They Tried to Prove Lott Wrong

But they couldn’t. so they LIED about it. They even accused him of using “bad information” in his popular book, “More Guns, Less Crime,” while using bad information themselves in their attempts to debunk his findings that showed that increased concealed carry CAUSED a reduction in violent crime. That they were inept in their efforts goes without saying, but the important thing is, even the NON-inept portion of their findings failed, on all levels, to debunk his findings and, in fact, inadvertently REINFORCED them. Of course, this did not sit well with the anti-gun fools, who are spraying spit all over when they denounce his work (without evidence). They’re really pissed! Now they’re saying (without evidence, of course) that Lott’s research “has been completely discredited” (which it has NOT) and that the “best research” on the relationship of “right to carry” laws to crime is their own paper, that alleges (again, without proof) that RTC temporarily increases aggravated assault (which it does NOT). The efforts of these fools amazes me, but is believed by most people who pay no attention to politics. (Daily Caller)