparently not intelligent enough. Nasheed is an American Muslim. That explains a lot. (ETF News)

"We're More Equal"

Anti-gun politician Charlie Rangel thinks he's “special.” He inadvertently admitted it when he was asked about that childish “sit-in” in Congress by anti-gun fools that failed, because the “sit-iners” didn't want to miss out on their vacations. Those fools were protected by layer upon layer of ARMED security while they demonstrated to keep the same protection from the average Americans. His reply was priceless: “That's a little different. I think we deserve—I think we need to be protected down here.” Which says emphatically that he thinks they are “special,” in that they “need” protection, and we don't. Such “elite thinking” is rampant in DC. They think they're “special,” because we elected them to BE “special.” They think they're entitled to special privileges, and that idea extends to their “special” health insurance that is superior to everything they offer us “peasants.” And their retirement program, that gives them equal pay to their congressional salary when they leave Congress—for life. Even after only ONE TERM. No barely sufficient Social Security scam for these fools! They didn't contribute ANYTHING, but they're getting “special benefits". And all the laws they make for us, they exempt themselves from. (America's First Freedom)

Baltimore Leads the Nation

In the increase in number of murders since Freddy Grey's death an d the “criminalization” of six innocent cops, who were just doing their duty showed that the Baltimore state's attorney “had it in for the cops by charging them with crimes, including murder with evidence so thin it hasn't a chance to hold up in court. Criminals have gotten the message, and have reacted with great alacrity, killing wantonly, ever since. Every cop so charged, so far, has been either found not guilty, or had a “hung jury,” showing that the jury could not find him guilty, but were afraid to just “let him go,” as they did in a later trial with another of the six cops so charged. I predict the same will happen with the rest of those unjustly charged cops as each comes up for trial. Who gets to pay their legal expenses doesn't seem to enter into it. And the mental anguish they suffered, combined with having no income for so long, as well.(Baltimore Sun)

Concealed Carriers Can Stop Shootings!

The anti-gun fools tell you confidently that concealed carriers don't stop mass shootings, and they're right, in a way. There are few mass shootings that have been stopped by concealed carriers. That's because most of them that ARE, aren't reported as “mass shootings” BECAUSE they were stopped. The article linked below tells of several potential mass shootings that were stopped by a concealed carrier. Some by shooting and killing or wounding the shooter, others simply by “getting the drop on him” and interfering with his plans. In both cases, mass shootings then didn't ensue, and were not called one. So no statistics can be gained about a mass shooting because it was stopped by a concealed carrier in the crowd.. Anti-gun fools use that fact to their advantage, since it keeps the total NUMBERS of mass shootings down. (Daily Caller)

Gun Control Insanity

The other day, a FIVE-YEAR-OLD was suspended from kindergarten for bringing a BUBBLE GUN with him to class! How stupid IS that? And these fools are the people who want to educate our young.! With people like that running our education system, we're in a LOT of trouble. And we can't seem to get anything done about it. Recently, a similar thing happened to another very young boy who chewed a Pop-Tart into a rough shape of a gun and used it to play “cops and robbers” at recess! It is this kind of insanity we encounter when we allow liberals to run our schools. They haven't the native INTELLIGENCE to do it, but we (not me) keep letting them do it. Hopefully, one day, intelligent people will take over in our schools and throw these fools out. But I'm not holding my breath. Turning blue doesn't appeal to me. (Guns 'n' Freedom)

GOP "Afraid" of NRA

That's what John Legend (who?) says. He says the ONLY reason Congress won't pass their stupid anti-gun legislation is because Republicans are afraid of the NRA. Of course, there's no other possible reason, right? It's not possible that Americans don't believe the anti-gun fools' pipe-dream that all you have to do is “make a law” and lawbreakers will obey it when they don't obey other laws, and want the means to defend themselves against the millions of ILLEGAL guns out there. Anti-gun fools are really stupid. They prove it every time they open their mouths, or sponsor a bill in Congress. None of the laws they have made in the past have ever done ANYTHING to “stem the tide” of gun violence, but that makes no difference to them. Making such laws are part of their “religion” and, like members of other religions, they take it on “faith” that their laws will work, while all they do is get people killed because they haven't the means to self defense. And now Democrats in the Congress do something juvenile like a “sit-in” to protest the fact that four of their latest fiascoes were rejected by the Congress. They call that “inaction.” They say they "just want a vote," but they've already had one. They just didn't get there way. (Daily Caller)

Australia's "Good" Gun Laws

In 1996. after a mass shooting, Australian politicos passed some of the stupidest gun laws going. Those guns they didn't just BAN, they forced owners into licensing the ones they owned, so the government knew who had every gun there was. Those guns that were legally owned by law-abiding people, that is, while those who owned ILLEGAL guns ignored that. And, predictably, “gun crime” has skyrocketed. The result of those laws is that only the CRIMINALS have guns. And they use them to victimize those who obeyed those laws. In just the last 12 months, over 3,300 people were charged with gun crimes, and 9,000 illegally-owned guns were confiscated. Does that sound like those laws “solved” anything? What it proves is that the only people affected were law-abiding people, while criminals were affected, not at all. Still, American anti-gun fools keep touting Australia's “good gun laws” and deny the increase in gun crime CAUSED by those laws. (Guns 'n' Freedom)

Dead In A Gun-Free Zone

Panera Breads are ALL “gun-free zones.” so you ought to be safe there, right? These two cops were NOT. Somebody saw this guy “acting strangely” in a Maryland Panera Bread and called the cops. Two deputies arrived, and he promptly shot them to death. How is this POSSIBLE? There aren't supposed to be any guns in Panera Bread restaurants. It's obvious this guy ignored their rules, as all those wishing to commit crimes do. People who plan on committing crimes do not obey laws or “rules” that say they can't bring their guns there. Gun-free zones are a really stupid “answer” to gun violence. All they do is DISARM honest, law-abiding people, who aren't the problem, anyway. They do NOTHING to prevent criminals, who don't OBEY laws or rules, from bringing their guns, and that gets people killed. But the anti-gun fools will never learn that. I, and others keep telling them, but they never listen. (Guns 'n' Freedom)

Proving Themselves Stupid

The anti-gun fools say, “For every gun used in self defense, 6 are used to commit a crime.” They say that in defense of their USELESS “gun laws,” but the argument doesn't stand up. There's a good reason for that: they limit the guns honest, law-abiding people can BUY, while criminals buy their guns ILLEGALLY, unencumbered by laws they routinely IGNORE. Owners of legal guns don't go out and search for shooting incidents into which they can insert themselves. Armed CRIMINALS do. They just don't care about any laws, so they will NATURALLY get into more “gun scrapes” than will LEGAL gun owners. I get really tired of pointing this out, and being not only ignored, but ridiculed. (Washington Post)

Real Gun Facts

Anti-gun fools give you all kinds of phony “facts.” These are facts liberals would rather you didn't know. One: Background checks do NOTHING to STOP gun violence. Many mass shooters have PASSED background checks because they don't (yet) have a record. And the others don't get their guns legally. They either buy them ILLEGALLY, or steal them. Thus not having to undergo a background check,. MAYBE a background check lets the cops find the shooter later, but that does nothing for those he kills Two: More people killed with blunt or sharp instruments than ever with guns. But the anti-gun fools don't talk about that. Then they'd have to ban all blunt or sharp instruments, which even they realize would be impossible. Three: They tell you legally-owned guns never stop “gun crime.” But guns in the hands of honest, law-abiding people have been used 760,000 times a year in self defense in America. Four: “Gun-free zones” do NOTHING to stop “gun crime.” People who want to victimize others with guns routinely IGNORE such “zones,” whether they're set up by law, or merely the “policy” of a private company. Gun crazies SEEK OUT “gun-free zones” in which to kill people because they know there probably won't be any guns there in the hands of the victims. More detail can be found in the linked article. (Breitbart)

100 New Cops

Chicago, responding to the massively high “gun violence” stats, has added 100 new cops to their roster. 100 more guns in opposition to the ILLEGAL guns in the hands of criminals. This while they have some of the tightest “gun laws” in the nation, and similarly high “gun violence” stats. They are a “showcase city” proving that the current idea of gun control not only does NOT work, it actually INCREASES gun crime. Their laws are so tight that many have been declared unconstitutional. But they then make new ones to do the same things until the new ones are declared unconstitutional. Then they do it again. Like other cities run by liberals, they have high crime rates, and they try and try (unsuccessfully) to bring it down, proving (again) their incompetence. Just look at ANY liberal-ruin city and you'll see similar evidence of incompetence in governing. So don't go to Chicago unless you have a death wish, of a gun nobody knows about. (MRC TV)

Pointing Fingers

This cartoon shows graphically how the worst offenders point fingers at law-abiding gun owners, when the blame really rests on them. (Liberty Alliance)

Proving Our Point

Cops in Palm Springs made 30 arrests, confiscated 23 illegally-owned guns, and 2 rocket launchers after a nine month investigation of gang members. Which proves our contention that most of the “gun problems” are caused by gangs, who don't OBEY “gun laws.” Whatever makes them think limiting guns for law-abiding people will do anything to slow down, or stop “gun violence” is a mystery. Of course, telling anti-gun fools the facts is futile. To them, facts that don't support their preconceived notions just don't exist. They go right over them with their lies about guns. Just about every man or boy in those gangs is too young to be allowed to own guns. But they all do. And they use them to victimize law-abiding people, who are mostly disarmed by the government laws and regulations that make them “easy targets.” (Desert Sun)

Insulting Our Intelligence

Obama does it all the time. like the time (recently) when he told us the economy was “doing great,” while 96 million Americans were out of work, and have been so for so long, they've given up on ever finding another viable job, so he can remove them from the workforce and only count those left, while LYING to us and telling us the unemployment numbers are small. He does it again when, while visiting the victims and the families of the Orlando killings, he says, “If we don't take action, we're going to have more of these killings,” he means that. “taking action” means DISARMING honest, law-abiding Americans, making them DEFENSELESS against such things as this shooter. He thinks, like most incompetent liberal politicians, that the secret to defending ourselves is to take away out guns. He thinks all we have to do when threatened is to call 9/11. when we do, the “bad guy “ can kill us while we're waiting for the cops to arrive. The cops, themselves, are the first to tell us they “can't be everywhere” and we should rely on ourselves. Ergo, have our own guns. The police POLITICIANS tell us otherwise, against logic and reason. But the cops “in the trenches” know it's true. (Just common sense)

Clueless to Conservative

People wonder why actress Stacy Dash has put her acting career in jeopardy by becoming a known conservative in liberal Hollywood. It's a matter of honor to her. In one of the best examples that a conservative if a liberal who has been mugged, she once had to use a gun to protect herself from an ex-boyfriend who liked to beat on her, and found her everywhere she went. So she bought a gun and, when he kicked her door in and attempted to assault her again, she scared the hell out of him by shooting at him as he tried to come up the stairs in her home. He hasn't been seen nor heard from, since. She didn't have a restraining order against him because she probably realized that piece of paper was useless. Her gun was her “restraining order,” and it worked. That experience made her question her former liberal stance, and she is now a proud conservative, even if that stance has cost her some work in liberal Hollywood. She even wrote a book about it. (The Blaze)

Dead In A Gun-Free Zone

Panera Breads are ALL “gun-free zones.” so you ought to be safe there, right? These two cops were NOT. Somebody saw this guy “acting strangely” in a Maryland Panera Bread and called the cops. Two deputies arrived, and he promptly shot them to death. How is this POSSIBLE? There aren't supposed to be any guns in Panera Bread restaurants. It's obvious this guy ignored their rules, as all those wishing to commit crimes do. People who plan on committing crimes do not obey laws or “rules” that say they can't bring their guns there. Gun-free zones are really stupid “answer” to gun violence. All they do is DISARM honest, law-abiding people, who aren't the problem, anyway. They do NOTHING to prevent criminals, who don't OBEY laws or rules, from bringing their guns, and that gets people killed. But the anti-gun fools will never learn that. I, and others keep telling them, but they never listen. (Guns 'n' Freedom)

Proving Themselves Stupid

The anti-gun fools say, “For every gun used in self defense, 6 are used to commit a crime.” They say that in defense of their USELESS “gun laws,” but the argument doesn't stand up. There's a good reason for that: they limit the guns honest, law-abiding people can BUY, while criminals buy their guns ILLEGALLY, unencumbered by laws they IGNORE, or just steal them. Owners of legal guns don't go out and search for shooting incidents into which they can insert themselves. Armed CRIMINALS do. They just don't care about any laws, so they will NATURALLY get into more “gun scrapes” than will LEGAL gun owners. I get really tired of pointing this out, and being not only ignored, but ridiculed. (WashingtonPost)

It Was A Real Lark

The Orlando shooter, whom I will not name, because that's what he wanted, went into his massacre as a lark. He called 9/11 three times DURING his shooting spree and declared his allegiance to ISIS. He maintained a regular check on Facebook and Twitter to see what kind of coverage he was getting. And he texted his wife several times with one hand while killing people with the other. It's really too bad there are people like this fool running around in this country, killing people just for the fun of it. And no amount of “gun control” is going to stop it, or even slow it down. Such people always get their guns, legally or illegally. IT doesn't matter to them. They plan to commit many murders, so a piddling little law like a gun law means NOTHING to them. The World Trade Center killers didn't even USE guns. They used BOX CUTTERS and AIRPLANES! So should we ban box cutters? AIRPLANES? Other such killers use KNIVES. If they want to kill, they'll find a way. Guns are only one tool they use. (Just common sense)

"It Defies Common Sense!"

Obama says, “Arming gays defies common sense.” Right! If you're an anti-gun fool, that is. Law-abiding gays are no different from any other law-abiding person, and have a right to defend themselves as much as anybody. They may now be a “protected class,” but they're just like everybody else in their need to defend themselves. The idea of letting them get guns only “defies common sense” in the fevered brains of anti-gun fools, who don't know what common sense IS. Most liberals deny the very existence of common sense and logic. Obama has an “army” of ARMED men surrounding him everywhere he goes. But he is no more entitled to that than anybody else in this country. That seems to be a “right” he takes for himself, but refuses to allow others to have. It really galls me when politicians like Obama deny us the rights they take for themselves, and say “it defies common sense” to let us arm ourselves when we can't afford armed security to follow us around after making life miserable for the people we will encounter in our travels. (Weasel Zippers)

Learning How To Lie

CNN's Don Lemon says, “The media is NOT trying to make this about guns! It's NOT! It's NOT! Methinks he doth protest too much. Maybe somebody should crack open his eyes because if he can't see that the media IS “making the Orlando shooting about guns,” instead of about the killer, And his own CNN is one of the worst offenders, he has no business being in a position where he can influence lots of people when he know so little. One day, Lemon should be attacked by a man with a gun. He'd wish then, that HE had a gun to use in defending himself. People like Lemon only think the way they do because they've never had that experience. Mostly because they're insulated from armed thugs by their own armed thugs. If you don't believe it, just try to walk into the CNN offices where he works without going through a bunch of armed security. Lemon must be taking lessons from Barack Obama on how to lie about things most people KNOW are lies. (Mediaite)

Pointing Fingers

This cartoon shows graphically how the worst offenders point fingers at law-abiding gun owners, when the blame really rests on them. (Liberty Alliance)

Proving Our Point

Cops in Palm Springs made 30 arrests, confiscated 23 illegally-owned guns, and 2 rocket launchers after a nine month investigation of gang members. Which proves our contention that most of the “gun problems” are caused by gangs, who don't OBEY “gun laws.” Whatever makes them think limiting guns for law-abiding people will do anything to slow down, or stop “gun violence” is a mystery. Of course, telling anti-gun fools the facts is futile. To them, facts that don't support their preconceived notions just don't exist. They go right over them with their lies about guns. Just about every man or boy in those gangs is too young to be allowed to own guns. But they do. And they use them to victimize law-abiding people, who are mostly disarmed by the government laws and regulations that make them “easy targets.” (Desert Sun)

Stern Mocks Gun Control

He equated it to sheep, lining up for the slaughter of the wolves who “pick off” a couple of the sheep, every night, and what would happen if the sheep had guns and the will to use them. What would have happened if the Jews had had some AR-15s when the Nazis came to their door to take them to the gas chambers. Howard Stern isn't usually saying things conservatives like, but even some liberals have had enough. And Stern is a good example of a liberal that has “had it” with the fools who take guns into “no gun zones” and kill unarmed innocent people. Why the anti-gun fools can't get it through their thick skulls that DISARMING yourself is NOT the way to self defense is a mystery. Maybe they're just stupid. Or evil. (World Net Daily)

It Was A Real Lark

The Orlando shooter, whom I will not name, because that's he wanted his name to become famous, went into his massacre as a lark. He called 9/11 three times DURING his shooting spree and declared his allegiance to ISIS. He maintained a regular check on Facebook and Twitter to see what kind of coverage he was getting. And he texted his wife several times with one hand while killing people with the other. It's really too bad there are evil people like this fool running around in this country, killing people just for the fun of it. And no amount of “gun control” is going to stop it, or even slow it down. Such people always get their guns, legally or illegally. It doesn't matter to them. They plan to commit many murders, so a piddling little law like a gun law means NOTHING to them.  It'll probably be dropped, anyway, if he confesses. The World Trade Center (9/11) killers didn't even USE guns. They used BOX CUTTERS and AIRPLANES! So should we ban box cutters? AIRPLANES? Other such killers use KNIVES. If they want to kill, they'll find a way. Guns are only one tool they use. (Just common sense)

Insulting Our Intelligence

Obama does it all the time. like the time (recently) when he told us the economy was “doing great,” while 96 million Americans were out of work, and have been so for so long, they've given up on ever finding another viable job and have left the workforce, so he can remove them from the workforce list and only count those left, while LYING to us and telling us the unemployment numbers are small. He does it again when, while visiting the victims and the families of the Orlando killings, he says, “If we don't take action, we're going to have more of these killings,” he means that,“taking action” means DISARMING honest, law-abiding Americans, making them DEFENSELESS against such things as this shooter. He thinks, like most incompetent liberal politicians, that the secret to defending ourselves is to take away out guns. He thinks all we have to do when threatened is to call 9/11. When we do, the “bad guy “ can kill us while we're waiting for the cops to arrive. The cops, themselves, are the first to tell us they “can't be everywhere” and we should rely on ourselves. Ergo, have our own guns. The police POLITICIANS tell us otherwise, against logic and reason. But the cops “in the trenches” know it's true. (USA Today)

It's Easy To Say

After the killings are done, it's easy to say, “We are in solidarity with the victims” and hold “vigils” with candle light. That only makes candles a “hot item.” It does NOTHING to “support” the people who have been murdered by a fool with a gun he bought LEGALLY, obeying all laws, then DISOBEYED all laws when he transported those guns across several states ILLEGALLY, after murdering a woman in his home state. Standing in a “candlelight vigil” does NOTHING to help those murdered. It didn't help the people we “left twisting in the wind” in Benghazi when we COULD have sent people to keep them alive. Like this writer, I'm getting sick and tired of people “mourning together,” holding candles “in memorium,” praying for the victims, and saying, “We feel your pain.” They don't. Only those who were murdered can “feel their pain.” Supporting them is making sure there won't be any more such victims by allowing honest, law-abiding people to have guns and the right to carry them when they go out among other people. We're not all morons, as the anti-gun fools want us to think. We won't “start shooting” at the slightest provocation, and if we do, SOMEBODY in the crowd will put a stop to it. (iPatriot)

"Gays Need Guns!"

That's the message being sent in California, where they are trying to pass a number of typically USELESS gun laws. The question is, “How can transgenders defend themselves without guns?” That's labeled as a “specious argument” by the anti-gun fools, though it is tragically true. If ANYBODY had his own gun, he's much more likely to be able to defend himself when faced by a criminal with his ILLEGAL gun—which is becoming more and more likely, every day. The anti-gun fools whine about honest, law-abiding people getting their guns easily, but say nothing about how easy it is to get a gun ILLEGALLY. But saying that arguing that people need to have their own guns to be able to defend themselves is NOT “a specious argument.” Saying that is the anti-gun fool's way of rejecting a logical argument, and feeling superior at the same time. (SF Weekly)

Right-Wingers Are Like Terrorists

DHS Director Jeh Johnson says, “Right-wing extremists are as much of a threat as Islamic terrorists.” This horse manure was said with a smug expression on his face at a meeting of the Homeland Security Advisory Committee in Texas. It really amazes me how incompetent politicians and bureaucrats divert attention from their incompetence by blaming blameless people for what they can't seem to control. And nobody calls them on it. Much less our incompetent president, who probably agrees with him. Right-wingers are the :loyal opposition” to the damned fool policies of the liberals currently in charge. And they think, in their incompetence, they can blunt their opposition by making such STUPID comments. Truth is, it is the LEFT-wingers that are the danger. For proof, just look at what they espouse. From thinking all they have to do is ask people not to bring their guns in certain places to keep guns out, to allowing MEN in women's restrooms and changing rooms if they SAY they “see themselves as a woman today.” (Weasel Zippers)

Screw You, Whoopie!

She told gun supporters to “back off,” on a recent episode of the liberal show, “The View.” Which is about as stupid at it comes. She says we can't explain such things as “Sandy Hook,” but we can. Like most “gun-free zones,” Sandy Hook is a colossal example of the fact that gun-free zones are USELESS. Like most anti-gun fools, she misses the point, altogether. Whether she does it deliberately or is just clueless, is not known. No-gun zones are an “engraved invitation” to mass shooters who want to kill people, because they can be reasonably confident there will be nobody there with a gun, and able to oppose them. Just about every mass shooting I know of HAPPENED in a “gun-free zone” of some sort. There, Whoopi, I actually had something to say. Now, how do you answer that? If you can? Hey, Whoopi, I know what I'm talking about. You don't. (Real Clear Politics)

That's Not the Point!

As usual, liberal lawmakers miss the point, altogether. On purpose, or otherwise, I can't say. Schumer and Feinstein say that “FBI suspicions should be enough to stop a subject from buying a gun.” WRONG! FBI suspicions alone, should NOT be enough to keep somebody from buying a gun. In the case of the Orlando shooter, it was not just “suspicions,” and should at least put him on a “watch list” so that, when he bought several guns on the same day, they could at least find out why, and maybe intervene before 49 people get killed. They have the power to STOP him from USING those guns if they have a pretty good idea what he wants to do with them. In this case, he had actually been TALKING about his hatred for gays, even though he may have been gay, himself. Sounds as if he may have been mad at himself for BEING gay, and took it out on others. (CNS News)

It's Not About Gun Control!

The anti-gun fools have been quick to get their “presses rolling” on a new drive for “gun control” after this Muslim radical murdered half a hundred gays in a gay night club in Orlando, Florida. Obama admits it is “terrorism,” but, as usual, won't breathe the word, “Islamic.” But it's not about gun control. It's about TERRORISM control, which is, as usual, being ignored. With the rise in gay activism and it's recent successes, you can expect more attacks on gays, soon. They're acting like bullies and targeting people they KNOW will refuse to do business with them on religious principles, so they can sue them out of business. They have to expect some backlash. Muslims, who hate homosexuals, anyway, can be expected to react violently, as they are wont to do. Incompetent politicians (beginning with Obama) still think all you have to do is make a law, and potential lawbreakers will obey it, including radical Muslims, who don't give a CRAP about our laws. (iPatriot)

Is It Terrorism?

Or just hate? Or both? One crazy Muslim who was incensed because he once saw two men kissing on the street in Miami went into a gay night club and opened fire, killing (so far) 49 people and wounding (so far) another 50 until he was stopped, and KILLED by responding men with guns (cops). There was ONE cop there early, who engaged him in a gun fight, and stopped, or slowed down his shooting spree. Then a “hostage situation” developed, and the other cops waited before “going in” and rescuing another 30 people. Anti-gun fools are already working overtime to use this to raise more money and get more of their USELESS “gun laws” passed, none of which, so far, have done ANYTHING to stop gun violence and, in fact, INCREASED it by keeping law-abiding people unarmed so they can't defend themselves against people like this shooter. Word is that he had an AR-15, the favorite gun to be blamed by the anti-gun fools in any mass shooting. Also, word is, this guy had NO record, so would probably have no trouble buying a gun legally. It is not known (yet) if he got his guns legally, but that is of no moment. Guys like this never seem to have any trouble getting their guns ILLEGALLY. Anti-gun fools confidently say that tighter laws on gun ownership will keep things like this from happening, But most such shootings happen in areas with the toughest gun laws. More later, as facts become available. All this is currently very preliminary, as the story is still coming out. (L. A. Times)

"A Truth Bomb"

Ted Nugent has just dropped a “truth bomb” on the anti-gun fools who think an unarmed community is a safe community. “People who argue for the banning of arms ask for automatic rule by the young, the strong, and the many, and that’s the exact opposite of a civilized society. A mugger, even an armed one, can only make a successful living in a society where the state has granted him a force monopoly.” A “force monopoly.” I'm a 78-year-old man who can barely walk because of old injuries. I would have NO CHANCE against an ILLEGALLY-armed criminal if he accosted me. And thugs, who are basically cowards, look upon people like me as “easy targets, which makes it much more likely they WILL accost me than they would a younger, able-bodied person. A gun in my hand would make all the difference, while maybe eliminating that thug from future actions against honest people. It makes us EQUAL. And, unlike what anti-gun fools insist, just because I'm armed, I won't be shooting anybody over something as unimportant as a fender-bender or just shooting myself. Responsible human beings don't do things like that. And there are already enough ILLEGAL guns out there in the hands of fools to have that happen, since most of them are in the hands of those thugs and gang members, who will kill you for looking at them wrong. (Daily Caller)

"It's Just Not True!"

Obama says, “The notion that I, Hillary, or any other Democrat wants to take away your guns is just not true!” It isn't? Then why are you—all of you—working so hard to do just that? Do you really think intelligent people will believe that garbage just because you say it? Especially when we KNOW how much you love to LIE, knowing we know you're lying? The way for us to know what you're really doing is to NEVER listen to what you SAY, but keep track of what you DO. Your actions put the LIE to such statements, on your part. Just as when you say the economy is in great shape, when we KNOW it is NOT. With 96 million Americans are not only out of work, they have given up on ever finding a meaningful job again and have left the work force, allowing you to stop counting them, which is how you can claim such low unemployment numbers. When the national debt is now DOUBLE what it was when you took office. Give us a BREAK! (Daily Caller)

Laws Not For Us

That seems to be the general opinion among anti-gun fools. Example: Washington Post columnist Carl Rowan, once said, "Anyone found in possession of a gun, except a bona-fide law officer should go to jail—period.” But when he found an unauthorized teenager swimming in his pool, what did he do? He ran out and shot him, with his gun. Did he go to jail for possessing a gun? Doubtful. He's a liberal, after all. Then there's Katie Couric's producer, who traveled to different states and bought guns, to bring back to New York, ostensibly to do a “documentary” designed to demonize guns. We don't know how many laws she violated, but nobody's pressing the issue, anyway. She's a liberal, right? They hate guns, but what do they suggest as a remedy? Take them out and SHOOT them! Senator (now Secretary of State) John Kerry talked about “assassinating George Bush.” Then there's the Democrat representative who said Rick Scott should be “put up against a wall and shot” instead of running for Governor of Florida because he was pro-gun. These people are so hypocritical the word hypocrite isn't harsh enough. And their rhetoric is VERY violent. That's what happens when people run out of arguments. They go immediately to insults and threats. (Gun Owners of America)

Major Birmingham (UK) Gun Problem

England has some of the toughest gun laws in the world. Why then, does Birmingham have such a major problem with gun crime? Could it be that criminals and gang members are IGNORING those gun laws? How is that possible? Don't criminals and gang members obey laws? Thinking they do is one of the basic flaws in most current gun laws. There are many other flaws in the laws they're currently making that not only makes them USELESS in stopping gun crime, they actually PROMOTE it. Therefore, these laws get people KILLED. But you'll never get them to admit that. Less than a half hour after a recent killing at UCLA the anti-gun fools were fund-raising, using that crime to con more money out of gullible people. They don't really want to make laws that work. If they did, hopefully, the problem would go away and their lucrative jobs would be gone. And they don't want that. Whipping up anti-gun sentiment pays too well. (Birmingham Mail)

Whomping Up Their Press Releases

I just watched a live shot of a shooting that happened at Dallas Love Field in Texas and I'll guarantee you the anti-gun forces, without waiting for the facts, are “whomping up their press releases” and their appeals for more money from those gullible fools who agree with their absurd notion that making laws against LAW-ABIDING people having guns will stop gun violence. One guy was filming, and predictably, as soon as shots were heard, his aim with the camera went crazy so you couldn't see the important part of the shooting. He finally got it under control and what appeared to be two cops aiming their guns into the terminal could be seen. One person has been transported to the hospital.It was the attacker, who had no guns. Only big rocks, which he tried to use on the cop. The only shots fired were fired by the cop. Look for the anti-gun fools to make hay out of this. (RT Question More)

Couric Eliminates Lott

You've no doubt hear of John Lott, the world's foremost authority on the gun issue. Katie Couric asked him to come to New York for an interview, where she and 7 staffers tried valiantly to get him to say something they could twist to sound like what it wasn't. So, after FOUR HOURS of an”interview” that was supposed to last only an hour, she gave up and left. He tried to get some of his results brought out, but Kouric said that most of it had been discredited in many ways. Only one little problem. It had NOT been discredited, in any way. Even some people who set out to discredit his research wound up supporting it. So what did Katie do with this four-hour interview? She left it completely OUT of her propaganda piece. She wasn't able to get words she could twist, like she did with others, so she just IGNORED the foremost authority on the “gun issue” in the country. This is what liberals do. They make “documentaries” in which they only honestly interview people they know will agree with them, and selectively edit interviews with people like Lott. But Lott was better at avoiding the pitfalls she set for him, so she just eliminated the interview and falsely called his research “discredited.” (America's First Freedom)

Ninth Circus Rules

The liberal “Ninth Circus” Court has ruled. The most reversed court in the land has ruled. They ruled in favor of California's requirement that applicants show “good and proper reason” to need to carry a gun in order to get a “carry permit.” And in so doing, said that Americans have NO right to carry a gun for self protection, or for anything else. This is a good example of what we'll get nationally if Hillary gets elected and is able to appoint the next Supreme Court Justice. “Rulings” that are patently AGAINST the Constitution, when their only job is to UPHOLD the Constitution. Liberals on the Supreme Court are famous for ruling AGAINST the Constitution, even though they are THERE to UPHOLD it. They are dishonest, and commonly rule, not by what the Constitution SAYS, but by their prejudices and BIASES. It is through liberals on the court that liberals plan to eliminate the Constitution as an obstacle to their intentions, forever. Little by little they “nibble” at it with rulings like this. Their next move is to get the Second Amendment repealed. After that will be the First Amendment. When that happens, this will cease to be a free country, when the ability to criticize the government without fear of criminal prosecution is removed, They're already working on it (in California, where else?) with their attempts to criminalize criticism of global warming acolytes. The source listed here is a liberal site, so take what they write with several grains of salt. (Slate)

Racially Excluded

You'd think, in a Chicago gun buy-back “dog and pony show,” that guns owned by white people would be as welcome as guns from black people, wouldn't you? Not even! They systematically turned away EVERY gun offered by a white person while accepting similar guns brought in by black people. I wonder why? Maybe they realize that most white people who own guns don't use them to commit crimes, while black people do, more often than not. Or maybe they're just racists. The exclusions were accomplished by a “surly female” from the mayor's office, so you can probably assume, on goof evidence, that they were excluded by order of the mayor. Is he finally revealing his racism? One wonders. Democrats are the worst racists, historically, while they ACCUSE Republicans, who voted FOR the Equal Rights Amendment while Democrats actually tried to BLOCK it. Of course, they'll deny their racism, but the facts make liars of them, as so often happens. (Guns Save Lives)

What Part of the Body?

The headline says: “Visalia Homeowner Shoots Intruder In the Backyard.” What part of the body is that? Some of the headlines I see are comical, because the headline writer doesn't think about what the headline sounds like. In this case, the item doesn't say where the bullet actually entered the intruder's body. The homeowner actually shot the intruder somewhere else, but he did it in his back yard. Apparently, they didn't think that information was important enough to report. This is “sloppy reporting,” and it is common. I've never been involved in something that made the papers where the paper didn't get it wrong. It's so common that most people don't even think about it. One notable headline I remember is this: “The cops shot a fleeing criminal in the street.” Right. I'm sure his street will hurt for a long time. Editors should read over their headlines to see what they sound like. (Fresno Bee)

"Subject To Reasonable Regulation"

HIllary says, “Okay, owning guns is a constitutional right.:But, like any other constitutional right, it is subject to reasonable regulation.” “Reasonable” regulation? Gimme a break! Liberals always call their attempts to circumvent, and make moot, the Second Amendment, “reasonable.” But they're anything BUT “reasonable.” But this statement told us a lot more than she intended. She revealed her plan to strip us of our constitutional right to be armed in self-defense, by making very UN-reasonable regulations that will make the guns we have, USELESS. Her “reasonable regulations” include such stupid things as “no gun zones,” gun locks, trigger locks, and even allowing people to CARRY their guns, but the guns must be UNLOADED! Tell me—what the hell good does an UNLOADED gun in your pocket do you when you encounter an ILLEGALLY-armed criminal in the process of committing a crime? He doesn't give a good damn about the “reasonable regulation” that any gun carried must be unloaded! He'll KILL you while you load your gun. Of course, the liberal-run Washington Post says that what she says is “wavering” on gun control. And we're supposed to BELIEVE that crap! (Washington Post)

France Is "Gun-Free"

So somebody fired at a tourist bus from a freeway overpass, injuring several. This guy was obviously not a very good shot, because he was only able to INJURE several people (including a child) with flying glass. So how did he get the gun he used? I say, :he” because such shooters are, so far, ALWAYS men. You liberals, don't get excited about that and get off subject. France is literally “gun-free.” So how did this shooter GET his gun? Anti-gun fools tell us that when guns are outlawed, there will BE no “violent crime.” So how did this happen in a country that is one big “gun-free zone?” Maybe they're LYING to us and assuming things not in evidence, as they always do. I haven't checked into it, but I'd bet the “gun crime” went up significantly after they, in effect, BANNED guns in France. (BBC)

The Unanswerable Question

It's a question usually never asked of an anti-gun fool when they screech about making more and better gun laws every time somebody misuses a gun. The question is, “Specifically, what law would have stopped this killing?” This question is now being asked of the anti-gun fools as they clamor for more laws in the wake of the UCLA killing that started in Minnesota, where the killer (now dead) killed a woman whose name appeared on his “kill list.” It's a question they can't answer truthfully, because all the laws they passed in the past have failed to do so. But they persist in making their USELESS “gun laws,” and those laws continue to fail to do ANYTHING about “gun violence.” That's because they target the GUN, not the person HOLDING the gun. They make laws that people with evil intentions IGNORE as a minor irritant when they want to do murder or mass murder. (National Review)

California Outlaws Free Speech!

In addition to several really STUPID anti-gun laws, California passed a law to allow them to punish anybody who criticizes global warming. I will never go there again. And I will continue to criticize those stupid enough to believe that horse manure, including Obama and, screw California. I lived in that insane state for years, and I didn't notice how STUPID they were, because I, like a lot of Americans, was not paying much attention to politics at the time, to my loss. I completely missed the “Reagan Revolution.” But I finally got smart, after listening to Rush Limbaugh on my brother's front porch, one day. I noticed that, while he is brash and overbearing in some ways, he speaks the truth. I don't agree with all of his OPINIONS, but I've never caught him in a lie. To those who think I'm stupid for listening to him, I say, YOU are the stupid ones. He woke me up, and I've been staying awake ever since. Anybody who makes a law against ANYBODY'S OPINION must have taken an overdose of “stupid pills,” which are easily obtainable in California. (Eagle Rising)

"Knockout Game" Lesson Learned

Marvell Weaver, a 17-year-old thug who thought the “knockout game” was a lot of fun, learned a hard lesson when he tried it on a concealed carrier. He walked up to a man at a bus stop and pushed his finger (pretending it was a gun) into his side, and got shot, since the guy had his own real gun, carried legally. He survived, but he will recuperate in prison for the next year. He said himself, that he “learned a hard lesson.” He had practiced the “knockout game” several times, whenever he was bored, which was a lot, without a problem (for him). But his luck ran out this time. If he had died, liberals would have made a big deal out of it, trying to criminalize the man who shot him, painting him as an "innocent boy." With the sales of guns skyrocketing as Obama tries valiantly to stop it, practitioners of this game will run into more and more armed victims, and become victims themselves, as this kid did. Yes, he learned a “hard lesson,” and I hope it “takes.” For his own good. The next guy might be a better shot. (Town Hall)

Obama Lies Again

I don't know why I made that the headline. It's not news when Obama lies. He lies just about every time he opens his mouth, and many times when he doesn't. Remember that “I've got my pen” crack? But actually, it's what he lied ABOUT that is at issue here. He has the GALL to say to gun owners, “I don't want to take away your guns!” Meanwhile, he and his cohorts are doing everything they can to take away your guns. This is one of the best examples of why you should never listen to what a politician SAYS. Watch what he DOES! And Obama does everything he can to do just the opposite of what he says he will do. He is the most deceiving president we've ever had. He set a new standard for lying in office, exceeding Bill Clinton's lying record by a lot. Just the other day he took credit for a “booming economy” that does not exist. I know it doesn't exist. You know it doesn't exist. HE knows it doesn't exist, but he still wants us to believe it does. He must really think the American voter is STUPID. And he may be right. They voted for him TWICE, didn't they? (PBS News Hour)

Sorry, Folks

Yesterday, my car broke down about 30 miles from home. I had to spend the rest of the day and part of today getting it towed and fixed. I could not get to my computers, so, no posts. I'm just one guy here, so if I'm not here, nothing gets done.

Just A Half Hour

That's all it took for gun haters to start demanding more and tighter “gun laws” while trying to raise money on the recent gun shooting at a college that claimed the life of one professor, as well as the shooter (I think). NO questions asked about whether or not the gun used was legally owned, because that doesn't matter to them. The fact is, it doesn't matter. If the shooter doesn't have a record of any kind, he can legally buy the gun. If he does have a record, he would ALREADY be prohibited from buying a gun legally. What is not said here is that ALL the laws against buying guns for certain people would do NOTHING to reduce gun violence. People who want to use guns for violence will still get their guns, in a back alley, somewhere. What laws are made should be to make it tougher on illegal gun sellers, or more costly, while making it easier for honest, law-abiding people to own and carry guns for self-defense. There are already too many ILLEGAL guns on the streets, in the hands of fools in gangs, and other kinds of criminals. Guns in the hands of honest people would “even things out.” (Gun Mart)

Anti-Gun Fool Illusion

Or should I call it a DELUSION? They are DELUDED if they think ANY of the “gun laws” they currently have in force will do ANYTHING to stop people like the UCLA shooter from getting a gun. This killer bought his gun legally in Minnesota. In so doing, he passed one of Obama's “strict background checks, since he didn't have a criminal record. So far, he's obeyed every law. Then he went and killed a woman whose name was on his “kill list,” and set out for Los Angeles on his kill spree. In so doing, he broke the laws of every state he passed through concerning carrying guns in their territory, including that of California. Then he took his gun onto a college campus, which was a “no-gun zone,” breaking another law. Arriving there, he murdered a professor, whose name was also on his kill list, then killed himself. What existing law could have stopped him? Maybe if that professor had been able to carry a gun, he could have been stopped before his last murder, maybe not. The point is, this guy obeyed, and disobeyed laws as it was convenient for him. He was not stopped in his evil intentions, by ANY law. Especially the “no gun policy” on college campuses. They're USELESS. (Gun Mart)

"Loaded Glock Beats 9/11"

That's the opinion of a California Assemblywoman, who was horrified by the latest silly actions on gun control by Democrats. How a Republican got elected in California is beyond me, but Shannon Grove, (R-Bakersfield) says, “A loaded Glock beats 9/11 on the phone, any day.” And she's right, even if mostly none of her colleagues agree with her. She made her comments at a Second amendment Freedom Rally held on the steps of the California State Capitol in Sacramento. She was joined by other Republicans (Surprise, surprise! There's more than one Republican in California!) in this sentiment. It's strange, in a state so adamantly hateful of guns, for her to arrive at such an opinion, but maybe it's a start towards common sense in one of the worst states for gun ownership in the nation. She thinks California politicians want to disarm their citizens as a way to make them completely dependent on the government—which, of course, cannot be everywhere, while a Glock in the pocket of an honest, law-abiding person, CAN be. I think it's more than that. The politicians FEAR an armed populace when they come to take what doesn't belong to them, as they ultimately plan to do. (Breitbart)

They Won't Report It

A concealed carrier opened fire on a gunman in Texas who had already shot several people and by so doing, kept him from killing more until SWAT arrived and killed him. But the media, in their reports, didn't mention that, glossing over his actions in saving many lives, at the risk of his own. Which is common, and is one reason why the anti-gun fools get away with telling us things like that just don't happen. Byron Wilson, who was shot three times by the shooter, grabbed his gun and returned fire, thwarting the shooter's plans to kill more, and leading to his death when he was killed by SWAT (the shooter, not Wilson). It's so common for the liberal media to ignore things like this that do not support their agenda, that it isn't even usually a subject for comment. But in this case, somebody noticed, and “word got out.” Thanks for that. (Bearing Arms)