Friday, July 20, 2018

Watch For Mass Killings

South Africa is demanding that 300,000 gun owners “turn over their guns.” That can only mean they are planning even more atrocities, and don’t want any guns to be in the hands of their intended victims. Recently, the South African National Congress approved a measure changing the Constitution to allow the government to TAKE land and other property WITHOUT compensation—to STEAL the property of others. There can be no other way to describe it. And when they come to TAKE their property, they don’t want to be met with gunfire. One unalterable fact is that gun control is the precursor to tyranny. Yes, they made a LAW that taking a person’s property was legal, as long as it’s the government doing it. But that doesn’t end it. It can only be carried out by FORCE. Which means many on both sides, will die or be injured. They are “nibbling at” our gun rights, taking them away little by little, under good-sounding “reasons.” Until the final action to completely remove them while we, who have been desensitized, will not fight it. They hope. But they misunderstand Americans. We will NEVER allow the government to completely remove our right to self defense, and to buy and use the means to that end, a gun. We will fight, and their attempt will result in the second American civil war. (Gunpowder Magazine)

Is Second Amendment "Optional?"

That's how it seems. In 2008, in the "Heller Decision," the Court finally RECOGNIZED that the Second Amendment was NOT "optional." That it DID allow citizens to be armed for self defense. Since then, the Court has avoided questions regarding the right to own and use the MEANS to self defense, a gun. Without which we remain defenseless against the millions of ILLEGALLY-owned guns in the hand of people who would do us ill. I'm convinced that the anti-gun fools WANT us to be defenseless against the "bad guys," whoever they are. They are not against gun ownership, per se, they're against SELF DEFENSE, but are unwilling to say it. That becomes evident when they ban such things as "box knives" after the World Trade Center disaster, and have tried in several cases, to ban STUN GUNS, which are purely defensive. It becomes clear when they attempt to make the Second Amendment "optional" by violating it in every way they can, outside of just ignoring it altogether. Evidence is their attempts to limit it to cover only guns "in use during the writing of the Constitution," and other such subterfuge. Things like forcing people to REGISTER and pass background checks in order to buy BULLETS, attempts to "regulate" gun PARTS, and forcing manufacturers to imprint serial numbers on ALL parts, which is next to impossible. (Reason Magazine)

Thursday, July 19, 2018

"Dangerous Level of Propaganda"

The Washington Postrecently “pulled the gloves off” in their coverage of a mass shooting foiled by two legal concealed carriers by intimating that the actions of these two were as bad as those of the mass shooter. They said the shooter’s actions did not require the “death penalty” when, actually, they did. They described it as “three shooters,” ignoring the unalterable fact that two of those shooters STOPPED the mass shooting and saved a bunch of lives. They tried their best to paint the heroes as “bad guys,” when they are the heroes of the plot. The local authorities recognized them as such. Not so with the gun-hating Washington Post. With this story, they proved the fact that they published GARBAGE, and that you could no longer believe ANYTHING they published. Mostly, this is an example of the LIES told by the anti-gun fools, of which they are part. After this, if you read ANYTHING they write, make use of your BS Meter and verify anything they print with at least two other sources, preferably not liberal sources. This kind of propaganda is insidious and dangerous, and it makes us wonder if the First Amendment is as good a thing as the Second. There should really be SOME kind of “oversight” over the TRUTH of what is printed. (American Gun News)

Awww, Poor Baby!

The Huffington Post actually ran this headline" "Goodbye Justice Kennedy, Goodbye Gun control." Which shows that they know which Justices will vote their way, and which will not. And they know what we've always known, that gun control is a "lost cause," since the right to self defense, and to own and use the means to that end, a gun, is GUARANTEED in the Constitution. They knew Kennedy would find a way to "get around" that, and they are pretty sure any justice Trump appoints will actually FOLLOW the Constitution, not try and "get around it." That's the problem with Supreme Court appointments: those justices are not supposed to be "political," but they inevitably are. Just by the very HISTORY of the appointees, which is usually known, at least by those appointing them. That is unavoidable. Both liberals and conservatives mourn appointments that will not help them advance their own wishes, and lifetime appointments prevent them from "getting rid" of justices they don't like. I "feel for" Huffington Post, but I just can't seem to reach them, since their desire is to "get around" and VIOLATE the Constitution, which is the very BASIS for ALL the laws of our land. They MUST conform to it, and the Justices of the Supreme Court are SUPPOSED to make sure of that, but who often DON'T. (Huffington Post)

Wednesday, July 18, 2018

Deadly anti-Gun Law

One of the deadliest of the anti-gun laws is the “waiting period.” Many people try desperately to buy a gun for protection when somebody threatens them. They need that gun RIGHT NOW. Not after a few days, or even a few WEEKS waiting period. Many of those people have BEEN KILLED while waiting for approval from those officious bureaucrats so they can get that gun, with which to defend themselves. All because some nameless, faceless bureaucrat or politician says they have to WAIT to gain the means to protect themselves from someone who has ALREADY threatened them, and probably already has a gun. One case I remember, right here in Denver, is the woman who was placed in a similar position. An ex boyfriend told her he was going to KILL her, and she believed him. So she tried to buy a gun and was told she needed to suffer a “waiting period.” Knowing that would just not do, she “became a criminal” and bought a gun ILLEGALLY. When that ex boyfriend came to kill her, she shot him to death. For that, she was imprisoned, for a time, for having an illegal gun. Better to be alive in prison than DEAD on the ground, while waiting for some fool’s PERMISSION to buy a gun, which is GUARANTEED by the Constitution. It says the right to bear arms “shall not be abridged.” Such laws ARE an abridgment, and are thus unconstitutional (Keep and Bear)

Forcing Criminality

People In Government, Especially In States Like New York And New Jersey, are forcing honest people to become criminals, in order to defend themselves against those who would use illegally-owned guns against them. In New Jersey, for instance, its anti-gun fool governor wants to raise the cost of BUYING a gun 2400%! And that's not even the cost of the gun, itself. It is the cost of the PERMIT the state requires you to buy before you can even BUY a gun legally. And other permit fees you must pay to get a gun are similarly in his sights. This reinforces the fact that, since politicians know they are constitutionally PROHIBITED from just BANNING guns, they are determined to make them impossible to even BUY, let alone carry and use for self defense, or anything else. They are even trying to get laws passed to treat gun parts and AMMUNITION like guns, themselves, requiring background checks and buying "permits" in order to buy BULLETS. This will inevitably create an even larger black market in not only guns, but gun parts and ammunition, as well. And I am, for one, in favor of that, since that's where most of the "bad guys" get their guns--and we might be FORCED to get the means to defend ourselves from them from the same place. (Daily Caller)

Tuesday, July 17, 2018

They're Reaching Hard

The liberals are really reaching. Now they say that the Russians sent one “flame-haired girl” to “get with” the NRA with the specific mission of getting Donald Trump elected president. How this one girl is supposed to accomplish that is in question. This girl (whose origin is NOT proven to be Russian) is supposed to have done that by… what? And how is Trump supposed to know about it? They’ve tried everything else in their quiver and it hasn’t made a DENT in Trump’s support, nor has it given them ANY grounds for impeachment. They’re frustrated, and grasping at straws. Red haired straws, at this point. This shows the futility of their accusations of “Russian collusion” with Trump, which has not been proven after more than a year of “investigating,” while RUINING good people by making them spend every dime they own to pay the lawyers Mueller and others have made necessary. And all they have found is a few minor “process charges” and a few banking problems from DECADES ago—again with NO CONNECTION to President Trump. They insist that it is “only a matter of time” until they come up with something, if they just “keep digging.” If that ever happened in a normal criminal investigation, that investigation would have been stopped, long ago. But not in a POLITICAL “investigation” with a Republican as its target. Proof of Russian collusion with Dumocrats is rife, but they ignore it. (The Sun)

Ignorant Jerks

I've always tried to limit the insults I apply to liberals. Not because I disagree with them, but because they're STUPID. They pursue goals that are a special kind of stupid. But today's insults for Donald trump and all who associate with him MARK them as stupid. Restaurants eject his staffers because they work for him, and many liberals cheer. Newspapers and television news shows call him stupid when THEY are too stupid to recognize greatness in a rough package. "Reporters" call his press secretary a liar because they don't agree with her, and some even stand up and YELL at her. Now Amazon employees have sent a letter to their CEO comparing Trump with the Nazis, which demonstrates their COMPLETE ignorance. Trump works hard to make things better for everybody, INCLUDING liberals, but they remain stupid. I'm not talking about those who CALL themselves liberals. I'm talking about the liberal "elites" who think they're better than the rest of us while pushing ABSURD ideas such as allowing MEN into women's bathrooms and changing rooms if they "think" they're women today. Or those who think disarming yourself is the way to self defense. That is the epitome of stupidity. And they think they can win arguments, not with facts--there are none to support their position--but by simply calling us names, such as "hater" and "Nazi," and the like. which shows their complete ignorance of just what those names MEAN. (The Daily Caller)

Monday, July 16, 2018

Telling the Difference

In Chicago, how do you tell the difference between a gang killing an a cop killing? The direction in which the bullets are going, maybe? The cops killed a man who was fleeing and reaching for a gun. That makes no difference, I suppose, to the “citizens” who are protesting that. What are the cops supposed to do? Wait until he gets his gun out and aimed at a cop before they “cancel his check?” As many of the very people who are protesting themselves are likely involved in shootings of other citizens, it’s a wonder they have time to protest. They deny the guy had a gun, but you take ANY gathering of people in certain parts of Chicago, and a majority of them will have guns in their pockets, needing cleaning after they killed somebody. And this guy DID have a gun and was reaching for it. Meanwhile, Rahm Emanuel and his gang make more and more anti-gun laws for them to ignore while they kill each other on purpose, and innocent people by accident, while trying to kill those they aim at. Nobody seems to notice that their anti-gun laws just make it easier for those who ignore them to victimize the law-abiding, who DO obey their laws. (Hey, Jackass!)

Dida Lotta Good

MOMS Against Guns (or something like that) hung a couple of anti-gun signs at a New Jersey school just before a crazed gunman shot the place up. Those signs did a lot of good, didn't they? That's what outfits like MOMS do. All cosmetic. And that includes the laws they promote. It's all cosmetic. Their laws don't work, and they know it. But they keep on pushing them, anyway. Which has convinced me they aren't really interested in safety, they're interested in CONTROL. They want to be able to tell us we CAN'T. It's the same with all those so-called "gun safety" outfits. They just want to be able to pass laws that tell us we CAN'T have a gun for protection, while those laws do NOTHING to keep guns out of the hands of people who shouldn't have them, because those people just IGNORE them and get their guns illegally. They either buy them out of the trunk of another criminal's car in a back alley somewhere, or they just steal them. (NJ)

Friday, July 13, 2018

"Cruel And Unusual"

The Constitution prohibits “cruel and unusual punishment.” But that doesn’t stop liberal “lawmakers” from passing laws that ARE “cruel and unusual punishment,” and they remain in force until they are declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. But by then, the damage has been done to many people. Such a law has been passed in Seattle, Washington. It requires that all guns be “properly secured” according to state guidelines, or a $10,000.00 fine will be assessed. If that’s not “cruel and unusual punishment,” I don’t know what is. And when that law is DECLARED unconstitutional after many years of being enforced, there will be many people who are “wiped out” by a “technicality” if their attempts at “securing” their guns are not perfect, according to state inspectors. Forgetting ONE small thing can get you a fine that will RUIN you if you pay it, or get you in MORE TROUBLE if you can’t. This is how would-be tyrants control the populace, even if their actions are ILLEGAL. Their “rules” for “securing” your guns make them USELESS for self defense, as much as if they didn’t exist. When someone comes at you wielding an ILLEGAL gun, it will inevitably take you too long to get your gun into action and he will KILL you. (Gun Alerts)

It Happened Again

I really get tired of saying this, but I'll say it again. Again, the anti-gun fools were wrong. They say legally armed citizens NEVER stop a mass shooter, but it happens every day. The liberal media, which is in cahoots with the anti-gun fools doesn't run it to a national audience, always keeping it a "local story" when an armed citizen stops a thug from shooting everybody in sight. Same here. David George, an EMT with the local fire department was shopping at Wal-Mart with his family when Tim Day started shooting in the store. Worried about his family, he stalked the shooter when he went by him shooting others. Still reluctant to pull his own gun, he did so and shot the guy when he shot the driver of a car he was trying to carjack. Another armed citizen was also there and he told him to watch the injured shooter while he, as an EMT, went to tend to the driver who was shot. So this man not only saved lives by stopping the shooter, he also probably saved the life of the driver who was shot. But I doubt you'll read much about this in the national media. (KOMO News)

Thursday, July 12, 2018

Shannon Watts Screws Up

She unconsciously told us the Second Amendment was constitutional. Something everybody with INTELLIGENCE knows, but she tries to make us think she doesn’t. The Second Amendment IS constitutional, but she doesn’t want to admit it, as she goes about in her attempts to subvert it. The fact that the measures she pushes never work seems to be lost on her. She wants to push her unconstitutional measures, anyway. Now she seems to have ADMITTED that gun control IS unconstitutional. Why the Court should take into consideration the affect on ANYTHING but the constitutionality of the measures is WRONG. The only thing that the Court is BOUND to consider is the CONSTITUTIONALITY of a measure. Not foreign law, and not his or her PERSONAL prejudices should be considered. Nor "the effect on public safety." This is clearly laid out IN the Constitution, whether many people realize it, or not. The Constitution clearly GUARANTEES each and every American who has not committed a felony the right to own and use a gun for self defense. That is a GIVEN. It can only be changed by changing the Constitution, itself, by means of the method set out IN the Constitution. Shannon and her cronies want to “get around” that. But she slipped up in her “Tweet.” (Bearing Arms)

Targeting Only Legal Gun Owners

The anti-gun fools have given up even PRETENDING to be trying to "keep guns out of the hands of criminals," and are now targeting LEGAL gun owners, who mostly aren't criminals. New Jersey's new governor, Phil Murphy, wants to "make it a lot more expensive to own a gun." The current "fee" for getting a PERMIT to buy a gun is only $2.00. Murphy doesn't like that, and wants to hike it a LOT (It's always about money, isn't it?). The current plan is to raise the "fee" from $2.00 to $50.00. Which is much higher than would be required by inflation. It's much worst than when Colorado Governor Hickenpooper DOUBLED the license plate fee in Colorado. DOUBLED it! This guy went for an increase of 25 times! All to make it harder to LEGALLY own a gun! Forget about getting a gun ILLEGALLY. This does NOTHING in that direction, and is just a "money-grubbing" action, using guns as an excuse. Of course, this has the effect of denying that constitutional right to those earning less money. People Dumocrats CLAIM to "love" and want to help increase their lot in life. But not their right to stay alive. The fact that you should not have to pay for a PERMIT to exercise a constitutional right doesn't seem to affect such fools as Murphy, of course. (New Jersey)