Liberal Politicians Are Stupid

How these lame brain fools got into office amazes me. Mayor Lightbrain in Chicago is one of the worst. She didn’t make all the ineffective, unenforceable anti-gun laws in Chicago, but she agrees totally with their “enforcement,” which only serves to get the law abiding killed, since they are the only ones who have trouble getting guns with which to defend themselves from the law breakers, who never have ANY trouble getting the guns they use to victimize the law abiding. Large cities all over the country suffer from the same stupidity displayed in Chicago by Mayor Lightbrain, and murder rates remain high. In NYC, Mayor DiStupid is “enforcing” his anti-gun laws while taking a BILLION DOLLARS away from his cops, effectively destroying any effectiveness they may have had on “defending” their citizens while making them “easy targets” along with the unarmed citizens. How STUPID do you have to be to do something like that. And remember, the mayor has his own “protection detail.” That has NOT been “defunded.” So do all the other politicians who disarm the PEOPLE while maintaining their on “security. This kind of stupidity is being repeated all over the country, and worse all over the world where they don’t have a Second Amendment. Why won’t these fools LEARN? They have to know their silly anti-gun laws don’t work worth a damn, but they continue to rely on them. And make new ones. (Just common sense)

Hick Admits It

 Ex Colorado Governor Hickenlooper admits the fact that gun laws would NOT have stopped the latest school shooing, or any others. But he still won’t do anything toward repeal of those silly gun laws his legislature made recently, and which got three legislators removed from office. This is typical liberal stupidity. They KNOW their laws do nothing to accomplish the goals they claim for them, but they still insist on making them. That shows stupidity beyond belief. But we expect it of liberals. They’re too stupid to realize tha they’re stupid, and they’re arrogant, too.(Just common sense)

Chicago: 87 Shot; 17 Dead

That’s a horrible headline isn’t it? But it’s routine in Chicago, which has very tight anti-gun laws on the books. Of the 87, three were CHILDREN! And I don’t mean teenage gang members, either. Children at age 7 and younger who were just caught in the crossfire as one gang shot up a family belonging to another gang. Mayor Lightbrain has no idea how to put a stop to this carnage, so she just wants to make even more of those ineffective, useless laws that haven’t ever stopped a single shooting death. Like most anti-gun fools, she blames the gun, and not the shooter. It’s not the gun. It’s the PEOPLE holding the gun that must be controlled. But people like Lightbrain don’t know that. She isn’t smart enough, it seems. The numbers keep growing in Chicago while the Chicago politicians keep blaming sources OUTSIDE Chicago for their “gun problem.” Of course, that’s an easy excuse, since unless the gun is MADE in Chicago, it MUST “come from outside.” Guns always come from somewhere else. And, of course, that completely ignores the guns made right there. (ABC 7 Chicago)

Cop Speaks for Second

Aaron Weiss, currently a cop in Dutchess County, NY and formerly a soldier who “went to war” to defend our rights, spoke out at a meeting of the county legislature as they met to decide whether or not to repeal New York’s “SAFE Act,” that stupid law made in the “dark of night” by legislators in panic over the shootings at Newtown, CT. He emphasized the fact that passage of that law was an act of cowardice, not bravery. He reminded them that the rights they so summarily wish to end were fought for by he and others and some did not come back to make this argument. We need more people like officer Weiss to speak out and remind anti-gun legislators of the facts of life—and death. (Eagle Rising)

Don't Bring A Gun

I hear stories about people bringing guns to demonstrations, some on the left, and others by right-wing counter demonstrators. This is not good. Bringing a gun to a demonstration clearly invites the other side to bring their own guns. Then predictably, some fool will start shooting, and people will die. The other side will shoot back, and the war is on. Demonstrations are no place for guns. Not if you want to stay alive. Tensions at demonstrations are always high, and often violence breaks out among demonstrators. I know that nobody wants to get beat up, but if I had a choice between getting beat up or getting shot to death, I know what I would choose. ANTIFA is just drooling over the chance to kill somebody for their political views, and to bring a gun to a demonstration is an “engraved invitation” to them to bring their own guns and, being armed, somebody is going to kill somebody. Riots are one thing. Demonstrations are another. But what you are inviting if you bring a gun to a demonstration is open warfare over political views—and that’s what ANTIFA wants. (Just common sense)

Gun Control Kills

In New Jersey, you must either be in the security profession or have a produce a “justifiable need” before you can get a “carry permit.” Which is actually pretty stupid because how often does a criminal give you warning before he hijacks yur car and kills you if you object? Is protecting your family a “justifiable need?” Apparently New Jersey cops don’t think so, even though such a “need” can be amply proved by circumstances. This case, in particular, where a man tried to defend against a carjacking and was murdered. This kind of thing is repeated, over and over, all over the country. But self-defense is STILL denied as a “justifiable need” by anti-gun politicians while people DIE because of it. What kind of FOOLS are these politicians? Their crime is a bigger one because they usually see to the protection of themselves and their own family while denying us the same rights, Constitution be damned. Sen. Diane Feinstein, for instance, one of the foremost anti-gun fools, HAS a “Carry permit” and carries a gun. Other such politicians have their own armed security. This is the work of imbeciles and needs to be stopped. (Joe the Plumber)

Grasping At Straws

“Everytown for Gun Safety” has labeled the Second Amendment as “a loophole that needs fixing.” What a bunch of buffoons they are! A constitutional amendment is NOT “a loophole.” It is a basic thing the Founders thought necessary in order for us to remain free. It enshrines the concept of self defense by guaranteeing us the right to buy and use the tools for it, guns. That’s because the lawbreakers have guns they usually obtain ILLEGALLY, and we need guns to be able to effectively defend against them. Everytown is like all anti-gun fools. They think that taking LEGAL guns away from the law-abiding, they can eliminate crime. That is a FANTASY. The law-abiding are NOT the problem. The lawbreakers ARE. And their laws do absolutely NOTHING to stop the lawbreakers from getting, and using their ILLEGAL guns. So all their laws do is make it easier for the lawbreakers to victimize the law-abiding, by disarming them. They’re not having much luck in getting the worst of their laws passed, and they’re getting frustrated. Which accounts for such a stupid idea that the Second Amendment is a “loophole,” and not a basic tenet of our laws and freedom. (Daily Caller)

Grannys Revolt

And Grandpas, too. They want to end Obama’s “death panels” before they can be formed. They hurled well-filled “Depends” (Not really filled) at legislators who want to end their lives through Obama’s “death panels” because it costs too much o keep them alive. Obama’s insensitivity to the elderly was highlighted. They would be wise not to mess with this bunch. They’re “armed to their false teeth” with second Amendments and will not hesitate to hurl them at the drop of a bedpan. Don’t mess with grandpa—and I’m one of them. We’ve been around long enough to know ALL the tricks. We were using them long before this current crop of politicians ever dreamed of being elected to office. (Patriot Action Network)

Self Defense With Guns

It used to be that an individual could use what is necessary to defend himself and his home. No more. A St. Louis coupe had the audacity to defend themselves and their home with guns after ANTIFA mobsters made some specific threats against them and marched on their home, threatening them further. Apparently, now only the leftists can threaten violence to anybody who disagrees with them. Of course, that just made the mobsters mad that they would have the audacity to actually defend themselves, so they published their name and address, inviting even more threats to them. One post on social media said this: “Someone identify these people. I don’t know the area. Get an address. I’ll help. Sue them, ruin their businesses, help their employees sabotage their capital, call their kids, call their family members, call their country club— use capitalism for the weapon it’s designed to be.” — kyle rezac-dennis (@krezacdennis) June 29, 2020 I guess today if you try and defend yourself against the mob, that mob will set out to ruin you. No longer is it acceptable for ANYBODY to disagree with a leftist mob. They will “target you” for destruction, and destruction is the only thing they’re good at. They have no answers, so they resort to violence. (Mic Drop Politics)

Ohio Schools Getting Smart

They’re no longer banning guns from their schools. They’re actually LETTING teachers and other staff carry their guns to school with them if they have “carry permits.” Saturday, December 14, 2013 marked the one year anniversary since a coward murdered his mother, stole her gun and her car, then drove to Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut. There he broke a window through which he entered the school, murdered several administrators then walked down the hallway and shot teachers before killing a classroom full of children. All told he brutally murdered his mother, six school employees and 20 innocent children before committing suicide.” There are current laws against everything he did that day, including killing himself. Did that stop him, or even slow him down? Hardly. Laws will never slow down such people. The only way to stop them is with a gun pointed in THEIR direction and a dozen or more schools in Ohio now realize this and are doing something about it. I’d lay odds any further would-be school shooters stay clear away from this dozen schools. (AmmoLand)

Background Checks Don't Work

Surprise, surprise! An anti-gun law that doesn’t reduce gun deaths. You’d think they’d learn, since none—not a single one—of the highly touted laws they pass to “protect you” from “gun crime” has ever prevented a single instance of gun crime. Background checks don’t prevent gun crime because the background checks can only be run on LEGAL gun sales, while ILLEGAL gun sales are not subject to a background check—and criminals and other malcontents, knowing they are going to use their guns for bad things will not make the mistake of giving the government their name and address, and the make and model of their gun or guns. Then there are “gun-free zones.” these are “free-fire zones” for the bad guys, who SEEK THEM OUT in which to do their dirty work because they can be pretty sure the law-abiding—who are their intended victims-- will not be armed, and able to effectively oppose them. Again, they only apply to LEGAL gun owners. Do you see a trend, here? Right: these laws ONLY apply to LEGAL gun buyers and owners, and NOT to the criminal element. The same is true of ALL their anti-gun laws, which is why they’re ALL so ineffective in “reducing gun crime.” I won’t go into other anti-gun laws, because I would be repeating myself. They ALL have the problem that they CANNOT apply to the criminal element in our society. (WAMU)

Change the Constitution

Many liberals have talked about changing the Constitution to better allow them to usurp our rights. They want to change, or eliminate the First, and the Second Amendments. Some want to change other tenets, but these are the major ones. These Amendments need to remain the same. To amend, or eliminate the would allow a despot to “take over” and do as he/she pleases with us. What I propose is a change to eliminate one of the serious mistakes the Founders made when they wrote it. What my suggested change does is apply a PENALTY to legislatures and legislatures, at whatever level, if they make, or even TRY to make changes and pass laws that do not conform to the Constitution. The Founders thought it would be sufficient to embarrass them by reversing those laws that are unconstitutional. That’s not enough. There needs to be a PENALTY for even attempting to pass a law that does not conform to the Constitution.

Legislatures regularly pass such laws, and enforce them until the Supreme Court finally gets around to declaring them unconstitutional. Another change would allow people to challenge laws without having to spend a bunch of money so that this gap could be reduced. Currently, the only way the Supreme Court can get involved is after a suit has been filed, and has run through the lower courts. There needs to be a more direct path so that unconstitutional laws cannot ruin lives before being so declared. One such law is the RICO Laws, which are unconstitutional on their face. They are designed to deprive people with a lot of money of their rights, and trample on other’s rights to accomplish it. They have never been successfully challenged, and they need to be. The State of Virginia is planning an unconstitutional gun grab, and adding such a punishment might just inhibit such actions. (Virginia Mercury)

Make Everybody Defenseless

That seems to be the goal of the anti-gun fools. They’re not just after your guns, they want to take away ALL means of self defense. That shows graphically by their “knee-jerk response” to ANY violence, with, or without guns. It is to take away from the law-abiding ALL means of self defense. If you use a large ash tray to stop a criminal from hooting you, the first thing they want to do is take away ALL your large ash trays, so you can’t use them to defend yourself in the future. They SAY they do it to “protect you,” but what they always do does NOT protect you. It makes you more vulnerable to attack from the law-breakers, who never have any problems getting their guns. They just buy them from a thug in a back alley somewhere, or just steal them. It’s easier to buy a gun illegally than legally. NO paperwork. No waiting periods. No convincing the seller you have a “good reason” to have a gun. You just have to “know somebody” and have the money. You don’t have to stand for a background check. The anti-gun fools don’t care a whit about your self defense. They just want your guns, while you die the next time a law-breaker brings his ILLEGAL gun to shoot you. (Just common sense)

Gun Control Is Foolish

Why am I writing this again? Gun control, as written, is a damned fool action. It does not do what it is advertised to do, and only violates the Second Amendment rights of innocent people, leaving the field open to those law-breakers who ignore such laws and victimize the innocent. I have to keep writing this over and over again because when I do, like the gun laws themselves, I am ignored by the gun-grabbers in their zeal to disarm all Americans, for whatever reason. They DO work the way the politicians wish they would work. They do reduce the possibility that those politicians’ minions will run into a gun when they come to take our property under color of law. Hitler knew it. Stalin knew it, and Castro knew it. And every would-be despot, everywhere knows it: the first thing you need to do on taking power is to disarm your populace, Then you can do with them as you will because it will then be illegal just to have the means of self defense—a gun. So they cannot defend themselves against any criminals, even those wearing badges. Criminals love anti-gun laws, because it makes life easier for them as they go about victimizing honest people. (Bearing Arms)

Practical Stupidity

That is gun control. Gun control, as we know it, does not work. All those who promote gun control have to know that, yet they continue to make their useless, unenforceable gun control laws that do nothing but destroy the entire concept of self defense while getting honest, law-abiding people killed. Why do they do that? Are they just stupid? Or do they have an ulterior motive? The only ulterior motive I can see for the anti-gun fool promoters is the “cushy jobs” they have, paid for by those gullible “contributors” to their anti-gun fool campaigns. For anti-gun fool politicians however, the ulterior motive is two-fold. One, it gives them more power to tell us what we can, and cannot do. And two, when the time comes for that politician to come for your property, he or she wants to face as few guns as possible. Those have emerged as the obvious ulterior motives, since they have to know their laws do NOTHING to stop, or even slow down “gun violence” and, instead, INCREASE it. So the first thing we need to do is get rid of every politician who supports gun control by voting them out of office, or not voting them in, in the first place, At the same time, people need to stop sending money to the damned fool anti-gun fool demonstrators. (Just common sense)

Banning Self Defense

I don’t know why they don’t just ban self defense, and be done with it. Everything the anti-gun fools do stops ONLY innocent, law-abiding people from being able to defend themselves against the law-breakers who just IGNORE their many laws and get their guns illegally. Then they go out and shoot them with their illegal guns. I just don’t understand a society that abhors self defense. But, to be honest, it’s only the politicians (mostly Dumocrats) who are always responsible for all those silly anti-gun laws. Show me a politician who makes anti-gun laws, and, Republican or Dumocrat, I’ll show you a wannabe despot. It’s the only real reason I can see for them to do everything they can to eliminate self defense. They want to come and take what isn’t theirs, and they don’t want to get shot when they try it. Every time someone fires a gun in anger (and sometimes not in anger), anti-gun fools jump up and demand more laws that keep the law-abiding from being able to defend themselves. And gutless politicians jump up and make more stupid laws to help. Their laws never stop a single instance of “gun crime.” If you tell them that, they immediately start calling you names, accusing you of wanting people to get killed, when that’s what THEY want. That’s it. Bottom line. (Virginia Mercury)

It's Beginning

I’ve been predicting the start of a civil war for a long time, and ANTIFA is bringing my prediction to life. I’ve also said that the time will come when someone in an ANTIFA crowd will bring an illegal gun to their demonstration and will shoot and kill somebody who opposes them. Fortunately this time, lousy marksmanship stopped a killing, but otherwise, it was just what I predicted. An SUV that was not involved in the “demonstration” (riot) was instantly surrounded by screaming rioters and the driver, afraid rightly for his life, accelerated through the crowd of swarming rioters. Not one, but TWO demonstrators pulled guns, but only one fired, hitting the driver. Then he put his gun away and continued “demonstrating” until he was arrested and charged with attempted murder later. This write-up goes to great lengths to disguise the nature of the “demonstrators,” but they were ANTIFA. Today’s “latter day KKK.” If ANTIFA is not designated as a “Domestic Terrorist Group,” allowing the arrest of its members just for being a member, this is not only going to continue, but will inevitably escalate into open warfare in the streets. (Deseret)

The AG Lies

Attorneys General are supposed to be the pre-eminent authority on what is, or is not lawful in their state. I remember, years ago, when I started selling tear gas guns for self defense, asking the Indiana AG for a “ruling” on their legality, and got one. The most recent “ruling” by the Virginia AG is a LIE. He should be ashamed of himself. Yes, their “red flag laws” ARE laws. At least, as far as he is concerned. One little problem. If a law does not conform to the Constitution, it is NOT A LAW. It is as if it did not exist. And as such, you are not forced to obey it. Yes, the legislature passed it, and the governor signed it, both knowing it was unconstitutional, hoping to enforce it until one day, long in the future, the Supreme Court got around to so declaring it. Long after the damage has been done to innocent people. In New York State, the governor is increasing the prison financing, knowing he’s going to illegally send people to prison for having LEGAL guns. Virginia will have to do that’ too. Because they are not going to be able to afford all the innocent people they send to prison with their unconstitutional law without a lot more money in the prison budget. (Town Hall)

Self Defense Now Illegal

Apparently it is if you live in St. Louis and are attacked by an angry ANTIFA mob. An innocent couple watched as an angry mob approached their property with “blood in their eyes.” So they got their guns and went out to defend themselves. One of their guns was a dreaded AR-15 and the mob, which had already destroyed an expensive gate, turned and ran for the hills at the sight of the guns, cowards that they are. Nobody was hurt, which I’m sure would not have been the case if the mob had not have been stopped in their tracks by the display of a legally-owned gun. Without that, I’m sure that home would have been destroyed and the owner killed—at least the homeowner thought so. Now a crooked politician who got himself elected DA plans to charge them with something. I don’t know what kind of a crime he can “tailor” to fit this situation, but this crooked lawyer, who is himself under investigation for corruption, can figure something out to use. And will, if not stopped by “wiser heads.” We need to have something that can be done in situations like this, where a lawful citizen is attacked, and uses a gun to defend himself against an illegal mob. Oh, wait! We DO have something we can do about it. It’s called the Second Amendment! Unless this crooked lawyer can find a way around it, and other crooked politicians team up to let him get away with it. (Fix This Nation)

NYC Spiraling to Disaster

We need to get rid of that doofus who sits in the mayor’s chair in New York City before he creates a complete crime disaster in that city. He is seeing to it that hundreds, maybe even thousands of prisoners, some violent offenders, get released, using the excuse that he is worried about them catching the virus, while at the same time cutting the police budget by $100 BILLION dollars, which effectively cripples them in their effort to keep those living there safe. That is a “recipe for disaster,” and anybody with a modicum of knowledge can see it. But DiBlasio cannot. At the same time he is making it almost impossible for the law-abiding to obtain guns for self defense while law-breakers have no problem getting guns—which is a second recipe for disaster. These actions have already caused the DEATHS of many people, yet he keeps those policies in force. In just 7 days recently in NYC, 97 people have been shot, 11 fatally. Which is a testament to the lack of shooting ability of most of the shooters. But it’s only going to get worse as DiBlasio does more and more stupid things while ignoring the deadly result. He needs to be forcibly removed from office as he isn’t going to resign under any kind of pressure. He has shown that. (Radio 1010 Wins)

Racism As An Excuse

The Dumbocrat Party seems to be the home of racism today. Everything they do seems to be about what they imagine to be racism, and some damned fool citizens accept their premise and do some of the damndest things. Like firing a utility truck driver for cracking his knuckles, saying he was “making a white power gesture. Then there are the fools who want to disband the cops, leaving them, and everybody else defenseless against law breakers while, at the same time, making guns harder to get for the law abiding, who are not the problem. And in Seattle, a corrupt Dumbocrat city administration lost control of a section of their city and the chaos that will be coming is showing its ugly head in the two shootings there which the cops were not allowed (by the occupiers) to investigate. And mark my words, those will not be the last killings in that “autonomous zone.” therein lies stupidity and lack of control over those who would break the law. And they want to use YOUR MONEY to pay for things they have no business paying for, to buy the votes of those who wish they could live at the expense of others. They want to pay for college for all, and give Medicare to everybody without considering whether or not they can even afford to do that. But they never do. They just promise, and it never happens because once they get elected they learn their lessons that there isn’t enough money in the world to pay for it all. And it’s all because of racism, according to them. (Just common sense)

Does Open Carry Increase Violence?

The anti-gun fools think so. So I guess we can expect cops, who practice open carry e very day, to start shooting each other all over. No? What’s different between cops and ordinary people? Really nothing. But they don’t go around shooting everybody just because they have the right to carry a gun, something denied to the rest of us. Anti-gun fools think we’re all uncontrollable fools who can’t be trusted to carry guns in self defense without “losing it” whenever somebody angers us. I had a carry permit in Indiana for many years and, except for practice in a shooting range, I don’t think I ever fired it. Am I different? I doubt it. I’m a typical responsible person; the kind of person anti-gun fools don’t recognize. But you’ll never convince them of that. They’re unalterably and illogically AGAINST anybody but cops and government agents carrying guns. That’s illogical, but logic isn’t a part of their makeup. (Jackson Free Press)

Solution to the Problem

In West Palm Beach, Florida (where I used to live), in response to the riots, the mayor, who is a Bloomberg supporter, declared a “state of emergency” and banned the sale of guns and ammunition. Of course, those of us with any degree of intelligence (which apparently doesn’t include this mayor) know that does NOTHING to stop the law breakers from getting their guns—and it is the law breakers who ARE the problem, not the law abiding. So their solution to the problem is to make the potential victims of gun crime completely defenseless against it, while doing nothing to stop it. Remember, this was where I found a sign posted that said, “NO CRIME ZONE.” expecting that to put a stop to crime. They have proved their stupidity time after time, and I’m glad I no longer live there. I don’t want to be completely defenseless against the ILLEGAL guns out there. People are going to die because of this, but like most politicians, this mayor will be good at deflecting the blame for the deaths he responsible for. (Daily Caller)

"Carry Craze" Scary

At least, to some people. But it isn’t a “craze.” To call it that cheapens it, and that’s their aim. If it’s nothing but a “craze,” there’s no logical reason for it, except in the minds of those so “crazed.” But it isn’t a “craze.” It’s a logical wish to be able to defend ourselves against those criminals who carry ILLEGAL guns and want to victimize the rest of us. As that Texas woman who had a carry permit but who was forced to leave her gun in the car when she went into a restaurant, and had to watch, in horror, while a criminal with an ILLEGAL gun, who didn’t feel the need to obey this restriction murdered her parents, along with several other people. I read often when somebody walks up to a car and points an ILLEGAL gun at the driver to “carjack” the car. I want that to be the LAST thing that man ever does. I’ve had “carry permits” before. And I have not ever killed anyone in a “willy-nilly” fashion. Or any other.(Mississippi Gun News)

Why Cops Carry Guns

Some fool politicians seem to think that sending unarmed cops out to enforce the law is a good idea. It is NOT. At any given time, a situation that SEEMS to be innocuous can escalate into a shooting death for the cop if he/she is not armed and ready for self defense. No amount of “gun control” is going to stop dedicated law breakers getting the guns they use to victimize the rest of us, so the cops need to be armed, or they’re just as defenseless as we are. It’s made worse by the fact that politicians almost everywhere think all they have to do is make a law against something and nobody will do it. That is disproved every day, and in every major city in the country that has a “gang problem” or a “crime problem.” It is well known that gang members and other criminals are ALWAYS armed, and almost always by guns not registered to them. Sometimes they buy them illegally, other times they just teal them. But laws against LEGAL gun ownership do NOTHING to stop their use—because criminals don’t obey laws. That’s why we call them criminals. (Just common sense)

Black Lives Don't Matter

At least, not to other blacks, if the rate they kill each other off is any indication. Now they’re into killing black CHILDREN at age 7 or 8. Nothing is said about that while they rail about the tiny number of black people killed by cops, usually while they are trying to kill those cops. Nothing is said about maybe there’s a good reason why cops seem to sometimes “shoot first and ask questions later,” but they have a good one. So many black men are ILLEGALLY armed and trying to shoot them. Meanwhile those who shout “Black Lives Matter!” refuse to admit that ALL lives matter which, to me, discredits them, entirely. Regardless of race. Of course, they will call me a racist for pointing these things out. But these things are TRUTH, and I’m in the truth business. They apparently, are not. Their problem is that they can’t state the truth, so they tell lies, instead. Like that lie that cops go out, each day, looking to see how many black men they can kill. Truth is, cops killing black men without obvious cause is at about the 1% level or smaller. Not even a blip on the horizon. But a blip that is promoted, far and wide, every day, until people believe it. And that makes people mad, which is what they want, so they can use that anger to promote their own narrative. Which included getting rid of the cops, so they can rob and kill at will. (Just common sense)

Gun Bans Work?

In New Zealand they don’t have the equivalent of our Second Amendment. So after a major shooting a few years ago, they passed what was essentially a complete gun ban in their country. So NZ ought to be the safest place on Earth, right? WRONG! They still have armed police “until it is shown that is not necessary.” How the hell will they ever know when it is “not necessary” for their cops to be armed so they can defend themselves? Maybe they thought it “wasn’t necessary” the other day in Aukland, where two cops were shot during a “perfectly innocent traffic stop,” with one of them being killed, and the other wounded. Truth is, it will NEVER be “unnecessary” for their cops, or any cops, anywhere, to go unarmed. They found that out the hard way in France some years ago when unarmed cops had to hide behind their cars and watch while a couple of gunmen murdered eleven people for “publishing a picture of Muhammad.” Was that the end of unarmed cops in France? Probably not. Politicians are well known for ignoring obvious lessons while continuing policies that get people killed. Such policies in NZ are as useless as they are elsewhere. If gun bans worked, that NZ cop would still be alive. (TVNZ)

S & W Sticks It To Gun Control

Smith & Wesson, a premier gun maker, has “Stuck it to gun control” by stopping selling guns in California altogether. If you want to buy a S&W gun, you’re going to have to go outside of California. Which is going to cost California gun stores a lot of money. Politicians never think about the RESULTS of the laws they make, only what they THINK will happen—which is usually what does NOT happen. Personally, I think ALL gun makers should stop selling in California, completely. Leave gun sales in California to those ubiquitous back-alley “out of the trunk” illegal gun sales, on which the state gets NO taxes, and no tax money from legal gun sales. (Just common sense)

They're Giving Up

That’s what they’re doing in Chicago. Maybe they’ve finally realized that none of their tight anti-gun laws do a damned thing to limit gun crime, so they have announced that they will no longer respond to active shootings—this right after Mayor Noodnick told her citizens NOT to use their legally-obtained guns in self defense and call 911. What the hell would be the point of calling 911 if the cops aren’t going to respond? You’re screwed, Chicago. You’ve got an incompetent mayor who has no idea what she’s doing, but who thinks she’s got a handle on it. Meanwhile, the people who live there are shooting and killing each other while she tells her cops NOT to respond to active shooter calls. “Just let them do it,” she says. How that stupid bimbo got herself elected mayor is a mystery unless you consider the intelligence level of a majority of Chicago voters. I’ve even got a nephew who lives there, but I doubt seriously if he voted for her. He’s too intelligent for that. You don’t solve the gun problem by not responding to active shooter calls. That’s surrender. And competent politicians don’t surrender. They do what they CAN to alleviate the problem, whatever it is. That’s just the opposite of what this incompetent bimbo is doing. (Mom At Arms)

"39% Own Guns"

39% OWN GUNS: Giving the LIE to former president Obama’s claim that a “majority of Americans like my anti-gun laws,” 39% now OWN guns, which is up from 34% in a 2012 survey (It was 50% in the 70s, before the defense against anti-gun laws got going). Obama claims aside, there were more laws passed in 2013 to loosen the laws against guns for individuals than to tighten them, although Obama predictably, when he lost in Congress, did much the same things they stopped him from doing by law “administratively.” You’d think politicians would learn that it ain’t smart to take their guns away from Americans. Their Second Amendment is precious to them, and they’re not gonna take kindly to their attempts to take them away. But NO! They’re “tone deaf” to suggestions that taking guns away from honest people while criminals still easily get guns because they aren’t concerned with obeying laws. I’ll be surprised if that ever changes. Anti-gun politicians are “hard-headed” that way, in SPITE of logic. Indeed, liberals deny the very EXISTENCE of logic and reason. They’re FOOLS, but we (not me) keep electing them, so we (not me) deserve what we get. (United Liberty)

As Predicted

The minute I heard about Mayor DiBlasio’s actions regarding the police and “drawing back” on law enforcement, I predicted that crime would skyrocket in NYC while people die because of his stupid actions. And, right on time, it has happened. Shootings and murders are up 100% (now more than 500%), and people are dying. Rioters and other criminals are swarming into NYC because of the promised LACK of enforcement of the law. There were 40 shootings there from June 1 to June 7. Compare that to only 24 shootings in 2019. This kind of prediction is the easiest thing there for someone with any degree of intelligence. Something DiBlasio apparently doesn’t have. Other cities likewise have decided to “draw back” from enforcing laws and have seen similar increases in violent crime. Los Angeles, for instance, has seen a 240% increase in murders. And note, most of these cities are run by Dumbocrats. Meanwhile, each of these cities have very tight anti-gun laws, which the law breakers routinely ignore. These are routine predictions I make on a regular basis—but apparently, nobody is listening. (Breitbart)

Nosy Doctors

Today, many anti-gun doctors are questioning children and their parents about their gun ownership and advising them to get rid of them. The first question is, who told them to ask? Obama and his thugs? Next question is, what’s it to them? What right do they have to ask these questions? And do patients have to answer them? At least one patient refused to answer and was told to take his business elsewhere, which he gladly did. Nobody wants to patronize a doctor who asks unnecessary questions based on their political opinion, then give ignorant advice. In Florida, they’ve even made a law against doctors asking, and refusing service if they refuse to answer. Florida seems to be way ahead of the rest of the country when it comes to guns. (Uncommon Gunsense)

No Doubt About It

The Mississippi governor knows what Louisiana politicians don’t know, apparently, that those homeowners who brought out their guns to oppose violent “demonstrators” who had already threatened their lives and property. It used to be that self defense of your life, your family, and your property was a given. Enshrined in the Constitution. But that was before liberal Dumbocrat politicians managed to get themselves in power. These fools don’t care about constitutional protections. To them, the Constitution is only an impediment to their wishes, and they ignore it as much as they can, making and using laws for their own purposes and enforcing them until the courts rule against them, which may take years. In Louisiana, the local prosecutor, a liberal Dumbocrat, doesn’t think self defense is a given. She said, “I am alarmed at the events that occurred over the weekend, where peaceful protestors (sic) were met by guns.”

She apparently doesn’t know the law, and she really should, considering her job. Or she just doesn’t care about the law if it goes against her personal feelings. And those “protestors” were NOT “peaceful! They had already threatened to kill them, burn their house down, even kill their dog. They broke a gate to enter and were advancing on the house when the McCloskys confronted them, standing in front of their home with their guns. They would have been within their constitutional rights to shoot them. The prosecutor apparently thinks allowing “demonstrators” to invade private property and threaten to kill the owners trumps the owners’ right to self defense. It does NOT. Somebody needs to instruct this “prosecutor” in the law. I expect a judge will do that if this ever comes to court—unless that judge is similarly biased. (Breitbart)

Revolution Coming

Way back then, King George found out that you don’t mess with our right to be armed for self defense. His efforts at gun control in “The Colonies” cost him a country. He tried to take the colonist’s guns away and they “whupped him.” He thought they couldn’t win because he was strong, and they were not. But they did. The state of Virginia is in a similar position, right now. Their AG is insisting that, since the “Red flag Laws” were made, we MUST “knuckle under” and allow the state to “take their guns” at will. The “gun rights” movement has been accepted by 114 counties, where they have pledged NOT to enforce that law, since it is unconstitutional. That should tell the despots in their legislature and the governor’s office something. But it does not. Can a revolution be far in the future? I don’t know. But if they persist in their efforts, how can it NOT come to armed resistance? And if it does, they have my personal full support. The revolt might not be successful, but many will die in defense of our Second Amendment right to be armed. (Washington Examiner)