Hypocrites Personified

Leland Yee, one of the most virulent anti-gun voices in the California legislature, has been CONVICTED, of what? Gun trafficking! I guess he figured that the more legal guns he could dispense with, the more ILLEGAL guns he could sell. That this is “hypocrite personified” goes without saying, and brings into question the motives of other anti-gun fools. In pleading for mercy, Yee said this: “In the 67 years of my life, I have devoted much of it to the work of the community, to people here in San Francisco and in the state of California.” But of course, that raises the question, what was he doing “on the side” all those years to benefit the illicit gun industry? He also said that he had hurt his family and his supporters, and that would “weigh on me the rest of my life.” Yeah, riiiight! He's just sorry he got caught. (Washington Post)

Million MOMS Against Guns

Or something like that. They held a "massive rally" in Topeka, Kansas, the other day--and 44 people showed up. I guess nobody cares about their brand of gun control in Topeka. That's happening more and more recently, as outfits like theirs plan "massive rallies" that draw very few people. You'd think they'd get the idea that fewer and fewer people give a damn about their efforts to violate the Constitution's Second Amendment and make us DEFENSELESS against the millions of ILLEGALLY armed criminals and terrorists out there. They just can't get it through their thick skulls that more and more intelligent people don't believe their BS any more, and so don't show up for their "rallies." I guess fools will always be with us, and this is the best proof of it. (CJ Online)

She Calls It Common Sense

And then she goes on to say that “gun-free zones work. "There is no evidence (there's that favorite phrase again) they don't.” Really? What about the fact that all but TWO mass shootings in the United States have occurred IN gun free zones? And what about all the criminals who have chosen to rob and KILL people in gun free zones, such as a Wal-Mart or a Target Stores parking lot? Maybe it is just that you choose to IGNORE such stories, so you can maintain your anti-gun narrative. Courtney Stewart, the writer of this article only graduated high school in 2003, and is obviously too young to know ANYTHING. She hasn't been on this Earth long enough to know anything. Yet she pretends to “school” others on things she obviously knows nothing about. Gun-free zones ARE “magnets” for bad guys who want to do us damage. The evidence IS there, even if she chooses not to see it. It's as obvious as the nose on her face, but she probably can't see that, either. (Citrus County Chronicle)

Big Miscalculation

Democrats assumed the female vote was theirs, just as they assumed other things in the 2016 election. I'm not saying miscalculating the female vote “did them in,” but it certainly helped. More and more women are arming themselves and getting training that lets them be the equal to men in handing guns. Democrats assumed the female vote was “a done thing,” and it wasn't. As they gained knowledge in the use and handling of guns, it gave them a lot more confidence in their ability to defend themselves without depending on the men in their lives.They moved consistently AWAY from the Democrat Party, which is pretty much dedicated to taking away our constitutional right to self defense, and to own and carry a gun. Democrats miscalculated many things, and continue to do so. Which is why they will continue to lose to people like Donald Trump, and those who support his programs. They continue to think somebody cheated, and stole the election. That way, they don't have to face up to reality and change their playbook. (Washington Examiner)

Not A Gun Problem

“It's a PEOPLE problem--a GANG problem!” You can't solve the gun violence problem by limiting gun ownership for LEGAL gun owners because the bulk of the violence it committed by gang members, who all get their guns ILLEGALLY. There are several ways to approach that problem, the first being to change their way of thinking. Second, to help them, another way is to promote “family living,” so they won't NEED gangs as a substitute for families. Get well-paying jobs that keep them occupied so they will not have time to “hang” with gangs. Maybe Chicago is beginning to figure out their problem. This was discovered by an outside source. The Chicago politicians have yet to take it up. It depends on whether or not they do, whether or not they begin to really attack their “gun violence problem,” or continue to have more and more people killed every year. (Chicago Sun-Times)

A Gun Is A Gun

Then the Fourth Circuit Court says, “We don't have the power to “extend” the Second Amendment protection to weapons of war.” But that's faulty thinking on the part of the judges. They don't have the authority NOT to “extend” it to “weapons of war.” A gun is a gun, and the Constitution clearly states that Americans will NOT have their right to be armed abridged! And that included 'weapons of war.” The Constitution did NOT exclude “weapons of war” from its guarantee. So no matter how you figure it, this ruling is NOT correct, and is a good example of how the courts are the enemies of the right of Americans to be armed. This is why there needs to be a way to reverse ignorant rulings and punish the judges who make them. (National Review)

Another Trend

Politicians are “waking up to reality” and making laws allowing people to carry their guns for self defense without the bother and expense of getting a “permit.” They're beginning to realize they don't have the right to limit that right for Americans. The Second Amendment to the Constitution prevents that. New Hampshire is the latest state to “wise up,” having passed a law to allow their citizens to carry guns without a permit. Eleven states already have such laws, and 16 are working on legislation to allow it. And it's happening with more and more frequency, as more politicians begin to realize on which side of the bread is the butter. Shannon Watts, founder of “MOMS Against Guns (or something like that) says such laws are an anomaly, but the frequency with which they are being passed suggests otherwise. I think SHE is the anomaly. (Washington Post)

He's Got It Right!

Georgia Rep. Eddie Lumsden recognizes that the Second Amendment is a RIGHT, not a privilege, as other politicians maintain. There isn't ANYTHING in the Bill of Rights that is a “privilege,” but those politicians aren't intelligent enough to realize it. Or they don't WANT to realize it, in their zeal to disarm all America and make them DEFENSELESS against the millions of ILLEGAL guns out there in the hands of criminals, crazies, and Islamic terrorists, who are pouring into America every day, ready to KILL all who don't convert to their perverted “religion.” Declaring it a privilege is part and parcel of the anti-gun fools' campaign to keep Americans defenseless. And they're losing, as witness the multiple failures of their “common sense gun laws” in Congress, and in legislatures, all over the country. There's a good reason why they're losing; they're going not only against the Second Amendment, but against the will of the American people, as well. (Bearing Arms)

2 Hour Response Time

That's how long it took for the cops to arrive on a home invasion call in Detroit, recently. What better reason to allow private citizens to have their own guns for self defense, and to carry same without “abridgment” of the Second Amendment guarantee that NO LAWS can be made to abridge that right. Luckily, that family wasn't harmed, by the grace of God. But they were trapped in their home for 30 minutes while the bad guys rifled their home. Some of the intruders left during the invasion, probably to get the stolen items out of the house and in storage, so they won't be stolen from THEM. The one guy left tried to leave, but was held for the cops when they FINALLY arrived. Hopefully, he'll “rat out” his accomplices. The dispatcher who “dropped the ball” will be punished, maybe fired, and that is only right. That dispatcher's incompetence could have gotten somebody killed. One gun in the house, in the hands of one of those living there, could have made all the difference. But the “gun laws” in Detroit will not allow it, leaving their citizens defenseless. (WXYZ 7)

"Dads Demand Guns!"

Because it's my ass that has to go see what that noise was.” When the wife wakes up and hears a noise, she does not go to find out what it was. I do. So do I go out there with nothing to use to defend myself if somebody who shouldn't be there is there, and has an ILLEGAL gun? Anti-gun fools say I should “just go back to bed and ignore it.” Safer that way. Also it gives the interloper free rein to steal my belongings, and maybe even come to my bedroom later and kill me. And my wife. No, sir. Not me. I'm going to go out there with my LEGAL gun in my hand, and KILL the SOB if I have to, to defend myself, and my family. If I can't get a gun legally, I'll get it any way I can, for self-defense. Nothing more. And I don't give a damn what your silly “gun laws” say. If I go to jail for that, so be it. My family will be safe. The only thing your silly “gun laws” do is make life easier for the burglars and thugs out there. They do NOTHING to make life safer for us human beings. If I have to break the law to make my family safe, I will. And be damned to you, and your “gun laws.” When the cops take over an HOUR to get there, I'm the only defense my family has. (Fox 5)

They Can't Tell the Truth

So the anti-gun fools systematically lie about guns. One way they lie is to cite figures from sources that KNOWINGLY lie to promote “gun laws." One such source is the Mass Shooting Tracker, (MST) one used often by the liberal media. MST openly brags about “using a different method” to define mass shootings that inflates the number of mass shootings by a factor of TEN! Their method is used “to punch holes in the NRA's argument.” The NRA is the National Rifle Association, the most successful pro-gun organization. If you have to LIE to “punch holes in their argument,” you're being DISHONEST. Their phony 'figures' are regularly used by the Washington Post and PBS and others to make it look like mass shootings happen much more often than they do. The liberal media is dishonest, but this is RAW! (Daily Caller)

It Doesn't Happen?

The anti-gun fools keep saying it doesn't happen, but it does; often. Somebody with a gun saves a life from another with a gun trying to take one. In this case, a woman shot her “boyfriend” when he tried to kill her son during an argument with him. There's no telling what would have happened to her if he had been successful in killing her son. But her action made that a moot point by killing him. What motivated him to start shooting at her son over his taking a car without permission, I don't know. I DO know HER motivation in shooting him to death. It was keeping her son alive. (WMC Action News)

Million MOMS Against Guns

Or something like that. They held a "massive rally" in Topeka, Kansas, the other day--and 44 people showed up. I guess nobody cares about their brand of gun control in Topeka. That's happening more and more recently, as outfits like theirs plan "massive rallies" that draw very few people. You'd think they'd get the idea that fewer and fewer people give a damn about their efforts to violate the Constitution's Second Amendment and make us DEFENSELESS against the millions of ILLEGALLY armed criminals and terrorists out there. They just can't get it through their thick skulls that more and more intelligent people don't believe their BS any more, and so don't show up for their "rallies." I guess fools will always be with us, and this is the best proof of it. (CJ Online)

Selective Rulings

The 4th circuit Court has ruled that "AR-15s and their magazines, or magazines 'like' them, are covered under their "assault rifles" legislation. And are NOT protected by the Second Amendment. Which effectively creates a new way to "get around" the Second Amendment, simply by "declaring" certain guns NOT to be protected under the Second. This is not under the power of the court, but they took it, anyway. The anti-gun fools look for any way they can to declare as many guns as they can, "not protected under the Second," and this is now one way, "certified" by the 4th Circuit. It's wrong, but it is now as good as a law, until we can find an INTELLIGENT judge to reverse it. (Prince Law)

Ending "Gun Control"

Trump has promised to end gun control, as we know it, today. And he is already working on a measure to end "gun-free zones" in public schools, nationwide. Other anti-gun laws are in his sights. But the fight is far from over. Local "authorities" are still dominated by anti-gun fools who will continue to make their illogical and stupid "anti-gun laws." Gun-free zones, for instance, have been a massive failure. Every mass shooting but two, so far, have taken place IN a "gun-free zone." Potential mass shooters SEARCH OUT gun-free zones in which to do their dirty work. Many other gun crimes have taken place there. Such as in Wal-Mart or Target Store parking lots. But even though Trump knows better, local politicians and bureaucrats do NOT.

They don't care how many innocent people they get killed with their silly "flights of fancy" they call, "common sense gun laws." Pressure from above in the next four, maybe eight years will have an effect on that, but it will not be total. The locals will continue to make their silly laws, and private organizations will still fall for the "gun-free zone" myth, and the other anti-gun myths that become law. So you need to be alert, and get rid of known anti-gun fools in your legislatures. One anti-gun writer says the Aurora Theater shooter said nothing about CHOOSING a gun-free zone as evidence that gun-free zones are not "chosen" by mass shooters. as if what he SAID or did not say was evidence of his thinking. But if you listen closely tho what he DOES say, he did. Other mass shooters confirm it. (Politifact)

"No Evidence to Support"

That's a favorite statement for liberals. They say, "There's no evidence to support" this, and "no evidence to support" that, when there IS, and they ignore it, so they can say that. Such is the case here, where they say "There's no evidence to support the theory that a 'good guy with a gun in the crowd' can stop a BAD guy with a gun," while there IS evidence it is true. MASSIVE amounts of it, which they roundly IGNORE, while spouting their lies. They still think that, if the average person were allowed to carry a gun legally, they'd "go insane" and kill somebody over a trifle, like a fender-bender or an argument over a parking space. They discount all the MILLIONS of guns there are already out there in the hands of gang members, who do, and others, who are simply criminals. In a church in Colorado Springs, CO, an armed worshiper they CALLED a "security guard DID stop such a mass shooting, before the shooter could kill more than two. And there are uncountable other such instances, which they ignore. (WTSP TV)

More Armed Cops

Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe, the outgoing commissioner of Scotland Yard, fervently believes in armed policemen. He even said that in his final speech as commissioner. He decried the refusal of many cops to carry guns. Whoever originally fostered the whole idea of cops without guns was INSANE, and has gotten many cops killed. Criminals usually don't feel the same way, and don't hesitate to shoot cops. He noted that one in eight officers refuse to carry guns, in spite of reports like the terrorist killings in France, while the cops had to cower behind their cars and let the perps get away, since they weren't armed, If I were a cop (and I used to be), I'd CERTAINLY want to be armed, to "level the playing field" with the criminals. (Irons In the Fire)

"You Gotta Be Nuts!"

If you think gun control (as we know it) saves lives! That's what comedian Jackie Mason said (with an added comment by me). Mason seems to be "the voice of reason" we sorely need, these days. There's no telling how many people gun control (as we know it) has killed, while the "gun-haters" apparently don't care. They have an INSANE hatred of GUNS and want to disarm everybody (except those gun-haters who carry their own guns, anyway, or can hire armed security while denying us the same right to self defese). Mason says that gun-control politicians who go about behind a wall of armed security while denying us the same right, "just don't care" how many innocent people they get killed by disarming law-abiding people. And he's absolutely right. (Breitbart)

Chicago Ignorance--Again

Chicago "authorities" say "guns are racist, and are a public health issue." Further, they say that gang violence is CAUSED by "white privilege." How blind and stupid ARE these people? Guns are NOT racist, nor are they a "public health issue." And they are NOT "caused by white privilege." That's just an effort to divert blame from their own stupidity. Gang violence is caused by stupid black people (As opposed to intelligent black people) who would rather shoot each other than have a meaningful discussion about their differences. It is a PEOPLE issue, not a public health issue. The politicians in Chicago have no idea how to stem gun violence, so they blame it on everything BUT what it really is, which does NOTHING to solve the problem, but no doubt makes them "feel better about themselves." (Chicago Sun-Times)

Really That Stupid?

"Teachers will kill their Students!' That's what politicians say about the law they are debating now in SC to allow teachers and other school staff to be armed, so they can stop a potential school mass shooter before he can kill lots of kids. Kill their students? Very doubtful, unless a student comes at them with his own gun and tries to kill THEM (and there are gang members in school who might). They say if the teacher "stashes his gun in his desk, a kid could get his hands on it, and kill a few people. As if the teacher isn't smart enough to keep the gun on his person and CONTROL access to it. They always base their objections on what "might" happen if the gun holder is completely stupid and irresponsible--which they would be TRAINED not to be. They think teachers are really STUPID and can't be trusted to be armed, They are actually thinking of themselves. (Post and Courier)

Extreme Vetting for Gun Buyers

Again, the incompetent leaders in Chicago want to make yet another law, on top of those already in effect, that will not do ANYTHING to reduce the gun violence they seem to be so worried about. Using a play on Trump's words, they want to create an "extreme vetting" program for legal gun buyers. Forget the fact that they already have that, in CURRENT laws. Just try and buy a gun LEGALLY without "extreme vetting." Of course, this completely IGNORES the fact that neither the current law NOR the new one proposed will affect ILLEGAL gun buyers, in the least. Illegal gun buyers don't subject themselves to "vetting." Can anybody show me a gang member or other kind of criminal who bought his gun legally? Gangs have wars over trivial things like the wrong person being in a gang's "turf." And they continue unabated. No "crackdown" on gangs is planned, and that's what they need. Meanwhile, they concentrate on people who OBEY the law. I had a Chicago Tribune story about this, but I couldn't get past their "anti-ad blocker" notice. (Chicago Tribune)

"DC Gun Laws Work" (?)

They say their gun laws have kept DC safe for years. Hardy har, har (giggle, gurgle!)! Thanks, Newsweak, I needed a good laugh, and that's the best one I've had all week. They call Trump's words "extreme and divisive," and that his rhetoric is "little more than empty promises." They are disturbed that he is KEEPING his promises. One of their "fears" is that Trump will "mess with" DC's gun laws, which they say have "protected DC for years." Why then, does DC rank right up there, right behind Chicago as one of the most dangerous places in which to live, because of all the gun violence? Now let's look at the FACTS, rather than fantasy: There is a distinct UPTICK in gun violence in DC this year, just as there has been for all recent years. That's what this magazine ignores. They're running an average total of almost 500 gun crimes a year, and Chicago has to "step lively" to stay ahead of them. And Newsweak has the audacity to say their laws have made DC safer? I have to giggle every time I think of how DUMB they are! (Newsweak)

Gun Grabber Fake News

This story was run in the Knoxville News-Sentinel and asserts that "constitutional carry" is dangerous. This is the usual gun-grabber lie, and they not only bought it, they're carrying it on further by spewing it in their pages, without ANY stats to back it up. This IGNORES the millions of ILLEGAL guns already on the streets, many of which are in the hands of gang members, who are mostly too young to have a gun, but get them easily, ILLEGALLY, anyway. It also ignores the adult criminals who not only break the law in buying their guns, they break the law, period. That's what they DO! And allowing honest, law-abiding citizens to carry guns for self defense is NOT DANGEROUS to anybody but illegally armed CRIMINALS why try to victimize them. Gun-haters just will never understand that law-abiding people will NOT "go wild" if they have a gun in their pocket and kill somebody over a fender bender or a real or imagined slight (as gang members do on a regular basis with their illegal guns). Or they just REFUSE to understand it because it doesn't fit their preconceived notions, nor advance their bogus narrative. (Ammoland)

More Fake Gun News

You'd think NBC News would be a little more careful in the stories it runs, wouldn't you? But they're not. Or they WANT to run fake news, as long as it advances their fake narrative to disarm honest, law-abiding people. They say that, since gun parts can be sent to customers and AREN'T guns, at that point, it is LEGAL to make and sell them to criminals and crazies. That they only become guns AFTER the customer finishes the assembly, and that is LEGAL. There's only one little problem. that's FALSE. And The ATF SAID it's false. Apparently, they didn't bother to, as this Free Beacon writer did, ASK them. They just ran with the LIE. The more I hear about this kind of thing, the less I respect the media. There's no use watching it, because they tell so many lies, it's hard to tell what's true and what's not. So I just stay away from the liberal media so it doesn't pollute my mind. (Washington Free Beacon)

Short-Sighted Action

The authorities went through a complicated series of actions after a "concealed carrier" came to the defense of a cop who was in danger of being murdered by a damned fool motorist, He came upon the scene while the "bad guy" was "beating the hell" out of the cop, had taken his gun, and was about to kill him. Whereupon this hero warned him, and when he did not stop, "put three" into him, killing him. He was then forced to suffer through a hearing to "clear him" against charges for killing that fool. He also was disarmed, by having his gun taken away, as "evidence." That made him an "easy target" for any of that guy's friends who might want revenge. Like he was going to "take the gun and run." So a local gun store made him a GIFT of another gun to replace it. The facts of the case should have made both actions unnecessary. But not for bureaucrats. They must have "all the "Is dotted" and "Ts crossed," and all the paperwork in place. In a world where "black men" are commonly shot by other black men, this black man came to the rescue of a white cop, by shooting another black man in the act of killing that cop. Unlike in Ferguson, MO, where a cop doing a righteous killing was vilified and made out to be the "bad guy" by a very vocal minority, this case caused little outcry. (Bearing Arms)

Shouldn't Even Be A Fight

This shouldn't even BE a fight. Obama's "rules change" that told his bureaucrats to put the names of elderly people who requested others to handle their finances on the "no-gun list" as a means of disarming yet another group of law-abiding people, should never have been made. Just asking others to handle your finances does NOT mean you are "mentally deficient" or a danger to society. Yet the "fight continues," as anti-gun fools line up to KEEP that rule in place, even though it is obviously patently WRONG. But that makes no difference to liberals in government. Anything that will disarm large numbers of people is something they want to keep, even though it is unconstitutional, and WRONG. (Bearing Arms)

Banning Lead In Bullets

Politicians and bureaucrats have "jumped on" lead poisoning from bullet fragments to allow them to ban lead in ammunition because doctors don't bother to look for, and remove lead fragments from people who get shot, unless they're in dangerous places in the body. In the United States, testing for lead in the body in occupations where lead poisoning is likely is routine. Which proves they KNOW it is a danger, but still don't bother to remove them. It IS only a small number of people affected in this way, but I'm sure it looms large to the victims of such laziness. Dying from being shot has long been laughingly called "lead poisoning," but this proves it's no joke. It's a REAL cause of death. It's just yet another way to make buying and using a gun more expensive and difficult. (CNN)

How Is It Possible?

Wal-Mart stores are "gun-free zones." Seems like one law-abiding person wasn't so law-abiding (or "house rule" abiding, anyway). He must have known Wal-Mart has a "house rule" making their stores and property a "gun-free zone." He was a legal concealed carrier, and brought his gun anyway. A good thing he did, because when he saw two guys having a knife fight, he stepped in and held them at gun point until the cops arrived, to take them into custody. He probably saved one, maybe two lives by so doing. He doesn't work for Wal-Mart, so they can't do anything to him for bringing his gun, though I'm sure they'd like to. Maybe they'll just ban him from coming there in the future, which is really stupid. Incidents where "good guys with guns" intervene to save lives seem to be coming more and more often. I don't know if they are being reported more, or are actually increasing as more and more people become concealed carriers. No matter. They prove us right when we say more guns in the hands of law-abiding people means more safety for everybody. Something the anti-gun fools steadfastly deny. (Bearing Arms)

Protecting the Criminal

This state senator in Florida says concealed carry is more needed than ever in the wake of the Ft. Lauderdale Airport shooting. Unlike anti-gun fools, he has a brain and it's working. What if there had been a licensed gun carrier next to the guy who opened fire on everybody that day, who could have "taken him out" before he got a chance to kill a bunch of people? that would be a good thing, right? But anti-gun fools don't think so. They think it's an excuse to make even more USELESS "gun laws" that do not work and get people killed. The only people these laws protect are the criminals, who don't obey ANY laws or regulations. If they mean to kill a bunch of people, what the hell do they care about their piddling laws that say they can't even BUY a gun? Steube is, of course, a Republican. Democrats aren't intelligent enough to support such laws. (The Gun Writer)

Anti-Gun Insanity

At a Spokane, Washington hockey game between two different law-enforcement organizations, the county sheriff came to watch. But he was denied entrance until he disarmed himself. The SHERIFF of the county! The top law enforcement officer of the county! What insanity is this? What if a criminal had brought his gun in ILLEGALLY, and decided to kill a few people? What would this sheriff be able to do? Watch in horror as his fellow citizens were killed by this criminal, who doesn't obey laws? This is how the INSANITY of the anti-gun fools works. They never think about the unintended consequences of their silly actions. They just do it, and to hell with those who die because of it. These people get others KILLED, but they don't care, as long as they can disarm everybody and make them defenseless against ILLEGALLY armed criminals. (Ricochet)

They Went Too Far

As usual, the "one size fits all" theory of government regulation strikes again. Yes, there are a FEW people so deranged they should never be allowed near a gun (some of them are in the government). But this rule, put out by Obama as he went out the door, and which he attempted to make irreversible, BANNED gun ownership, not on their mental inability, but on their asking someone else to handle their finances. That took a constitutional right away from a large segment of our society that HAS no mental disability. This is the typical kind of over regulation of the Obama administration, which gladly, is OVER. And Congress has seen fit to end it, contrary to Obama's effort to make it something they could NOT stop. (Washington Post)

Blaming the Victims

Of course. Memphis Police Director Michael Rawlings blames a new law in Tennessee for the rise in gun crime, because it allows people to carry their gins and store them in their cars, even without a permit to do so. But guns were being stolen way before this. He cites the 851 guns taken from cars (out of 2,000 total stolen, as opposed to 348 stolen from cars in 2013 [he didn't say how many were stolen elsewhere in that period], before the law was passed). His theory was proven false by the fact that MORE guns were stolen from other places. Guns WILL be stolen, no matter where they're stored. Yes, a few more were stolen from cars after the law was passed, but the number is still smaller than the TOTAL of guns stolen, and that is NOT due to the law. But then, anti-gun fools will always twist ANY stats they can to make pro-gun legislation look bad. And this "police politician" is no different. (WREG)

Prosecute Constitution Abuse

Trump was elected president largely on the votes of those who wanted to retain their right to be armed in self defense. He promised to support the Second Amendment, and he could do that by instructing his new Attorney General to take legal action against states that pass laws and make regulations that infringe on people's rights under the Second Amendment. DOJ has prosecuted states in other cases involving violations of the constitution, and this would be right and proper. Washington, DC and Chicago, for instance, have made several laws that have been DECLARED unconstitutional, So they remake the law in almost identical fashion, and pass it, enforcing it until the next time it is declared unconstitutional, fining people big money, end even imprisoning some. This should cause those politicians involved to be subject to lawful indictment and prosecution. This can be done, and it would reassure potential gun owners that he meant what he said. (Second Amendment Foundation)

Democrat Hypocrisy

Hypocrisy is a word used a lot in politics, and for good reason, There is a lot of hypocrisy in politics that politicians ignore. For instance: politicians (mostly Democrats, but some Republicans, too) hate and decry voter ID, but they LOVE "background checks and "carry permits" as a means of "gun control." They fight, tooth and nail, to prevent any kind of "voter ID, claiming it "disenfranchises minorities," as if they couldn't come up with a few bucks for a state ID card or a driver's license. Then they go out and do everything they can to make getting a concealed carry permit as difficult as they can, and the most expensive. Tell me: what's the difference between "carry permits" and voter ID? The answer is, NO voter ID benefits the politicians, making it easier to steal elections. Letting people carry their own guns for self defense is just something some politicians hate, and think they can limit or get rid of, while many of them go around behind a WALL of ARMED "security" while denying citizens the same right, in spite of the constitutional guarantee. (Bullets First)

The "Deadly Duo"

The anti-gun fools are worried. The appointment of Jeff Sessions as Attorney General signals a "new world" for them, and they don't like it. Couple that with the NRA, which is already a "thorn in their sides," and you have a "deadly duo" against their idea of gun control. Sessions knows the Constitution guarantees us the right to be armed in self defense, and he will do everything he can to stop their unconstitutional actions, in concert with the NRA, which has been working alone to do that, in the past, and is now JOINED by powerful assistance. They KNOW their efforts violate one of the most BASIC amendments, and they further know Sessions is not going to let them get away with the things they got used to getting away with under Obama and, before that, Bill Clinton. Bush (the younger) wasn't overly concerned with gun rights, on either side. The next 4 (or maybe 8) years are going to be hard ones for them. (AWR HAWKINS)

Getting Around the Law

Most politicians know they can't just BAN guns, so they do everything they can short of it to make life harder for those who want to buy, or carry their guns for self defense. Their "gun safes," "trigger locks," and "gun-free zones" are ways to that end. They're talking now about making it almost impossible to buy ammunition, without which guns are useless. In Connecticut, the governor wants to raise fees for "carry permits" to unaffordable levels so only the richest of folks can afford it. Or the "security" those people can afford to buy. Governor Malloy wants to cover up his incompetent budget management on the backs of those who want to "carry" by raising the fee from the current $70 (plus an added state fee of another $70, total $140.00), to a total of $300.00, with a $300 renewal fee every five years. Buying a gun is expensive enough, without "carry fees" that rival the cost of the gun, itself. (NRA-ILA)

Big Anti-Gun Rally!

A Witchita State University gun rally against "campus carry" was called to show their strength--and it did. All of 15 people showed up, including the speaker. Looks like almost NOBODY is interested in stopping people from carrying guns in self defense in Witchita. "The rally was in support of proposed legislation that would undo campus carry for law-abiding citizens, forcing said citizens to wander the campus defenseless like everybody else." I guess real people don't want to keep them defenseless like the anti-gun fools do. Being unconstitutional notwithstanding, the people have shown their opposition to these high-handed fools who want to keep people defenseless against the millions of ILLEGAL guns already out there, being carried by people who want to do us ill. I really get tired of saying this and having it "bounce off" those fools who want everybody disarmed, in spite of the constitutional guarantee. (Breitbart)

In Six More States

It's a trend, folks! Six more states are in the process of considering permitless concealed carry. apparently, politicians are realizing that this is the way to reduce gun violence, by eliminating the ILLEGAL gun owners who prey on UNARMED citizens. The six states are Alabama, New Hampshire, Indiana, Kentucky, South Dakota, and Texas. Indiana is where I was born, so I appreciate that. What will really surprise me is if Colorado, where I now live, ever does the same, with its liberal-dominated legislature and governorship. Twelve other states already have permitless carry. Adding these will make it 18. A big part of the country. The country is slowly getting smart, although the anti-gun fools are horrified. They're always horrified when laws are made to let people defend themselves. (Breitbart)

Against the Second

The Maryland Legislature is adamantly AGAINST the Second Amendment. They prove it, every time they pass one of their onerous "gun laws" that VIOLATE it. Laws such as the wrongly named "Maryland Firearms Safety Act," which is anything but. That law sent several firearms manufacturing companies elsewhere, where the government was more "friendly" to them, and caused some gun stores to simply close. While lawmakers were patting themselves on the back, cops were trying their best to put down the REAL problem, increasing gun crimes committed by ILLEGAL gun owners who get their guns out of the trunks of the cars owned by other criminals, in a back alley somewhere. something this law CANNOT reach. So far, ALL the "gun laws" only target LEGAL gun owners, who aren't the problem, for the most part. One of the most glaring failures where "gun laws" are concerned is the "gun-free zones"all over the country, not just in Maryland. Such zones only serve to INCREASE gun violence, as do all the other gun laws, But don't tell the anti-gun fools, they have a "tin ear" for that. They're convinced they're right, so don't confuse them with facts. (America's First Freedom)

Increasing Gun Crime

That's what ALL the "gun laws" do, so far. But the anti-gun fools won't believe it when we tall them. Their minds are made up, so don't confuse them with facts. Gun safes, Safe gun storage laws, gun-free zones, even background checks only affect LEGAL gun owners, who don't commit most of the gun crimes. Those are committed mostly by ILLEGAL gun owners, who IGNORE such laws and rules. As an example, ALL mass shootings have happened IN "gun-free zones." Would-be mass shooters SEEK OUT gun-free zones because they can be pretty sure legal gun owners, who OBEY laws, won't be armed, there. And they don't put their guns in gun safes at home, or practice "safe gun storage." They don't care. And there is NO WAY to get illegal gun owners to sit for a background check. Gun laws, as made today, are fruitless. They're USELESS to reduce gun crime, instead INCREASING it by disarming law-abiding people and making them DEFENSELESS against illegal gun owners, who obey NO laws. We tell them the answer, which is more law-abiding people with their own guns, being allowed to carry them everywhere. But they won't hear of it, and they're in places where they can get those useless laws passed. (Just common sense)

Gun Buyers New Confidence

People were buying guns at record levels during Obama's administration, because they were fearful that Obama would do even more to stop them from being able to defend themselves with a gun, if necessary. Now that Trump is in office, they have regained confidence that this will not happen. Trump has not only PROMISED to get rid of what Obama already accomplished in that arena (not much, thanks to the NRA and some other organizations), he will make laws making it all but impossible for liberals to do what Obama couldn't. Anti-gun fools will have a "tough road to hoe" in the next four (maybe 8) years. They've done this to the extent that the FBI says new background check applications have DROPPED by half a million, just in January. (Breitbart)

Judges Aren't Too Smart

At least, not in the Fourth Circuit Court. They just said, in a ruling, that if you have a gun, you're automatically a "suspect." Now THAT is stupid! Judges should be smarter than that. Having a gun, LEGALLY, does NOT make you a "suspect." It only makes you better able to defend yourself against the REAL suspect, the man with an ILLEGAL gun. The fourth Circuit recently ruled that just carrying a gun (legally) makes you "suspect," until proven innocent. That violates the Fourth Amendment and the "innocent until proven guilty" concept, which is LAW in this country. Maybe these judges don't know that. If not, they have no business BEING on the Court. One judge said that merely carrying a gun (legally or otherwise) makes you a danger to others and subject to foregoing certain constitutional protections afforded to persons who do NOT carry guns. How big a fool does that make this judge? If they saw what I said, they might want to find me in contempt. They'd be right. I AM in contempt of this court. (America's First Freedom)

"They're Out of Step"

Bloomberg's suckers, "Everytown Against Guns (or some such) says, "The NRA and President Trump are 'out of step" with the American people." Oh, yeah? How then, did Trump win the presidency against all the predictions about what the American people thought? And why does the NRA have MILLIONS of members who are concerned about their RIGHT to own and use a gun for self defense? Why do the anti-gun fools LOSE just about every time they try something? I think it's "Everytown" and all the other anti-gun fools that are "out of step," and they aren't intelligent enough to realize it. They got "bent out of shape" about the NRA being included in a presidential strategy meeting at the White House the other day--why? It they're so "out of step," such a meeting wouldn't make much difference, would it? (Guns)

The Anti-Gun Fallacy

MIchael Bloomberg, one of the most virulent anti-gun fools, lives in a "gated community" guarded by men with guns, that they CALL a gun-free zone." So do many other anti-gun fools, and many (most) of them run around, surrounded by gun-carrying thugs. But they want to deny us the right (guaranteed by the Constitution) to also have armed security, unless we can afford to HIRE it. One Senator thinks the way to self defense is to open our borders to Islamic terrorists, who have PROMISED to kill ALL "unbelievers," while taking away the guns from its citizens so they can't defend themselves. Sen. Chris Murphy (Democrat, of course), is that Senator. I don't know if he lives in such a community or not, but obviously he only talks to people who think the same way he does. So he's not intelligent enough to know how STUPID his thinking is. If we keep electing such damned fools to the Congress, we will continue to get STUPID "gun laws" made. (America's First Freedom)

Enemy of Gun Rights

Michael Bloomberg is an ENEMY of the constitutional right to own and use the means to self defense, a gun. Ever since he finished his ILLEGAL third term as mayor of New York City, where he tried to control their pop-drinking habits and other things that were none of his business, he has been meddling in Second Amendment rights all over the country, trying his best, and spending $MILLIONS to overturn them. I wonder what part of "shall not be abridged" he does not understand. Now he's got his money (again) in Colorado, giving it to lobbyists who want to destroy gun rights here. The Colorado legislature is currently looking at a bill to better the training for teachers and other school employees, so they can carry their guns to school and protect their students if a mass shooter comes to kill them. His minions say the bill will allow no training at all, at the discretion of the county sheriff. The bill is supported by all 64 Colorado county sherifs--and they are the people who should know. (Ammoland)