Friday, July 21, 2017

Gun Control--Then Reality

California is flailing about in all directions trying desperately to “control” guns and thus reduce, or eliminate “gun crime.” They have no idea what they're doing, and the sum effect of all their laws is getting law-abiding people, who OBEY their laws, killed and injured, while the criminals and other “bad guys” disobey them. They just can't understand the fact that the “bad guys” disobey laws for a living, and are not likely to obey their useless laws. All their laws are a mish-mash of micro-managing that defies understanding and are, themselves, difficult to enforce. Clearly, the best defense is an offense—which means we need to allow the law-abiding to have and use guns for their own self defense to counter the millions of ILLEGAL guns already out there in the hands of the bad guys. But the anti-gun fools aren't intelligent enough to realize this truth. They shudder at the very thought of law-abiding people with their own guns, while bad guys already have their own guns. Disarming yourself is NOT the way to self defense, but they'll never know that. Their minds are made up, so don't confuse them with facts. (Breitart)

Gun-Grabber's Ignorance

Letting female victims of their men's beatings have guns for self defense is bad, because it adds the possibility of deadly action to the equation.” That's what this “gun-grabber” who writes for Huffington Post thinks, anyway. Maybe she should find an abusive boyfriend. Maybe her opinion might change, but that's doubtful. Anti-gun fools aren't smart enough to recognize reality. She really thinks abuse victims should have NO WAY to avoid serious injury, or even death at the hands of their abusers. Does she have a better answer? No. She just tells people what to do or not to do and is willing to take the risk--for other people. The unfortunate truth is, she is right, at least in that anti gun fool cops and prosecutors will more than likely arrest and imprison her when she DOES defend herself with her gun, legally carried, or not. They shouldn't have the power to do that, when it is clearly self defense. But they do. In any case, I'd rather be in prison than in a coffin. (Truth About Guns)

Thursday, July 20, 2017

Dream On, Babe!

Shannon Watts, boss of “MOMS Against Guns” (or something like that) says, “I sense momentum in the push for gun safety in state regulation.” Really, Shannon? What about all the states passing concealed carry laws? A MAJORITY of states now have such laws in force. Actually, I sense momentum in gun RIGHTS at state level. They call their silly laws, “gun safety,” but they are ANYTHING but that. They make law-abiding people HELPLESS against the ILLEGAL guns held by criminals and other “bad guys.” Their laws simply get innocent people KILLED and injured, but they're too stupid to perceive reality. Every time their laws are proven to be useless, they push to make MORE of them, while innocent (and guilty) people suffer. We tell them and tell them, that their laws don't work, but they're not listening. It's like throwing a rock at a boulder. It just bounces off their cement-like skulls. Chicago is one of the best examples of that: with all the TIGHT gun laws in force there, Chicago has been declared a “war zone,” and the National Guard has been called out. Visitors are being warned to be careful when going out. (Guns)

Guns: "Only for Killing"

Anti-gun fools say that guns are manufactured ONLY to kill. They're wrong—guns are also manufactured to SAVE people from being killed by “bad guys” who MISUSE them. Without guns for self defense, many more INNOCENT people will be killed by those who MISUSE their guns for criminal purposes. What they don't know, or ignore, is that ANYTHING can be used for good OR ill, and guns are no different. They can be used to kill an enemy, or to provide food for the table. Fire is another thing. It can be a big help by keeping you warm and by allowing you to cook food to eat and keep you warm, or it can destroy huge areas and kill many people if it is MISUSED. Then there's the hypodermic needle. It is commonly manufactured for medical use, where it is used, every day, to save lives, and make the lives of sick people more comfortable. It can also be used by “druggies” to slowly kill themselves by injecting poison into their veins to “get a high.” Drug users commonly use “dirty needles” and often kill themselves without knowing they're doing it. The point is, most everything can be used for good or ill, including guns. (Quora)

Wednesday, July 19, 2017

"Chicago Is A War Zone"

I don't know how many were shot this most recent weekend in Chicago, but over the 4th of July weekend, 84 people were shot, and 11 died. Rahm Emanuel, the mayor, has asked for the assistance of the National Guard, to help keep the peace. That's just one step below declaring full martial law in Chicago. I've been in Chicago on business, and at the time had no idea how dangerous it was just to be there. Many people are actually calling Chicago as much of a war zone as Iraq or Afghanistan. That's saying a lot. And the Dumocrat leadership (Obama's former left-hand man) has no idea how to stop it, save to make more of the kind of laws that have FAILED to stop it, so far. They aren't smart enough. (The News Nerd)

"Common Sense Gun Control"

Anti-gun fool activists are asking, “Will Trump's new FBI Director support common sense gun control?” Good question. When will they come up with some? They certainly haven't yet. Every “gun control “ measure they have come up with so far does NOTHING to stop, or even slow down “gun crime.” In fact, all they do is make it worse by making honest, law-abiding people who actually OBEY laws defenseless in the face of all the NON-law-abiding people who do NOT. That's NOT “common sense,” that's a tragedy, since it gets innocent people KILLED. “Gun-free zones,” for instance. There isn't a single mass shooting that hasn't occurred IN a “gun-free zone.” Criminals candidly tell us that they SEEK OUT gun-free zones in which to do their “dirty deeds” because they can be pretty sure there won't be any “law-abiding person” there who has a gun with which to shoot back. Things like “gun locks,” and “safe storage” that involve locked boxes that take MINUTES to open when the “bad guys” already have their guns out and ready KILL people. All their other “common sense gun laws” are just as bad. Wray will do well NOT to support them. (Outdoor Life)

Tuesday, July 18, 2017

"Real Men Don't Need Guns"

That's what the female gun-grabbers say, but they don't want you to know that THEY do. Recently, they did a “march” from Fairfax, VA to Washington, DC to PROMOTE anti-gun legislation, PROTECTED BY ARMED GUARDS. This is a typical contradiction they don't even seem to understand. They're not too bright. If they were, they'd KNOW that the laws they support are USELESS to stop, or even slow down gun violence, because the perpetrators of gun violence don't OBEY laws—ANY laws. So why do they expect them to suddenly obey theirs? They need to find some kind of solution the worst criminals can't ignore, instead of continuing to insist on making USELESS laws nobody obeys. But that will never happen. These people are too STUPID to come to such a conclusion. They just keep on making laws than only make law-abiding people defenseless, and killing people, while being blissfully unaware of that. (Keep and Bear)

Phony NRA Members

Although there are really just 5 MILLION NRA members, 14 million people SAY they're NRA members. Why, I don't know. Maybe it's just wishful thinking of people who may have ONCE been members and feel like they still are, and maybe many of them only claim membership so pollsters will ask their opinion AS a NRA member. The NRA never gives out member information, so there's NO WAY pollsters can get that information except to ask the NRA itself to poll their members, which they regularly do. But pollsters from all over PRETEND to know what NRA members think, and it's only a PRETENSE. Other people CLAIM NRA membership so they can give pollsters false information, and pollsters paid for by anti-gun fool groups “eat it up” like a puppy licking an ice cream cone. I'm sure that's how they came by their strange idea that a MAJORITY of NRA members SUPPORT their silly, ineffective “gun laws” that do nothing but get law-abiding people KILLED by keeping them DEFENSELESS against ILLEGALLY armed criminals. They talk incessantly about how many people are killed by guns, IGNORING the fact that almost ALL of them are killed by ILLEGAL guns. (NRA-ILA)

Monday, July 17, 2017

Gun Lies & Damned Lies!

The anti-gun fools are spreading the MYTH that a majority of Americans WANT gun control. Evidence that this is a lie is the fact that MOST of those silly “gun laws” are defeated. The very fact that there is a big fight over gun rights should be an indicator to intelligent people, but doesn't make a dent in the stone-like heads of the anti-gun fools. What Americans want is “gun SAFETY.” The laws that have been made, and are currently in place have done NOTHING to stop, or even slow down “gun violence.” They are NEVER going to stop gun violence with these laws because the people who use guns for ill simply don't OBEY laws. To think that, all of a sudden, they will obey THESE laws is imbecilic. But the anti-gun fools will never “Tumble” to that. (Orlando Sentinel)

Deluded Anti-Gun Fools

They think the Dumocrats are losing elections because they're not sufficiently anti-gun! They also say that only 19% of gun owners are members of the NRA! Really? Then where do they get their millions and millions of members? Pew Research recently came out with a poll that purported to show that 84% of Americans supported background checks. I don't know how they get such figures. Maybe they do their polls in the lobby of the Dumocrat National Convention. Joe Scarborough thinks Dumocrats lose elections because they are so vocal about their SUPPORT for gun control! DUMOCRATS! What FOOLS these people be! Voters support gun SAFETY, not gun CONTROL. There's a difference. One that escapes anti-gun fools. They continue to think their useless gun laws “protect people,” when in fact, they get people KILLED, by DISARMING them, while the “bad guys” never have any problem getting their guns, in places where the gun laws are the tightest—like Chicago, where their laws are some of the tightest in the nation, while they have the single highest gun death rate in the nation. They try and ignore that. (Huffington Post)

Friday, July 14, 2017

Injecting Racism

The liberals inject racism into everything. We've become so used to it, many of us don't even notice it, any more. Meanwhile, racist professors tell us that BEING white is racism. They use anything they can to CREATE black against white racism, and certain blacks are “eating it up,” because they think it empowers them. The cartoon pictured is subtle in it's injection of racism into the “gun question,” but it's there, for all to see. They take standard phrases and tell us they are “code words” to mean racism, so they can CLAIM racism where it does not exist. These people spend all their time SEARCHING for racism, in everything that happens, which indicates racism on THEIR part. Yes, there are a few racists left. They had almost disappeared when Obama began whining about racism in his attempt to get a race war started, so he could exploit it. That he failed during his 8 years of terror says a lot about the REAL racism situation. (Just common sense)

Deluded Survivor

Tiara Parker, who survived the shooting at the “Pulse Night Club” in Orlando, Florida, is now helping to push a gun control law that would have done NOTHING to stop the shooter at the Pulse Night Club. The politicians working to pass the law probably know it would be completely ineffective in stopping such shootings, but they work to pass it, anyway, because it makes them “feel good” about “doing something,” whether or not it does any good. That's what the anti-gun fools do—infringe on our constitutional rights to make themselves “feel good,” while actually getting people KILLED by disarming them in the face of all the ILLEGAL guns already out there in the hands of people who just want to do us ill. One of these days, SOMEBODY will come up with a REAL law that will do some good, but it won't be these people. And these people will probably oppose it. (KVPI Channel 6)

Thursday, July 13, 2017

Making Americans Defenseless

That seems to be the purpose of the anti-gun fools, not “stemming gun violence,” as they claim. Every time we find something we can use to defend ourselves, whether it is a gun, or something else, they want to outlaw it. I once was in line at a 7-11 store with a uniformed cop behind me. I had one of those metal flashlights in my pocket, and that cop took notice. He said, “You know, that could be considered a weapon, don't you?” I replied, “Yes; and if I ever use it as a weapon, we can discuss it then.” He just laughed, but his question revealed a mindset in many cops and legislators. ANYTHING that can be used as a weapon, they want to outlaw. Every law they make (so far) does its best to make the guns we DO have useless for self defense. Gun locks, gun safes, and laws regulating the storage of guns do exactly that: makes them USELESS for self defense because they cause it to take way too long to “get it into action” when we are threatened by a thug wielding an ILLEGAL gun.

Then there are such things as “gun-free zones,” where law-abiding people don't bring their guns, but criminals DO. They IGNORE such laws, and actively seek out such places, because they know that law-abiding people will not usually be armed for self defense so they can victimize them, at will. They have to know their current laws are USELESS to stop criminals with ILLEGAL guns from victimizing law-abiding people, but they keep making them, anyway—which says a lot about them. So it's no wonder places like Chicago, which have some of the tightest gun laws in the land, also have the highest numbers of gun crimes anywhere. They have to know that, too, but they will not hear of allowing law-abiding people to have and carry their own guns for self defense against ILLEGALLY-armed criminals, even though the Constitution guarantees us that right. (Just common sense)

Deluded Anti-Gun Fools

They think the Dumocrats are losing elections because they're not sufficiently anti-gun! They also say that only 19% of gun owners are members of the NRA! Really? Then where do they get their millions and millions of members? Pew Research recently came out with a poll that purported to show that 84% of Americans supported background checks. I don't know how they get such figures. Maybe they do their polls in the lobby of the Dumocrat National Convention. Joe Scarborough thinks Dumocrats lose elections because they are so vocal about their SUPPORT for gun control! DUMOCRATS! What FOOLS these people be! Voters support gun SAFETY, not gun CONTROL. There's a difference. One that escapes anti-gun fools. They continue to think their useless gun laws “protect people,” when in fact, they get people KILLED, by DISARMING them, while the “bad guys” never have any problem getting their guns, in places where the gun laws are the tightest—like Chicago, where their laws are some of the tightest in the nation, while they have the single highest gun death rate in the nation. They try and ignore that. (Huffington Post)

Wednesday, July 12, 2017

"Gun Control Is Racist"

That's what a writer at Salon thinks, anyway. She talks about Trump's “heavy handed” enforcement of gun laws, which is completely non-existent. She compared gun violence reports to the old “red line” policies of the past (80 years ago), and found similarities. Thus, she determined that gun control was racist. I really get tired of liberals always coming out with new things that are “racist,” based on the thinnest “evidence” possible, and which stretch the definition of racism to the limit. She “found” that neighborhoods red lined 80 years ago have higher incidences of gun violence than anywhere else. That does NOT indicate racism. It indicates the FACT that more people LIVING in those neighborhoods COMMIT gun violence. It has nothing to do with the fact that the neighborhood was “red lined.” Liberals work HARD to try and convince the rest of us that as many things as possible are actually racist, even if they have to twist the truth unmercifully to accomplish it. By so doing, they cause the word “racism” to become meaningless. (Salon)

"But Not for Thee"

Congress is saying, “Guns for we, but not for thee.” There is a movement in Congress to allow members of Congress to be armed, after the shooting of Rep, Scalise. Members of Congress have begun to realize the fact that they are sorely threatened, and have no means to defend themselves. Rep. Mo Brooks says, “’Right now when we’re in Washington, D.C., once we’re off the complex … we’re still high-profile targets, but we have absolutely no way to defend ourselves because of Washington, D.C.’s rather restrictive gun laws,’ Brooks, R-Ala., told Maria Bartiromo on ‘Sunday Morning Futures.’”

And he's right. The same rights should be recognized for all of us, but they're not. Every one of us is subject to being attacked, injured, and even killed, every day, at home, or on the street. We're high profile targets and have absolutely no way to defend ourselves because of the “rather tight gun laws” in most areas of the country. Even the “gun-grabbers” in Congress could be armed, while attempting to make more and more laws PREVENTING us from doing the same. The contradiction here is obvious, made even more obvious by the danger to members of Congress that are equal to our own. (Oath Keepers)

Tuesday, July 11, 2017

Only In Chicago

Chicago has some of the toughest “gun laws” in the country, ALL of which violate the Second Amendment, but do NOTHING to stop those who wish to do us ill from getting a gun. The Second amendment clearly says, the right of ALL Americans to be armed, “shall NOT be infringed.” But they make laws and regulations all the time that DO “infringe” on that right, which is guaranteed by the Constitution. Example: In Chicago, there has been a STRING of armed robberies, one of them featuring a SIX-YEAR OLD, brandishing a gun. Show me ANYWHERE it is legal for a six-year old to have and use a gun, never mind what this one used it for! And somehow I suspect the guns those ADULTS used in their robberies were not legally bought. It is obviously very easy to get ILLEGAL guns in Chicago, and the “bad guys” take full advantage of it. That's in SPITE of those “tough gun laws. So what the hell good are they? One day, the anti-gun fools will find a law that really works, and I'll be right with them. But I'm not holding my breath waiting. I'm not fond of turning blue. (NBC Chicago)

FBI: "Gun Control Didn't Work"

The FBI recently came out with a report that basically says, “Gun control, as we know it, wouldn't have stopped the Alexandria shooting.” Virginia anti-gun fools say “lax gun control in Virginia is responsible,” but that's wrong. The guns the shooter used were bought LEGALLY in Ohio, not Virginia. It is said that he shouldn't have even been ABLE to buy a gun because he had been CHARGED with domestic abuse in the past. Note: he was “charged,” but not CONVICTED. Thus, he had a “clean record.” He is also known to have converted one of his guns to take an illegal magazine, after purchase. Frankly, NONE of the current gun control laws now in force would have had a bit of control over his gun purchases or modifications. And if they had, he simply would have gotten them ILLEGALLY, as most criminals do. (National Review)

Monday, July 10, 2017

Phony "Study" Results

A recent “study” by an outfit that puts out “findings” KNOWN to be biased “found” that concealed carry laws “caused” increases in felonies by concealed carriers. In areas where crime rose after a concealed carry law was passed does NOT mean it CAUSED that increase in felonies. Their biased figures included felonies in TRAFFIC cases which did not even involve a gun. The truth is, gun felonies by concealed carriers are in the THOUSANDTH of a percentage of ALL “gun crimes,” which they ignore. Typically, gun carry permit holders WILL be arrested, even if their actions were in self defense—until the cops can determine that. Very few CONVICTIONS were recorded. This outfit never responds to criticisms of their “studies,” but just go on, as if nothing ever happened. They continue to put out flawed “studies,” as if they were true. Their “studies” are therefore ALL questionable. But the anti-gun fools use them regularly. (Crime Prevention Research Center)

Gun Laws Mean Nothing

Not to criminals and other bad guys, anyway. Whoever told the anti-gun fools they could stop them from their crimes by making a law that says people who don't OBEY laws cannot be armed is ignorant. And the politicians who believe that crap are incompetent. Criminals who have been asked their opinion of gun laws tell us they APPROVE of them, because it makes it a lot easier for them to rob and kill, since the chances of their intended victims being armed is a lot smaller. And that's something the anti-gun fools will never understand. They don't have the INTELLIGENCE to understand that all they are doing with their insane laws is making it easier for the bad guys to victimize the law-abiding people who DO obey their laws, and thereby getting many innocent people killed. (Just common sense)

Friday, July 7, 2017

I Would Want To

The New York Times asks, “Who would want to live in a world where everybody is armed for self defense?” My answer is, Me. I would want to. I'd feel a lot safer if good people carried guns to protect themselves, and me, from the “bad guys” who carry their guns ILLEGALLY, in spite of all their “gun laws.” People who are dumb enough to ask such a question completely ignore that little fact, and keep honest people disarmed, so the “bad guys” can victimize us at will. By so doing, they make life a lot more dangerous for everybody. But don't tell them that, doing so is like throwing a rock at a boulder. It just “bounces off.” And they keep on making laws that only get good people killed, as in Chicago, where they have some of the tightest gun laws in the nation, coupled with some of the highest gun crime stats. But they never learn from experience. They just make excuses, blame something else, and keep right on making their deadly, USELESS gun laws, while innocent people die. (Breitbart)

"Alexandria Shooting Funny"

Chelsea Gentry-Tipton, head of the DNC's “Black Caucus” in Oklahoma, wrote, in a Facebook post, that she “found that shooting funny.” such insensitivity seems natural to Dumocrat operatives, and when her resignation was demanded, she “apologized,” using the usual Dumocrat talking points they all use when caught out”: “You took me out of context”: “I'm the victim, here”: and the one all black politicians use, “If you're not black, you don't understand.” She also did what most anti-gun fools do, she insulted the NRA and everybody who believe in our right to self defense and to own and use the tool to accomplish it, a gun, when she said, “The very people that push pro NRA legislation in efforts to pad their pockets with complete disregard for human life." Yeah, having a hard time feeling bad for them. Yeah, “complete disregard for human life.” Opposing their USELESS gun laws that only get people killed is “having complete disregard for human life.” And this is the kind of fool we have representing us in too many places. (Conservative Tribune)

Thursday, July 6, 2017

Worse Than We Thought

Yesterday, I wrote a post saying that 6 people were killed out of 20 shot in Chicago over the Fourth of Jukly weekend, in spite of all their very tough gun laws. But then the figures came in, including MONDAY, and those figures rose to 15 dead out of 102 shot. It's a WAR ZONE in South West Chicago! And there are innocent people getting killed in that war, which is mostly between street gang members who use ILLEGALLY-owned guns. 56 year old Tyrone Burdine was shot to death in his front yard, and his death was witnessed by some CHILDREN who were nearby, who barely missed getting shot, themselves. This carnage must END—and the kind of laws anti-gun fools are constantly making while patting themselves on the back for “doing something about gun violence” are doing NOTHING to stop it, or even slow it down. In fact, it's making it WORSE, by DISARMING law-abiding people so they're “sitting ducks” as criminals shoot each other all around them with their ILLEGAL guns in their war. We keep telling them this, while they can see it for themselves, but they don't learn from their mistakes, and more and more people get hurt and killed, while the blood is on THEIR hands. (ABC 7, Chicago)

Calif. Throws Blame Elsewhere

California anti-gun fools are frustrated. They feel that their already way too tight “gun laws” aren't good enough to stop the flow of guns into their state from elsewhere. So now they want the Congress to make even more and tighter laws, nationally. What they don't realize, and never will, is that ALL their laws do NOTHING to “stop gun violence,” and never will, so long as they target the GUNS, not the people using them to commit crimes. You CAN'T stop guns coming into the state completely. There will ALWAYS be a “black market” in guns, EVERYWHERE. Every law they make makes honest, law-abiding people DEFENSELESS against the MILLIONS of ILLEGAL guns out there. And they do it in spite of the constitutional guarantee of our absolute RIGHT to be armed in self defense. Allowing law-abiding people to be armed as the “first line of defense” against ILLEGAL guns is something they simply won't even consider. They're THAT stupid. (S.F. Chronicle)

Wednesday, July 5, 2017

Stay Away From Chicago!

If you want to stay alive, that is. Thugs killed 8 people and wounded a total of 60 people, just over the July Fourth weekend. In spite of all their very tight “gun laws.” What has to happen for the anti-gun fools in Chicago to learn their lesson? That all their silly laws not only do NOT stop, or even slow down the fool gang members killing one another and others? Telling them this is like throwing a glass of water into a lake. It just “doesn't compute.” They're not intelligent enough to “tumble” to that fact. A law should be made to eliminate such people who make such laws from the legislature AND from the city lawmaking bodies for stupidity. And in New York City, a thug shot and killed a female cop from ambush. Of course, New York City is well known for their tough gun laws, which did NOTHING to keep a gun out of the hands of the killer. Cops did accomplish that in this case—by KILLING she shooter. (Chicago Tribune)

Worse Than I Thought

I thought VA Gov. Terry McAuliffe was crazy when he said “93 Americans are killed every day by guns.” That was an impossible number that didn't happen. But he's loonier than I thought. His figure was actually “93 MILLION Americans killed by guns every day.” 93 MILLION! And this man is the GOVERNOR of Virginia and a former Democrat National Committee Chairman! How did such an ignorant man ever get to this point? Corruption in politics, is how. They've got things fixed, everywhere on the East Coast. When he is put out of one job, he gets another. When a Democrat elite wants a new political job, the “powers that be” “fix it” for him/her. That's how Hillary got that senatorship, to set things up for her to run for president. They even dispensed with her most important opponent for her. Before that, it's how she got to be Secretary of State, with NO experience, anywhere, that qualified her for such an important position. She really screwed up badly there! Previous to that, all she was, was the WIFE of a president and a governor, and that's ALL. None of that qualified her to be a senator, OR Secretary of State. And CERTAINLY not president. And the same thing is true for Terry. He's obviously too ignorant to be a governor, or anything else except, maybe dog catcher. And probably not that, either. (Breitbart)

Tuesday, July 4, 2017

"May the Fourth Be With You!"

Happy Fourth of July! This is one of the most important of dates, I believe, because it reminds us of our beginnings, and our FREEDOMS—at least the few we still have left, with liberals all over the country working tirelessly to take them away from us, one by one, starting with our guaranteed Second Amendment right to self defense, and to own and use the equipment to make it happen, a gun. Today, we need a “permit” to do almost anything important, and the power to require a permit is the power to say “no.” So revere this holiday, because it is more than an excuse for a cookout and fireworks.

"Didn't Work; Need More"

The New York Times admits that all their tight gun laws did nothing to keep that doctor from wreaking revenge for his firing in that hospital in the Bronx. New York State was the first state to pass more stringent gun laws in the wake of the Sandy Hook shooting, in which 20 CHILDREN and 6 staff members were gunned down. But that law, called the “SAFE Act,” has done NOTHING to stop people like this doctor from killing people. One of its provisions is limiting magazine size to 10, but this mad doctor had three magazines, so he had his 30 rounds. He did have a record, but it was a misdemeanor record, which does not stop him from buying guns. All their laws do is disarm law-abiding people so that mostly nobody in that hospital was armed, making them “sitting ducks.” That's what ALL the anti-gun laws in this nation do: keep law-abiding people disarmed, and thus unable to defend themselves against people like this—and they want more of the same. (New York Times)

Pushing Gun Control

As I predicted, gun control advocates lost no time using the shooting in Alexandria to tout gun control. Virginia Governor Terry McCauliffe was the first to stand in the blood of the victims of the Republican baseball practice (for a charity ball game) and demand more USELESS gun control laws. He said that “Wednesday is not a good day to talk about gun control,” then proceeded to talk about gun control. But he's not smart enough to know that the way to “gun safety” is NOT to disarm the populace. And, of course, he wildly exaggerated the number of deaths by guns, saying 93 people die by gunfire every day. It's a typical anti-gun fool LIE. (Daily Caller)

Monday, July 3, 2017

I'm Back!

Well, vacation's over. I was the birthday present for my sister on Saturday, and it was a present for me, too. I also got to see most of the rest of my extended family there. Everything went smoothly until I was on the way back. We got on the plane, then it broke down. It was getting wrong electronic readings, so they had to take us off it and find a new airplane. Other than a three-hour wait, everything else went okay, Now I'm baaacckk!

Ignorant Judges Making Law

An ignorant judge in Florida thinks legislators can't make law—only judges do that. This judge ought to be removed from the bench for ignorance. County Judge Milton Hirsch recently ruled that legislators “overstepped their bounds” when they revised the self defense law, putting the burden of proof on prosecutors. An unattributed quote in the article said it best: “How can this individual sit on a bench and say stuff like that without fear of being tagged as a moron and removed for cause? If he cannot understand the principle of Separation of Powers, he does not need to wear the black robe.” This judge only showed his complete IGNORANCE by this ruling, and is sure to be reversed by the next court up—unless it is the Ninth, whose judges are just as ignorant. The Ninth is the most reversed court in the land. (Gun Free Zone)

We'd Be Sitting Ducks!

And so it begins--those who dirty their drawers at the very idea of law-abiding citizens being armed, so they AREN'T “sitting ducks” if somebody comes into a peaceful ball game and starts shooting at random will have their say. And on the other side, those who think it would be okay for everybody to be armed, just in case will also have their say. Who is right? It only took two guns in the friendly hands of the ONE security detail there to “neutralize the threat” by “pinning down” the shooter who opened up on the unarmed crowd of congresspeople assembled there to practice for a charity baseball game. But what if every congressperson there had had ONE armed security person there. Likely that shooter would have been dead a lot quicker than he was, and all those unarmed people would not have to fear for their lives.

One of my favorite scenes in a movie was the one where a gunman walked into a bar and tried to hold it up. The next sound was of 43 guns being cocked, while the robber stood and was surrounded by 43 cocked guns. Turns out it was a “cop bar,” and the WRONG place for him to stage a holdup. Nobody was hurt, not even the would-be robber. But the fact that everybody there was armed made a lot of difference in his plans that day. Truth is, if more people go about armed, they most likely won't just “go wild” and shoot up everything in sight, like anti-gun fools think they would do. Like those cops, their guns would stay in the holster until needed, then would come out and put such a would-be shooter in his place. (Just common sense)

Friday, June 23, 2017

On Vacation

I will not be posting for most of the next week, starting Saturday. I will be on probably my first ever vacation. I will be there for most of the week, at least until Wednesday, maybe longer. But I'll be back the next Monday, rarin' to go. This may be my last chance before “the big eight-oh.”

Thursday, June 22, 2017

WaPo Pushes False Figures

In an obvious effort to make gun control look good, the Washington Post says that most of the 1,300 fatalities they mention are accidental deaths of CHILDREN. What they fail to mention is that a lot of them were suicides of people in their late teens, and of the others, most are gang members killed by other street gang members in “drug buys gone wrong.” Like all anti-gun fools, they regard guys up to 19 as “children.” This gives a false perception that this many TODDLERS are getting killed by guns. The “bad guy” in this case is, as always, the NRA, which teaches that public EDUCATION, which they provide, results in fewer suicides. Gun control, as we know it, DOESN'T WORK. It only serves to make the anti-gun fool think they're doing something REAL to stop gun crime—but they're not. They actually INCREASE gun crime, because they DISARM honest, law-abiding people while doing NOTHING about all the ILLEGAL guns in the hands of the bad guys. We keep telling the anti-gun fools that, but it's like bouncing a rock off a boulder. They just aren't listening. (America's First Freedom)

Thank God for Scalise!

If Rep. Scalise hadn't been at this charity baseball practice for congresspeople, what we would have now been reading about would be a mass murder case. Rep. Scalise is the Majority Whip, and gets a security detail consisting of two Alexandria cops. That way, when this deranged Bernie Sanders supporter and Trump hater started shooting at this “target-rich environment,” there would have been nothing there to stop him killing everyone there in the time it took for other cops to respond to the 911 call. TWO guns, in the hands of trained cops, made all the difference, killing him before he could shoot any more people. Forget the fact that they were cops. They were two “good guys with guns,” and they stopped his plans from fruition. In reality, there should have been MANY people there with guns to protect against such an occurrence. Anti-gun fools dirty their drawers at the very thought of average Americans being armed for self defense. Never mind that, without them, more people would suffer. But anti-gun fools don't have the INTELLIGENCE to figure that out. (USA Today)

Wednesday, June 21, 2017

Misguided Lawmakers

In California, they passed a law allowing teachers and other school staff to be armed, so that, if some crazy came to their school to kill children, they could shoot back, Now, you'd think that would be a good idea, wouldn't you? But Assemblyman Kevin McCarty (Dumocrat, of course) doesn't think so. He has introduced a measure that, if passed, will DISARM those teachers, who are NOT the problem, and leave them DEFENSELESS when that crazy comes to their school to kill children, which IS the problem. When that happens, they'll just have to wait until the cops (finally) get there to dispatch the crazy with THEIR guns. Meanwhile, the crazy will have killed many children, and probably some staff, as well.

I don't know what's wrong with people like McCarthy, but it's catching. Lawmakers all over the country have succumbed to it, and are getting people killed in large numbers. McCarthy says, “It is essential for there to be a 'safe environment' in which children can learn and that is not possible when civilians are allowed to 'roam the halls,,' armed.” What makes him think teachers and other staff who have been deemed sufficiently responsible to be ALLOWED to carry their guns on campus are a problem is beyond me. But the thinking of ALL anti-gun fools escapes me. They're just not logical in their thinking. I would even go so far as to say they are STUPID. (Breitbart)

Stabs Mom, Shoots Himself

In Chicopee, Mass. A 15-year-old boy stabbed his mom to death and then used a gun to end his own life. But, how is this POSSIBLE? Like in Chicago, they have all those tight gun laws in Massachusetts! His mom shouldn't have even been ABLE to get a gun! But, as usual, all those tight gun laws don't do a thing to keep guns out of the hands of law-abiding, OR lawless people. Anti-gun fools will no doubt include this instance in their “gun violence” stats, even though the gun part was a suicide. They do that, you know, to make their stats look worse than they are. This again proves that all their ignorant gun laws do NOTHING to stop such actions. But do they pursue other means and methods? Nope! They keep making the same USELESS laws over and over, and get more and more people killed, since they're made DEFENSELESS in the face of all the ILLEGAL guns already out there in the hands of people who don't bother with permits or registration of their guns. (U. S. News & world Report)

Tuesday, June 20, 2017

Violent Politics

Have you ever heard of violence being committed by REPUBLICAN politicians or their supporters? Have they ever gone “into the streets” and RIOTED? I don't think so. But the same can't be said for the Dumocrats. There have been many riots in support of their efforts to dislodge Donald Trump from the office he LEGALLY earned in the 2016 election, and, while it has not been PROVED, there is word that there are many PAID demonstrators among them, paid by the Dumocrats. Then there are the individuals who are moved by the Dumocrat rhetoric to do violence. Such as the shooter in Alexandria, VA, who, following Bernie Sanders' advice, put several Republicans in the hospital before the cops killed him. This guy actually made sure they WERE Republicans before he started shooting. He actually had a LIST of Republicans he wanted to kill! He “camped out” at that park in his van for THREE MONTHS before he did his “dirty work,” showing a complete premeditation and dedication to his wish to kill Republicans because he didn't agree with their politics, and he BELIEVED the crap the Dumocrats put out. (National Review)

Shutting Down A Politician

The wife of the police chief in Hartford, CT knows whereof she speaks. After an ignorant anti-cop politician made some particularly ignorant statements about cops in her support of a bill that, if passed, would further hinder the cops in doing their jobs, she sent her a letter. That politician referred to the cops as “cowboys with bats and guns” and said, “too many cops are killing kids and this has to stop.” In her letter in response, this wife told that politician that she was ignorant, and could not pass “situational training” and make the instant decisions made every day by a cop. That she should be ashamed of herself, and wondered how this ignorant politician even stayed in office with all her conflicts of interest and ignorant decisions. That cops had gotten into “shooting scrapes in Hartford only 20 times recently, and only killed one person in the last four years—and that shooting was entirely justified. Follow the link to read her letter completely. It's very satisfying to those who prize our police and wish them well. You know--those of us with intelligence. (Bearing Arms)

Monday, June 19, 2017

"Americans Want Gun Control"

At least that's what Dumocrat pollster Maggie Omero says. She recently took part in a poll to promote gun control. She said they fielded 16 different proposals on gun control, and THAT was assumed to be proof that “Americans want gun control.” Of course, she gave no details on those proposals, because there probably weren't any. Nor was there any mention that any such proposals (IF they actually exist) came from people who took part in their poll BECAUSE they were anti-gun in the first place. They were only in her imagination. CNN commentator Marc Lamont Hill said “We need to get beyond the power of particular lobbies if we're going to get anywhere,” not mentioning the fact that that the top “lobbyist” organization is the NRA, which is supported by millions of Americans who don't agree with their fantasies. The unfortunate part, for them, is that that statement revealed their bias in FAVOR of more limiting gun control laws. Anti-gun fools like to fool themselves that a majority of Americans really WANT gun control, but it just is NOT true. And their continued losses when attempting to make such laws is proof of that. (News Busters)

A Study for THAT?

A “new study” by anti-gun fools says, “Pro-gun people are motivated by fear.” And, of course, they used a NAZI to illustrate the story. They needed a “study” to prove that? For a change, they're right, but not in the way they think. Yes, people are scared—scared of being DEFENSELESS when faced by a “bad guy” holding an ILLEGAL gun. Their “gun laws” do NOTHING to stop criminals and other bad guys from getting their guns, but only stop law-abiding people from getting them for self defense, making it easier for the bad guys to victimize us. They have a RIGHT to be scared—I'M scared. At my age, criminals regard me as “easy pickings.” I want to disabuse them of that opinion—permanently. I want the tools to be able to do that, which is being denied me by the “powers that be.” Every law or regulation they make is DESIGNED to make it easier for illegally armed criminals to victimize me, and that infuriates me. (Truth About Guns)

Friday, June 16, 2017

Just Like I Said

Private gun owners DO make a difference in crime, contrary to what anti-gun fools say, and here is yet another example: two bloody murderers escaped prison after murdering two guards with their own guns. They ransacked a house for clothes, food, and money. Fortunately for the owners of the house, they weren't at home, or they'd have been killed, too. Then they stole yet another car so the cops wouldn't know what they were driving. But that didn't do them any good, either, for they were soon involved in a gunfight with cops that had them fleeing through the woods to yet another house, where they tried to steal yet another car. But the homeowner, a “badass” himself, stopped them and held them at gunpoint until the cops arrived and took them into custody. They wisely did not name the homeowner in the news reports, apparently to keep from making him a target for their friends. “Don't mess with Texas,” of course, but don't mess with this Tennessee resident, either. (The Daily Wire)

Kardashian Gun Control

Kim Kardashian, like most anti-gun fools, wants ARMED security for herself, while denying it to the rest of us. That seems to be a “hallmark” of many anti-gun fools. One anti-gun columnist (now dead) actually SHOT at a teenager that he found using his pool without permission. Fortunately for the teen, he was a lousy shot. Many anti-gun politicians run around behind a WALL of armed protection—again, while denying that right to the rest of us. Sen. Diane Feinstein, one of the most outspoken anti-gun fools out there, in ADDITION to her armed security, has her own gun permit, and carries her own gun. Such things illustrate the hypocrisy of the anti-gun crowd. They think there is no “disconnect” here, since most of them (Feinstein excepted) don't carry guns, themselves, but HIRE armed security for protection from “the masses.” All this in VIOLATION of the Constitution of the United States, which recognizes the inherent RIGHT of ALL Americans to be armed in self defense. (Daily Caller)

Thursday, June 15, 2017

Unarmed Cops Baffle Citizens

They just can't figure out WHY several countries put UNARMED cops on the streets, KNOWING that most, if not ALL neer-do-wells are likely to be armed. And they can't figure out the fuddled thinking of politicians who think DISARMING their citizens is the way to self defense. It frightens me to see unarmed cops running AWAY from a couple of men in London who are STABBING people in the streets, or cowering behind the doors of their patrol cars watching in France, while Islamic terrorists kill eleven people at a satire newspaper who had the audacity to draw a PICTURE of their “prophet.” And I'm not scared of much of ANYTHING. But the world that the ignorant politicians we have elected are creating scares the hell out of me. For only the second time in my life, I want to get a “carry permit” and carry a gun, so I won't be helpless if attacked. My own BROTHER, an ex Marine who is 70 years old, repulsed two would-be muggers who had knives, with his "sword cane" and now carries HIS gun when he goes out in case they were gang members who might come back with reinforcements. It's a scary world we're living in now, due in no small part to those IGNORANT politicians who think the way to self defense is to DISARM ourselves. (Glenn Beck)

Ignoring the Proof

In Alaska, Arizona, and Wyoming, they made laws that made carrying a gun, openly or concealed, legal without a “permit.” And gun murders PREDICTABLY dropped significantly. We told the anti-gun fools, and they yawned. It was like throwing a rock at a brick wall. It didn't even make a dent. Which is proof of something else: that they aren't interested in “reducing gun crime,” they're only interested in disarming law-abiding citizens, making it easier for armed criminals to victimize people. They'll deny it to their dying day, but that's the real life result of their stupid “gun laws.” They're trying now to stop people from calling it “gun control,” wanting them to use the term, “gun safety,” instead. A typical liberal way to change people's thinking through changing the words they can use. (Breitbart)

Wednesday, June 14, 2017

Another Shooting

There's been another major shooting in Alexandria, VA. One of the injured is a U. S. congressman. It happened at practice for a baseball game between congresspeople, and I predict it will be used by the anti-gun fools to make sure NOBODY who is law-abiding is ever allowed to have a gun to defend him/herself from such attacks. That's what the anti-gun fools do: make sure everybody is DEFENSELESS if they OBEY laws—which it is obvious this shooter does NOT. The anti-gun fools have no imagination. They know only one way to MAYBE stop “gun violence” in America. That is to take away the means of self defense from people who obey laws. That this makes those people DEFENSELESS means nothing to them, apparently. Lawless people are not bothered by their laws. They just go out and shoot people and DAMN their laws! (Yahoo)

"Target-Rich Environment"

It was a “target rich environment” in Alexandria, VA, where Republican congresspeople were practicing for a charity baseball game when shots rang out, seriously wounding one congressman and two cops, among others. There were MANY congresspeople there, most without any kind of protection from people such as this Bernie Sanders supporter/Trump hater. Scalise has a security detail, and they sprung into action, killing the shooter before he could hurt any more people. Two “guys with guns” stopped this from becoming a massacre of specifically Republicans. It is said that he specifically ASKED if these were Democrats or Republicans before opening fire. When innocently told they were Republicans, he happily opened fire, hoping to kill as many as he could. This proves again what I've been saying, all along. That one or two guns on the premises can STOP such shootings in their tracks. But the anti-gun fools still aren't listening, and are already demanding more of their USELESS laws keeping honest citizens unarmed and defenseless. (CNN)

Tuesday, June 13, 2017

"Common Sense Solutions"

They call their USELESS gun laws” “common sense solutions” to gun violence, which seems to be “out of control.” Only their solutions AREN'T “common sense,” don't work, and gun violence is NOT “out of control. It's DOWN. And they are now saying that “70% of NRA members support MOMS.” Hoo, ha! Giggle, giggle! Thanks, people, I needed a good laugh, and you've provided it again. They SAY they support the Second Amendment, but they're LYING. One of the things they inadvertently brought out in this article is that every instance of “gun violence” happened where the “gun laws are the tightest. And, of course, the anti-gun fools are still counting people up to age 19 (street gang members) as “children,” and including suicides to make their figures look more alarming. (The Baltimore Sun)

Dancing In Their Blood

The anti-gun fools are “dancing in the blood” of the Pulse Night Club victims in Orlando, FL. Florida lawmakers gathered NEAR that club to demand even more of the INNEFFECTIVE gun laws that FAILED to stop the killers of 49 people there. Now they want to make a law to keep even people who commit misdemeanor hate crimes from owning a gun. Such a law depends on those people actually OBEYING their law; something they have already demonstrated they don't care about. That's the basic problem with ALL the current anti-gun laws: they DEPEND upon lawbreakers to OBEY them, and they DON'T. They ignore their insignificant laws and commit more serious crimes. We tell them and tell them, but telling these gullible politicians that is like throwing rocks at a boulder; it just bounces off without making a dent. It's not like laws against murder or rape; those laws are made to PUNISH the perpetrators. The anti-gun laws are made to “stop gun violence,” and do NOT. They INCREASE it. (Guns)

Monday, June 12, 2017

"This Is WAR!"

That's what Florida Sheriff Wayne Ivey, in Brevard County says, when he told his citizens to “arm yourselves,” after another shooting in Orlando killed FIVE people. “Folks, now more than ever is the time for our citizens to be prepared to serve as the first line of defense, not only for them, but for their families,” Sheriff Ivey said, in his post on Facebook. He says, among other things, that they must be prepared to be “the first line of defense” in what constitutes a WAR. “What they (terrorists) don’t count on is being attacked themselves, having to become defensive to save their own lives,” Ivey argued. They don't count on being attacked in return, and having to worry about losing their own lives before the cops arrive to kill them. He told them that those precious minutes that go by before the cops can arrive can mean life or death for everybody who isn't armed, and he couldn't be more right. This guy is a “gem” of a police politician. He must be a former “cop in the trenches” to know so much. Police politicians usually aren't that smart. Some people applauded this, but others (fools all) said he was “fear mongering.” Since when is it “fear mongering” to tell people the truth that may keep them alive? (Fox News)

They're Smarter Than Politicians

Gullible politicians buy the bullsh-t put out by the anti-gun fools and become anti-gun fools themselves. They lie, alter statistics, and fill us full of bulldung to support their mistaken notions. In Great Britain, they basically BANNED guns for the populace after a major mass shooting. They DISARMED their populace, making them literally DEFENSELESS against all the ILLEGAL guns already in the hands of “neer-do-wells” who only want to do us ill. They THINK they're doing a “good thing,” but they're not. They're getting people KILLED by disarming them while IGNORING the menace of criminals, crazies, and Islamic terrorists, who have no trouble getting their ILLEGAL guns wherever they live. They look in HORROR at the very idea of the average citizen being armed in self defense. In England the people want their gun rights back after THREE major terrorist strikes in three months. But will the politicians listen? Probably not. That would take INTELLIGENCE. (Tribunist)

Friday, June 9, 2017

Gun Law Frenzy

The Los Angeles Times actually said recently, that “The right to bear arms is more dangerous than terrorism.” They're in PANIC, folks! They see state after state realizing reality and approving concealed carry for law-abiding human beings, and that frightens them. Never mind the millions of ILLEGAL guns already out there in the hands of people who want what's yours and are willing to just TAKE it. They apparently WANT those crooks, crazies, and Islamic terrorists to prevail. Every law and regulation they pass or support DISARMS honest, law-abiding citizens and makes it easier for the “bad guys” to victimize them. And if we come up with something less than a gun that is an effective way to defend ourselves, such as the disguised stun gun, they want to make THAT illegal for us to have and carry, too. I was once told by a cop that the metal two-cell flashlight in my back pocket could be considered a weapon. I told him, “If I ever USE it as a weapon, we can discuss it, then.” (America's First Freedom)

More Gun Control, More Crime

That seems to be what's happening more and more, every day. Places (like Chicago) that have extremely tight gun laws, also have the worst “gun crime” problem in the nation. It's just as bad in Europe. “Throughout the 20th century, various nations in Europe tightened their controls on guns owned by law-abiding citizens. In many cases, the new controls amounted to bans on entire classes of firearms, licensing and registration requirements for the few firearms that could be owned, rules on storing guns and ammunition, and bans on possessing the guns in public for self-defense, whether said guns were carried openly or concealed.” And gun crime spiked. It's as predictable as the sun coming up in the morning, but gullible anti-gun politicians don't know it\. They keep making laws and regulations to limit law-abiding people in gun ownership and use, while doing NOTHING to do the same for the “bad guys. (America's First Freedom)

Thursday, June 8, 2017

"Use What You Can"

That seems to be what the Islamic terrorists are telling their “believers” today. With all the “gun laws” tightening up because of their deadly pursuits, guns are becoming harder to come by (though not impossible). So now they tell them to use whatever they can find to kill unbelievers. Trucks? You can rent those easily, and use them to mow down innocent unbelievers like hay in a field. Knives? Go in any kitchen. You can use them to stab everybody in sight. Pressure cookers? Go back to the kitchen. They make dandy bombs. Hammers? Any hardware store. Recently in London, a rental truck was used to kill a bunch of people, and when it stalled after killing a bunch of unsuspecting people, the killers jumped out with KNIVES and stabbed everybody they could in the eight minutes before “good guys with guns” arrived to kill them. The next day in Paris, a man attacked a cop with a HAMMER! And, of course, since a “good guy with a gun” was the one under attack, the hammer-wielder was stopped. All this proves again what I've been saying, all along. If they can't get guns, they'll use anything they can find to kill people. So getting rid of guns makes NO difference. (BBC)

Ban Rental Trucks!

Islamic terrorists use them to kill people! They're just too easy for the average person OR a terrorist to get! Their other important uses are unimportant, compared with their ability to kill people if misused. This is the same argument used by the anti-gun fools in their constant efforts to violate the Second Amendment of the Constitution, and is just as stupid. You don't stop people who want to do others ill by banning the items they use to accomplish it. If you could, you would have to ban many things we use, every day, for constructive purposes, such as knives, cars, trucks, pressure cookers, and many other things that CAN be used to hurt people. That would be as STUPID as it is to ban GUNS because they CAN kill people. There are some people who NEED to be killed, and cops kill them, every day. Usually while they are trying to kill the cops with their ILLEGAL guns. (Just common sense)

Wednesday, June 7, 2017

"They'd Shoot Each Other"

British anti-gun fools tell us it's a good thing the killers in London only had a rental truck and some KNIVES to use to kill innocent people in London. That if it happened in America, where guns are so easily available, the death toll might be HUNDREDS, rather than seven as armed and panicky people shoot wildly and probably shoot more innocent people than terrorists. How STUPID is that? If anybody in the crowd had been armed, and TRAINED in gun use, they could have killed the attackers DURING the eight minutes it took armed cops to finally arrive and kill the terrorists (and who didn't accidentally kill any citizens). As usual, they giggle at the whole idea that the common citizen might be well trained in gun use and well able to put down a couple of crazed terrorists without killing each other. Requests for background checks have increased a LOT after those attacks in London. (Truth About Guns)

He's Getting It Right

Unlike several other victims of (and relatives of victims of) gun violence, he isn't out there trying to disarm everybody. He's campaigning AGAINST anti-gun laws, since they're a USELESS exercise, anyway. Most mass shooters either don't get their guns legally, or they haven't yet committed a crime so they can easily pass those highly vaunted “background checks.” Claude Colgan's sister was killed in the “Montreal Massacre,” which preceded Columbine by many years. He's against laws that only punish the law abiding while doing NOTHING to reduce gun crime. I also understand that a Columbine survivor is now a Colorado lawmaker and is staunchly pro-gun. That these people are more intelligent than some others, like the “Brady Bunch” and “MOMS Against Guns” (or something like that) is obvious. Taking guns away from law-abiding people is STUPID. But don't try and tell that to anti-gun fools. Their minds are made up, so don't confuse them with facts. (PJ Media)

Tuesday, June 6, 2017

"Run: Hide: Tell: Throw Beer!"

That's how an UNARMED population “fights back” against Islamic terrorism, according to the British PM. After a major shooting a few years ago, the British did the only thing they could think of; they DISARMED everybody so they'd be perfect victims of subsequent attacks. In this case, the attackers didn't even use guns! They first ran a rental truck into a crowd, killing some, injuring many. Then they jumped out and started stabbing everybody they could, until the armed cops finally arrived and killed them. The Islamic terrorists are, instead of using more highly technical methods, now using very simple measures. Tools that cannot be banned, and are all over the place, like rental trucks and knives. The victims were reduced to fighting back with chairs, tables, and mugs of BEER. Until the “good guys with guns” appeared and ENDED the terrorists. The simple logic that allowing the average citizens to be armed in self defense seems to escape the British authorities, as it is mostly here. And they have no Second Amendment to make it harder on the politicians to disarm them. (Daily Caller)

"Making Children Killers"

Proving their ignorance yet again, the anti-gun fools are telling us we should never allow our children to play with squirt guns because it makes KILLERS out of them. As with most of their ignorant statements, they have no real basis for that, except for their hatred of guns, in any form. They even hate POP TARTS shaped like guns, or a child's FINGER used as a gun to play “cops and robbers.” They're so frightened of guns in the hands of anybody but the COPS, they dirty their pants every time they even HEAR about a gun. They see a PICTURE of a gun and they cower. To think squirt guns make killers out of kids is STUPIDITY and complete HYSTERIA. But then, they just don't see how that makes them look like the FOOLS they are. (Daily Caller)

Monday, June 5, 2017

British Anti-Gun Stupidity

They continue to field UNARMED cops, in spite of the fact that ARMED Islamic terrorists are “running wild” in their country, killing and maiming their citizens. What's going to happen when an UNARMED cop comes upon an ARMED terrorist? Just what DID happen recently, where some unarmed British cops came upon some ARMED terrorists and had to run. In Borough Market, they came upon some men indiscriminately stabbing people, and they turned and RAN. What the hell GOOD are unarmed cops? And these bad guys didn't even have guns! Like the unarmed cops in France, who were seen cowering behind their cars while terrorists killed people within their sight, unarmed cops are USELESS in the face of ARMED criminals and terrorists. Some of their cops actually REFUSE to carry guns! Frankly, any cop who will not carry a gun isn't FIT to be a cop. (Daily Caller)

Ignoring the Obvious

The police chief in Los Angeles warns that “There will be an apocalypse if national concealed carry passes.” Which shows his abject IGNORANCE about guns and crime. He thinks allowing law-abiding people to have guns to defend themselves is a “bad thing,” totally IGNORING the millions of ILLEGAL guns already out there in the hands of criminals, crazies, and now Islamic terrorists who have PROMISED to kill as many “unbelievers” as they can. Police politicians commonly ignore this as they go about trying to disarm honest people and make it easier for criminals to victimize them. Never mind the fact that the Constitution explicitly recognizes our RIGHT to be armed in self defense, as we were before such stupidity as their current “gun laws” were enacted. This police chief needs to ask the cops “in the trenches” if they agree with his ludicrous crack, on an anonymous basis. So they can answer truthfully without fear of reprisals. (Breitbart)

Friday, June 2, 2017

Didn't Make A Dent

In Chicago, which, with some of the tightest “gun laws” in the nation, they confiscated 118 guns from just one gang, and it didn't make a dent in the “gun problem” in Chicago. They put more than a thousand more cops on their streets and that didn't help, either. All these guns were ILLEGALLY owned, but they don't talk about that. They just want to disarm honest, law-abiding folks to make it easier for the owners of ILLEGAL guns to victimize them. With all this activity, still 6 people were killed, and 44 wounded over the Memorial Day weekend. To say that what they're doing is unsuccessful would be an exercise in understatement. (Guns)

Only Cops Should Have Guns

Because they're the most reliable and law-abiding people going, right?—NOT! Cops commit more gun crimes than do concealed carriers. Right—the people charged with UPHOLDING the law commit more gun crimes than concealed carriers! No, the cops aren't bad people as a RULE. But there ARE some “bad apples.” And more of them are “bad apples”by percentage than are concealed carriers among private citizens, according to John Lott, the premier gun statistician, often criticized by the anti-gun fools (which I consider a “badge of honor). Anti-gun fools keep saying that allowing people to carry guns on campus makes students and staff LESS safe—which is a LIE. But then, they tell a lot of lies to support their unsupportable position. Concealed carry on campus has been the law in at least THREE states for years, with not a SINGLE crime being committed by them. I am NOT saying that cops are lawbreakers. They are NOT, for the most part. But concealed carriers commit gun crimes in the THOUSANDS of a percent, while cops do in the HUNDREDS of a percent. Both groups commit very few gun crimes, but concealed carriers do a lot less than cops. (Breitbart)

Thursday, June 1, 2017

Gun-Grabbers Spouting Lies

It's all they have. They can't tell the truth and advance their efforts to violate the Constitution's Second Amendment. The police chief AND the district attorney in Los Angeles collaborated for an op-ed in the Los Angeles Times recently, in which they told us that universal concealed carry would make policing much harder. Which ignores completely the FACTS. Between 2007 and 2015, concealed carry permits increased 215%, while the murder rate DROPPED 14% during the same period. Meanwhile, concealed carriers committed between six and ten times FEWER crimes than did COPS in the same time period—and cops are less likely to commit crimes than the average citizen. It ignores the fact that there are MILLIONS of ILLEGAL guns already on the streets in the hands of the “bad guys,” who wish to use them to victimize innocent law-abiding people. (America's First Freedom)

Anti-Gun Until Reality

I've always said that an anti-gun fool is just a liberal who hasn't had an ILLEGAL gun shoved in his face, and this Mississippi woman is a perfect example of that. She freely admits that she was “anti-gun” until a home invader shoved a gun in her face. Lori Sheldon survived a home invasion by an armed man. Soon she was learning how to shoot, and was qualifying for her concealed carry license. If anybody tries it again, they're dead. I think this is the reason many anti-gun fools actually become gun carriers themselves. One well known anti-gun columnist actually SHOT at a teenager who was illegally using his pool. Sen. Feinstein, one of the most virulent anti-gun fools carries her own gun, IN ADDITION to the phalanx of ARMED security who usually surround her, Other anti-gun politicians likewise go around surrounded by ARMED security. Rosie O'Donnell, a washed-up comedienne who is very anti-gun (for us) has ARMED security for her kids. This is becoming so common it's a cliché. (Breitbart)