"Shot In the Back!"

That’s the claim from demonstrators, who are demonstrating because the cops “shot a teenager” who was reaching for his own gun when being confronted by the cops in a robbery investigation. He is known to the cops, and was out on bail for THREE felonies, including sexual assault on a child by a person in a position of trust, according to the records. One of the things often ignored by the liberal media in cases like this is the possibility that this “teenager” was a gang member. They ignore it because the liberal media is “anti-gun,” and they want to promote events like this to advance their narrative. Later evidence will tell if this kid was “shot in the back,” but that won’t likely convince those “demonstrators,” whose minds are usually made up, so they don’t want us to confuse them with facts. I’ve seen way too many of these events, where people blatantly LIE to promote an anti-gun narrative. One of the most egregious example of that occurred in Ferguson, Missouri, where a giant “teenager” was shot by cops when attacking a much smaller cop. The cop shot him as he advanced on him in a threatening fashion, but biased “witnesses” said he was “moving away with his hands up.” Which was a blatant LIE, but the crowd rioted, and did much damage before order was restored. Even so, that cop’s life was ruined, for just doing his job and reacting to the fear for his own life when this GIANT, who had just “strong-armed” a shop owner and was “dancing down the middle of a street” when asked to stop by the cop, who was then attacked. But the media didn’t deign to notice that. (Denver Post)