When the Pope came
to Philadelphia, they BANNED GUNS anywhere around him. Of course,
that's unconstitutional, but they don't care. It will be all over
before any case can be brought before the Supreme court, or any
“inferior court,” so they'll get away with it. It's that old saw,
“Better to ask for forgiveness later than ask permission now and be
refused.” Especially since there's no punishment designated in the Constitution for violating it, except for reversal of the violation, if possible. In this case, it's NOT possible. But did they really think that if anybody decided to shoot
the Pope, their “rules” would have stopped him from having a gun
in the Pope's presence? Of course, there were a lot of guns around
the Pope (at least 11,not counting the cops). They were all carried by his security and all the cops
running interference. As usual, “the authorities” deny us “peons”
the right to self-defense while ALLOWING it to “dignitaries,” who
can well afford to HIRE their own guns and men to carry them, so they
don't have to. And, of course, they have armed cops right there to
take care of anybody who wants to shoot the Pope. Something us
“peons” don't have, as a rule. This is one of the best examples
of that “double standard.” (The Truth About Guns)
Monday, September 28, 2015
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment