An anti-gun fool “researcher” found, in his “research,” that
background checks don’t work. Then he says we need more and better
background checks. This is typical of anti-gun fools. Take the
results of “research,” and then deny those results. He basically
told us, “Just
because background checks don’t work, don’t think we don’t need
to use them in our efforts to deny our citizens the constitutional
right to be armed for self defense.”
He didn’t put it exactly that way, but that’s what he was
actually saying. This is a good example of a “researcher” who,
when his research refutes his favorite pipe dream, he just refutes
his refutation and goes right on with his attempts to fool us with
his “research.” I’m becoming convinced that the government just
wants to eliminate self defense as a basic right, and is using
anti-gun fools to do it. By getting rid of the right to own and use
the means to self defense, a gun, they hope to eliminate self
defense, as well. The evidence is that, every time we find something
LESS than a gun that is useful in self defense, the ban it. Like
they’re trying right now to do with stun guns. One cop even took me
to task one day over a metal flashlight I had in my pocket, saying
that it could be used as a weapon. My reply was, “And if I ever use
it as one, we can discuss it then.” (NRA-ILA)
Thursday, November 1, 2018
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment