Monday, April 29, 2013

I'm Gonna say It Again

Again and again until it sinks into the feeble minds of all those FOOLS who blame the GUN when some ignorant FOOL takes a gun and kills a bunch of innocent people they find in bunches. We need more people in those groups with “carry permits.” People these “shooters” don’t know are there, who can shoot them before they can kill more than one or two people. Getting rid of guns isn’t going to solve the problem. Guns EXIST. You can’t “uninvent” them. “Bad guys” will ALWAYS be able to get their guns while people who OBEY laws won’t. If Frank DeAngelis, principal at Columbine High School, had had a gun when he “looked around a corner and watched one of the shooters killing people” he could have “put a couple in the head of the shooter” and ended at least that one shooter’s “kill score,” then go after, and kill the other. As it was, all he could do was “hide and watch” as the shooter murdered students and teachers. One of these days we MIGHT find a COMPETENT politician who will realize this and put a stop to “no gun zones,” which are “open invitations” to shooters who want to spray bullets into crowds of people. (Just common sense)

Liberals Say: "More Guards At Schools"

The Fox News best-known liberal, Alan Colmes, the one who was “bounced from the Hannity and Colmes show and is now only a “radio host,”  says the answer to school shootings is “more guards.” What KIND of guards? ARMED guards in uniform, so a potential shooter can locate them first and kill them before killing other innocent people? So they can become their FIRST targets? What they NEED is more teachers, principals, janitors, and the like with “carry permits” who can “put a couple in” a potential shooter before he can kill more unarmed innocent people. Like happened at that church in Colorado Springs, Colorado when a crazed killer came in without knowing she was there. They CALL her a “security guard,” but she wasn’t. She was a parishioner who happened to be legally armed, and who they ASKED to “act” as a security guard. But the thing that allowed her to stop this shooter is that he didn’t know there was anybody there who was armed. And that was the “secret.” (Just common sense)

Thursday, April 18, 2013

Guns SAVE Lives!

 Don’t tell liberals, but guns SAVE lives. Oh, hell. Go ahead and tell them. They won’t believe you, anyway. They believe too much in THEIR truth. They still think guns kill people on their own, without the intervention of those eeeevil humans. They still think a CRIMINAL, who does not OBEY laws, will OBEY a law that says they cannot be armed. They still believe a CRAZY, who wants to shoot up a school or a shopping center will be deterred by the though of breaking a law from his plans to break MANY laws. What FOOLS they be! And no amount of logic will change their minds as they go about making more and more laws that keep guns out of the hands of RESPONSIBLE and law-abiding people, but which do NOTHING to keep guns out of the hands of CRIMINALS. This illogic is lost on them. (Gun Owners of America)

Tuesday, April 2, 2013

"Gun-Free Zones"

Except for those carried by criminals and crazies wanting to shoot everybody in sight, that is. People who obey laws obey gun laws. Criminals don’t. Recently, such a fool murdered 19 CHILDREN, some as young as 5. the day before another killed at least two people in another shopping center. The news media went “wall-to-wall with it. In Denver, at least one radio station spent the entire DAY into the night talking about it. I’m sure this happened all over the country, maybe even the world. And they should, because somebody killing a bunch of CHILDREN is a real tragedy. What did these two shootings gave in common? They were both “gun-free zones.” But what about that shooting last year in a GUN SHOP where the guy shot a clerk and was instantly made into “Swiss cheese” by the rest of the clerks and customers, including the one he shot? It was a news item for a few hours and then “sank like a stone.” Except for the Indianapolis media, nobody was interested in the story. Why? Because the victim was armed and able to defend himself. Even the “anti-gun crazies” shut up about it because this kind of story, where the victim was armed just didn’t fit their narrative. I’ve always noticed that such shootings ususally didn’t happen at gun shows or anywhere else where everybody was armed, and for a good reason. In “gun-free zones” like schools and the like, they might as well put up a sign saying, “No guns here. We’re defenseless. Come on in and shoot us.”

Yes, such shootings are bad. But trying to eliminate guns to stop them is illogical and STUPID. The GUN didn’t kill these people. The man HOLDING the gun did. If he couldn’t get a gun (doubtful) he’d find something else to use in killing innocent people. Anybody who BELIEVES that a CRIMINAL, who violates the law for a LIVING, will OBEY a law saying he can’t be armed is STUPID. And that includes all those stupid politicians who think so, including our illustrious President Obama. I’m getting very tired of repeating this and having it fall on deaf ears while more and more people DIE because of this rampant STUPIDITY. I’m still waiting for our incompetent politicians to WAKE UP and realize that the ONLY WAY to eliminate such atrocities is to allow as many GOOD people as possible to be armed, including in those ubiquitous “gun-free zones” for self defense so the crazies and criminals won’t be FREE to kill innocent people. It is a PROVEN FACT that where there are MORE GUNS in the hands of innocent people, violent crime goes DOWN. In Florida, where getting a carry permit is easy, the violent crime rate has PREDICTABLY gone DOWN wile the deaths and injuries to armed CRIMINALS has gone UP. There cannot be more OBVIOUS evidence this is true. But our anti-gun politicians are blissfully IGNORANT of this fact. They’re PURPOSELY ignorant of facts that do not advance their narrative. (

Too Far the Other Way

Incompetent politicians in Nelson, Georgia, instead of simply making it easier to get a “carry permit,” want to FORCE residents to BUY a gun. That’s how incompetent politicians with delusions of grandeur ALL seem to think: got a problem? FORCE somebody to do something, even if it’s the right thing. Thinking of the RIGHT WAY to limit gun violence, such as punishing USE of guns in crimes with no ability to “drop those gun charges” to obtain the criminal’s cooperation in convicting him in other crimes just seems to be something they cannot even THINK about. When are we going to start electing COMPETENT people to office? The new Nelson, GA ordinance specifies NO penalty, which makes it useless. And all you have to do to be allowed to ignore it is to object. They say they’re “just making a point.” What point does a stupid, AND useless ordinance make?(