Minneapolis Crime Spikes!

Remember what I said about what would happen if you took the cops out of the equation? Well, they did it. The fools sitting on their City Council voted unanimously to disband their police department. And crime predictably is out of control. A woman was beaten and robbed in a store parking lot and their security didn’t call the cops because there were no cops to call. It was up to that security officer to help her, and he did what he could—which was not much. Criminals who do these things are never punished, so they’re going to just take what they want, and anybody who objects will be beaten or murdered. Those fool Minneapolis politicians Should be removed from office for incompetence, then sued out of their socks by the citizens. Better yet, put them out on the street to be victimized by those criminals they have helped so much. If they can’t see the error of their ways by now, they should be removed from office and barred from ever being able to hold public office again. At the very least. And if they are sued, the amounts sued for should be financially crippling to them. The citizens should go out and get their own guns and to hell with legality. With no cops, who is going to do anything about it. Then you’ll truly have the “wild west atmosphere” the anti-gun fools talk about so much. (Breitbart)

The Power to Say "No"

The Second Amendment gives all Americans the undeniable RIGHT to “bear arms.” It does not specify what “arms” we may bear, of under what rules. But today’s limpid bureaucrats and politicos think they can “regulate” them out of existence. So they first apply the “need” for a license to be armed, a specific violation of the Constitution, which dictates the law. Under the Second, no such license should ever be required because the power to license gives the government the power to say “no.” And the government should have no such power. Yes, allowing free ownership and use of a gun means criminals will be able to get guns legally, too. But why would they? They can get them much easier illegally. Or just steal them. You cannot stop criminals from getting guns by making laws to limit the purchase and use of guns by honest, law-abiding people. It can’t be done, even if it were not allowed under the Constitution. Criminals will always get their guns, and there are millions of illegal guns already in the hands of criminals, crazies, and now Islamic extremists. I know why politicians favor gun control. They fear an armed populace. But the private citizens who favor it are either in for the money, or they’ve “bought the BS” put out by the politicians. (Just common sense)

Godawful Damned Fools!

That’s my description of ANYBODY who wants to defund or abolish the police, and/or get rid of prisons altogether, turning criminals loose to prey on the rest of us with impunity. Because without the police there to get between us and the criminals, and the prisons in which to keep them, we’re going to descent into a very dangerous world where those who have most guns will rule. And the criminals always have the most guns, no matter what the laws say. The movement to eliminate the cops and prisons can only benefit one group of people, and that is the criminal element. Anybody who favors eliminating the cops and prisons is either a criminal or a damned fool, one or the other, maybe both. Personally, I don’t want to live in a world where there is no police protection, and I’m far too old and infirm to resist, myself. Those ignorant politicians who go along with it must think they have something to replace them with, and I’d love to know what it is—and it isn’t a social worker. Having them answer police calls, as has been suggested, without being armed is sure suicide, for them, and everybody else involved. (Just common sense)

Minneapolis Crime Spikes!

Remember what I said about what would happen if you took the cops out of the equation? Well, they did it. The damned fools sitting on their City Council voted unanimously to disband their police department. And crime predictably is out of control. A woman was beaten and robbed in a store parking lot and their security didn’t call the cops because there were no cops to call. It was up to that security officer to help her, and he did what he could—which was not much. Criminals who do these things are never punished, so they’re going to just take what they want, and anybody who objects will be beaten or murdered. Those fool Minneapolis politicians Should be removed from office for incompetence, then sued out of their socks by the citizens. Better yet, put them out on the street to be victimized by those criminals they have helped so much. If they can’t see the error of their ways by now, they should be removed from office and barred from ever being able to hold public office again. At the very least. And if they are sued, the amounts sued for should be financially crippling to them. The citizens should go out and get their own guns and to hell with legality. With no cops, who is going to do anything about it. Then you’ll truly have the “wild west atmosphere” the anti-gun fools talk about so much. (Breitbart)

Happy Thanksgiving!

  I'm taking the day off so I can stuff myself. Have fun.

Creating A Rebellion

Liberals don’t think it can happen in America, but so did King George when he tried to take away America’s guns. That cost him a country he thought was his when his settlers resisted his high-handed ways. I guess he thought, “Oh, another rebellion to put down.” But he soon found out American settlers were made of sterner stuff than were those of the other rebellions he had put down. They “handed him his head” and took his country away from him. Now we’ve come full circle and our own government, not some foreign power’s king, wants to take our guns away, and with it, our right to self defense. That ain’t gonna sis too well with the millions of gun owners, and they won’t stand for it. They think they’re so strong they can’t provide any resistance to their draconian, unconstitutional laws, but if they succeed in making a law to disarm America, the rebellion will begin. And the gun owners WILL win. (Just common sense)

The Predicted Response

Remember that St. Louis couple that defended their home and life from violent threatening rioters who were committing felonious breakins to get to them with an automatic weapon? Rioters who broke a gate to get to them, making that couple “afraid for their lives?” Now the cops have come for their weapon to make sure that doesn’t happen again. They WANT them to fear for their lives, maybe get beaten to death by an angry mob. I have noticed that this is the usual response by the authorities when they find a person has the means for self defense, knowing the cops are precious minutes away—minutes in which thugs can do much damage, even kill them. They come and take away that tool for self defense, even though the Constitution guarantees us the right to have it. They know the high court operates so slowly they can get away with that for many months, maybe even many years before they are ordered to return that tool to the owner—maybe long after that owner has been killed in a subsequent riot, that may come, since the rioters know how stupid those “authorities” are, and what they will do. So they won’t have to “back off” in the face of that tool this time and they can now do what they want, maybe even kill them. (Daily Wire)

Unbelievable Incompetence!

Incompetent elected “officials” have been going out of their way to illustrate their stupidity by defunding their police departments, instigating record rises in violent crimes, since there are fewer cops out there to stop the criminals from victimizing innocent people. At the same time they are releasing violent criminals—rapists and murderers, to prey on the rest of us. Meanwhile, they are working hard to disarm all HONEST, law-abiding people, making them “easy targets” for criminals. Why do they do that? They need the space to house the “REAL criminals”—people who congregate with family members for Thanksgiving dinner. They impose crippling fines and jail sentences upon these terrible criminals, and there just isn’t enough room to house those rapists and murderers. Then they cry when violent crime goes out of control. There’s only one solution to this insanity, and that’s to get a gun—legal or illegal. A bullet doesn’t know, nor care, if it is legal or not. Since those incompetent politicians are making it all but impossible for us to defend ourselves legally, while turning all the violent criminals loose to prey on us, we’re going to have to do it illegally. (Just common sense)

Democrats Are Mobsters

They are no different from the old union “enforcers.” They don’t meet opposition with logic and common sense, they just go out and beat up, and maybe KILL their opponents. So if you’re a Trump supporter, you’d better have your gun ready when they come for you, because they may even want to KILL you for opposing them. I don’t think I’ve ever seen an election this violent, not even one of those “tin pot banana dictatorship” sham elections down south. If we let them win, they will change this country into a dictatorship, as did Adolph Hitler in Germany. The proof is in the pudding with AOC’s listing of Trump supporters so they can be “dealt with” later when the Dumbocrats are in power. And there is also “donor-watch.com,” which is already showing ANTIFA and BLM which houses to burn and who to kill. ANTIFA and BLM are the thugs of the Dumbocrat Party, just as, some years ago were the KKK. They maintained “plausible deniability” so they can say, “Oh, they have nothing to do with us.” But notice, ALL their violence is directed at Trump and the Republicans. So who do you THINK are behind them? (Trump Train News)

They're Waking Up

Americans are waking up to reality concerning gun control. The anti-gun fools have had them fooled for years with all their false claims, but reality is coming to the fore, and people have noticed. Gun control does NOT do what it is touted to do. It does just the opposite, in fact. Disarming law-abiding people only makes it easier for those using ILLEGAL guns to victimize those law-abiding people who obey their insane laws. Criminals do not obey anti-gun laws. that’s a given, since they don’t obey ANY laws. The law-abiding DO obey gun laws, even if they think they’re stupid, and that makes them “easy targets” for the holders of the millions of ILLEGAL guns out there in the hands of criminals, crazies, and now Islamic terrorists. This, of course, causes an INCREASE in violent crime, rather than the decrease the anti-gun fools promise—and thus many people die. The fact is, owners of LEGAL guns are not the problem. Those with ILLEGAL guns ARE. And people are waking up to that fact, and stop supporting those unenforceable, useless laws that only get people killed. (Western Journal)

California Gun Killings

Wait a minute. California has some of the toughest anti-gun laws on the books, so how is this possible? Someone had to have either gotten his guns illegally or passed a background check and got them legally in order to bring off this outage. I thought all these tight laws were supposed to STOP things like this? Why weren’t they able? The truth is, this is yet another proof that anti-gun laws are useless to stop, or even slow down “gun crime.” Only the law-abiding obey them, and they aren’t, for the most part, the problem. The problem people are criminal, crazies, and Islamic terrorists, who regularly kill innocent people to make a political point. And they couldn’t care less about anti-gun laws. They are bent on violating much worse laws than those insignificant prohibitions on their use of guns in committing their other crimes. Laws are for those who obey them. Thus, the only people to whom these laws will apply are the law-abiding, who obey them. Completely ignoring the lawless, who routinely DISobey them. So what the hell good are they? They merely make it easier for the lawless to victimize the law-abiding. The anti-gun fools have to know this, but they ignore it and keep making their useless anti-gun laws, then ask in wonder, why gun crime persists. The news articles are still reporting that 5 people died in this California killing spree, but the death toll has risen to 6. So what are California lawmakers going to do, now? Make more useless anti-gun laws for them to ignore? (People)

Phony "Studies"

Liberals commonly use phony studies to promote their scams, and so do anti-gun fools (a repetition, there). Now comes a “study” that says if you own a gun, you suddenly have become suicidal. What a stupid idea that is! They have all kinds of spurious ideas they promote through their phony studies, like connecting gun ownership with a rise in crime, and murders, But a gun is merely an inanimate object until it is activated by a human hand. People don’t suddenly want to kill themselves just because a gun becomes available. To think so demonstrates stupidity beyond belief. And an attempt to con people into not buying a gun for fear of becoming suicidal, or wanting to murder somebody. The truth is high crime and high instances of suicide have nothing to do with the availability of a gun. And it is not the LEGALLY-OWNED guns that are the problem. It is the ILLEGAL gun holders who create all the suicides and violent crime. Not the gun. The human beings who get their guns illegally because they expect to use them in criminal activity so they so they don’t stand for a background check. Legal gun owners get their guns to defend themselves against the millions of ILLEGAL guns out there. And, no, getting a gun does NOT make you want to kill yourself, no matter what the JAMA Network in Missouri may say. It’s a phony study designed to make you afraid to buy a gun. (Bearing Arms)

Practical Stupidity

That is gun control. Gun control, as we know it, does not work. All those who promote gun control have to know that, yet they continue to make their useless, unenforceable gun control laws that do nothing but destroy the entire concept of self defense while getting honest, law-abiding people killed. Why do they do that? Are they just stupid? Or do they have an ulterior motive? The only ulterior motive I can see for the anti-gun fool promoters is the “cushy jobs” they have, paid for by those gullible “contributors” to their anti-gun fool campaigns. For anti-gun fool politicians however, the ulterior motive is two-fold. One, it gives them more power to tell us what we can, and cannot do. And two, when the time comes for that politician to come for your property, he or she wants to face as few guns as possible. Those have emerged as the obvious ulterior motives, since they have to know their laws do NOTHING to stop, or even slow down “gun violence” and, instead, INCREASE it. So the first thing we need to do is get rid of every politician who supports gun control by voting them out of office, or not voting them in, in the first place, At the same time, people need to stop sending money to the damned fool anti-gun fool demonstrators. (Just common sense)

Finding Something to Write

It’s hard to find something to write about gun control, since I’ve written it all, at one point or another, and been roundly ignored by the anti-gun fools, and I’m “preaching to the choir.” It’s very obvious to intelligent people that anti-gun laws not only don’t work, they contribute to the problem by disarming the law-abiding, making it easier for the lawless to victimize them. But those making the anti-gun laws are obviously NOT intelligent people, since they continue to insist on making laws they KNOW don’t work, an only add to the problem. I’ve always advised voters NEVER to elect an anti-gun politician, but they keep doing it, and are making the problem worse, instead of better. Now we’re in danger of getting both an anti-gun president, and an anti-gun vice president, which is going to add considerably to the problem for at least the next four years. The laws they make only apply to LEGAL gun sales and use, because they can’t get to those owning ILLEGAL guns, so they do the next best thing (in their minds). (Just common sense)

Knee-Jerk Reaction

That’s what happens after every “gun crime.” Most gun crimes are committed by people who get their guns illegally, but after a gun crime, stupid politicians immediately clamor for the passage of more laws to control LEGAL gun ownership and use. What the hell good that does in keeping criminals, who obey NO laws, from getting and using guns, I don’t know. They call their anti-gun laws “common sense” laws. But nothing could be further from common sense. They have to know they don’t work worth a damn, but they keep making them, making the law-abiding “easy targets” for those who get their guns illegally before committing their other crimes—with their illegal guns. I know what drives the politicians—it is the knowledge that they will someday come for your property, and don’t want to get shot when they do. But the anti-gun fools? That’s impossible to figure. I think it’s the fine salaries they pay themselves out of the money given them by the fools who “buy” their lies. And lies they are, because they can’t tell the truth and still promote controlling LEGAL guns while criminals go wild using ILLEGAL guns. (Just common sense)

"Stop and Frisk"

Most Dumbocrat-run municipalities today have banned “stop and frisk from the “quiver” of police arrows they use to fight crime. Which, of course, makes it much more difficult for them to confiscate ILLEGAL guns, even though that is the single most effective way of getting illegal guns off the streets. Instead, they spend all their time making life miserable for honest, law-abiding people who simply want to have their own guns, with which to defend themselves against those millions of illegal guns, on the street. This is just the opposite from what they SHOULD be doing, but incompetent liberal politicians not only don’t know that, they reject the very idea. And they wonder why “gun crime” is out of control. Likewise, they piss and moan about the number of black men who are killed by the cops. It might be instructive to look at all those shootings to find out how many of those black men were trying hard to kill that cop at the time he was killed. But they won’t do that. Doing that would mess up the narrative put out by the anti-gun fools. Another contributing factor is the liberal complaints about black men being more likely to be in prison than white men. Again, if you look deep into it, you’ll discover that more black men commit crimes than do white men, and SHOULD be in prison. But again, liberals won’t even entertain the idea. (Just common sense)

Doubling Down On Stupid!

That St. Louis politician (er, uh, prosecutor) took a legal action and jumped right in, lying about the charges she is about to lay on a couple of lawyers who displayed their legally owned guns to “put the fear of God” into a bunch of cocky rioters who threatened to kill them, then shower in their bathrooms and eat in their dining rooms after they’re dead, saying those people were just “walking by,” on their way to the mayor’s house to protest there. The charges she is making are “displaying firearms for an illegal purpose.” Which is a big, fat LIE. They were displayed for a LEGAL purpose, guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States. She has NO legal ground to stand on, and is spending taxpayer money to make a grand political statement in an election year—which is probably going to backfire on her, big time. Those rioters were trespassing on PRIVATE PROPERTY, not walking on public streets, when they threatened these homeowners on their own property. The very act of damaging that entrance to their property puts the LIE to that claim. (CNN)

Stupid Politicians

I can’t believe there are so many stupid politicians out there making anti-gun laws that “infringe” on our Second Amendment rights, KNOWING they are illegal and will eventually be reversed, and their laws thrown out. And anti-gun laws are not the only kinds of laws that are introduced, and passed that are in direct violation of the Constitution. Many laws are passed that are “ex post facto” laws, another kind prohibited by the Constitution. That’s a Latin description of “retroactive” laws. Under those, you can do legally one day something that is declared illegal the next day and made retroactive so that what you did legally the day you did it is DECLARED illegal retroactively the next day. Think about it: what if you had to shoot somebody legally on Wednesday and that is made illegal on Thursday retroactively and you “go away” for ten years for doing something that was legal when you did it. Politicians will sometimes stretch the law in painful directions to get their way, and anti-gun fool legislators are the worst at doing that. (Just common sense)

Gun Control Insanity

The politicians have no idea what to do about “gun crime,” so they PRETEND they’re doing something by passing incessant anti-gun laws that shooters just IGNORE as they go about getting their guns ILLEGALLY or just stealing them. Yes, anti-gun laws can help, AFTER the killings. We must have laws making it illegal for a felon to be in possession of a gun, and against USING that gun in an illegal manner, so we can prosecute offenders. But they’re USELESS to keep that “gun crime” from happening, in the fist place. That must be very frustrating for the anti-gun fools, and the gullible legislators they convince to make their useless laws. Their very approach to limiting “gun crime” is wrong, and short-sighted. You can’s stop gun crime by taking guns away from the law-abiding. You just can’t. But since they have no idea what to do, they keep doing things that will not, and do not work, and tell everybody they’re “doing something” to end gun crime. But they aren’t. That is proven, every day, buy the fact that where anti-gun laws are the tightest, gun crime is at its highest. And where anti-gun laws are loosest, or non-existent, gun crime is DOWN. Those are figures the anti-gun fools routinely ignore. They just want to disarm America, for their own purposes. (Just common sense)

Anti-Gunners Are Dancing

Sheriffs all over are using Covid 19 as an excuse to partially or completely shut down background checks and concealed carry permits and the anti-gun fools must be gigglng in their beards—if they have one. The Sheriff in Harnett County says it’s the fingerprinting. He doesn’t want his deputies getting that close to an applicant as is required to fingerprint them. I recognize his concerns, but like many politicians he’s “throwing out the baby with the bath water.” There are ways to get around that problem—maybe requiring a little more work, if they’re willing to do it. The best way to handle it is to eliminate the licensing requirement, and institute permitless concealed carry so if you’re not a felon or someone legally deemed a dangerous person, you can carry a gun if you own one. “The right to bear arms is a fundamental right, and one that becomes even more acute during times of emergencies. If the state is going to require a license in order to lawfully carry, then the government of that state must ensure that those licenses can be approved in a timely fashion. Otherwise, it’s failed in its responsibility to the citizens it purports to represent.” But they won’t even entertain that, so there is the quandry. The answer fr the citizen to be able to defend oneself from those millions of illegal guns already out there is to get theirs illegally, too. If enough do, they won’t be able to stop them in the long run. (Tactical Sh-t News)

The Chicago War Zone

Some news sources say calling Chicago a “war zone worse than Afghanistan” has “racial overtones” because most of those being shot and killed are non-white. But when they say that, they’re missing the point, entirely. Why AREN’T more participants white? Maybe it’s because they aren’t the criminal element that many black people are. Most people who live in Chicago have never heard a gunshot, and most who have live in Chicago’s South Side, where gang wars rage. And most of the shooters are black. As are most of those shot. And it’s mostly over drugs. Selling them, or buying them. In a recent weekend alone, 106 people were shot, and 14 died. And I guaranteed you gangs and/or drugs were involved in every shooting. As were black people. So talking about “being worse than Afghanistan” is NOT racist, it is the simple truth. The numbers alone support it. And this is a city with some of the tightest anti-gun laws in the nation. So what’s the problem? Those laws cannot apply to those who are the worst shooters because they don’t get their guns legally. They don’t stand for background checks and, therefore, don’t give their names and addresses to the government. So anti-gun laws cannot reach them, except on a case-by-case basis as some are caught with their illegal guns. And “that ain’t gonna git it.” Meanwhile, the Dumbocrat mayor and all her accomplices have no idea how to handle it. (Chicago Tribune)

What FOOLS They Be!

I don’t know what drives anti-gun fools, but their every move so far has been stupid. Now Elizabeth Warren wants to eliminate all armed school resource officers, making school students ABSOLUTELY defenseless against any fool who comes in wanting to kill a few children. She must really hate children to want them to be killed so easily. The very idea that the way to self defense is to make yourself defenseless is pure stupidity! But they continue It, and call it “common sense.” Being so stupid should cause them to be BARRED from running for ANY office where they can actually personify their stupidity by making laws that get law-abiding people killed. Dumocrats vie with each other to come up with the stupidest laws, and anti-gun laws are only part of their stupidities. Warren wants “Medicare for All,” which is a pipe-dream. The cost ($52 TRILLION) over just ten years will absolutely BANKRUPT this country. She thinks she can finance it by taxing the rich. She really thinks the rich will not take steps to avoid any tax she levies, even if they actually made enough to pay this stupid theft of their earnings. Where we get such stupid politicians is a mystery to me, but we get them in large quantities, mostly in the Dumocrat Party. There are some in the GOP, but not nearly as many. (Truth About Guns)

Ignorant, Stupid Fools!

That’s the best description I can give to the anti-gun fools who insist on making more and more anti-gun laws when they have to know they don’t work worth a damn to limit the number of guns in the hands of criminals. All they do is limit the number of guns in the hands of the law-abiding, most of whom are NOT the problem, anyway. They only make the law-abiding, who are the favorite targets of the lawless, defenseless against the millions of ILLEGAL guns out there in the hand of the lawless. The very idea on which the anti-gun scam is based is illogical. First, you can’t eliminate crime by eliminating guns. Next, you can’t stop the lawless from getting the guns they use to victimize the law-abiding by making laws. They just ignore them. They ARE criminals, after all. They don’t obey laws. Period. So why would they bother to obey a piddling little law that says they can’t be armed while they commit their other crimes? I think their main goal is to criminalize self defense for everybody but those working for the government, one way or the other by first, making guns very hard to get for the law-abiding, while criminals get their guns easily in a back alley somewhere. They call their laws “common sense gun laws,” but they’re anything BUT common sense. They’re ignorant, stupid, and illogical, but the law-abiding DO obey them, making them “easy targets” for the lawless. (Just common sense)

Gun Control Fantasies

All anti-gun laws are based on one or more gun control fantasies. End result: eliminating guns. That’s the worst fantasy because if you get rid of all LEGAL guns, you’re left with the millions of ILLEGAL guns, already out there in the hands of criminals, crazies, and now Islamic terrorists, who will then overrun us with their crimes, unslowed or stopped by a world where only the bad guys have guns. Then there’s the idea that background checks and making a list of all gun owners will eliminate “gun crime.” It will NOT. Those with criminal intent do not usually buy their guns legally. They either buy them illegally from other criminals, or just steal them. All those lists do is allow the cops to trace a gun used in a crime IF that gun was gotten legally, and the buyer standing for a background check. Again, criminals don’t do that. So what good are they? Then we have the fantasy that says if guns were no more, there would be no suicides. That’s really stupid. If a person is tortured enough to want to kill him/herself, the lack of a gun is not going to stop them. There are way too many ways to commit suicide that do not involve a gun. I could go on and on, but I won’t. The anti-gun fools just ignore me, anyway, and keep making their stupid laws that only make things worse. (Just common sense)

"Common Sense Gun Control"

That’s what they call it, but nothing about gun control is common sense. The very basis for gun control doesn’t track. You CANNOT end gun crime by taking guns away from the law-abiding; and there is NO WAY you’re ever going to do away with every gun in existence. You may take some legally-owned guns away from gullible owners who believe your guff, but the criminals, who are the ones who ARE the problem, are not going to give up their illegally-gotten guns. They are, after all, a staple in their “toolbox.” You can establish all the “gun-free zones’ you wish, but the lawless merely regard them as “target-rich areas” where the law-abiding will not be armed—thus giving them an “easy ride” when robbing, raping, and killing innocent people. The way to self defense is NOT to disarm yourself and make yourself an “easy target” for the lawless, who routinely IGNORE gun laws while committing their other crimes. The anti-gun fools, who push all these useless laws must have an ulterior motive because they have to know they don’t work worth a damn in doing what they claim they want to accomplish. (Just common sense)

Insufferably Stupid Advice

Joe Biden pretends to be an expert on how to stop police killings, and gives this advice: “Just shoot ‘em in the leg.” Which is the advice of an imbecile because shooting them in the leg does not remove the threat, as to officers in Rialto, California found out recently. They were in a gas station when a man ran up and attacked them with a knife. One cop shot him in the leg after twice “tasing” him didn’t put him down. But he kept coming with his so-called “non-lethal knife,” stabbing one cop in the stomach before being shot to death by the other cop. The injured cop is now in the hospital fighting for his life. One would hope if Biden actually does win the presidency, his decisions won’t be this abysmally stupid. But that’s a forlorn hope, since Biden has a hard time putting two thoughts together. It’s a known fact that he wants to put known anti-gun fool Pete Buttgiggle in charge of his efforts to circumvent the Second Amendment and “come for your guns.” I hope we continue to control the senate so we can put a stop to that. Remember, I advised never to elect an anti-gun fool to any political office, yet we (not me) have elected one to the highest office in the land, if he is, finally, confirmed. I think he will be, The “fix” is definitely in.  (Truth About Guns)

"Gangs Won't Surrender Guns"

Surprise, surprise! The “police commissioner” in New Zealand met with a number of “gang leaders” in an effort to get them to give up their guns. Not unexpectedly, that effort fizzled. The gangs refused to give up their guns. They know that the new anti-gun laws are a boon for them, as they disarm more law-abiding people, making it easier for them to be victimized by those gangs, who will still have their guns. I doubt if it’s much different here, since most of the “gun violence” is committed by gangs. Especially in Chicago, but in any big city you could mention, too, and even in some smaller ones.. The lawless are the lawless, no matter what the laws. They ignore them. In the US, one of the worst places for mass shootings is a school. Every school in the nation is a gun-free zone, and the lawless SEEK OUT places like that, where they can be pretty confident there will be no guns there they don’t know about. Any uniformed “resource officers,” they can locate and “deal with (kill)” early on, before they start killing children and other staff. The anti-gun fools have to know this. It is obvious, even to the most ignorant. But they keep them that way, while wondering why people go there to kill children. (Gun Free Zone)

3-2-1- "Gun Control"

In other news, “Water Is Wet.” The anti-gun fools are out in full force demanding more and more of their USELESS, unenforceable gun control laws that never do ANYTHING to stop, or even slow down “gun crime” after the latest school shooting in “gun-free” California. Each and every one of their stupid laws is in effect there, but somehow this 15-year-old student still got hold of the gun he used to kill two fellow students and almost himself. His actually HITTING those students must have been an accident because he is the only person I know who could put a gun in his mouth, pull the trigger, and miss. Naturally, the anti-gun crowd automatically want to do more to keep guns out of the law-abiding while completely ignoring the fact that the gun he used HAD to have been gotten illegally since he was too young to buy one legally. So how the hell would their laws stop him? The way to self defense is NOT to make yourself defenseless. The anti-gun fools have to know that, yet they keep on insisting on doing the same things, over and over again, hoping for a different result. That’s the very definition of insanity, but the insane have no idea they are insane. (Breitbart)

Biden Blames NRA

Senile Dumocrat presidential candidate Joe Biden (no matter what the media says) is blaming the NRA for the fact that a 15-year-old CHILD got a gun ILLEGALLY, and killed a couple of his fellow students in California the other day. How the NRA, who only champion the American’s constitutional RIGHT to be armed, is responsible for a kid getting a gun ILLEGALLY and killing some people is beyond my muddled thinking. But hey! I’m only an old blogger who is still able to see things clearly. Not like “Ol’ Joe, who speaks to walls instead of the audience. Damn! How the Dumocrats think such a man is capable of running this country is something else. Of course, this senile old man would be easy to control. Of course, Joe is not alone in his stupidities. Every Dumocrat running has similar views on guns. They all think the way to self defense is to make yourself DEFENSELESS. I don’t know. Maybe it’s something in the water in DC that promotes stupidity. Of course, such stupidity is not, in any way, limited to those in DC. They’re EVERYWHERE that Dumocrats congregate. And they spawn anti-gun fools like one former congresswoman who got shot in the head and not killed, who really thinks if nobody had a LEGAL gun, she wouldn’t have gotten shot. How ANYBODY can think keeping guns out of the law-abiding can do anything about guns in the hands of the lawless shows a stupidity beyond belief. (Bearing Arms)

Is A Revolution Coming?

WalMart thinks so. At least that’s the excuse they give for removing guns and ammunition from their shelves. They think there will be a bunch of ILLEGAL gun owners out there killing people, so what is their “solution?” Disarm as many LEGAL gun owners as possible to make them “easy targets” for those with their ILLEGAL guns. This is illogical. Logic demands defenders have the means to repulse the aggressors if, and when, they come. They can’t do that if they are unarmed. The way to self defense is NOT to make yourself an “easy target” for an attacker, but anti-gun fools—including WalMart--not only don’t know that, but refuse to listen when informed of it. This can only be stupidity. I say that because there is a difference between simple ignorance and stupidity. Ignorance is a simple lack of knowledge. Stupidity is having knowledge, but doing stupid things anyway. If a revolution comes and gets to me, I want to have a gun to use in repulsing it. But not if WalMart and other anti-gun fools have their way, and I’ll probably die. (Looser Rounds)

Ignoring the Warnings

In just about every mass shooting (mostly in “gun-free” schools), the shooter gave off many signals that such an event was imminent. One shooting at a military base in Kentucky, the man who became a mass killer gave off many signals. He was supposed to be a “counselor,” but was, himself, in need of counseling. He dressed like a Muslim, spouted Muslim terrorist pap, and generally made a nuisance of himself before he took a gun and killed a bunch of people. In another case, one mass killer was “contacted” by the cops 69 times before going into a school and killing some students, In all these cases, the shooter gave off many warnings, all of which were IGNORED. The anti-gun fools predictably target the guns, and ignore the whole idea of NOTICING such warnings and doing something about them. They also refuse to allow one of the best defenses against such school shootings, which is allowing teachers and other staff who are already legal gun carriers to bring their guns to school, as if those people will “go wild” and become mass killers, themselves. Actually, having guns there in the hands of people who are not in uniform and can’t be located and killed FIRST would be the first line of defense against a mass killer. But they refuse to credit that while kids get murdered. (Bearing Arms)

"Shall Not Be Infringed"

What is there about that the anti-gun fools do not understand? Their entire purpose is to get the government to violate a major constitutional edict. The Constitution is the very BASE upon which ALL our laws rests. Every law made—federal, state, or lower MUST conform to the constitution or it is not a law, at all. The Second Amendment to the Constitution is very simple. It says, “[T[he right of the people to bear arms shall not be infringed.” Period. You can ignore that reference to an “organized militia” because the Founders figured an organized militia to be ALL THE PEOPLE and they wanted them to bring their guns with them. So each and every anti-gun law that limits or bans gun purchase, ownership, and use is UNLAWFUL. Unlawful. Get it? It is against the law, whether they like it, or not. Most of their laws do the exact opposite of what they are touted to do. They disarm the law-abiding and leave the field open to the carriers of ILLEGAL guns so they can victimize the law-abiding, at will. They actually INCREASE violent crime, rather than reduce it. Those promoting anti-gun laws are either stupid or they have an ulterior motive. (Just common sense)

Handcuffing the Cops

In response to a few “bad apples” the anti-cop damned fools want to defund or eliminate the cops, altogether. Which is about the stupidest thing they can even consider, much less actually DO. In this case they’re jumping on one cop who had to shoot three suspects, which were all judged to be “good shoots” to get that cop fired “so he won’t kill again,” as if he were a “serial killer” who had to be stopped. In truth, he seems to be a good cop who ran into three violent criminals who threatened him, and he had to shoot to stay alive. In another case, the family of a suspect killed by a cop said “he wasn’t trained properly” so let’s defund the police department so they can’t train future officers. Others simply want to abolish cops, altogether. They can’t be stupid enough to believe that will not get lots of people killed as criminals “take over” the streets, committing their crimes without worrying abut a cop coming to arrest them. The cops are our protectors, and to abolish them leaves us wide open to a “survival of the fittest” scenario and we will descend into a “road warrior” scenario where only the meanest and toughest will RULE. Then they will wish they had their cops back, to protect them against them. (Mail News)

Gun Control Is Stupid!

I say that because gun control accomplishes NOTHING when it comes to reducing violent crime. Instead, it INCREASES it by disarming the law-abiding, making them into “easy targets” for law-breakers and their ILLEGAL guns. What they accomplish is the exact opposite of what they are claimed to do. The anti-gun fools have to know this, yet they keep making those stupid, unenforceable, useless laws while people die as a result. The difference between ignorance and stupidity is simple. Ignorance is a lack of information. Stupidity is knowing the truth and doing the same stupid things over and over again, as the anti-gun fools do. The very definition of INSANITY is doing the same things over and over and expecting a different result. And gun control is unconstitutional by its very nature. The Constitution says, “[T]he right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” Thus ANY law limiting that right IS an infringement and thus is unconstitutional, “organized militia” notwithstanding, since the Founders considered an “organized militia” to be ALL THE PEOPLE and they wanted them to bring their own guns with them. I’ve said this before, but the anti-gun fools ignore me and keep making their stupid laws. (Just common sense)