Judge's Personal Defense

In Ohio, a gunman shot a county judge outside the courthouse and got the surprise of his life. The judge turned and shot him to death. Now the chief justice of the State Supreme Court is advising courthouse employees and especially judges to go armed, because of the "real potential for violence against them." Right. But what about the "real potential for violence" against the rest of us? Don't we deserve at least as much protection as do judges and other courthouse employees? Apparently not, according to anti-gun fools, who wet their panties at the very thought of the average citizen carrying their own guns for protection. They think that would create a "wild West atmosphere" where people would be shooting each other over trivial things. what they ignore is the fact that probably one out of ten people on the street are ALREADY armed, illegally. And it is those people we need to be protected against. People who IGNORE all their vaunted "gun protection laws" and victimize the rest of us. Why should a judge or a courthouse employee have more rights than the rest of us, especially when the Constitution says our right to be armed "shall not be infringed." Every law they make to disarm us is an "infringement." They'd better learn that. (ABC News)