Columnist Wrong

He says he supports the Second Amendment but also likes “gun-free zones” because they “work so well.” What? How many times recently have mass shooters chosen “gun-free zones” in which to ply his foolishness because he was pretty sure there would be no guns there to oppose him? Is he totally blind? Or just brain dead? He’s about 2 million off in his estimate of NRA membership, too. He still pushes the outdated and discredited idea that  the mention of “militia” in the Constitution is saying that gun ownership is only a right if the person is a MEMBER of a state militia. Like anti-gun fools, he forgets that There WAS no such thing as a “state militia” when that was written. A “militia” was ALL the people. What it was saying was that NOBODY could be barred from the ownership and use of guns for self-defense. (Frederick News-Post)