The criminals didn't worry
because there were three men on that bridge that night. He had a gun,
so he figured he would be “in charge.” so as they passed him, he
pulled out his gun and pistol whipped him. But instead of cowering at
his superiority, the guy he pistol whipped pulled out his own gun and
shot him to death. Lesson learned: don't attack without knowing your
victim isn't prepared. But he didn't get to reflect on it for very
long, because he is now on a slab in the morgue and the guy he pistol
whipped is at home resting, after telling the cops his story, backed
up by the testimony of his friends. It was a clear case of
self-defense, and there is now one less armed criminal running the
streets in Phoenix, Arizona. It again proves that those who make laws
against self-defense really want violent crime to succeed, no matter
what they tell you. As long as they keep honest people unarmed,
situations like this will end up in the guy who got pistol whipped,
and maybe his friends, as well, dead. They paint nasty pictures of
honest, reliable people “going wild” if they have guns, and all
that does is show their lack of confidence in our reliability—which
is bogus. (The Right to Bear)
Saturday, September 26, 2015
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment