But Does It Work?

Apparently that doesn't matter to a court in Illinois. If it “makes people feel better,” it's okay to violate a very basic constitutional right. How STUPID are some judges? They suppose that bans on weapons make sense because it “makes people feel safer.” Only one problem: it doesn't stop people from being victimized by criminals with their ILLEGAL guns, as gun ownership will do. Owning and carrying their own guns will ALSO “make people feel safer.” Especially the ones who do have their own guns. But that is not even considered by this kind of a fool. I don't know what's wrong with these anti-gun fools—which this judge seems to be. They can't see reality. They only see what they WANT to see. It's a malady that seems to be common with them. I wonder which came first: stupidity, or gun control? Or are they the same thing? (The

(Right to Bear)