Missing the Criminals

The Governor of New Jersey has just signed an executive order aimed at gun manufacturers, which is just one more measure that does that. There is not a single anti-gun law that affects criminals in a bad way. They only affect the law-abiding, while he law-breakers just IGNORE them and victimize the law-abiding, who DO obey them, even if they are stupid. And they are—all of them. Because they target the very people who are the VICTIMS of the criminals who simply use ILLEGAL guns to victimize them. Why these people can’t gt it through their thick skulls that these laws are USELESS, I don’t know. Or I wouldn’t know if I didn’t realize the same thing Hitler did. Or Stalin did. Or Castro, or any number of other despots did, that the first thing you need to do on gaining power is to DISARM YOUR PEOPLE, making them “sitting ducks” when you come to take their property or just KILL them. Each of those despots mentioned disarmed their people immediately on taking power, then MURDERED millions of their people. Our would-be despots are in the Dumocrat Party, and many of them have revealed themselves by their “threats” while trying to get the Dumocrat presidential nomination. (The Press)

Stupid Judges

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld Chicago’s “assault weapons ban, in spite of clear instructions in the Constitution that the right of all Americans to keep and bear arms “shall not be infringed.” President Trump has changed the base of most courts by appointing many judges and justices who are GUIDED by the Constitution, not their own political beliefs and their “instructions” from liberals. But there is obviously much more work for him to do in that direction, and this damned fool ruling is evidence of that. He needs to keep on appointing judges who are fair, and who accept the fact that it is their duty to rule as instructed by the Constitution, and do so. Liberals hate that, because it means they can no longer flout the Constitution and do as they please, instead. They have controlled the courts for far too long, and that needs to change. And President Trump is just the man todo it, which angers liberals, non end. They hate to be forced to obey the law. They want to be uncontrolled in their “governing,” and want to be able to act in a dictatorial manner, without constraints. The Courts are being re-formed, as more and more judges who WILL follow the Constitution are appointed. (Truth About Guns)

Enforce Existing Laws!

One of the common factors in mass shootings is the tendency of the shooter to give off many “signals” prior to the shooting that he is a definite danger to society, and those signals are ignored, until people die. One blatant example of this happened in Tarpon Springs, Florida, where a man threatened several times to commit a mass shooting, and it was ignored by the “authorities. What makes this case so blatant is that the person making those threats is a COP! One of their detectives told another that, if he didn’t get the raise he wanted, there was “going to be a mass shooting at the police station.” They obviously thought it was just a joke, but if it was, it was in abysmal bad taste, and should have at least caused an intervention. It happened more than once, and was ignored both times. He was not “red flagged,” and was not arrested. Though he resigned—just before the chief could fire him. But he still owned guns—cops are able to know where to get them—and he could still commit a mass shooting in that police station. Yes, in some places, such things do get action. But the response is “spotty.” Some places take action, and others do not. The worst thing is that, even though he resigned from this department, he still is an “authorized” police officer who could be hired by another department. In one case, a mass shooter had been “in police trouble” 69 times before he shot up a school. (DC Dirty Laundry)

Texas Gets It Right

“Don’t mess with Texas” actually means something. Texas politicians, after that impromptu mass shooting in the Odessa area, instead of following in the footsteps of politicians elsewhere and demanding more “gun control,” or the disarming of potential victims, immediately eased restrictions on the use of guns by the law-abiding, allowing for self defense, instead of making their citizens more easily murdered by fools with illegal guns. I’ve always wondered about the sanity of most politicians when they respond to these mass shootings by making their citizens much easier targets for such fools, instead of simply trying to find out the overwhelming CAUSES for such actions. To disarm potential victims is insane. But most politicians (mostly Dumocrats) insist that disarming potential victims is “common sense,” which it is NOT. We don’t know yet what set this shooter off, but thankfully he’s now dead, thanks to the guns in the hands of the cops. Maybe it was simply a case of “suicide by cop.” He could have accomplished that without murdering 7 people, but who knows about the thinking of such people. (NBC News)

The Next American Revolution

The last time gun confiscation was tried on what were to become Americans happened because of Britain’s attempts to disarm all colonists. So we declared our independence from Great Britain, then went on to win the war they tried to use to subject us to their demands, while creating a great nation that now surpasses everything British. Now our own (Dumocrat) politicians would like to try disarming Americans and they will meet the same stiff resistance. It they persist, they will get the same result Great Britain got when they tried. There WILL be another “American Revolution,” and the ones who will suffer the most will be the “gun-grabbers.” We just can’t convince these stupid politicians that we will NOT be disarmed. Yes, they have managed to pass a bunch of silly laws that disarm the law-abiding, but even those law-abiding people (including me) will go on to become “criminals” if they attempt a COMPLETE “gun-grab.” the Founders thought the right to self defense was important enough to put the right to own and use the means to that “right up top” in those rights GUARANTEED, and we have become used to the fact that this IS our right, and will, again, FIGHT to retain it. Those politicians will “find a gun behind every blade of grass,” as the Japanese expected during WWII, which was why they didn’t attack the American mainland. To take away our gun rights will be very dangerous for those foolish Dumocrat politicians. I guarantee it. (The Federalist)

Commonality in Mass Shootings

What is the same in just about every instance of a mass shooting? That’s a question asked by many in their attempts to “do something” about “gun crime.” The answer is simple: gun-free zones.” Almost every mass shooting incident has occurred IN a “gun-free zone.” Many have happened is schools, ALL of which are gun-free zones. Just about every mass gathering, such as a “rock concert,” is a DECLARED gun-free zone, even if the entire city or state in which it happens is not a gun-free zone, as is California, and many other states. California has some of the tightest anti-gun laws in the nation, and the entire state is pretty much a gun-free zone. Then how do such things as the most recent mass shooting IN California happen? That shooter should not be able to even buy a gun, unless he has a “clean record,” up to now? And those with clean records CAN get their guns legally. But if they can’t get them legally, there’s always that guy in that back alley somewhere with all kinds of guns in the trunk of his car he will sell them, regardless of their criminal history. Previous mass shooters, already in prison for their crimes, freely tell us they SEEK OUT gun-free zones in which to do their nasty deeds, because they know the law-abiding will not be armed, there. Gun-free zones are an “engraved invitation” to such people to do their crimes within them. I try to stay out of gun-free zones because being in them is dangerous. But it is becoming harder and harder to FIND a place that isn’t a gun-free zone, in one way or another. So I remain very alert when going there, lest I become the victim of a crazed shooter who just wants to kill people for some obscure reason. (Just Common sense)

They Never Answer

I’ve asked the anti-gun fools many times why they continue to insist on lawmakers making their unenforceable, useless anti-gun laws that don’t work worth a damn to stop, or even slow down gun crime” rather than search for something that WORKS? They have to know their laws not only do not work, they actually create MORE “gun crime” by disarming the law-abiding while the law-breakers have no trouble getting their guns illegally. Each and every anti-gun law only applies to people who get their guns legally and who stand for their background checks. Criminals get their guns illegally, and never stand for a background check. The only people who buy guns legally and then go out and shoot a bunch of people are those who have no felony records up to the time they do their mass shootings. So how do background checks and other anti-gun laws do anything to stop those people? They don’t, and there is only one thing that will effectively stop “gun crime” by killing gun criminals when they attempt to victimize an ARMED citizen. That is to allow the law-abiding to BE armed, so they can defend themselves, reducing “gun crime,” one gun criminal at a time. But they will not hear of that, and all they can cite in their refusal is “the need to get guns off the street.” Never mind all they do is get LEGAL guns “off the street,” leaving the way wide open to ILLEGAL gun owners. (Just common sense)

Ignoring Reality

Liberals routinely ignore reality and pursue their silly, unworkable, stupid ideas. Example: MSNBC host Chris Matthews “heaped praise on California” for all their anti-gun laws, completely ignoring the fact that none of those laws prevented the “Gilroy Massacre.” Matthews continues to be “tone deaf” to the liberal fiascoes. If he was really honest, he’d know that none of their anti-gun laws have done a single thing to stop, or even slow down “gun crime,” but he does not. Or if he does know, he ignores it and pretends “all is well” in that liberal-dominated state that is “going down the tubes.” California is in “money trouble.” They don’t have enough money to pay their bills, yet they continue to create give-away programs, right and left, while liberal-run cities like San Francisco “change the language” to make things look better. They recently changed “convicted felon” to “justice-involved individual,” whatever THAT means. But it allows them to say they have no convicted felons in California. That’s what liberals do; instead of solving problems, they just change their name to make them “go away,” while the actual problem remains. (The Blaze)

The Gun Control Myth

Describing the gun control myth is simple: gun control does not work.” Not to do what the anti-gun fools claim it does, anyway. The article linked describes the false argument the anti-gun fools are making about the gun control research being done by the centers for Disease Control (CDC). They insist Congress cut off any research into gun control, which is false. Congress only prohibited the CDC from doing research specifically tom PROMOTE gun control. But this fight wouldn’t even be worth mentioning if the CDC research didn’t lead to the death and injury of the law-abiding by promoting “gun control,” which only disarms the LAW-ABIDING, leaving all the guns in the hands of criminals, who don’t obey laws. The gun control myth is that gun control “stops gun crime.” It does not. It only makes it worse by disarming the law-abiding, making them “easy targets” for the criminals, who never seem to have trouble getting their illegal guns, whatever the law is. In fact, where the anti-gun laws are the tightest, that’s where illegal guns are easiest to come by. Gun control is not about controlling guns. It IS about controlling PEOPLE. You and I. Being able to tell us what we can and cannot do. (Liberty Park Press)

"Secondary Gun Ban"

The left can’t just ban guns. Our absolute RIGHT to be armed for self defense is guaranteed in the Constitution, which is the BASIS to which ALL our laws MUST comply, or not be a law, at all. So they do everything they can to make it impossible to USE the guns we have. From banning ammunition and doing everything they can to make ammunition impossible to get, thereby causing a “secondary gun ban,” to intimidating bankers into refusing to lend money to anybody engaged in the gun-making, or gun-selling trades, which is what they’re doing, now. They’re trying to make laws to force gun-makers to micro-imprint identifying numbers on each bullet, so they can be identified, AFTER use, something that is impossible to do. They say “There is no constitutional protection” for bullets, so we can do what we want with them,” which is WRONG. Making bullets impossible to get is a “secondary gun ban” and is therefore BANNED by the Constitution. Making money unavailable to gun-makers or sellers likewise, creates a “secondary gun ban,” and is unconstitutional on its face because it makes it harder, if not impossible to make or sell guns—which is unconstitutional. The fact that all this does NOTHING to keep guns out of the hands of criminals or crazies doesn’t seem to dawn on these fools, since they get their guns ILLEGALLY. (California Globe)

Again and Again!

I’ve repeated this over and over again, but the anti-gun fools are “tone deaf” to it. GUN CONTROL DOES NOT WORK! That’s a fact, not my opinion, and they have to know it. But they continue to pressure lawmakers everywhere into making more and more of those ineffective, unenforceable, STUPID laws to “control guns.” But they don’t control guns. Not even close. Instead, they make things worse by disarming the law-abiding, who are NOT the problem, while ignoring the law-breakers, who ARE the problem. Anti-gun laws only apply to the law-abiding, because they do obey laws, even stupid ones, while the law-breakers, true to form, do NOT. They will not address this. When I point out that anti-gun laws do not work, they just ignore me, or call me names. They never enter into a discussion about it, where they might have to actually face facts. This tells me they have a hidden agenda: total CONTROL over us.

The power to tell us what we may, and may not do. Gun control is just “the first step.” They know they, or their successors are going to “come for what is ours” sometime in the future, and they want to meet as few guns in the hands of their potential victims as possible. The first thing a wannabe dictator must do is disarm hi populace. Then he can do what he wants to them. Hitler knew that; Stalin knew it; Castro knew it, too. They all disarmed their people as soon as they took power. Then they went on to murder millions with little opposition. The article linked here talks about “internal squabbles” at the White House “delaying gun control legislation.” Why not? Today’s White House is run by people more intelligent than in past days, and they know those laws don’t work. (Bearing Arms)

"Gun Control Restores Freedom!"

That’s what Dumocrat Corey Booker (Spartacus) thinks, anyway. He tells of people showing him the bullet holes in their windows, and says they shouldn’t have to “duck for cover” all the time, as shots ring out in their neighborhood. He’s right, there, even though he’s typically wrong in his “solution” to the problem. His solution is to get rid of all LEGAL guns, leaving the millions of ILLEGAL guns in the hands of the bad guys alone. But that, of course, will not work, worth a damn. What WILL work it to allow the law-abiding to be armed, so they can, instead of cowering behind cover, shoot back, and kill those “bad guys,” reducing “gun crime,” one shooter at a time. Booker makes the same mistake as do all anti-gun fools, thinking first, that it is POSSIBLE to eliminate all guns, and second, that this will cause “gun crime” to go away. Anti-gun laws have not done so, and any new ones will fail, as well. But Booker, like most crooked politicians, has an ulteior motive in that he knows the government will eventually come after the money and property of all Americans (that’s what crooked politicians do), and they want to meet as few guns as possible when they do. Think I’m wrong? Look at Nazi Germany, where gun control was “the law of the land,” while the “government” murdered six million Jews. In the old Soviet Union too, guns (for all but government agents) were verboten, and Stalin murdered millions. It can happen here. (Truth About Guns)

No Consequences

It’s a fact. If a criminal applies for a background check and lies to obtain it, there’s no penalty applicable. They can apply as many times as they want, hoping for an overworked, underpaid bureaucrat misses something and they get approved. When it is found they lied, their application is just rejected. They aren’t punished for lying on their application. Of course, this means nothing to the real criminals, who buy their guns illegally, or just steal them. Anti-gun laws only apply to people who actually buy their guns legally and have to pass a background check. What those fools who write stories about “gun crime” never talk about is whether or not the gun used was obtained legally. It is always assumed it was obtained legally, and their myriad anti-gun laws will somehow stop a criminal from getting a gun. They will not. A criminal always knows where to get a gun illegally, and he usually does. I say “he” because just about all criminals involved in “gun crime” are men. If that’s sexist, tough. Then we talk about the laws already on the books to add time to prison sentences for using a gun to commit the crime. They are usually “bartered away” to get confessions to other crimes. We need to start enforcing them. (Daily Caller)

Completely Stupid Politicians

Gun control does not work. It has never worked, and politicians have to know it doesn’t work. So why do so many of them push those unworkable, unenforceable, USELESS anti-gun laws that criminals and terrorists routinely ignore? A good example of that is the drug dealer in Philadelphia who was about to be arrested, so he took an AR-15 and tried to kill the cops trying to arrest him, putting six of them in the hospital before he finally “wimped out” and surrendered, so they wouldn’t kill him. This guy was a felon, and as such his owning any kind of a gun was PROHIBITED by law. So how did he even HAVE an AR-15? That’s easy. He bought it on the black market, of just STOLE it. He’s a criminal. They steal things. He violates the law, every day. So why should he give a “tinker’s damn” about a silly little law that says he can’t have his AR-15? Politicians know their anti-gun laws do not work worth a damn. But they keep making them. Each and every Dumocrat presidential candidate has PROMISED to violate the Second Amendment of the Constitution, and so have one or two Republicans. Are they STUPID? I don’t believe they’re stupid. I believe they have an ulterior motive in wanting to disarm law-abiding Americans. They know they’re coming for what belongs to them in the future, and they want to meet as few guns in the hands of their intended victims as possible while they rob them. There is simply NO WAY to “get rid of all guns in existence,” but that is their stated goal. An impossible dream, but they’ll take what they can get. A mostly unarmed populace. Something Hitler had in Germany before he went in and murdered six million Jews. Stalin had it in the old Soviet Union, and he murdered more millions. (Just common sense)

What's Wrong With Them?

I just can’t figure out why so many people are so stupid about guns. Every time some fool rushes out to kill a bunch of people, they jump right out and demand more law-abiding people be disarmed. They don’t seem to understand that you don’t disarm yourself in the face of danger. You arm yourself and prepare to fight. I don’t think these people are stupid. I think they have an ulterior motive in disarming the populace. They want a disarmed populace so they (the politicians) can do with them, what they wish, without opposition. They can’t be so stupid as to believe that the way to self defense is to make yourself defenseless while the “bad guys” continue to get their guns illegally and use them to victimize those law-abiding people who obey those silly, stupid laws. Their purpose is to destroy the very concept of self defense. The proof is those cases where the people who use their legal guns to oppose the criminals get in trouble for doing so. Hitler disarmed his people, then murdered millions. So did Soviet dictator Josef Stalin. Many other dictators did so, as well, and the result is always millions of dead. It that what they’re after? They call their silly laws “common sense gun laws,” when they’re anything but. (Just common sense)

Gun Control Failed--Again

In Philadelphia, the mayor is screaming for more gun control after six cops were shot by a criminal who, I’m sure, didn’t gt his gun legally, after passing a background check. This was not your usual “mass shooting.” It was a “career criminal” who was a felon and barred from owning a gun. So how did he get the AR-15 he used to try and kill six cops? He got it illegally, of course. He decided that, rather than go back to prison, he’d rather die in a hail of bullets—then he changed his mind, and surrendered. But the mayor is too stupid to realize this, and wants even more of the useless, unenforceable, anti-gun laws that did nothing to stop this guy from sending six cops to the hospital and possibly ruining their lives if their injuries are severe enough. There seems to be few politicians who ARE smart enough to realize that none of the anti-gun laws they pass ever work, while they pass even more of them, and THEY fail. Meanwhile, people die because of their ignorance. Others face months, even years of agony and inability to work and earn a living. Some are permanently injured. But does this guy care? He just ignores all their anti-gun laws and obtains his guns illegally, and to hell with their laws. And the mayor doesn’t know any better than to insist on more of those silly laws. (Bearing Arms)

Taking A Victory Lap

That’s what “MOMS Against Guns (or something stupid like that) is doing. They actually held a meeting just to celebrate their “success” in conning WalMart into instituting an “open carry ban” for all their stores, thus putting all their customers in further danger, since the only people to bring their guns there will be the criminals, who will be pretty sure there will be no law-abiding people there who are armed. What these stupid people don’t realize is that criminals do not obey bans on bringing their guns into WalMart, or Target, or any other store run by similarly stupid people who believe criminals will obey their wishes. It’s the same thing with those fool lawmakers who make LAWS limiting gun ownership or creating “gun-free zones.” Gun-free zones are an “open invitation” to criminals to bring their guns and victimize the law-abiding, who will not be armed. I call these people stupid for a simple reason: they have to know their laws do not do anything to stop criminals from getting guns, and instead keep the law-abiding from having guns for self defense against those armed criminals. But they continue to make those stupid laws, while those laws get law-abiding people killed and injured. What drives these people is a mystery. (Fast Company)

No Conclusive Evidence

There is “no conclusive evidence that ‘Red Flag Laws” work. But there is conclusive evidence that they do NOT work, that is being ignored, as legislators all over the country rush to make them in the wake of mass shootings that most likely were NOT done by somebody legally owning the weapons they used. This is nothing more than “gun control panic” being displayed by legislators who are being “shamed” by anti-gun fools who should know better into passing more of them. Guns are taken away from people somebody in their neighborhood thinks they will be a danger to themselves or others—or just has something against them. Those laws are written so loosely that all it takes is for one person to make a complaint to get the cops to come and take away their guns, which is unconstitutional on its face. But enforcement of those unconstitutional laws will continue until the Supreme Court gets around to DECLARING them unconstitutional, while people die because they are being illegally disarmed. By the time the Supremes do it, much damage will be done that can’t be undone. But the anti-gun fools and those legislators are too damned dumb to realize it. I say that because the evidence is there that their laws don’t work, but they ignore it and keep making them. That’s dumb. (Gun Policy)

Willful Ignorance

That’s what’s being displayed by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors when they say the NRA is responsible for putting guns in the hands of mass shooters.” Which is the basis for their stupid resolution declaring the NRA to be a “terrorist organization.” What they REFUSE to recognize is that mass shooters more often than not get their guns ILLEGALLY, which neither the government, nor the NRA has any control over. That’s a mistake the anti-gun fools have always made when they work so hard to pass useless, unenforceable anti-gun laws that DO NOTHING to stop, or even slow down “gun crime,” and instead INCREASE it by disarming the law-abiding so they are DEFENSELESS against the millions of illegal guns out there. They have to know their laws are useless, but they refuse to stop pushing them and, instead, go after the real causes of mass shootings instead of wasting time and money on a lost cause. There has to be an ulterior motive in all that activity toward disarming all law-abiding Americans, and I know what it is. It is POWER. The power to tell us what we can, and cannot do, and gun control is just one of the vehicles they use to gain that power. (Clash Daily)

Police Ignore the Danger

They do that on a regular basis. They take any excuse to avoid investigation when a potential mass killer gives advance evidence of his probable anti-social actions that may lead to a mass shooting. In one case a man who gave evidence he, as a Muslim, hated America and thought Americans should be killed, then went out and killed a few on a military base where he had previously been employed as a “counselor.” In this case, the shooter’s own mother “OUTED” him to the cops because she was worried when he bought an “assault-style” rifle. She was worried that he had bought that rifle because she knew him to be a vocal white supremacist, and not too stable in his thinking. Turns out she was absolutely right in HER thinking. It must have taken a lot out of her to do what she did, and be ignored by those who should know better. She didn’t give her name, or the name of her son, and the cops didn’t bother to ask. Neither did they bother to spend one minute investigating. That’s just lazy police “work.” They should have at least investigated. Maybe they would have uncovered something that would have allowed them to stop him before he committed his outrage. It’s time the cops took some time investigating people who gave “signals” they might be a danger so they can at least be monitored. Just being legally able to buy a gun is no reason for the cops to ignore a clear warning. (Daily Mail)

"We'll Take Your Guns!"

The watchwords for the Dumocrat Party are these: “Hell yes, we’ll take your guns!” That’s what “Beto” O’Rourke yelled when someone asked him a question about gun control. And Beto is not alone in that. Just about all the Dumocrat candidates feel the same way, never mind the Second Amendment prohibits it. But they don’t care about that. They figure they can find some way around the Second Amendment, like banning the only bullets the AR-15s or AK-47s can use, claiming that the second “doesn’t cover bullets.” Or taxing guns so much nobody but the rich will be able to afford one. They’ll do everything they can to get around the Second Amendment while, at the same time, working to repeal it. That’s what they do. If they can’t score, they just try and move the goal posts so they can. At least they’re being a little more honest about it now. They ADMIT wanting to take away your guns to make you defenseless against the millions of ILLEGAL guns already out there. In the past, they’ve always rushed to assure you they don’t want to take away your guns while working hard to do just that. They can’t tell you why they want to take guns away from the law-abiding while the law-breakers get their guns, anyway. So they just start insulting you when you ask that question. (The Hill)

Wearing Trump Down

After the mass killings in El Paso and Dayton, President Trump is showing signs of “cracking” in his efforts to avoid making even more useless, unenforceable, and counterproductive anti-gun laws. He has indicated a willingness to increase background checks, one of the anti-gun fools’ favorite useless law. Yes, a background check MIGHT slow a potential mass murderer down a bit and force him to break yet another law in obtaining his guns. But he will. If he can’t get his guns legally, he’ll find a black market gun salesman in a back alley somewhere, selling guns out of the trunk of his car. As long as they target the gun, those mass killings will continue as misfit, angry fools decide the way to “change things” in this country is to kill a few of us. A background check MIGHT allow us to identity the killer AFTER he has murdered a bunch of innocent people who usually don’t have their own guns because of the law, and thus are defenseless against him. Allowing the law-abiding to own and carry guns for self defense against these fools is the ONLY way to solve the problem, but the anti-gun fools won’t hear of it. That’s why I call them “fools.” (USA Today)

Criminals Love Gun Control

Because they know that all it does is make the law-abiding more vulnerable to their victimization. That’s ALL it does. Supporters claim that gun control is “the answer” to “gun violence,” but it is NOT. It makes gun violence worse by making the law-abiding into “easy targets” for criminals of all kinds. And criminals know this. They just ignore these laws and use their ill-gotten guns to victimize those who obey the law. Politicians all over want to take away as many guns from the law-abiding as they can, because many of them intend to create a dictatorship, and want as few guns as possible in the hands of the law-abiding. They know there isn’t a lot they can do about people who ignore anti-gun laws, but they consider them “kindred spirits.” Both intend to fleece the law-abiding in every way they can. Only the method differs. The criminals use guns alone. The politicians use LAWS, and guns to back that up. that’s the only thing I can see as the goal in taking guns away from anybody. Hitler and Stalin did it, and then went on to murder millions of law-abiding citizens as they went about fleecing their citizens. (The Federalist)

Always the Same Thing

Another day, another mass shooting. And repeat. And immediately following, politicians everywhere whine for more gun control. Knowing that gun control doesn’t work, and will not stop a single mass shooting. What’s WRONG with these people that they flail around and do the same useless things, that have never worked, and never will? Are they stupid? Or do they have an ulterior motive in disarming the law-abiding, making them “easy targets” for those who just IGNORE all their laws and shoot people, anyway. People “jump up and down” and DEMAND more and more anti-gun laws, knowing they don’t work, and legislators “knuckle under” and make even more of their useless, unenforceable laws. And more people die when the next mass killer ignores them, as he will, if he can’t get his gun legally. Until they stop targeting guns and start examining other solutions, the killings will continue, the demand for more anti-gun laws will continue, and the deaths will continue. That’s a given. Many people say there has been an increase in the number of mass killings in America, but that’s wrong. They haven’t increased in frequency, we’ve just begun to notice them more, while the liberal media plays them up to knock the politicians—if those politicians happen not to be Dumocrats. (Just common sense)

NY Times Blames the Tool

The anti-gun fools blame the gun for all “gun crime” when they should be blaming the shooter. Then they try and eliminate guns from society, which will never happen. It’s like putting toothpaste back in the tube. Now the New York Times tries to blame the AIRPLANES for knocking down the Twin Towers 18 years ago when they should be blaming the Muslim terrorists. Not one gun ever shot somebody on purpose without somebody’s hand on the trigger, and not a single airplane crashed into a building without somebody’s hand on the throttle and the steering. Liberals seem unable to get what minds they still have after all the brainwashing they’ve suffered that it is NOT the inanimate object that does the damage, it is the PEOPLE. Without a person at the controls, or holding the gun, neither an airplane nor a gun can do anything. So why don’t they start finding ways to keep people from USING those tools to do the damage instead of trying to get rid of the inanimate objects? Next, the liberals will be trying to ban airplanes from the skies because those “airplanes” decided to commit suicide by flying onto the Twin Towers. They’re that stupid. (Town Hall)

An Impossible Dream

That’s what the anti-gun fools are pursuing. They think they can eliminate all guns not in the hands of the government from existence. That’s what they’re whining for within seconds after a shooter opened fire on a bunch of innocent people at a WalMart in El Paso, Texas. Others are “demanding action” from their legislators, and from the U. S. Congress. But they never specify WHAT “action” they should pursue, because there isn’t any that will do anything to stop such people as this shooter from getting his guns, legally of he has no record up to this time, or illegally of he is in a group prohibited from owning or using a gun. They call organizations like the NRA “evil” for standing up for our constitutional RIGHT to “bear arms.” Apparently, self defense is a “no-no” to them. Only those who wish to use guns for criminal purposes are allowed to get guns, and they do that by IGNORING the laws and regulations they propose, and pass into effect. None of them work worth a damn, and they only get the law-abiding people killed, since they DO obey those laws, even if they do think they’re stupid. The anti-gun fools have to know this, but they keep insisting on getting the same tired, old, useless, unenforceable laws passed, while law-abiding people die as a result. (Education Week)

Gun Control No answer

Politicians everywhere are struggling with how to solve the problem of “gun crime,” and so far, their every answer is wrong, and does nothing. That’s because they target the GUNS, which, without someone’s hand on the trigger, are no problem whatsoever because they are inanimate objects. Universal Background Checks are useless on their face. They do NOTHING to stop gun crime. They CAN help the cops to find the shooter IF he bought the gun legally and stood for a background check, which criminals usually do not, because they know they are going to use that gun for breaking the law and don’t want to give the cops an avenue right to their door. So they get the gun ILLEGALLY in the first place. Gun safes and other methods they SAY are ways to keep guns out of the hands of curious kids don’t work, either, and only make it impossible to get your gun into action quickly enough when threatened, and will get YOU killed.

Gun-free zones” are one of the worst ideas ever to come down the pike because they are an “engraved invitation” to killers to come into them and kill the law-abiding, who will not be armed because they DO obey laws, even stupid ones. The same is true of ALL their anti-gun laws in one way or another, because their target is wrong. They are so ignorant that they even get angry when “wiser heads” refuse to make more of their stupid laws. House Majority Leader (temporarily) Nancy Peelosi even went so far as to THREATEN the Senate Majority Leader if he didn’t “pass” some of their stupid laws. As if he could pass or not pass them by himself. One Dumocrat actually had the gall to threaten the Supreme Court with “packing” if they didn’t violate the Second Amendment with a ruling. The way to self defense against illegal guns is a LEGAL gun in the hand of the potential victim. The evidence of that is that every policeman you see is armed. (Just common sense)

What's the Ulterior Motive?

The anti-gun fools aren’t really stupid, yet they continue to push useless, unenforceable anti-gun laws as a means of “keeping guns out of the hands of criminals.” They have to be aware that they don’t work worth a damn to “keep guns out of the hands of criminals,” only the law-abiding. They make it impossible for the law-abiding to defend themselves against those criminals, who simply have no problem at all getting their guns illegally. Mass shooters and other armed criminals willingly tell you they CHOOSE gun-free zones in which to do their killing because they KNOW the law-abiding people there will most likely not be armed, and will thus be defenseless. The El Paso killer even wrote into his “manifesto” that he CHOSE a gun-free zone. So what IS their ulterior motive? The ulterior motive for the politicians is CONTROL. They want to control what you may, or may not do. And gun control is one vehicle. But what is the motive for the non-politician anti-gun activists? Are they just stupid? I don’t think so. But their motive isn’t as clear as the motive for anti-gun politicians. Maybe they’re just dupes. Maybe they actually believe they can ultimately eliminate all guns. They won’t even entertain the notion that the ONLY solution is to allow the law-abiding to be armed, so they can defend themselves. The cops can’t do it, and the cops will be the first to admit it. Those “in the trenches,” anyway. Police politicians in the higher ranks may think otherwise. They’re politicians, after all. that’s how they got where they are. (Just common sense)

Leprosy In American Cities

Leprosy is a disease that was “eliminated” in America—until the liberal (Dumocrats) came along and took over the running of most American cities. Now those cities are “sh-tholes” the people living in third world cities would not like to live in. Homelessness abounds, and streets and vacant lots are filled with tents, cardboard boxes, and other “shelters” for them, while the “authorities” look the other way. Gunfights between criminals of all stripes erupt daily, and the shooters don’t care who gets in the way of their badly-aimed bullets. And the guns they use are illegally-obtained because of tight anti-gun laws that guarantee to keep the law-abiding unarmed, so the criminals don’t have to worry much about their law-abiding victims shooting back. Those cities are mostly all broke—or soon will be. New York City was one of the original cities to go completely broke—until it was “bailed out” by liberal federal politicians with YOUR money. They’re broke, but they still use your money to start all manner of “giveaway programs” while going further and further into debt. That’s the “magic” of liberalism. (Headline Health)

I Just Don't Know

I can’t figure out the thinking that causes people to go into a crowded place and start killing people, at random. It just isn’t sane. But I don’t want to call the two mass shooters who killed so many people in El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio, crazy, because that is a “clinical term” that requires they be committed, rather than imprisoned. Which means they might even be released, if some doctor, who might not have even been born yet, decides they are “cured.” Someone who does that has to be mentally unbalanced, even if not crazy. Such thinking is definitely a mental aberration, but not necessarily insane. The killer in El Paso surrendered, and will face whatever comes, The one in Dayton was killed, just as the one in El Paso should have been. People who do such things forfeit the right to breathe the same air as the rest of us, in my opinion. Predictably, the anti-gun fools jumped right on both shootings, before the echoes of the gunshots had gone away, but what the bloody hell do they think their stupid laws will do to keep such people from committing mass murder? If they can’t get a gun legally, they will just get it illegally. When they contemplate such a major crime, they aren’t a bit concerned with violating a silly little anti-gun law. No amount of laws that keep the law-abiding from getting guns for self defense will ever keep such people from getting guns, so why do they keep making more of them? To control us better, that’s why. Politicians just want to be able to tell us what we can, and can’t do. (Quartz)

"No Guns Allowed"

Dicks led the way, and lost $100 million dollars in sales when they stopped selling guns. Then WalMart decided not to allow “open carry” in thir stores, and Kroger Stores followed suit. Now CVS Pharmacies has gone them one better (or worse). They are now BANNING guns in their stores, which, in Denver, at least, includes Target Stores. Which begs the question: “Do they really expect thugs and criminals to OBEY that restriction?” They just ignore all other laws, regulations, and rules, so why should they obey this one? Which means when they come into those stores to do their dirty work, there will be nobody there who is armed, and able to resist them. And good people will die. All because short-sighted executives “knuckled under” To anti-gun fools and got rid of any guns in the hands of honest, law-abiding people and made them defenseless against these thugs. Which makes shopping in these stores more dangerous than before. Before they made these ignorant rules, the law-abiding could bring their guns with them, and thus be well able to resist those criminals who want to victimize their customers. So I stay away from those stores as much as I can. And I recommend others do likewise if they want to stay alive. (Just common sense)

"Ending Gun Violence"

The cops were still at the scene of the latest mass shooting (in El Paso, Texas), and Elizabeth Warren was already asking for the passage of more useless, unenforceable anti-gun laws. She just hasn’t the intelligence to understand that making guns hard to get is NOT the way to “end gun violence.” the ONLY solution is to allow the law-abiding to be armed, so they can kill as many of these stupid mass shooters as possible, before they can kill as many innocent people as they wish to kill. Meanwhile, the authorities should become much more alert to the potential shooters “giving signals” that they might well become a mass shooter. The stories of mass shooters running afoul of the law many times BEFORE they become mass shooters is rife. One such mass shooter had been visited by the cops 63 times before he became a mass shooter. You’d think somebody would notice, and do something to stop him, other than keep him from getting his gun legally, forcing him to “go underground” and get it illegally. But not stopping him. The anti-gun fool are so fixated on banning guns that they just can’t take the time to look at other solutions, so they do the simplest thing, which does NOTHING to prevent gun violence. We need to put guns in the hands of the law-abiding, who are not the problem, so they can defend themselves, and others from the vermin who just want to kill people. (CNN)

AOC Is Completely Stupid!

How she managed to get herself elected to Congress is a mystery with her abysmal intelligence level. She has yet again showed her stupidity with her comments about what happened to some friends of Dan Crenshaw (a war hero), who used one of his guns to fend off an attack the other day. She likens them to felons and wife-beaters without any kind of evidence of such. With universal background checks he would not have been able to have loaned a gun to a friend, and that friend might now be dead because of it. This bimbo pretends to have the “moral high ground” in criticizing a war hero who lost an eye to the enemy while protecting the very rights he exercised in loaning that gun, but she hasn’t the right to shine his shoes. She has nothing to recommend her as a lawmaker. Ex-bartenders don’t have to be very smart to learn how to mix drinks to make people drunk, so what qualifications had she to be a lawmaker? None. And she proves it every time she opens her yap, which seems to be every day. This demonstrates one weakness in our system. There is no intelligence test required for candidates to Congress, which is how we get such stupidity in the making of many of our laws. We need to send this bimbo back where she belongs, making drinks to get people drunk, so they can do stupid things. (Flag and Cross)