Not the kinds of laws they're making these days Did you know that
thousands of people are killed with knives, clubs, and bare hands?
Statistics show that you'd have a better chance of being struck by
lightning than to be killed with a gun. Why then, is the gun their
FIRST TARGET when it comes to “:making us safe?” The gun is
USELESS without somebody HOLDING it, pointing it, and shooting it.
Otherwise, it's an inanimate object, like a car, that without a
driver can't hurt anyone. More people are killed by cars than by
anything else. Why don't they want to ban cars? They say adding fees
to gun purchases and ammunition isn't “infringing.” It IS. Guns
are expensive by themselves. To add unnecessary “fees” (taxes,”
“penalties”) to their cost is DEFINITELY an “infringement” that makes it hard on people of lesser earnings.
Voting people who MAKE “gun laws” in office isn't too smart. But
we do it, anyway (not me). They keep saying their laws are
“reasonable.” But who defines “reasonable?” Them, of course,
and the laws they come up with are ANYTHING but “reasonable.” The
secret is for people to be more vigilant. If someone “shows signs”
of mental problems (as all of the mass shooters have done, but were
ignored), somebody should SAY something to the right people so they
can be restrained, if possible. (The Gleaner)
Monday, September 7, 2015
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment