The New Discrimination

It's the new discrimination. We almost got rid of irrational racism before Obama started calling ALL people who disagreed with him racists. And now we have a new form of discrimination--against the NRA, and anybody in the gun making or selling business. Many liberal-owned businesses, especially banks, are refusing to do business with anybody who agrees with the NRA, or has anything to do with making, selling, or repairing guns. That's rank DISCRIMINATION. Meanwhile, Muslims and gays canvass bakeries trying to find one that refuses to do business with them on religious grounds so they can sue them out of business and get a big payday. The double standard is obvious, but they do it, anyway. they don't even care if we know what they're up to, as long as they can find a "hard-left" judge to bring it before. A judge who will rule, not on the law or the constitution, but his/her own prejudices. And now we are seeing a new racism. It's called, "white privilege." They're trying to convince people, even white people, that "whiteness" gives people a certain amount of "privilege," just because they're white. They're trying to CREATE racism against WHITES. (Just common sense)

"Not Afraid of NRA"

The Dumocrats are now saying Trump is "afraid of the NRA" because he's "backing down" from what he said the other day about "fighting the NRA. They just don't understand that maybe, just maybe, he sees the rightness of their position, and the wrongness of his, which he did not see the other day when he made his ridiculous statement about "take guns first, due process later." Only dictators do that, and he knows he is not a dictator. That statement was made in the "heat of the moment," with many CHILDREN being killed. It's frustrating, i know, and frustration leads to wrong statements. Trump isn't "afraid of the NRA." or anything else. It is the Dumocrats who ARE. they fear the NRA because it has defeated them so many times, in so many ways. And they HAVE defeated them because their position is as WRONG as was Trump's when he put confiscation before due process. Dumocrats just do not understand people who defeat their ignorant policies, and love to demonize them. They have nothing else, so they call them names and impute "false motives" to their actions, so they don't have to argue on the issues, for which they HAVE no truthful arguments. (Just common sense)

Creating Their Own Problems

Many black men have bought the bull droppings that cops wake up each day and try to kill as many black men as they can. That they "go hunting" for black men to kill. That is a MYTH. A LIE put out by such as "Black Lives Matter," and they have also put out what they consider a "solution" to that "problem."Kill cops." From ambush, if necessary. Shoot them in the back. Run over them with a car. Any way you can. Is it any wonder why uniformed cops are very nervous, today? They wear distinctive, easily identified uniforms, drive similarly easy to identify cars, while black men who want to kill them are hard to identify--until they start shooting at them, as they did recently at two cops who were just eating a meal in a restaurant, killing them. Making orphans out of their kids, and widows of their wives. Is this fair? Does this do ANYTHING to stop cops from shooting black men who are often shooting at them? From pursuing black men who are committing crimes? Who are selling drugs? Victimizing innocent people? No. It is simply making it even more possible that a cop will draw his gun and shoot, as a first option. Does that make him (or her) less apt to "shoot first, and ask questions later" if there is anybody left alive? They're CREATING the very "problem" they pretend to abhor. And getting more of them killed, unnecessarily, while condemning people who only want to help people to death for wearing that distinctive uniform. (New York Post)

I Just Don't Understand!

And I understand most things. But I don't understand where the anti-gun fools are coming from. They have to know that NONE of their highly-touted anti-gun laws work worth a damn in keeping guns out of the hands of people who should not have them, but they keep making more and more of them, anyway. Or at least, they TRY. Fortunately, the NRA "keeps them honest" in most cases, effectively opposing most of them. In any case, every time there is a mass killing (in a school, or elsewhere), they "jump on their high horse" and insist on making more of their USELESS laws, whether or not a gun was used. In the meantime, they absolutely REFUSE to even CONSIDER something that WILL do something about the people who misuse guns, and that is allowing most Americans to be armed for self defense, especially teachers. In Israel, they DO arm their teachers, and have had only TWO school shootings in many years, and those two resulted in a dead shooter. I keep asking: "What makes you think DISARMING yourself is the way to self defense?" And they have no answer, so they immediately start insulting me, calling me a "gun lover," and "child killer," or something else equally disgusting. They call their flights of fancy, "common sense solutions," but nothing could be further from "common sense." (Just common sense)

News They Won't Use

The anti-gun fools tell you that people NEVER use a legal gun for self defense. That's a LIE. People have used a gun for self defense approximately 2.5 MILLION times a year. That's a lot of times, especially considering how hard they make it for people to even GET a gun legally, claiming disarming people is "for self defense." It is NOT. You do NOT defend yourself by making yourself DEFENSELESS. But you can't convince these anti-gun FOOLS of this simple truth. So the Center for Disease Control (CDC) did a study that revealed this--and they BURIED it. They didn't want the public to "tumble" to that lie. What the hell is the CDC doing having a study about GUNS? Guns have nothing to do with disease. But I guess the anti-gun fools will take their stats anywhere they can. But these weren't what they wanted, so they ignored them, while the CDC just BURIED them. These findings matched earlier studies by Gary Kleck, which were labeled "controversial" by the anti-gun fools. Why were they "controversial? Because they didn't support the LIES told by those anti-gun fools, that's why! The CDC studies were done in the 90s, but were unknown until Gary Kleck unearthed them recently to show that they proved his own "controversial" studies to be correct. Anti-gun fools are infuriated. (Reason Magazine)

It's A Puzzle to Me

Why the anti-gun fools continue to make laws and regulations they must KNOW do not work. If they just want to disarm everybody in America for their own purposes, they must also know they will never accomplish that goal. Every time they make a new law to keep law-abiding citizens from owning or buying a gun, or to make the guns they do have useless--like making ammunition almost impossible to get, it creates a "black market" in exactly the thing they ban. Like bump stocks. Politicians are rushing now to make bump stocks hard, if not impossible to get, after the Las Vegas massacre. They have to know that will only inspire people to make more of them available on the black market. They are so easy to make, there will be garages everywhere full of them, for sale. They also must know that none of the laws they HAVE made do ANYTHING to stop, or even slow down "gun violence," and only make it easier for the fools who IGNORE them to victimize those who OBEY them. Are they just STUPID, or what? They will NEVER get rid of ALL guns, and they have to know that, too. Are they just "playing" with us? Is it just a hobby with them? Do they not know that the way to self defense is NOT to get rid of the best tool to that end, a gun? It's a real puzzle. (Truth About Guns)

Hospital Again

If anybody has been wondering where I've been for the last 3 days, I've been in the hospital. A severe stomach ache was the reason. At first they thought it might be pancreatitis, but their final diagnosis was that I had passed a gallstone. A lot of bother, but it's over now. Back to work tomorrow.

The Columbine Anniversary

This year is the 19th anniversary of the killings at the Columbine high School, and the anti-gun fools are "trotting out" their usual tired, old, USELESS laws and regulations that do NOTHING to stop future Columbines from happening. They have to know that NONE of their laws work, but sill they trot them out and demand lawmakers make even more of them. David Hogg, that ubiquitous teenaged child who thinks he knows more than any adult, is now going to write a BOOK (or have it written for him) about his ignorance. They declare even more "no-gun zones" that shooters SEEK OUT in which to do their killing. They stop the LAW-ABIDING from being able to buy guns, in many instances, thus making it far easier for thugs and criminals to victimize them, since they aren't armed and able to defend themselves. The shooters at Columbine broke many of their laws, just to GET their guns. Other shooters who, up to the minute they started shooting up a place, had not broken any laws, and thus got their guns LEGALLY. THEN they shot up a place, sometimes a school, and sometimes other places. And if they couldn't get a gun or guns, they used a knife. They went around and stabbed and slashed everybody they could. In one place, a guy took a machete and slashed a bunch of people. The point is, if they can't get their weapons legally, that has never stopped them. So what the hell GOOD are their anti-gun laws? All their thrashing around and rallying, demonstrating, writing books, and articles, published in liberal sources stop not a SINGLE killing. We keep telling them this, and they keep ignoring us. And people keep dying. I could go on and on, and the anti-gun fools cannot truthfully say I'm wrong. So they start calling me names, and try to demonize me. (Just common sense)

Gun-Free Zones

The guy who shot and killed three women in that large vet's rest home was no doubt aware that it was a "gun-free zone." But that didn't deter him in his wish to kill some people. The only thing that confined the killings to only three was the arrival of people with guns, the cops, who confined him to one room, where he took those three women hostage, and subsequently killed them all, and himself. I thought gun free zones were supposed to stop things like this. Apparently, they don't. But the anti-gun fools insist on continuing to make them, even though they KNOW they don't work. They just don't understand, or PRETEND to not understand, that people like this killer SEEK OUT gun free zones in which to conduct their nefarious plans. They just don't give a damn about them, since they plan on committing a much more serious crime. The people who make such laws just aren't too bright. But they still are in a position to make them. (Just common sense)

Replacing the American Flag

The proof of the liberal influence at work on the "student march" for their lives is that Emma Gonzalez, a major supporter, made a speech wearing a "Cuban dictator-looking" military jacket bearing a CUBAN flag, instead of the usual American flag worn in America. That tells us she likes Cuba, a country where a new dictator began confiscating the guns of its citizens within two days of taking power, and has since murdered THOUSANDS, maybe more, of his people after disarming them. It is a common theme among dictators to disarm their people as soon as they can. Unarmed people cannot give their dictator much lip without getting killed, or imprisoned for long periods. The Nazis did it; so did Stalin in Russia--and predictably, the murders of MILLIONS ensued. Politicians CLAIM that disarming the populace is to PROTECT them, but it is NOT. It is to eventually ENSLAVE them. But in America, with the liberal media solidly behind our wannabe dictator politicians, it will not be to protect them, but to enslave them, as usual. If you let them disarm you, you can bet that soon they will come for you. (Conservative Tribune)

"Just Shoot "Em Dead!"

That's the advice one anti-gun fool professor is giving the other anti-gun fools. James Pearce, an adjunct professor at Southern State Community College, says, "A bunch of anti-gun types (fools) should arm themselves (with the guns they hate) and attack the NRA headquarters, and leave no survivors." Meaning, kill them all. Just "arm yourself" and use that which you are against to kill the opposition so they can't make logical arguments you can't answer. That's the kind of thinking you can expect from anti-gun fools, who aren't too bright. This guy is a professor, but he isn't too bright, and is now under investigation after he said this on Facebook. Of course, Facebook didn't censor him because that's the way they think, too. When you can't answer what your opponent is saying with logic and intelligence, just call them names, or wish them dead. This is a logical progression from that. If calling them names doesn't work (and it won't), just KILL them. Problem solved. Only it won't. It will just get THEM imprisoned, or executed for mass murder--IF they don't get killed themselves in the attempt. Now he's under investigation, he says it was a joke. But I think he was deadly serious.(Fox News Insider)

Sorry Again, Folks!

Yesterday, while I was in the act of updating my blogs, the Internet went down, and didn't come back until later that night. So there was no way I could finish. Hopefully, that doesn't happen often.

It's A Cliche'

"Guns don't kill people; people kill people!" That's what anti-gun fools always say whenever we point out this basic truth that they ignore with all their USELESS "gun laws" that do NOTHING to stop, or even slow down gun violence. But nobody seems interested in the reason WHY it is a cliche´. It is such because it is TRUE! One of the things that push kids to the EDGE in school is bullying. Years ago, you could just punch a bully in the nose and "cure him" of bullying YOU. I did it, on my dad's advice, and it worked, with ALL the bullies that had plagued me to that point. Word got around that I would no longer be "easy,", and the school didn't make a criminal case out of it. You might get a 3 day suspension (vacation), and then go right on with your education, while he, hopefully, has learned the lesson that you will no longer be an "easy target' for his bullying, so he will probably move on to another "easy target," and leave you alone. Today, if you punch him in the nose, you could be EXPELLED from school, and have that on your "permanent record," affecting your entire life, and your ability to be admitted to a good college. So it festers and festers, and some kids "crack" and come to school shooting, as Nickolas Cruz did, in Broward County, Florida, after cops ignored massive evidence that it might happen, FBI ignored a sure warning that he might, and a sheriff's deputy cowered behind his car while Cruz murdered 17 people. If we don't change the policies that punish kids for RETALIATING to a bully so that the bulling doesn't "fester" within him, while making sure that sure evidence is not ignored by "the authorities," we will continue to have mass killings in schools. It is NOT the guns. It is the PEOPLE!. Believe it. OWN it! (Just common sense)

"Time for Gun Confiscation"

At least that's what the Tampa Bay Times thinks, anyway. In spite of the fact that the Constitution, the BASIS for ALL our laws, forbids it. Whatever makes these ignorant anti-gun fools think taking guns away from LEGAL owners will stop those who buy their guns ILLEGALLY, or just STEAL them, is beyond me. But it has to be the workings of an irrational, ignorant mind. They really expect that to affect the ability of CRIMINALS to get a gun, and that's irrational. Of course, it's the same with ALL their anti-gun laws. They expect LAWBREAKERS to somehow OBEY their stupid laws, and they won't. People bound on killing a bunch of people will get their guns any way they can, and to hell with their feeble gun laws. That's the fatal flaw in all their silly, useless gun laws. They do nothing beyond making it easier for the bad guys to victimize the law-abiding, by DISARMING the law-abiding, making them "easy targets" for those who just ignore their useless gun laws. One of the more obvious useless laws is the "no-gun zone," where people are expected to leave their guns elsewhere upon entering. Law-abiding people do, while non-law-abiding people do not. In fact, they SEEK OUT gun-free zones , and avoid places where there might be some guns there to oppose them, We have that, on good authority, from the criminals, themselves. (Truth About Guns)

"Just Shut Them Up!"

If you can't win the argument; if you have no true facts to support your position, and have run out of lies, just call your opposition names to shut them up. That's the direction the anti-gun fools are taking, and have always taken. That's why they say the NRA is racist, and are terrorists, and "have blood on their hands." Racist is their favorite epithet since Obama revived its popularity among liberals as a means of not having to argue on the facts, in any debate. They think if they can make their opponents look bad enough, they can win the argument in spite of having no facts on their side. Liberals have always used that ploy when they just can't come up with a cogent argument to blunt criticism (which is usually every time). And most anti-gun fools are liberals. It has been said (by Rush Limbaugh, I think) that a political argument involving a liberal will last about 30 seconds before they start calling you names. Listen carefully in any debate with a liberal and you will notice this, in action. Arguing with a liberal is pointless. His positions are always against logic and reason, but he will feel very strongly about his false positions. Hence the insults. (The Hill)

"Sorry" Isn't Good Enough

The IRS "politicized" itself, stalling applications for tax-free status for right-wing organizations, or ones they PERCEIVED as being right-wing, and nobody went to prison. Lois Lerner lost her job and had to retire to a comfortable retirement on a lavish "pension" without real punishment. They got caught, and they said they're "sorry." And it was "forgotten." The boss at IRS got no punishment, whatever. He's still running it. Obama's "Fast & Furious" plan sold many guns to the Mexican drug cartels for no real reason except what they CLAIMED was their purpose (which didn't hold water) and they said, "sorry" when they got caught. Nobody was really punished. In Waco and Ruby Ridge, citizens were MURDERED by government agents. The then Attorney General, Janet Reno, "took responsibility." But what did that mean? Was she punished, in any way? Were the "government agents" who wantonly MURDERED those civilians (even their DOGS) ever punished? The guy who MURDERED a woman with her child in her arms at Ruby Ridge was later quietly given a commendation for that murder. They didn't announce it. Did they ever punish that Border Control agent who pointed the nose of automatic weapon in the face of a SIX-YEAR-OLD to capture and send him back to that "island prison," in Cuba? Did they ever even IDENTIFY him to the public? They complain that this nation is "heavily armed." But if they treat us that way in a "heavily armed" country, think how they would treat us if they were ever successful in getting rid of ALL the guns in the country? (Just common sense)

Guns and Race

Like any good liberal, Shannon Watts makes a racial slur in her rebuke to a Jewish woman threatened by some Neo-Nazis, thus introducing race into her "argument." the woman got a gun for self protection after a bunch of Neo-Nazis published her home address on their web site, thus painting a "target' on her back. Shannon, a "top anti-gun fool" financed, through cutouts, by George Soros, told her in a Tweet, that her wishing to be protected was because she was "white." The situation, of course, has nothing to do with race, but not to liberals, including Watts. The cops think driving by her house once in a while will protect her, but that kind of "protection" is so easily avoided by "bad guys," it's silly. Getting a gun to defend herself is a much better plan. It is this kind of stupidity that makes a fool out of Watts and other liberals on a regular basis. Liberals are trying HARD to get a race war started, and the "Black Lives Matter" fools are cooperating. I guess they like the idea of killing more white folks. (Twitter)

Real Gun Control

An armed thug goes into a barber shop and starts robbing people in Peru. Overconfident, he takes his attention off one man, who takes away his gun and starts kicking the hell out of him. The rest of the barber shop customers join in, kicking him repeatedly. Even people from outside come in and add a few kicks. Later kicks are obviously delivered after he loses consciousness. One would assume he is subsequently picked up by the cops, But in any case, his robbery plans went seriously awry. Which is an object lesson for all thugs: don't get cocky and turn your back on your intended victims. You may become a victim, yourself. And THEN go to prison. Or maybe not to rob anybody. This guy is lucky to be alive--IF he is. Most thugs feel that having a gun makes them a GIANT, and indestructible. They're not. And this situation proves it. Having a gun is NOT the "end all," and you could be in big trouble if you don't stay alert. Or maybe not try and intimidate anybody with a gun, (Conservative Tribune)

"We Are the Experts"

That's what 17 year-old Parkland High School student survivor of the Broward County school killings David Hogg claimed, while "dumping on" the NRA. Where in hell this fool got that notion, I don't know. I guess hiding in a closet while dodging bullets makes him an expert on gun control--or something. But the NRA is NOT responsible, just because they stand up for our CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT to be armed for self defense. In any case, nothing that came out of his mouth--or from the mouth of Bill Maher made any sense at all, concerning gun control. Both were completely clueless on the subject. I feel sorry for those kids. That had to be a life-changing experience. But it does NOT make you an expert on gun control or anything else. Neither are the anti-gun fools "experts" on the subject, since everything they do does NOTHING to stop, or even slow down what they call "gun violence," but what I simply call "violence." It would be no kind of violence without the participation of damned fool killers, most of whom are insane. What Hogg is feeling is the arrogance of ALL anti-gun fools, instilled in them by other anti-gun fools. Their very "campaign" is paid for, lock, stock, and barrel by anti-gun fools, who are financed by billionaire meddler George Soros. They are being USED, and they don't know it. (The Blaze)

Failure At all Levels

Nasim Najafi Aghdam went to the You Tube Campus the other day and shot the place up. She was a Muslim who was angry because You Tube "censored" her videos. Even though she was not a "right-wing extremist." Quite the contrary; as a Muslim, she would not have been a conservative, no matter how leftists would so wish. I only mention her being Muslim because that goes to her way of thinking. Muslims seem to have a tendency toward violence against ANYBODY who they don't like, for any reason. But that isn't the subject of this post. Gun control laws, and the "authorities," at all levels FAILED in this case, and ALLOWED this to happen. The girl's own family was alarmed by her actions and warned the local police, to no avail. They did look into it, and questioned her, but decided she was no threat, although she had bought a gun and was practicing at a gun range. Nothing illegal, to be sure, but something to be taken into consideration, which apparently they did not. They should have taken more of an interest, but they did not, and in retrospect, what could they do, since she had no "record," up to that point? She obviously passed a background check when she bought the gun. So much for THAT law. There are way too many cases where "warning signs" were ignored. In Broward County, Florida, there were 69 such "red flags" that were ignored, and 17 (mostly) children lost their lives. We need to take more seriously those "red flags," and maybe we can head off such occurrences. At Ft. Hood, there were also many "red flags," and they were ignored, costing lives. So too, at other places, with predictable results. (CNN)

Double Standard On Guns

In the village of Sherwood HIlls, Wisconsin, a "concerned parent" walked into a school and handed a teacher a piece of cardboard with the word, "gun" on it, to demonstrate the weakness of the school's security, hoping to make schools safer for his children. The school didn't appreciate that, and called the cops, who arrested him. He threatened no one in his little protest, and did NOT "hinder teaching," in any way. It was a simple demonstration, and not even a disrupting one. But they arrested him, anyway. Meanwhile, thousands of "frightened" students go all over the place, from Tallahassee to DC, to protest and "show their support for gun control," PAID FOR by anti-gun fools, who are themselves paid for by a billionaire money-man, George Soros. And nothing is done to arrest any of them, while some of their demonstrations ARE disruptive. This is typical. With Dumocrats controlling things in most areas of our lives, they make it as difficult as possible to demonstrate against THEIR policies, while doing everything they can to inhibit opposition. And liberal judges support them. (Truth About Guns)

Car Drives Into Ceowd

In Müenster, Germany, a fool drove his van into a crowd of people, killing several, and injuring more. WE NEED TO BAN CARS! At least, we do, if we use the same thinking gun-grabbers use. They seem to think that if some fool MISUSES a gun, we need to ban guns from the face of the Earth. Except for those in the hands of criminals and other "bad guys" who don't bother to obey laws, of course. I'll be surprised if the gun-grabbers don't seize upon THIS occurrence to whine and cry about banning GUNS! That's the way they think. If ANYTHING happens, using ANYTHING, ban guns! They can't think of anything to REALLY solve the problem, so they seize upon the simplest thing, and attempt to demonize those who wish to retain their constitutional RIGHT to self defense, and to own and use the means to that, a gun. They flail about trying to erase guns from the face of the Earth, while the "bad guys" always find a way. And they demonize the NRA, the organization that stands up for that right, saying they are responsible for all "gun violence," while it is really the fools who misuse their guns who ARE responsible, when they are the only ones that are looking at the REAL solution, while training people in the PROPER use of guns. (DW)