They Finally Found Something

The anti-gun fool crowd have been looking long and hard for something—anything---they could twist into getting rid of their most effective nemesis, the NRA. Now they’ve found it, and the liberal New York AG is just the crooked politician to push it. But the NRA isn’t gonna go down without a fistfight. And they have “put their fists up” with their own suit against the New York AG. They want badly to get rid of the NRA because it is EFFECTIVE. The NRA has done more to put a stop to their shenanigans than any other organization, bar none. And they hate that. The anti-gun fool crowd is clearly violating the law—the most basic law there is in this country—the Constitution. Which clearly prohibits ANY law being made that infringes upon our right to self defense, and to own and carry the means to that, a gun. Yet here they are, in the business of MAKING such laws, in violation of the Constitution. There is no punishment specified in the Constitution for such action. Or they would by now be in prison. It would be different if their silly little laws DID what they SAY they’re supposed to do—get guns out of the hands of criminals. Instead, they work very hard to keep them out of the hands of honest, law-abiding people so they cannot defend themselves against the millions of ILLEGAL guns out there. Guns they can’t touch because criminals never stand for background checks, or let the “man” even know they have a gun. They’re gonna need a big stick to go after the NRA, because the NRA has an even bigger stick, and the money to back it up, compared to their pitiful little “budgets.”(Just common sense)

Al-Jazeer After Your Guns

This anti-American, terrorist-owned network formerly owned by former VP AlGore, the “global warming” swindler and now is owned by the royal family of Qatar, asks the usual question asked by our own anti-gun fools: “What are you trying to do? [Effie Steele] said. If you’re trying to save lives, you don’t want to put more guns in the hands of people. If you’re trying to make money, then you can come up with any argument. . .” On the contrary, to save lives you DO put more guns in the hands of HONEST, reliable people to oppose the guns that are ALREADY illegally in the hands of criminals and crazies. I’d ask, “what’s WRONG with these people?” But I know what’s wrong. They’re fools who want only to remove as many guns from the equation as possible to make their OWN guns more effective when they come after what’s ours. Like Adolph Hitler, the dictator who started World War II, they don’t want any guns in the hands of the people so they can more easily subjugate them. (al-Jazeera America)

I Don't Understand

The anti-gun fools must know that not a single one of their silly, stupid anti-gun laws do anything to prevent gun violence, and instead INCREASE it by disarming the honest, law-abiding people who are NOT the problem. Whenever some fool wielding an ILLEGAL gun goes on a shooting spree, they jump up and go after LEGAL guns. Which is about as stupid a thing as there is. But they will not even entertain the thought of the only real way to reduce gun violence: allow the law-abiding to have guns to counter the millions of illegal guns out there, by killing the ones who try to victimize them with their ILLEGAL guns. That will surely reduce gun violence, one dead shooter at a time. Imagine how the bad guys would feel if they knew their intended victim just might be armed and ready to kill them if they try. Legally armed people don’t go out and victimize people with their guns, like the owners of illegal guns do. And criminals don’t want to stand for a background check because that would lead the cops right to their doorstep after they commit a crime with their gun. So why don’t the anti-gun fools go after the illegal guns? That would be too hard, so they go after the “low-hanging fruit,” legal gun owners, since they can identify them. I think anti-gun politicians are just AFRAID of legally-armed constituents. (Just common sense)

It Does Sound Familiar

A judge ordered a retrial of two cops who shot and killed two young kids on a bridge right after Hurricane Katrina and the reason sounds very much like what happened in the Zimmerman trial: “After a jury convicted five other former officers in 2011, their attorneys argued that prosecutors' online comments and leaks to news organizations were part of a "secret public relations campaign" that deprived their clients of a fair trial.” The “vendetta” against George Zimmerman ordered by Obama worked HARD to convict Zimmerman of SOMETHING, ANYTHING so as to support Obama’s agenda to promote the appearance of racism in this country and further demonize guns. But nobody called them on it in the Zimmerman case because their phony case was so weak Zimmerman won. But they’re still trying, every day. They follow him in his car, lie about him in family disputes, etc. He needs to move far away and change his name so they’ll one day maybe leave him alone.(Mail Online)

They Finally Found Something

The anti-gun fool crowd have been looking long and hard for something—anything---they could twist into getting rid of their most effective nemesis, the NRA. Now they’ve found it, and the liberal New York AG is just the crooked politician to push it. But the NRA isn’t gonna go down without a fistfight. And they have “put their fists up” with their own suit against the New York AG. They want badly to get rid of the NRA because it is EFFECTIVE. The NRA has done more to put a stop to their shenanigans than any other organization, bar none. And they hate that. The anti-gun fool crowd is clearly violating the law—the most basic law there is in this country—the Constitution. Which clearly prohibits ANY law being made that infringes upon our right to self defense, and to own and carry the means to that, a gun. Yet here they are, in the business of MAKING such laws, in violation of the Constitution. There is no punishment specified in the Constitution for such action. Or they would by now be in prison. It would be different if their silly little laws DID what they SAY they’re supposed to do—get guns out of the hands of criminals. Instead, they work very hard to keep them out of the hands of honest, law-abiding people so they cannot defend themselves against the millions of ILLEGAL guns out there. Guns they can’t touch because criminals never stand for background checks, or let the “man” even know they have a gun. They’re gonna need a big stick to go after the NRA, because the NRA has an even bigger stick, and the money to back it up, compared to their pitiful little “budgets.”(Just common sense)

Stupidity of Action

In New York City, it’s not a good idea to be the target for the cops. Not because you might get shot, but because probably the safest place to be when the cps are shooting is in front of them with them aiming at you. Not so safe place to be is anywhere near them when they’re shooting, as two “bystanders” to a bunch of cops shooting at a “mentally disturbed man” learned. The cops shot three times at this man, missed all three times, and wounded TWO bystanders. Then their highly intelligent DA, instead of filing charges against these cops for negligence, filed them against this “disturbed man” for being the CAUSE of them injuring two bystanders. Maybe the guy rated being shot at, and maybe he didn’t. But the cops missing him and hitting innocent people TWICE was not his fault. But he will likely spend 25 years in prison because of these “cops that can’t shoot straight.” (Truth About Guns)

She Just Doesn't Get It

Chicago Mayor Lightbrain has not a single idea on how to stop, or even slow down “gun crime” in her city, so naturally, like all liberal politicians, she blames others for her failings. She ignores the fact that her city already has some of the tightest anti-gun laws in the nation, yet criminals have no trouble getting the guns they use to victimize Chicagoans. She blames federal policies for her own failings, as well as “guns coming in from outside the state,” as if all guns should be made in Chicago. Which they are not, and never will be. Guns are made all over the world. And that will continue. The problem is, of course, all the tight anti-gun laws in Chicago do is prevent honest, law-abiding people from getting the guns they need to oppose those illegal guns in the hands of the law-breakers. Which, of course, makes things worse. But she can’t see that. She just isn’t intelligent enough. Just like all anti-gun fool politicians. Of course, like most liberal politicians, she’ll call me a racist for what I’m saying here because that lets her use her blackness as a shield against any criticism. (DailyCaller)

Smith & Wesson Doing Well

With all the hooraw over gun control and “keeping guns out of the hands of criminals,” you’d think gun makers would be suffering, wouldn’t you? Not so. Smith & Wesson, one of the best-known gun makers, is “going great guns” and so are other gun and ammo makers (until Obama successfully ruins their business by banning their raw materials). Gun sales are at their highest in a long time; maybe anticipating a law being made against buying them, period (in spite of the Second Amendment). I guess they hoped to hide their guns when Obama’s thugs come to take them on some pretext or another. (Just common sense)

Blacks Killing Blacks

“Black Lives Matter!” But apparently not to other blacks. Statistics show that the biggest threat to the lives of all black men are other black men. Not the cops. They try and lay it on the cops and cite the very few instances of a cop (black or white) shooting and killing a black man as proof of their claims. Many of those cases are “righteous shootings. But the numbers don’t lie. Way more black men are killed by bullets fired by other black men than by any other group. And most of these black men on both sides are gang members or other kinds of criminals. You look at the victims of shootings, and most of them have guns of their own (illegally) and are shooting back. Meanwhile, the anti-gun fools can only target LEGAL gun owners with their silly, unenforceable laws against guns in the hands of the law abiding. Their laws cannot do anything about the millions of illegal guns out there, because they can’t locate them until they are used in a crime. And then it’s too late. And whenever a shooting happens, they never talk about the legal or ownership of the gun used. It’s almost always an ILLEGAL gun that is used, and to call attention to that does not advance their narrative. They’ll call me a racist for pointing out thee facts, because that’s all they have: name calling. (Just common sense)

Underhanded Tactics

The ATF, formerly Obama’s anti-gun agency, in its efforts to disarm all Americans (but cops and government agents, of course, and Sen. Feinstein) used underhanded tactics to get certain “slow-witted people” to do things to get themselves in trouble, then making an “example” out of them. It’s a classic system of conning people into breaking a little-known law they didn’t even know about, then arresting them for it. And practicing this con on people who are a “little slow.” They’re working very hard and doing everything they can to disarm us, folks. We need to do something to “rein them in.” (Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel)

Empowering Criminals

That’s what all those wimpy liberal (Dumbocrat) city politicians are doing when they refuse to accept help from the feds in controlling their street crime while doing everything in their power to STOP the cops from being able to effectively do their jobs. Chicago Mayor Lightbrain says, “We’re doing all we can to stop gun crime in Chicago.” But “doing all they can” is doing all the WRONG THINGS, making it easier for the lawbreakers to victimize honest people. I watch that popular cop show, “Chicago PD,” and have to laugh. If Chicago cops really did all the things they do on that show, the liberal wimp politicians would have them all in prison, being murdered by the very criminals they put there. Whenever a gun is used to victimize somebody, nothing is ever said about whether or not the gun involved was legally obtained by the shooter. They always assume it was, when it wasn’t. Almost ALL guns used in crimes were obtained ILLEGALLY, but they do not tell us that. They just do al they can to eliminate LEGAL guns, making it easier for the CRIMINALS to victimize the law-abiding. (Just common sense)

Anti-Gun Fools Want Guns

I think it’s funny. Recently, many new legal gun purchasers are people who have previously been anti-gun, but who have since come to their senses and wished to have the means toward self defense for themselves. How many of those are still against gun ownership for others, I don’t know. In this world were politicians go around “protected” by AR-15s while denying the right to be similarly defended for others, it’s possible. But then, was it not always thus? Politicians denying the “peons” the right to the tools for self defense while using them, themselves. Personally, I think the very anti-gun fool movement is promoted by would-be criminals and other law-breakers so they won’t meet as many guns to oppose them when they come for other people’s property. Criminals have been asked if they support, or oppose gun control and, to a man, they SUPPORT it. That is very telling. They want to make sure the law-abiding, who are their intended targets, will be less likely to have their own guns, with which to oppose them when they come to rob them. (Just common sense)

All the Wrong Things

Chicago Mayor Lightbrain is opposing Trump coming in and using existing federal agents to bring back order in her city, saying, “We’re doing all we can to eliminate the gun violence.” Trouble is, they’re doing all the WRONG things. Chief among those are the plethora of useless, unenforceable anti-gun laws that do nothing except to disarm the honest, law-abiding citizens, allowing the law breakers “free rein” to victimize them. Next, she signals to her police that she will NOT stand behind them when they do what is necessary to bring back order and convince the law breakers their actions are not a good choice. She does that by her ACTIONS when liberal criminal supporters demand she go after her cops whenever they think they did something wrong. So naturally they are going to retreat when they should be advancing when “demonstrators” throw everything but the kitchen sink at them and cause injuries to them, since they know they might lose not only their careers, but might be sent to prison themselves, for doing their jobs the best way they know how. (Just common sense)

All the Wrong Things

Chicago Mayor Lightbrain is opposing Trump coming in and using existing federal agents to bring back order in her city, saying, “We’re doing all we can to eliminate the gun violence.” Trouble is, they’re doing all the WRONG things. Chief among those are the plethora of useless, unenforceable anti-gun laws that do nothing except to disarm the honest, law-abiding citizens, allowing the law breakers “free rein” to victimize them. Next, she signals to her police that she will NOT stand behind them when they do what is necessary to bring back order and convince the law breakers their actions are not a good choice. She does that by her ACTIONS when liberal criminal supporters demand she go after her cops whenever they think they did something wrong. So naturally they are going to retreat when they should be advancing when “demonstrators” throw everything but the kitchen sink at them and cause injuries to them, since they know they might lose not only their careers, but might be sent to prison themselves, for doing their jobs the best way they know how. (Just common sense)

Learning A Lesson

Other politicians are slowly learning the “Colorado lesson” as others are retaliating by FIRING them all over the country. Such is the case in Rhode Island as four members of a city council are facing recall for trying to turn gun permitting over to the state: “Call it a double whammy. Four town council members in Exeter, R.I., not only failed in their bid to get the state to take over concealed-carry permitting for their town, but now they face a recall election Saturday because of it. The story is a small-town version of the drama that played out in Colorado earlier this year, when two state senators behind a new gun-control law were recalled by angry voters in September. A third facing recall resigned last month.” All anti-gun politicians should take note if they value their jobs and careers. (MinnPost)

Doubing Down On Stupid

That St. Louis politician (er, uh, prosecutor) took a legal action and jumped right in, lying about the charges she is about to lay on a couple of lawyers who displayed their legally owned guns to “put the fear of God” into a bunch of cocky rioters who threatened to kill them, then shower in their bathrooms and eat in their dining rooms after they’re dead, saying those people were just “walking by,” on their way to the mayor’s house to protest there. The charges she is making are “displaying firearms for an illegal purpose.” Which is a big, fat LIE. They were displayed for a LEGAL purpose, guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States. She has NO legal ground to stand on, and is spending taxpayer money to make a grand political statement in an election year—which is probably going to backfire on her, big time. Those rioters were trespassing on PRIVATE PROPERTY, not walking on public streets, when they threatened these homeowners on their own property. The very act of damaging that entrance to their property puts the LIE to that claim. (CNN)

Accusing A Target

George Zimmerman is a “prime target” of all anti-gun fools. In this latest attempt to jail him, his girlfriend lied about him pointing a shotgun at her face in order to get quick action out of the police. It did not happen, but the cps bought it, as she intended. At the time. She must have figured out that making such a charge itself was a crime and wanted to CYA. Now she says she was NEVER “threatened” by Zimmerman though her insistence she was got him again slammed to the ground and cuffed. Now “all is forgiven” and she wants to “be with him.” Goody-goody! Love returns. Meanwhile, Zimmerman, who successfully defended himself against a thug who was a known breakin artist got hurt again by more lies. If I had a girlfriend like that, I’d dump her. (Gun Free Zone)

Politics of Gun Control

When two members of the McCloskey family defended their home and family by showing an automatic rifle, they probably didn’t plan on having to defend themselves further politically when a very anti-gun politician found a way to attack them for defending themselves. It is said that “demonstrators” were “on their way somewhere else” and were just “walking by” the McCloskey property when the McCloskeys threatened them. Why then, did they break one of the McClosky’s gates? Even if that were true, the McCloskeys were within their rights to display their defense tools if that would in any way prevent violence if they thought, even wrongly, that they were “under attack.” Point is, nobody was hurt, whether or not the threat was real—and that local politician pretending to be a law-enforcer had no business injecting herself into the situation. Her action is purely political and twists the law unmercifully if it proceeds. A senator asking for an investigation is NOT “interfering with a local matter.” It is calling for a needed investigation into an abuse of power by a local politician. (Fox 2 Now)

It Ain't Over Yet

The Senate, in a “last-minute action,” (what else is new?) renewed the ban on plastic guns so now people can’t Xerox a gun and carry it on a plane. Whodathunkit? Their fixation on guns is still strange when you remember how many deadly weapons are all around us on a daily basis. Remember, there wasn’t a single gun involved in the takeover of four planes that resulted in 3,000 deaths on September 11, 2001. But that goes right by the anti-gun fools. The fault in ALL cases is the gun, no matter whether or not a gun was used, or if the gun was there legally. They don’t care. They just want get rid of guns, period. If that were possible. (Lawyer Herald)

Killing Self Defense

Do the anti-gun fools really think that eliminating guns will stop all violent crime? They can’t be that stupid… can they? But apparently, they are. They have to be aware that violence predated guns. That before guns were the chief instrument for violence, that position was held by a sharp blade. People injured and killed each other very efficiently with knives and swords. And if they actually succeed in eliminating guns, knives will again come to the fore and violence will continue. The obvious solution is to find out why so many people want to commit violence and get in the way of that violence. Eliminating the TOOL for that violence is NOT the answer. But they don’t know that, and they actively resist admitting it. Why? I don’t really think they are all stupid, although they act as is they were. We need to stop them from making all their stupid anti-gun fool laws that only get honest, law-abiding people killed. People are saying the head of “MOMS Against Guns” (or something like that) has killed more people than guns not in the hands of fools, and they’re right. That also applies to politicians who follow her lead and make stupid anti-gun fool laws. (Just common sense)

Don't Have to Obey

Sheriffs don’t have to obey today’s anti-gun laws and they’re not going to. A growing number of them are REFUSING to enforce unconstitutional anti-gun laws and they’re right to do so. Liberals accuse them of “violating their oath of office,” but I disagree. A law that does not conform to the Constitution of the United States is, according to no less an authority than the Supreme Court, NO LAW and should NOT be enforced. So their actions in refusing to enforce those unconstitutional laws IS adhering to their oath of office. Believe it. And more and more of them are figuring this out. (The Blaze)

Don't Shoot the Legs

If the cop in the this scenario had just “aimed for the legs” as that crazed fool came after him with a screwdriver, he would have been dead several times over. When the cop stopped him (for what, I don’t know, but the cop threatened the suspect, in no way), he immediately attacked the cop with a screwdriver, which is a weapon that can inflict deadly injuries. As he charged, the cops shot him many times, with no seeming effect, until the last shots. If that cop had followed Joe Biden’s instructions, he’d be dead, even though the suspect was TECHNICALLY unarmed. This, and many other situations again prove that our former vice president, now a presidential candidate, hasn’t a clue about anything, let alone “gun control.” The advice to “shoot for the legs” is just as stupid as his former advice to homeowners when their home is attacked, to “fire a warning shot with a shotgun.” One man tried that, and ended up being the only one arrested by the cops. These instances are ample evidence that we should never leave split-second decisions in life-and-death cases to the politicians, sitting in their “Ivory Towers.” They make, and enforce their many anti-gun fool laws while the law-breakers just ignore them and us their illegally-gotten guns to victimize the law-abiding, who are the only ones who actually OBEY their silly laws. Anti-gun fool laws only apply to the law-abiding, who are NOT the problem. (Self-Reliance Central)

Denying the Obvious

The anti-gun fools will never be satisfied, because their ideas just don’t work. Meanwhile, they deny the very idea that DOES work in stopping gun violence. As soon as they heard about the “average citizen” who killed a would-be mass killer before he could kill more than two of the hundreds of worshipers in that Fort Worth church, they moved to put a stop to having ANYBODY in such places who have their own guns and can stop such atrocities in their tracks. They see somebody effectively doing what they CLAIM their laws do, and they immediately move to put a stop to it. Even stupid people know that the way to self defense is NOT to make yourself defenseless. Yet they continue to ignore the effectiveness of allowing people to be armed, in self defense. Former NY Mayor Bloomberg says, “We can’t allow the average citizen to be armed.” Why the hell NOT, Mike? Who died and made you God that you should make such a stupid statement? Anti-gun laws do not work. Guns in the hands of “average citizens” DO. Which would put the anti-gun fools “out of a job,” and they don’t want that. (Just common sense)

Blame It On the Guns

As usual, those lame-brained liberal (Dumbocrat) politicians miss the mark and blame all their gun violence on the inanimate tool. The gun. Of course, that ignores the silly and stupid policies they install that contribute to that violence. Like in NYC releasing thousands of felons so they can victimize the honest people in that city while doing all he can to stifle any police response. The gun was invented to allow the honest people to effectively oppose the workings of the dishonest individuals who want to be able to victimize them at will. But then those dishonest individuals, who were denied access to guns legally, went out and got them illegally, and used them to further victimize the law-abiding. The guns are NOT responsible for the violence. The PEOPLE are. There was rampant violence long before anybody even knew what a gun was. Look back 200 or more years and the sword was the instrument of violence and it’s use only ended when the gun was invented, since the sword, no matter how deadly it was in its time, was no match for the gun. But that does not mean the gun is at fault. It is only the latest TOOL to be used by the law-breakers in their quest to victimize as many people as possible. (Breitbart)

One More Chance

There has been another mall shooting in Columbia, Maryland (close enough to DC to frighten politicians), according to Fox News. The last one that was bally-hooed was NOT a “mall shooting.” It was simply one guy shooting another that happened IN a mall. Whatever; it’s just another chance for the anti-gun fools to clamor for yet more silly laws that do nothing except give such people more unarmed victims while that leads to more dead people who aren’t allowed the means to self-defense, the right to carry their own guns. Nobody can convince these brain-dead politicos that the laws they make are useless, and that they kill people. They just refuse to listen and go out and make more restrictive anti-gun laws. They never learn from life. (Baltimore Sun)

The Right Idea

As stupid liberal politicians are working assiduously to make us defenseless in the face of the crime wave expected as they release violent criminals “because of Covid 19,’ while limiting the ability of the law abiding to get their own guns for self defense, Americans are buying guns in record numbers, both legally and illegally, from some of the very criminals against whom they will need them. They know that approaching is going to be a need to defend themselves because the cops can’t. They couldn’t even at full strength because they couldn’t be everywhere, but with the movement to defund the cops gaining strength all over the country, the cops will be even less able to defend them. Americans are known for their ability to defend themselves against marauding criminals in the past—although that has been somewhat weakened as police presence took over the job. But with the weakening of that assistance, the need to have their tools for their own defense means having their own guns. And they have responded to that need by emptying many gun stores. The criminals, who figured they’d have a “gay old time” victimizing the law abiding are going to be very surprised when they die at the hands of their intended victims. Americans have always been a “hardy breed,” and, with the exception of the few who would not “rise up” in self defense, are quite capable of defending themselves in the absence of the cops. (Just common sense)

Another School Shooting

There has been yet another shooting in a school, where guns are not allowed by law. When are these ignorant politicians going to learn that laws do NOT stop criminals and crazies from shooting up places? I’m only aware of ONE shooting in a gun store, and the killer ended up quickly dead. Another shooter tried to shoot up a church, but there was one small woman who had a legal gun and she shot him, stopping his shooting spree. It has become obvious that “no gun zones” are an INVITATION to shooters to come in and shoot people while there will be no guns there to oppose him. When are our fool politicians going to get this very simple idea? Probably never, because they’re “tone deaf” to reason. They’ll keep making their ignorant laws to disarm us and let us be killed by people who don’t pay attention to laws. I just don’t understand the mindset of these fools. (Just common sense)

Sen. Yee's An Imbecile

California State Senator Leland Yee (Democrat, as usual) is an immigrant from China. He should be sensitive to protecting the Constitution, since they had none there. But he isn’t. He was instrumental in the “bullet button” law that forced gun makers on the AR 15 to create a magazine removing system that required a TOOL to remove. This applies to the AR 15 but not to other weapons with the same firing rate and use the same ammunition like a Ruger Mini-14.. This law is based on the fact the gun “LOOKS” mean. Sen. Yee knows absolutely NOTHING about firearms. He only knows the AR 15 “looks mean” and he is horrified that people can actually BUY such a gun. But he doesn’t seem to be concerned about other guns just like it. And since he can’t just ban the gun, he makes a law to ban the magazine release. This writer asks: “Do we have to weld the magazine in place to satisfy these people?” This law simply shows they just want to make your gun useless for the purpose it is designed: self-defense. (GunNews Daily)

The Predictable Response

Remember that St. Louis couple that defended it’s home and life from violent threatening rioters who were committing felonious breakins to get to them with an automatic weapon? Rioters who broke a gate to get to them, making that couple “afraid for their lives?” Now the cops have come for their weapon to make sure that doesn’t happen again. They WANT them to fear for their lives, maybe get beaten to death by an angry mob. I have noticed that this is the usual response by the authorities when they find a person has the means for self defense, knowing the cops are precious minutes away—minutes in which thugs can do much damage, even kill them. They come and take away that tool for self defense, even though the Constitution guarantees us the right to have it. They know the high court operates so slowly they can get away with that for many months, maybe even many years before they are ordered to return that tool to the owner—maybe long after that owner has been killed in a subsequent riot, that may come, since the rioters know how stupid those “authorities” are, and what they will do. So they won’t have to “back off” in the face of that tool this time and they can now do what they want, maybe even kill them. (Daily Wire)

I'm Not Dead Yet

Reports to the contrary are a bit premature. I’ve just been in the hospital for the last 2 weeks while they took care of some “bleeders” in my intestines. While they were at it they took care of a few other items, and I’m actually still in a rehab facility (no, not THAT kind). Posts may be a little spotty until the 15^th, their estimated day I get to go home. But I’ll do my best.