Friday, May 26, 2017

Preferring Criminals

In California, they just passed a measure in the legislature that shortened the sentences for convicted violent criminals who committed crimes with guns. This confirms what I've been thinking, all along. That Dumocrats prefer the criminals to the law-abiding people. These are the same Dumocrats who moan and whine about how bad GUNS are, and then they make sure there are many more armed violent criminals out on the streets. Sen. Stephen Bradford (D-of course) says he introduced the bill after a 17-year-old who was in a car involved in a drive-by shooting but didn't shoot a gun said because he didn't shoot a gun, even though he was part of the gang that did the shooting, he was innocent. Have you ever heard of a criminal in prison who DIDN'T declare his innocence? I thought the law said that everybody involved in such things was guilty, whether or not he fired a shot. This is a good example of how Dumocrats coddle criminals, all over, and in California more than most. It's just a little more obvious there. (Daily Caller)

Gun Control Is Illogical

They call their silly laws “common sense gun control,” but they are neither. They are not common sense, nor are they gun control. Their basic premise is illogical, that the way to self defense is to disarm yourself in the face of the millions of ILLEGAL guns already out there in the hands of criminals, crazies, and now Islamic terrorists. You tell them that, but they don't hear you. It's like throwing a rock at a boulder. It just bounces off their heads without discernible effect. Gun-free zones are their worst invention.

They take away from honest, law-abiding people the right to be armed in self defense, while the “bad guys” just ignore them and bring their guns, anyway. When they're intent on serious crimes like murder and robbery, they're not concerned with a piddling law (or “policy”) that says they can't bring a gun into a certain area. In fact, they SEEK OUT such areas, because they know law-abiding people will docilely leave their own guns elsewhere, so they won't have to face the guns in the hands of the citizens and can do their dirty work without opposition.

The gun free zone is bad because it forces people to leave their guns elsewhere, while the “bad guys” ignore them. That gets people killed, but the anti-gun fools don't care. They fool themselves into thinking that they're “doing something good, by getting rid of guns in a certain area.” But they don't. They only tell the criminals where they can more easily victimize law-abiding people. And they take full advantage of it. Known mass shooters themselves will tell you they SELECT gun-free zones like schools in which to do their dirty work because they can be pretty sure they will not be facing a gun in the hands of one of their intended victims, (Just common sense)

Thursday, May 25, 2017

Total Ignorance On Guns

The Minnesota Legislature is considering legislation that would eliminate all licensing requirements for people to be allowed to carry guns for self defense. Many anti-gun fool legislators say “allowing people to freely carry guns is unwise.” How do they think they're going to STOP criminals from carrying guns? They can make all the laws they want to stop the law-abiding from carrying guns to defend themselves against those CRIMINALS who ignore “gun laws,” and they're not going to be able to eliminate guns from the picture. If this country announced to the world that it was getting rid of ALL means of self defense, what fo you think would happen? Other countries, who wish to 'take us over,” would then move in and do so. The same is true on a local level. If ALL law-abiding people were barred from having guns, the CRIMINALS (who ignore laws) would “take over” and nobody could stop them. I think that's the real purpose of the anti-gun fools: to make it easier for the criminals to take over. They CAN'T be stupid enough to really believe the swill that the way to defend ourselves is to disarm ourselves, leaving us DEFENSELESS against the onslaught of CRIMINALS who wish us ill and want to TAKE what we own. Their professing their wish to "stop gun violence" is ignorance personified, if they think disarming us is the way to that, leaving us with the former. (Duluth News Tribune)

They Call It "Common Sense"

Anti-gun fools call their stupid gun laws “common sense gun laws,” but they're ANYTHING but common sense. They simply reflect the abject STUPIDITY of the lawmakers who THINK it is “common sense” to make yourself DEFENSELESS against all the ILLEGAL guns already out there, in the hands of criminals, crazies, and even Islamic terrorists (a repetition, there). If their laws WERE “common sense laws,” they wouldn't have to describe them that way in an obvious (to intelligent people, anyway) attempt to fool us. Their idea that taking away the means to self defense is the way to attain self defense is TOTAL IGNORANCE. It is NOT “common sense,” in any fashion. People who buy into that stupidity are stupid, themselves, not to recognize the contradiction therein. Then there's the simple fact that their "common sense" is unconstitutional. (The News Tribune)

Wednesday, May 24, 2017

Break Out the Guns

Great Britain is famous for having the biggest UNARMED police force in the world. But when real danger is imminent, they're quick to “break out the guns,” as witness their response to the bombing at a rock concert in Manchester that killed 19 (one of them an eight-year-old girl) and wounded 119. Today, everywhere you look, there are cops and soldiers bristling with firepower. They are not going to make the same mistake made in France where the unarmed cops were seen cowering behind their cars while Islamic terrorists went about killing people within their sight. Thus, the British displayed the fallacy of having unarmed police doing a dangerous job WITHOUT adequate tools with which to defend themselves. They famously (or infamously) deny their citizens the right to have and use the tools of self defense, as well as many COPS. But when REAL danger strikes, the guns come out. (Daily Mail)

What's Their Point?

The Huffington Post says, “The NRA is in denial about the slowing of gun sales since Trump's election.” They say it as if that was significant. It's not. In fact, reduced gun sales because of Trump's election is absolutely NOT unexpected, since people are no longer afraid their gun rights are going to be further restricted or taken away entirely under Trump. So they're not buying guns in such high numbers as they were under Obama. So what? And I don't think the NRA is “in denial” when they report no significant decrease in gun sales. They're just reporting REAL numbers, instead of the phony ones put out by the anti-gun fools such as the Huffington Post. I think this is just them trying to “take a victory lap” to which they are not entitled. (Huffington Post)

Tuesday, May 23, 2017

"There Oughta Be A Law!"

There oughta be a law against people bringing their guns into churches! They're places of worship, not violence! A man in Kansas City came into a church and shot the greeter in the head. He (the greeter, not the shooter) was taken to the hospital and is thankfully expected to survive. “MOMS Against Guns” (or something like that) are dancing in the blood of the victim, as they are wont to do. Wait—there IS a law against people bringing guns into churches! You mean this guy ignored that law? Golly gee! I thought people OBEYED laws! (sic) Seems like their “common sense gun laws” aren't very “common sense,” after all. But don't tell them that. Their minds are made up, so don't confuse them with facts. The pastor says church members are safe (really?), that he and other members did what they could to be sure of that, without detailing what they did. But that greeter might disagree. Cops say the shooter is “in custody.” (Fox 4 KC)

They Don't Get It

Many older people who profess to be “gun people” are disturbed by the “change” in the NRA from largely promoting hunting and sport shooting to “warlike” guns with “camo-like” finishes instead of “contoured fine wooden stocks and elegant inlays and engraving.” They just don't get the whole reason the Second Amendment was such an important part of the Constitution. The Founders weren't as much concerned with hunting and sport shooting rights as they were with the American people (all of them) being part of a “militia” the government could “call up” in the event of an emergency and they wanted them to bring their own guns so the government (which at the time was small and weak compared to now) would not have to pay to provide them. It's that simple, but the anti-gun fools want you to believe otherwise, that the Second was to preserve hunting and shooting sports. Such was the furthest thing from their minds. (Shall Not Be Questioned)

Monday, May 22, 2017

Another Gun Buyback

In Los Angeles there are 70 guns now “out of the picture” for criminal use. Hooray! Now the criminals there will have only a few million ILLEGAL guns to use in victimizing honest citizens while they use the money they gained in that buyback to buy new guns that work. The fools who sponsor those buybacks don't realize that money is fungible. Which means the money they get for old, mostly non-usable guns they “turn in” can be used to buy the NEW guns they need to be able to keep intimidating honest citizens. And the lawlessness goes right on, unabated. Then the cops do another gun buyback, and do it all over again. They just can't understand that their aim at the GUNS is a faulty aim, and they should be aiming at the USE of the guns. They'll never learn. (Breitbart)

The "Gun-Free Zone" Myth

The anti-gun fools would like for all America to be a “gun-free zone,” in spite of the fact that “gun-free zones” are known “killing zones” that are sought out by those who want to kill people, or just rob them. This is PROVEN by the unalterable fact that MOST “mass shootings” occur IN “gun-free zones,” and there is no lack of gun violence performed in “gun-free zones” everywhere. In California, they passed a law allowing guns on campus, IF the school approved. Out of 977 schools in the state, only FIVE allowed them. Now they want to pass a law taking even that authority away from “school authorities.” They seem to be frightened of the whole idea of people carrying their guns legally on campus. Never mind that many people already carry their guns ILLEGALLY on campus. These laws are like all the other anti-gun fool laws, in that they only apply to those who OBEY laws while the REAL threats do NOT obey laws. (Orange County Register)

Friday, May 19, 2017

Carrying It Too Far

The anti-gun fools commonly carry their fiction too far, as in suspending children from school for chewing pop tarts into a rough shape of a gun or bringing a TOY gun to school. Playing “cops and robbers” using their FINGERS as a gun, or drawing a PICTURE of a gun. Now I've heard it all. A magazine nobody has ever heard of, called, Popsugar Magazine is now telling parents they need to stop their kids from playing with WATER guns, because that “normalizes,” in their minds, real guns. Talk about “going off the deep end!” The writer of the article, whose mother allowed NO guns in her house, says, “Guns are not innocent, even if they are made of plastic and only shoot water.” How STUPID is that? She sees only the bad things about guns, ignoring the guns' ability to keep people alive. Which is common with anti-gun fools. Does she think even COPS shouldn't have guns, because they're “evil?” Of course, she has no problem with “water squirters” if they don't LOOK like a gun. Stupid! Even if they don't LOOK like a gun, the kids are pretending they ARE, whether or not they LOOK like a gun, and are shooting each other with them. (Breitbart)

A Damfool "Study"

The anti-gun fools try everything they can to make gun owners look foolish. Now they're citing a flawed “study” at the University of Colorado School of Medicine that says if a teenager has guns in his home, or even in a friend's home, he's at higher risk for mental problems. On what they base that amazing result, I don't know. And I'll bet they don't know, either. This smacks of them “making it up,” which anti-gun fools do on a regular basis. And where better to find anti-gun fools than in a university? Of course, the “study” ignores the unalterable fact that MOST teenagers who have a close association with guns are in a street gang, and it is these who are responsible for the highest amount of “gun violence,” and that has nothing to do with guns in the home. Of course, the source is a known liberal outfit. (Colorado Public Radio)

Thursday, May 18, 2017

"Self Defense: A Bizarre Premise"

That's what the NY Times says, anyway, again showing their complete ignorance about the real world. What the hell do they think guns are FOR, anyway? They aren't MADE for criminals to use in victimizing people. When they do, they're misusing them. They're angry that 11 states have passed laws to allow “concealed carry” on campuses. Of course, as usual, they got the number wrong when they reported it. They said it was 10 states. They talk about the “risks” in allowing “concealed carry” on campus, completely ignoring the unalterable fact that people carry guns on campus ILLEGALLY, every day. As usual again, they decry people's ability to handle guns safely, again ignoring those people who ILLEGALLY bring their guns on campus. What they're really against is people's ability to defend themselves against all the ILLEGAL guns already out there. They want us to be DEFENSELESS when thugs attack us. They deny it to their dying day, but it's undeniable. (Breitbart)

Official Constitution Violation

In New Jersey, where they have lots of financial issues already, they're studying a bill to divert money to violating the Constitution. They can't afford to fix the roads and bridges, but they want to spend money to “study” gun control as a “public health issue.” They spend a lot of taxpayer money on gun control, anyway, but, to my knowledge, this is the first time politicians have tried to make a LAW to specifically spend taxpayer money on violating the Constitution. Hopefully, the governor will veto the bill if it ever gets to his desk. One hopes he's more intelligent than the clowns who are pushing this bill. Anybody with any INTELLIGENCE knows that gang violence is at the root of their “gun problems,” but they don't bother to even LOOK at that. They have very harsh “gun laws” already that are doing NOTHING to “stem gun violence,” but they insist on making more of them for the gangs and other criminals to ignore. (NRA-ILA)