Declaring His Stupidity

The best way to get rid of the gun control foolishness is to stop electing anti-gun fools. It’s easy to do, usually, because the fools who want to take away our constitutional right to self defense, and to own and use the means to that end, a gun, really think the whole country is behind them. So they willingly ANNOUNCE it. Very few anti-gun fools HIDE their intentions. In Minneapolis, a mayoral candidate wants to disarm the COPS! The people who have to go up against the holders of ILLEGAL guns, daily. The people who will die first if that ever happens. If it ever happens, all the cops should resign. In England, the cops have (mostly) been disarmed for a long time, but they are rethinking that, as many unarmed cops get killed, all the time. In France, a couple of terrorists shot up a newspaper office and killed 11 people with ILLEGAL guns while unarmed cops cowered behind their cars and could do nothing. The whole idea of disarming the cops is a STUPID IDEA, and the guy who proposes it should be soundly defeated at the polls—and he will be, because his stupidity is on display. Many anti-gun politicians keep their wishes “on the down-low,” so they can get elected, and then work to get rid of that right. Never mind, everything they do gets more people killed. (Gun Free Zone)

"Gun Control Litmus Test"

Dumocrats are whining about Trump having a “gun control litmus test” for his new Supreme Court nominee, which is stupid. There needs to be no “litmus test” for Supreme Court Justices. The freedom of American citizens to be armed for self defense against all comers—INCLUDING the government, itself, is THE LAW. The Second Amendment to the Constitution, which is the FOUNDATION on which ALL our laws sits, MANDATES it. And ANY Justice that is named, MUST uphold it. That is not a “litmus test,” it is a matter of LAW. The Dumocrats still think they can “get around” that, if they can somehow get a Justice in who is willing to IGNORE the Constitution, and allow their unconstitutional laws to NOT be declared unconstitutional. Dumocrats DEPEND on liberals being appointed to the Court, so they can get them to approve their unconstitutional actions, and it won’t work with Trump’s nominee, with the only “litmus test” being the Constitution, and the REQUIREMENT that any Justice uphold it. Their very Oath of office DEMANDS that they uphold the Constitution. Unfortunately, way too many politicians think that oath is “just some words,” and they have no obligation to adhere to it. (Guns)

Defensive Gun Use Rises

The anti-gun fools will paint it as a bad thing, as more and more law-abiding LEGAL gun owners shoot the bad guys who try and victimize them with their ILLEGAL guns. They’ll call it, “more gun violence,” as more and more people defend themselves against the bad guys with their own LEGAL guns. They just can’t tell the difference between honest people defending themselves and the bad guys victimizing them. Or they just don’t want to. Every time a gun sends a bullet down the barrel is a “gun crime” to them, and they use it to improve their phony numbers. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reports this increase, which makes anti-gun fools crazy. So they just LIE about what it means, to keep up appearances. And you know what they say in politics: appearance is ALL. It doesn’t matter how big a LIE it is, somebody will believe it, and keep up the pressure on lawmakers to enact more USELESS anti-gun laws, while people DIE because of it. They use these defensive gun uses to illustrate their LIES that, “gun violence is out of control.” But make no mistake. They ARE “concerned” that those figures HAVE risen, and WILL have an effect on their efforts to take away our gun rights. What I want to know is, why is the CDC getting involved in this? Gun use is NOT a “disease.” (Bearing Arms)

Liberals Are to Blame

The liberals complain about the “conditions” in our big cities, never mentioning that liberals are the ones “in charge” in those big cities, and it is THEIR POLICIES that have CAUSED those conditions. Look at any big city with miserable conditions, and you’ll find a liberal government, in place, many times for YEARS. One of the worst examples right now is San Francisco, where people CRAP in the streets, and nobody does anything, either to stop the practice and punish those who continue to do it, or even to CLEAN UP the crap in the streets. All they do is send out bureaucrats to make MAPS as to where the most crap is in the streets, so people can avoid the worst of it. Some such cities are BANKRUPT because the liberals in charge have no idea what they’re doing, and spend all their time spending other people’s money, demanding more when it threatens to run out, and blaming others for their own shortcomings. They whine and cry about CRIME in their cities without mentioning that their “gun laws” that disarm the law-abiding just make things worse. They tend to make the law-abiding “easy targets” for the bad guys, who routinely IGNORE their simple minded, USELESS “gun laws. (Just common sense)

The Sheriff Was Wrong!

I told you recently that a recent shooting was supposed to be lawful under the “stand your ground law” in Florida. It was NOT. It was a simple case of bloody murder. One man pushed another to the ground in a dispute over a handicapped parking space. He turned to leave, but turned back to say something, and the guy on the ground shot and killed him. Under the “stand your ground law,” the shooter must be suffering a life-threat. This guy was NOT suffering a threat to his life. Yes, he had suffered the indignity of being pushed to the ground, but that’s not a “life threat.” It was not a good reason to kill the guy who pushed you down, as this guy did. The sheriff was wrong to use the “stand your ground law” in this instance. This guy should have been charged with at least second degree murder, whatever they call that in Florida. The fact that the shooter had threatened the victim before, apparently didn’t enter into the thinking of the sheriff. This story gave the anti-gun fools something they will be citing for the next hundred years, or more, even though it was a CRIME, and wrongly attributed. (Clergy Supports Second)

"Don't Mess With Mom!"

One stupid thug tried to carjack a car with two kids in it, and ended up with lots of woe. The mother saw him jump into her car with her kids, and jumped in with them, demanding he get out. He refused, so she shot him. The shot didn’t kill him, but it caused him to run into a utility pole. The woman, and her kids were not injured. But the bad guy? Not so much. He’s in the hospital, and will go quickly to prison after being released. This is a good lesson for bad guys everywhere: “Don’t get between a mother and her children.” There is nothing more fierce than a mom, if you threaten her children. Better yet, don’t do the crime, at all. She could have killed him, but didn’t, although she shot him in the head. He must have a really hard head. And, yes, this is yet more evidence that letting Americans carry guns for protection really does help stop crime. One crime at a time. The more bad guys you kill, the fewer crimes will be committed, including “gun crimes.” (Daily Caller)

Mugged By Reality

It has been said that a gun control activist is just someone who has never had to look down the barrel of a gun in the hands of a criminal (or something like that). Former anti-gun fool Ryan Moore found that out the hard way recently as two gun-toting criminals relieved him of all his important pocket possessions the other day. They took his MacBook Air, two iPads, an iPhone, an iPod Touch, and his wallet (presumably containing all his pocket money). After that, he had an epiphany, and actually became a gun owner. Then he took the next step and joined that “horrid old” NRA, and actually donated more money to them. He says what inspired him to join the NRA was people like David Hogg and their silly uninformed screeds. He has since become an outspoken Second Amendment supporter. He says leftists are the big reason why NRA donations and memberships have skyrocketed lately. The more they whine and scream for gun control, the more people become gun owners and join the NRA. They recognize that laws can’t stop bad people from being bad, but good people with guns, CAN. Too many people just can’t grasp that. (Bearing Arms)

He Couldn't Get A gun

So he used a knife, killing and injuring many people, including a 3 year-old girl. The story doesn't say whether or not he tried to get a gun, just that he came to that birthday party in Boise, Idaho to kill. The article says they don't know if this was a "hate crime." But how could it be NOT a "hate crime?" Not necessarily your usual kind of hate crime, hate against Muslims (many Muslims lived there), but simply hate because he was earlier asked to leave because of his behavior. Looks like he hated that. Proof, again, that getting rid of guns will not stop such people from their evil deeds. Banning knives will not, either.

He will find something else. Like a club. You can make a club out of anything. A furniture leg, for instance. A baseball bat. If you start banning everything that can be used to kill or maim, you will soon be banning everything, and still people will attack and kill others, using things they can still get, or getting one of the banned objects ILLEGALLY. We keep telling the anti-gun fools this, but they keep on ignoring us and making their USELESS laws that do NOTHING to "solve the problem," but only make it worse, by disarming the law-abiding, making them "easy targets" for those who obey NO LAWS. (AP News)

Schumer's Stupid Warning

Chuckie Schumer has “warned folks” to “watch out for 3D printed guns,” completely ignoring the MILLIONS of real guns, already out there. This shows the typical stupidity shown by many politicians, who have no idea what goes on in the world, outside of their own personal interests. There is nothing new about unregistered guns in circulation, way before they invented 3D printing. Chuckie just THINKS that represents a “new threat” because of his limited knowledge. And this fool is responsible for the entire Dumocrat Party. First of all, he does not understand guns—or anything else he PRETENDS to make laws for or against. He thinks a shotgun is a “rapid fire weapon.” Just like other anti-gun fools. He really believes that if we get rid of all LEGAL guns, crime will stop. He has no idea that if we do that, crime will go all out of control because there will be NO guns in the hands of the victims, making it easier for the bad guys to victimize them. He really believes that making a LAW against something actually stops people from doing it. (NY Post)

Gun Control's Basic Flaw

It assumes that evil doers will OBEY the many laws they make. Also, they assume that eliminating LEGAL guns will also eliminate all the ILLEGAL guns (millions) already out there. Only the law-abiding obey their laws, and that makes them "easy targets" for those who IGNORE their laws. Potential (and past) mass shooters SEEK OUT " gun-free zones" in which to do their dirty work because they know the law-abiding people there will usually NOT be armed, and able to oppose them. They get their guns ILLEGALLY, and don't bother to sign up for a background check. I, and many other intelligent people have told them this countless times, but they don't listen. I guess they're just too STUPID to understand logic and reason. Or they have an ulterior motive such as just wanting the POWER to tell others they CAN'T. To be able to CONTROL the actions of others. What they don't understand is that we need to examine the REASONS why people do things like mass murder, and PAY ATTENTION when a potential mass murderer warns us as the one in Annapolis, MD, did, many times before he walked into a newspaper office and started killing people. Gun control is USELESS in preventing such crimes, and they need to learn it. But they're "tone deaf" to reason. (Daily Signal)

Not "Stand Your Ground"

In Clearwater, Florida the other day, two men got in an argument over a handicapped parking spot. One man pushed the other violently to the ground, and appeared to be walking away. Whereupon the man on the ground pulled out a gun and shot the other man to death, only shooting him in the front because the man appeared to be turning to say something. The Sheriff says he will not arrest this man because of Florida’s “stand your ground law.” That is just WRONG. There is NO WAY this is a “stand your ground” situation. The pusher was walking away and did not appear to be further threatening the killer. It’s a clear case of cold blooded murder. How the sheriff twisted things to make this ruling is a mystery to me. The unfortunate thing is that this gives the anti-gun fools just what they want. They will cite this case forever. Hopefully, prosecutors will take a more reasonable view of this obvious murder. The killer had previously threatened the victim, which the sheriff apparently did not take into consideration. This situation is NOT what the “stand your ground law” was meant to be. Pushing a man to the ground and walking away should NOT be worthy of a death sentence, especially not right in front of the man’s young boy, only 5. (Eyewitness News)

Failed Yet Again

Again, a shooter in a mass killing got his gun legally, because, up to the time he murdered a bunch of people, he had not yet committed a crime that disallowed him from buying a gun. I'm talking about the killer in Annapolis, MD, who walked into a local newspaper office and killed five people with a shotgun that he had bought legally a year previously. NO, that's not an oversight. People who have committed no crimes have the constitutional RIGHT to own and use guns, and to buy same. The Second Amendment guarantees it. And unless the American people allow something STUPID to happen, that's not going to change. This is yet ANOTHER proof that the very approach the anti-gun fools take is WRONG. It's USELESS to attempt to get rid of the TOOL for violence. An evildoer will always find a way, as the mass killer in communist China, who killed a bunch of school children with KNIFE figured out, for himself. The killer in Annapolis gave us plenty of warning, but nobody paid any attention. We need to start paying attention to this kind of person when they unwittingly warn us of their insanity. (Breitbart)

The Liberals Are Steamed!

In Wisconsin, Republicans are trying to get firearms safety classes started in their schools, and the anti-gun fools are losing their minds, because they want to pretend guns do not exist to our children. They want to keep them gun ignorant as long as possible. They think that is the way to keep children from seeking out and finding their parents’ guns and accidentally killing one of their friends, or themselves. But, as usual, they’re very WRONG. Curiosity about something kept from them fuels their search for those guns, and that creates many opportunities for deadly accidents. Teaching them about guns, and letting them handle them in CONTROLLED situations, eliminates that curiosity while they can be admonished about gun safety and the fact that these are not “cap guns.” They KILL people. Thus creating a healthy dose of reality in them, making them much less likely to accidentally kill somebody. But you will never convince the anti-gun fools of this. They have an irrational FEAR of guns, for themselves, their children, and YOUR children, thus being responsible if one of those children accidentally kills somebody. (Guns and Rifles)

Before Facts are Known

The anti-gun fools were out Tweeting for more of their USELESS, INEFFECTIVE gun laws that only DISARM law-abiding people, leaving them DEFENSELESS against fools like the guy who shot up a newspaper office the other day. Gabby Giffords, a KNOWN anti-gun fool since getting shot in the head, Tweeted. "Summer interns shouldn't have to dodge bullets while doing their jobs....we need to do something about it." Yes, Gabby, your "insight" is stunning. Like a bullet. They SHOULDN'T have to "dodge bullets." They should be able to throw a few back at such fools, instead of having to hide under desks, cowering. Not a single one of your previous "gun laws" has done ANYTHING to put a stop to such massacres, so why should we bother to listen to you? If just a few of the law-abiding people working at that newspaper had been armed, they could have killed that shooter before he could kill five employees, and wound more. But Gabby just wants to DISARM good people. leaving the way open to fools like that shooter to come into a peaceful workplace and kill people, being pretty sure there will be no guns there to oppose him for several minutes. Ignoring the fact that the shooter had a PERSONAL grudge against this newspaper, the liberals "knee-jerk" blamed "Trump's anti-press rhetoric" for this outrage. (Breitbart)

Watch For Mass Killings

South Africa is demanding that 300,000 gun owners “turn over their guns.” That can only mean they are planning even more atrocities, and don’t want any guns to be in the hands of their intended victims. Recently, the South African National Congress approved a measure changing the Constitution to allow the government to TAKE land and other property WITHOUT compensation—to STEAL the property of others. There can be no other way to describe it. And when they come to TAKE their property, they don’t want to be met with gunfire. One unalterable fact is that gun control is the precursor to tyranny. Yes, they made a LAW that taking a person’s property was legal, as long as it’s the government doing it. But that doesn’t end it. It can only be carried out by FORCE. Which means many on both sides, will die or be injured. They are “nibbling at” our gun rights, taking them away little by little, under good-sounding “reasons.” Until the final action to completely remove them while we, who have been desensitized, will not fight it. They hope. But they misunderstand Americans. We will NEVER allow the government to completely remove our right to self defense, and to buy and use the means to that end, a gun. We will fight, and their attempt will result in the second American civil war. (Gunpowder Magazine)

Is Second Amendment "Optional?"

That's how it seems. In 2008, in the "Heller Decision," the Court finally RECOGNIZED that the Second Amendment was NOT "optional." That it DID allow citizens to be armed for self defense. Since then, the Court has avoided questions regarding the right to own and use the MEANS to self defense, a gun. Without which we remain defenseless against the millions of ILLEGALLY-owned guns in the hand of people who would do us ill. I'm convinced that the anti-gun fools WANT us to be defenseless against the "bad guys," whoever they are. They are not against gun ownership, per se, they're against SELF DEFENSE, but are unwilling to say it. That becomes evident when they ban such things as "box knives" after the World Trade Center disaster, and have tried in several cases, to ban STUN GUNS, which are purely defensive. It becomes clear when they attempt to make the Second Amendment "optional" by violating it in every way they can, outside of just ignoring it altogether. Evidence is their attempts to limit it to cover only guns "in use during the writing of the Constitution," and other such subterfuge. Things like forcing people to REGISTER and pass background checks in order to buy BULLETS, attempts to "regulate" gun PARTS, and forcing manufacturers to imprint serial numbers on ALL parts, which is next to impossible. (Reason Magazine)

"Dangerous Level of Propaganda"

The Washington Post” recently “pulled the gloves off” in their coverage of a mass shooting foiled by two legal concealed carriers by intimating that the actions of these two were as bad as those of the mass shooter. They said the shooter’s actions did not require the “death penalty” when, actually, they did. They described it as “three shooters,” ignoring the unalterable fact that two of those shooters STOPPED the mass shooting and saved a bunch of lives. They tried their best to paint the heroes as “bad guys,” when they are the heroes of the plot. The local authorities recognized them as such. Not so with the gun-hating Washington Post. With this story, they proved the fact that they published GARBAGE, and that you could no longer believe ANYTHING they published. Mostly, this is an example of the LIES told by the anti-gun fools, of which they are part. After this, if you read ANYTHING they write, make use of your BS Meter and verify anything they print with at least two other sources, preferably not liberal sources. This kind of propaganda is insidious and dangerous, and it makes us wonder if the First Amendment is as good a thing as the Second. There should really be SOME kind of “oversight” over the TRUTH of what is printed. (American Gun News)

Awww, Poor Baby!

The Huffington Post actually ran this headline" "Goodbye Justice Kennedy, Goodbye Gun control." Which shows that they know which Justices will vote their way, and which will not. And they know what we've always known, that gun control is a "lost cause," since the right to self defense, and to own and use the means to that end, a gun, is GUARANTEED in the Constitution. They knew Kennedy would find a way to "get around" that, and they are pretty sure any justice Trump appoints will actually FOLLOW the Constitution, not try and "get around it." That's the problem with Supreme Court appointments: those justices are not supposed to be "political," but they inevitably are. Just by the very HISTORY of the appointees, which is usually known, at least by those appointing them. That is unavoidable. Both liberals and conservatives mourn appointments that will not help them advance their own wishes, and lifetime appointments prevent them from "getting rid" of justices they don't like. I "feel for" Huffington Post, but I just can't seem to reach them, since their desire is to "get around" and VIOLATE the Constitution, which is the very BASIS for ALL the laws of our land. They MUST conform to it, and the Justices of the Supreme Court are SUPPOSED to make sure of that, but who often DON'T. (Huffington Post)

Deadly anti-Gun Law

One of the deadliest of the anti-gun laws is the “waiting period.” Many people try desperately to buy a gun for protection when somebody threatens them. They need that gun RIGHT NOW. Not after a few days, or even a few WEEKS waiting period. Many of those people have BEEN KILLED while waiting for approval from those officious bureaucrats so they can get that gun, with which to defend themselves. All because some nameless, faceless bureaucrat or politician says they have to WAIT to gain the means to protect themselves from someone who has ALREADY threatened them, and probably already has a gun. One case I remember, right here in Denver, is the woman who was placed in a similar position. An ex boyfriend told her he was going to KILL her, and she believed him. So she tried to buy a gun and was told she needed to suffer a “waiting period.” Knowing that would just not do, she “became a criminal” and bought a gun ILLEGALLY. When that ex boyfriend came to kill her, she shot him to death. For that, she was imprisoned, for a time, for having an illegal gun. Better to be alive in prison than DEAD on the ground, while waiting for some fool’s PERMISSION to buy a gun, which is GUARANTEED by the Constitution. It says the right to bear arms “shall not be abridged.” Such laws ARE an abridgment, and are thus unconstitutional (Keep and Bear)

Forcing Criminality

People In Government, Especially In States Like New York And New Jersey, are forcing honest people to become criminals, in order to defend themselves against those who would use illegally-owned guns against them. In New Jersey, for instance, its anti-gun fool governor wants to raise the cost of BUYING a gun 2400%! And that's not even the cost of the gun, itself. It is the cost of the PERMIT the state requires you to buy before you can even BUY a gun legally. And other permit fees you must pay to get a gun are similarly in his sights. This reinforces the fact that, since politicians know they are constitutionally PROHIBITED from just BANNING guns, they are determined to make them impossible to even BUY, let alone carry and use for self defense, or anything else. They are even trying to get laws passed to treat gun parts and AMMUNITION like guns, themselves, requiring background checks and buying "permits" in order to buy BULLETS. This will inevitably create an even larger black market in not only guns, but gun parts and ammunition, as well. And I am, for one, in favor of that, since that's where most of the "bad guys" get their guns--and we might be FORCED to get the means to defend ourselves from them from the same place. (Daily Caller)

They're Reaching Hard

The liberals are really reaching. Now they say that the Russians sent one “flame-haired girl” to “get with” the NRA with the specific mission of getting Donald Trump elected president. How this one girl is supposed to accomplish that is in question. This girl (whose origin is NOT proven to be Russian) is supposed to have done that by… what? And how is Trump supposed to know about it? They’ve tried everything else in their quiver and it hasn’t made a DENT in Trump’s support, nor has it given them ANY grounds for impeachment. They’re frustrated, and grasping at straws. Red haired straws, at this point. This shows the futility of their accusations of “Russian collusion” with Trump, which has not been proven after more than a year of “investigating,” while RUINING good people by making them spend every dime they own to pay the lawyers Mueller and others have made necessary. And all they have found is a few minor “process charges” and a few banking problems from DECADES ago—again with NO CONNECTION to President Trump. They insist that it is “only a matter of time” until they come up with something, if they just “keep digging.” If that ever happened in a normal criminal investigation, that investigation would have been stopped, long ago. But not in a POLITICAL “investigation” with a Republican as its target. Proof of Russian collusion with Dumocrats is rife, but they ignore it. (The Sun)

Ignorant Jerks

I've always tried to limit the insults I apply to liberals. Not because I disagree with them, but because they're STUPID. They pursue goals that are a special kind of stupid. But today's insults for Donald trump and all who associate with him MARK them as stupid. Restaurants eject his staffers because they work for him, and many liberals cheer. Newspapers and television news shows call him stupid when THEY are too stupid to recognize greatness in a rough package. "Reporters" call his press secretary a liar because they don't agree with her, and some even stand up and YELL at her. Now Amazon employees have sent a letter to their CEO comparing Trump with the Nazis, which demonstrates their COMPLETE ignorance. Trump works hard to make things better for everybody, INCLUDING liberals, but they remain stupid. I'm not talking about those who CALL themselves liberals. I'm talking about the liberal "elites" who think they're better than the rest of us while pushing ABSURD ideas such as allowing MEN into women's bathrooms and changing rooms if they "think" they're women today. Or those who think disarming yourself is the way to self defense. That is the epitome of stupidity. And they think they can win arguments, not with facts--there are none to support their position--but by simply calling us names, such as "hater" and "Nazi," and the like. which shows their complete ignorance of just what those names MEAN. (The Daily Caller)

Telling the Difference

In Chicago, how do you tell the difference between a gang killing an a cop killing? The direction in which the bullets are going, maybe? The cops killed a man who was fleeing and reaching for a gun. That makes no difference, I suppose, to the “citizens” who are protesting that. What are the cops supposed to do? Wait until he gets his gun out and aimed at a cop before they “cancel his check?” As many of the very people who are protesting themselves are likely involved in shootings of other citizens, it’s a wonder they have time to protest. They deny the guy had a gun, but you take ANY gathering of people in certain parts of Chicago, and a majority of them will have guns in their pockets, needing cleaning after they killed somebody. And this guy DID have a gun and was reaching for it. Meanwhile, Rahm Emanuel and his gang make more and more anti-gun laws for them to ignore while they kill each other on purpose, and innocent people by accident, while trying to kill those they aim at. Nobody seems to notice that their anti-gun laws just make it easier for those who ignore them to victimize the law-abiding, who DO obey their laws. (Hey, Jackass!)

Dida Lotta Good

MOMS Against Guns (or something like that) hung a couple of anti-gun signs at a New Jersey school just before a crazed gunman shot the place up. Those signs did a lot of good, didn't they? That's what outfits like MOMS do. All cosmetic. And that includes the laws they promote. It's all cosmetic. Their laws don't work, and they know it. But they keep on pushing them, anyway. Which has convinced me they aren't really interested in safety, they're interested in CONTROL. They want to be able to tell us we CAN'T. It's the same with all those so-called "gun safety" outfits. They just want to be able to pass laws that tell us we CAN'T have a gun for protection, while those laws do NOTHING to keep guns out of the hands of people who shouldn't have them, because those people just IGNORE them and get their guns illegally. They either buy them out of the trunk of another criminal's car in a back alley somewhere, or they just steal them. (NJ)

"Cruel And Unusual"

The Constitution prohibits “cruel and unusual punishment.” But that doesn’t stop liberal “lawmakers” from passing laws that ARE “cruel and unusual punishment,” and they remain in force until they are declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. But by then, the damage has been done to many people. Such a law has been passed in Seattle, Washington. It requires that all guns be “properly secured” according to state guidelines, or a $10,000.00 fine will be assessed. If that’s not “cruel and unusual punishment,” I don’t know what is. And when that law is DECLARED unconstitutional after many years of being enforced, there will be many people who are “wiped out” by a “technicality” if their attempts at “securing” their guns are not perfect, according to state inspectors. Forgetting ONE small thing can get you a fine that will RUIN you if you pay it, or get you in MORE TROUBLE if you can’t. This is how would-be tyrants control the populace, even if their actions are ILLEGAL. Their “rules” for “securing” your guns make them USELESS for self defense, as much as if they didn’t exist. When someone comes at you wielding an ILLEGAL gun, it will inevitably take you too long to get your gun into action and he will KILL you. (Gun Alerts)

It Happened Again

I really get tired of saying this, but I'll say it again. Again, the anti-gun fools were wrong. They say legally armed citizens NEVER stop a mass shooter, but it happens every day. The liberal media, which is in cahoots with the anti-gun fools doesn't run it to a national audience, always keeping it a "local story" when an armed citizen stops a thug from shooting everybody in sight. Same here. David George, an EMT with the local fire department was shopping at Wal-Mart with his family when Tim Day started shooting in the store. Worried about his family, he stalked the shooter when he went by him shooting others. Still reluctant to pull his own gun, he did so and shot the guy when he shot the driver of a car he was trying to carjack. Another armed citizen was also there and he told him to watch the injured shooter while he, as an EMT, went to tend to the driver who was shot. So this man not only saved lives by stopping the shooter, he also probably saved the life of the driver who was shot. But I doubt you'll read much about this in the national media. (KOMO News)

Shannon Watts Screws Up

She unconsciously told us the Second Amendment was constitutional. Something everybody with INTELLIGENCE knows, but she tries to make us think she doesn’t. The Second Amendment IS constitutional, but she doesn’t want to admit it, as she goes about in her attempts to subvert it. The fact that the measures she pushes never work seems to be lost on her. She wants to push her unconstitutional measures, anyway. Now she seems to have ADMITTED that gun control IS unconstitutional. Why the Court should take into consideration the affect on ANYTHING but the constitutionality of the measures is WRONG. The only thing that the Court is BOUND to consider is the CONSTITUTIONALITY of a measure. Not foreign law, and not his or her PERSONAL prejudices should be considered. Nor "the effect on public safety." This is clearly laid out IN the Constitution, whether many people realize it, or not. The Constitution clearly GUARANTEES each and every American who has not committed a felony the right to own and use a gun for self defense. That is a GIVEN. It can only be changed by changing the Constitution, itself, by means of the method set out IN the Constitution. Shannon and her cronies want to “get around” that. But she slipped up in her “Tweet.” (Bearing Arms)

Targeting Only Legal Gun Owners

The anti-gun fools have given up even PRETENDING to be trying to "keep guns out of the hands of criminals," and are now targeting LEGAL gun owners, who mostly aren't criminals. New Jersey's new governor, Phil Murphy, wants to "make it a lot more expensive to own a gun." The current "fee" for getting a PERMIT to buy a gun is only $2.00. Murphy doesn't like that, and wants to hike it a LOT (It's always about money, isn't it?). The current plan is to raise the "fee" from $2.00 to $50.00. Which is much higher than would be required by inflation. It's much worst than when Colorado Governor Hickenpooper DOUBLED the license plate fee in Colorado. DOUBLED it! This guy went for an increase of 25 times! All to make it harder to LEGALLY own a gun! Forget about getting a gun ILLEGALLY. This does NOTHING in that direction, and is just a "money-grubbing" action, using guns as an excuse. Of course, this has the effect of denying that constitutional right to those earning less money. People Dumocrats CLAIM to "love" and want to help increase their lot in life. But not their right to stay alive. The fact that you should not have to pay for a PERMIT to exercise a constitutional right doesn't seem to affect such fools as Murphy, of course. (New Jersey)

Another Gun Control Lie

They constantly tell us, without any basis in fact, that “98% of Americans support gun control,” which is a blatant LIE. They have no REAL stats to support their position, so they LIE and cite PHONY stats, hoping we’ll believe them. What they don’t count on is that the average American is not as stupid as are their anti-gun fool supporters, because they KNOW their laws and regs DON’T WORK. That all they do is make things WORSE by disarming the law-abiding, making them “easy targets” for the “bad guys,” who routinely IGNORE their laws. What drives these people, I don’t know. That have to KNOW their laws and regulations have NO EFFECT at all on the “gun problem,” but, instead of trying to find something that WILL work, they keep on passing their USELESS, INEFFECTIVE measures. We tell them and we tell them their laws don’t work, but they’re “tone deaf” to reason and logic. Liberals don’t believe there even IS reason, OR logic. That way, they don’t have to be either reasonable, OR logical in their actions and words. (Says Uncle)

Hogg Needs Comeuppance

Seventeen-year-old anti-gun fool David Hogg thinks he's a "rock star" because the liberal media and his anti-gun fool "handlers" are treating him like one. Everywhere he goes, he seems to be surrounded by microphones shoved into his face to record his every utterance--as if what this ignorant kid knew something important to say. He doesn't. He has seized upon his position as (maybe) a Parkland School "survivor" to get his "fifteen minutes of fame." His first attempt at getting Laura Ingraham's sponsors to stop sponsoring her failed, big time, so like most liberals, he's doing the same thing again, and expecting a different outcome. Which is the very DEFINITION of insanity. Somebody needs to clue this damned fool that what he is supporting is USELESS in stopping "gun violence," and only makes it worse, by DISARMING the law-abiding, while ignoring the fact that criminals don't OBEY laws and, are thus, not affected by them, except for the better. (The Blaze)

Anti-Gunners Are Furious

The anti-gunners are furious because Trump nominated Brett Cavanaugh to be a Supreme Court Justice. So the hell WHAT? Who gives a damn what the liberals (anti-gun fools) think? They prove their abysmal ignorance every day by the laws they pass and want to pass. Meryl Weiner, one of Shannon Watts’ girls, says Cavanaugh oughta be SHOT. Meanwhile, the NRA is asking all its six million members to “ramp up” their support for Cavanaugh, because he has been a PROVEN supporter of gun rights—as he should be, since gun ownership and use is constitutionally GUARANTEED. The left is already “talking trash” about him, saying he is “part of the swamp,” because he once worked for President Bush. They don’t make the designation between a REAL “swamp dweller,” who does what he must to protect his politicians, legal or ILLEGAL, and HONEST people. The left is “disturbed” by the number of “conservative” Justices there will be on the Court. Tough—I’ve been disturbed, for years, at the number of LIBERAL Justices on the Court. If the past is any teacher, they will do everything they can, even LIE about him, as they did Justice Thomas, to get him rejected. With Thomas, they INVENTED a “sexual abuse” thing, using SOMEBODY’S pubic hair on a Coke can as "evidence." One wonders what LIES they will come up with this time. (Gun Free Zone)

Flailing In The Wrong Direction

The anti-gun fools continue to flail around, trying to find SOMETHING they can do to "reduce gun crime," and they're, as usual, looking in all the wrong directions. In California, for instance, they're trying to pass a bill into law requiring vendors to track gun parts, and pay a license fee (It always comes down to more money for the government, doesn't it?). To buy ammunition or any gun parts, you will have to do the same things you have to do to buy a gun, itself. Pass a background check, and buy a special license. Anything to make it harder to own a gun and actually USE it. Vendors would be "controlled" through a licensing scheme, and certain gun parts would require tracking. Which, of course, would require serial numbers to be cut into them--something that has already been proven to be almost impossible. As usual, they claim this law will "save lives," without any empirical proof. They say it will "prevent criminals from gaining access." Yeah. The same way anti-gun laws keep guns out of the hands of criminals--who routinely IGNORE their silly laws and victimize those who OBEY them, and are thus UNARMED. (Guns)