"Good Is Bad, Bad Is Good"

As in George Orwell's prophetic novel, "1984," a date that was supposed to be far in the future when it was written, the government "Information Services" tell you that simply, "bad is good, and good is bad," and expect you to believe it. Now the New York Times" is doing just that with a recent pronouncement that, "Without gun control, we would be like Soviet Russia," when, in fact, just the opposite is true. If all of us (except the lawbreakers, of course) were disarmed, what would there be to stop "government officials" from doing just what they wanted to do with all of us, on whatever excuse they make up? (As they're even now doing with ANY evidence of "oddity" on the part of a gun owner, even a traffic ticket, in some places) The truth is, there are certain LEGAL requirements for a person being declared "mentally ill," not just the unsupported word of a "government agent" or a politician. The Times is now preaching that very thing with this article. (New York Times)

Irrational Gun Fright

A WWE star, no less, found a gun in his rental car, and was "afraid for his life." Like the gun was a living thing, and would shoot him without anybody touching it, This is completely irrational thinking, which is rife among gun-haters, nationwide. This big, bad, wrestling star was frightened at the very sight of a gun, though it might be said (by some people, anyway) that he had good reason to be afraid, with "Black Lives Matter" spreading the lies that cops automatically want to kill a black man within reach of a gun. But he did the right thing. He called the cops and explained things. they came and got the gun, and praised him for his proper action. Not nearly like the BLM fools think. The cops told him that they find guns in rental cars, all the time. So his finding one was not unusual, or surprising. The point here is, he was frightened by that gun as a result of the LIES told by the BLM fools, who spread fear among people who are gullible enough to listen to them. (TMX Sports)

We "Promise" Protection

Liberals like to blame Trump, or the NRA for the mass shooting at that Florida school. Anything but the REAL reason. But the real blame belongs right in Obama's pocket, because he came up with the "Promise" Program that caused juvenile criminals to NOT be arrested for their "minor" crimes, Therefore, their names would NOT appear on the background check lists the "authorities" use to determine who will have the right to buy a gun. So people like the Florida killer would be able to easily pass such background checks and buy the guns hey will use to kill a bunch of children LEGALLY, as Cruz did. Even after 39 visits by the cops, the MURDERS of many pets, and PUBLISHING, on his social media sites, his INTENTION to kill people. Not only that, the FBI got a DETAILED account of his activities that scared the hell out of me, but caused the FBI to do NOTHING. His "Promise" Program began in Chicago, and we know how successful it was there. Yet it spread, and is being used in several places in the country, INCLUDING Florida. Yet nobody in the anti-gun fool camp will blame that program. Instead, they blame their favorite "whipping boy," the NRA, or their most recent general "whipping boy," President Trump. Ignorance, personified. (The Last Refuge)

Like A Horror Movie

You've seen horror movies where the "monster" keeps getting killed, and keeps "coming back," time after time? It's the same way with gun control. We keep killing it, and it keeps coming back. But this time, I think it's really dead, with the advent of 3D printing being able to "print" a working gun that can kill you. The government has attempted to stop online instructions for making 3D printed guns, but they have nonetheless proliferated. There are now "clubs" whose members work HARD to perfect them and come up with new designs that are more and more stable and dependable. The government might be able to censor that on the Internet, but they can't stop people from gathering to continue to do so, and make them ever better and dependable. The government hates this technology because the "bad guys" can use it for doing ill. But isn't that true of real guns? How about fire? Can they ban fire by law? The bad guys never have a problem getting guns, as witness the MILLIONS of illegal guns now out there, against which the law-abiding NEED a defense, but which the government wants to deny us. I guess they'd rather we DIE than have a means of self defense--just because the bad guys can use it, too. Short sighted thinking and ignorance on their part. (Bearing Arms)

Selective News "Reporting"

CNN made a big thing of USING frightened teenagers who survived the Florida school killings in Broward County Because they think that can feed their silly narrative to get rid of the Second Amendment, along with every LEGAL gun in this country. That this would leave the users of ILLEGAL guns still in possession of their guns to use to victimize the law-abiding doesn't seem to bother them. Meanwhile, they never hold a "forum" for the mothers and fathers of the victims of gang killings in Chicago, where the gun laws are so tight, and stop NO gun killings. I guess they aren't interested in promoting the TRUTH. The truth is, NONE of their highly touted "gun laws" do ANYTHING to stop, or even slow down "gun violence." They want to not only IGNORE that, they want to HIDE it from the view of people who pay only peripheral attention to the news. You know, they people who ignorantly support those useless laws. The truth, again, is that in every city controlled by liberals (who are all anti-gun fools), the number of gun killings remains HIGH. But they don't want you to know that. (CNS News)

Missing the Point

As usual, the anti-gun fools miss the point, entirely. After an ex USAF man murdered two dozen people in a Texas church, the military has rushed to add 4,000 dishonorably discharged airmen to the "no-gun list." As if those who wish to kill a bunch of innocent people even NOTICE that their names are on a "no-gun list" when they go out to get the guns they use to kill them. Yes, the Air Force screwed up when they didn't add this killer's name to such a list, which "contributed" to the problem. But do people not right in the head ever consider such things? Why don't they look into the mental problems those people have? Why don't they give them the help they may need? Why don't they keep better track of what they're doing? Seems this killer was "wide open" when he bought his guns and stole others. Did they even NOTICE? They, like most anti-gun fools, just blame the guns, thinking such people even BOTHER to obey their silly anti-gun laws. There are so many other things they can do to stop these people from killing innocent people, but they concentrate on something that has a "track record" of NOT working. (CNN)

"Police Will Protect You"

"So turn in your guns." Yeah, right! They did a masterful job in that Florida school shooting. How about Scot Peterson, the armed cop on duty at that school who went and hid when he should have been killing that evil kid? Ask the victims of other mass shootings who died in the first 3 minutes while it took the cops 7 minutes to get there with their guns (Oh, you can't. They're dead). Sometimes the cops can't even protect themselves. Just ask the cops in Colorado and elsewhere, who died at the hands of an ILLEGALLY armed criminal (Can't ask them, either). The cops themselves will be the first to tell you that they CAN'T be everywhere at once and stop all crime. At least, the ones "in the trenches" will. Not the "police politicians" at the top, many of whom have never BEEN "in the trenches," and swallow that anti-gun fool horse droppings. That the cops can, and will protect you in all cases is one of the worst fairy tales told by the anti-gun fools, while they're stripping you of the means to self defense while keeping it (often) for themselves. The amount of STUPIDITY there is in those anti-gun fools is breathtaking! They continue to blithely push for the passage of USELESS, INEFFECTIVE laws that only get people killed by DISARMING the law-biding, using stupid, silly excuses like, "If everybody has a gun they'd be killing each other all the time." Many people DO have ILLEGAL guns, and even THEY don't always go about killing people over trifles--unless they're street gang members who have to kill somebody for initiation into their gang. (WPTV)

Stay Out of Police states

Like NY, NJ, CA, etc., if you want to carry your legally-owned and carried gun in your home state. They'll arrest you, fine you, sometimes JAIL you, even if your gun is properly stored for travel. They don't care about you. They'll let you just "rot in jail" forever, if they can. "In any state dominated by Dumocrats (like NY), gun-owners, local and out-of-state, will be mercilessly harassed, even thrown in jail, at every opportunity, and based on the most feeble of excuses. Cynical Democrats calculate that gun-owners don’t vote for them anyway, so they have nothing to lose in singling us out for punishment. That is their long-standing “agenda.” So a "police state" is any state whose government is dominated by Dumocrats, who hate the very idea of ANY private citizens being able to carry a gun, much like it is in Russia, In Russian there is noway to get, or LEGALLY carry a gun unless you're a government employee. TSA doesn't care, either. They'll "fink" on you to the locals. and the locals will finish your harassment. And if you have a job that does not allow people with arrest records (wherever they may be) to be employed, say "bye-bye" to your job, right along with your freedom. Be ready for a long stay in that "police state." I live in Colorado, which is such a state, so I can't get a gun, even though, at my age, I'm regarded as an "easy target" by thugs who want to mug people and rob, sometimes kill them. (AmmoLand)

Failure Upon Failure

The very people who FAILED to stop numerous mass shootings, and simple armed robberies and murders now want us to believe they "know better" as the debate on "gun control" goes on, and on. The anti-gun fools have made, or caused to be made, numerous "gun laws" that have FAILED to stop, or even slow down those who wish to obtain a gun or guns for nefarious purposes. Yet they pretend to know what's best for us. They refuse to even CONSIDER arming many teachers and/or other school staff to there would be armed people THERE in the school when a mass shooter started killing students. The very fact that the killer cannot know WHICH teachers will be armed, and ready to shoot him before he can kill any more children is a PREVENTATIVE. He will go to other places where the "no gun policy" is still in force and leave those schools alone. No gun zones, which ALL schools are today, are an "engraved invitation" to would-be killers because they can be pretty sure there will be nobody there who is legally armed. That's one of the basic flaws in their thinking. I have been preaching this for a long time, but those fools aren't listening. They think they know better. Their minds are made up, and will not allow facts to get in their way. We need to find better minds to work on the problem. They say armed teachers "might" go crazy and BECOME mass shooters if they had a gun to use. By that reasoning, any police officer or other armed official "might" go crazy and start killing people. so what's the difference? (Just common sense)

Slandeing the NRA

Liberals hate the NRA almost as much as they hate Trump. Now they're trying valiantly to push their false narrative about the Russians "colluding" with Trump to get him elected. They SAY that Russia contributed a lot of money to be "cleaned" through the NRA to the Trump campaign, hoping to put into question every dollar the NRA contributed. Of course, they can't prove it, but that's true of everything else in the push to convince America that Trump is "an unfit president." Now they're saying the NRA is "sounding more like the Russian kind of propaganda" than a simple anti-gun outfit. They talk about a fictional Russian push for "gun rights," which we all know is impossible, since Russia has no Second Amendment, and having a gun in Russia is a prison offense. Non-government people in Russia are just not allowed guns, period. Which, as in America, does nothing to stop Russian crooks from getting their guns. And there is no "NRA style" organization there BECAUSE there is no Second Amendment. In Russia, members of such an organization would be jailed, for long terms in a gulag, if caught. They talk about a Russian, who is a "life member" of the NRA, who met with Trump, Jr., trying to arrange a meeting with Trump. Of course, they don't say whether or not it was successful, since it was obviously not, only that it was TRIED. Innuendo and unprovable lies. That's all we hear. (NY Daily News)

Trump's "Listening Meeting"

Trump held a gathering that included survivors of the Broward County school massacre and everybody there demanded he "do something" to keep things like that from happening. Only problem is, nobody but the anti-gun fools and their dupes (which included most, if not all the students) had any idea WHAT to do. And all they could come up with was the old, tired ideas that have never worked, and they KNOW they never worked. Others had no idea what to do, but they insisted they do SOMETHING. I'm sorry for what they lost, but what doesn't work doesn't work. I hear a lot about universal background checks, which MIGHT allow the cops to find the shooter AFTER he has killed a bunch of people (IF he in fact stood for one), but does NOTHING to STOP such shootings. The Shooter in Florida had his gun or guns ILLEGALLY. Which means he violated many laws in obtaining them. Nobody knows how he got his gun or guns, or if they do, they aren't talking. But the world is FULL of stories about shooters who PASSED a background check because up to that time they had not committed a crime. The killer inn Las Vegas DID pass a background check because he had no record. So either he passes one, or doesn't. And that has never even slowed down a man who wants to commit mass murder and often himself does not expect to survive. When they're out to commit mass murder, they just don't care about a piddling little law that says they can't be armed. They'll find a way. (Just common sense)

Today We're Insane!

Shannon Watts' husband says "concealed carriers have a mental condition." They're really getting desperate, folks! Yesterday, we were racists/white supremacists, and anything else nasty. They have nothing else, so they say we're racist and insane! If you ask me, the insanity and racism is on their side. They have to know everything they do is unconstitutional, but they don't care. They want to disarm all America, at whatever cost. Calling us racist, or insane is all part of their not being able to push through MOST of their silly little laws that don't work, anyway. Shannon thinks they are winning because they "scored" a few successes. But if you don't "cherry pick," and look at ALL their actions, MOST of them fail. Like their "gatherings" of anti-gun fools that are supposed to convince the rest of us we have no chance, at which few, in any people show up. Then there are all the bills they sponsor that never become law. And the fact that NONE of their laws and "regulations" do ANYTHING to stop gun violence and, instead, INCREASE it, by disarming honest, law-abiding Americans so they're "easy targets" for those who obey NO laws. They also say we're paranoid. But you're not paranoid if there are ILLEGALLY armed thugs out there who want to rob and/or kill you--and there are. There are MILLIONS of illegal guns out there in the hands of thugs, everywhere. (NRA-ILA)

The Epitome of "Political"

The Dumocrats and other liberals have been very successful at damming up criticism of their ignorant policies by saying their protestations "are not political" while those of the NRA or the Republicans ARE. They are continuing that in sending 100 or so frightened Broward county school students to Tallahassee to lobby for gun control. These kids, who haven't been on this Earth long enough to know anything on their own have been brainwashed by liberals and anti-gun fools to really believe that the way to self defense is to DISARM yourself. I saw a picture on TV of a large bus that has been chartered to take those 100 students to Tallahassee to lobby lawmakers in favor of their gun control pipe-dreams. Which makes me wonder: who PAID for that charter? Certainly not the students. It is painfully obvious they were paid for by the anti-gun fools who have been working overtime to brainwash them ever since the shooting that scared them to death. Their main student spokesman, for instance, is the son of a former FBI man, and the FBI is at the forefront of the anti-gun fool movement. Liberals have been marveling at how "eloquent" he has been. Actually, it's not surprising. They've been working HARD to prepare him by drilling their talking points into him, every hour, of every day. How many other parents are anti-gun fools? How many added to the other brainwashing efforts? They claim that what we do IS "political," while what those kids do is NOT. Which is a LIE. Anybody with any intelligence KNOWS it's a lie. But they get away with the lie. (Just common sense)

Shannon Watts Is Deluded

She recently put out a statement, extolling all the gains her "MOMS Against Guns" organization (or something like that) has "scored" in over coming the Second Amendment that GUARANTEES our right to be armed for self defense. She talked about the number of states that have passed gun control measures, and how much they have reduced gun violence. Of course, she ignores the fact that MOST of the gun control initiatives have FAILED, because nobody but the "intelligence impaired" want them. She says, "If Hillary had been elected, gun control would benefit," and she's right. Thank God for Donald Trump! She also ignores the fact that every gun control law they have passed has done NOTHING to ":stem gun violence." That's a fact that can't be ignored, but she ignores it. She says gun violence has been INCREASING lately, forgetting that MOST of the "gun violence" was committed by people who ignore her laws. Making those laws is FUTILE because the law-abiding aren't the ones who commit the crimes. Talk about "cherry picking facts!" She not only does it for others, she does it for herself. What she's doing doesn't work, but she didn't get the memo. (Pop Sugar)

They Can't Get It Right

It pains me that our politicians (for the most part) just can't get it right. Every time there is a major "gun crime" or just a weekend in Chicago, they whine and scream for more gun control. Never mind that none of their "gun control laws" do ANYTHING to "stem gun crime," and, instead, CONTRIBUTE to it by disarming the law-abiding, making them "easy targets" for those who don't OBEY those useless laws. They have to know those laws don't work worth a damn if they have any intelligence, at all. But either they don't, or just PRETEND they don't.Faithfully enforcing some of the laws we already have would help. One such is the laws in some places that add more time to the sentences of thugs who use guns in their crimes. Those charges are commonly DROPPED to get confessions in other crimes. That smacks of lazy police work. Taking the "easy road."

Now one big contributor is saying, "No more money without an assault weapons ban!" How stupid is that? Assault weapons are used in such a small number of "gun crimes" as to make their figures unnoticeable. Yet they "focus in" on them, as if they were a major problem. And still criminals get them easily from their ILLEGAL sources in a back alley somewhere. High school students are telling the politicians they want more "gun laws." Yes, they were "at risk" at that Broward County, Florida school. But they've been listening to the anti-gun fools and buying their bullsh-t. They don't know any better. Tell me; is there ONE existing gun law that would have prevented ANY of the school shootings? Anti-gun fools won't answer that question. They can't. So they just call me names and slander the NRA. which is all about gun safety and the Second Amendment GUARANTEE of the RIGHT to be armed for self defense. (Breitbart)

Gun Violence: Terrorism?

That's what liberals are saying now. "Gun violence is a form of terrorism." Not a chance! Terrorism is killing innocent people for one reason: to promote an idea. Gun violence in the USA doesn't fall under that umbrella. Criminal gun violence is usually to take away from people, that which they've EARNED. Something the government does so well. Trying to equate gun violence with terrorism is typical Dumocrat scam to make more of it than it is, and frighten people into supporting their silly gun laws. Gun violence, most of which is committed by people who IGNORE their highly touted "gun laws," would not be stopped by their useless gun laws, and never have been.

Only the law-abiding would obey them, and they are not the problem, as a rule. What kind of logic leads to such an assumption, I don't know. But liberals (Dumocrats) have no logic. They even claim that there IS no such thing as logic OR reason, so they don't have to use it. Real logic tells us that the way to self defense is NOT to disarm yourself. Criminals aren't worried about the law-abiding "going after" them, so we don't have to convince them that we are not a threat to them, which is the government's excuse when they wish to disarm this nation. And ALL their laws DEPEND on LAWBREAKERS to, somehow, OBEY their laws when they obey no others. (ANJRPC)

"Back In the Fifties"

People are noting that, back in the fifties we didn't have news of mass shootings and major gun crimes every day like we do now. They ask, "Why not then?" What, they ask, did we do differently back then that we don't do now. They ask the question, but they don't want to hear the answer. The answer is, we didn't have the ubiquitous anti-gun laws we have now. The law-abiding weren't as defenseless. You could buy a gun anywhere, in "big box stores," small "Mom and Pop hardware stores, and even in some corner drug stores (where they sold almost everything), by unfettered mail order. They didn't have people trying to ERASE the very KNOWLEDGE of the existence of guns from everybody's memory. 200 years ago there were not ANY "school shootings" of students and teachers because the kids brought their guns to school WITH them, in case they saw a squirrel they could shoot to add to the dinner table on the way to or from school.  Anybody who came in wanting to shoot up the place would soon resemble "Swiss cheese."

What we've done is take as many guns as we could AWAY from the law abiding, leaving the field open to those who IGNORE all those silly, stupid, "gun laws." And crime has predictably grown, right along with the tightening gun laws. The key to reducing mass shootings and other "gun crime" is to give their guns back to the law-abiding and let them start killing those who obey NO laws. let alone laws that say they can't use a gun in doing their crimes. But they don't want to hear that. They cringe in horror at the very mention of letting the law abiding be armed for self defense. They continue to make their silly anti-gun laws that CREATE opportunities for the bad guys. Go to ANY liberal-run city with tight gun laws, and they will predictably have high "gun crime" stats. That's a given. But liberals will not recognize it, and the carnage continues. The article linked here was written a few years ago, but it makes some pertinent points that are still relevant, today. (National Review)

Thank God for the NRA!

Hillary and her henchmen are now claiming that, "If not for the NRA, Hillary would now be president. "Let’s face the facts. Without the NRA Hillary would be President and Schumer would be the leading the Senate. The Supreme Court would be backed with young gun grabbing justices. The record number of judges DJ Trump has had appointed would be all to the left of center (WAY to the left). Imagine the 9th Circuit Court being the norm for the country as a whole.") Not only that, that mad woman, Nancy Preelosi would again be the Majority Leader in the House, and, between her and Chuckie, they would be able to forever block ALL legislation Trump suggests. Soon we would be a socialist country, with the government STEALING a large part of the fruits of the production of new wealth produced by those willing and able to PRODUCE new wealth. And forget about your constitutional right to be armed for self defense. Dumocrats have tried everything in their power during the last 8 years to disarm law-abiding America, and with Hillary in the White House, they would no doubt be able to "git 'er done." Of course, there's no proof that the NRA had ANYTHING to do with her loss, except to contribute money to conservative candidates and run a few ads, which they have the right to do. Just as there's no proof for her other imaginary plot, the "Russian connection." But that has never stopped the Dumocrats from promoting a lie before. (AmmoLand)

It's Not the Answer!

Immediately after (or maybe during) the school shooting in Broward County, Florida, the anti-gun fools came out of the woodwork demanding more and more gun control--as if that would do ANYTHING to stop such people from doing their dirty work. Gabby Giffords and Diane Feinstein, both well-known anti-gun fools, were among them, touting completely unrelated anti-gun laws that would have done NOTHING to stop such atrocities. Giffords speaks confidently about "peace and safety," as if her misguided laws would have done ANYTHING to have stopped this killer. Broward CountySchools specifically ban ALL weapons that could be used to defend their students against such shooters, including stun guns, which are not normally a deadly weapon. But did their "rules" do ANYTHING to stop this atrocity from happening? Predictably, NO. But does that stop them from making those rules? NO. They apparently don't have the INTELLIGENCE to figure that out for themselves, and they won't listen to "wiser heads." They never answer the questions I ask, and continue to make these USELESS laws, patting themselves on the back, while killers still get their guns, easily. (Breitbart)

Anything BUT "Sensible"

The anti-gun fools describe all their efforts to disarm Americans as "sensible," but they are ANYTHING BUT sensible. They don't work worth a damn. But they keep imposing new, ineffective, and sometimes unenforceable laws and regulations, while "gun crime" continues, and INCREASES. They're all unconstitutional because they are all INFRINGEMENTS on our right to be armed for self defense. Their laws and regulations only cause gun violence to succeed, because they DISARM the very VICTIMS of gun crime, which is usually accomplished by use of guns that are ILLEGALLY owned. No amount of "background checks" will work, because they're only applied to LEGAL gun buyers, not the CRIMINALS, who get their guns illegally, or just STEAL them. Disarming their potential victims only makes it easier for those criminals to victimize them, at will. The new "bumpstock bans" that are "in fashion" now by anti-gun fools are just as ineffective in stopping gun violence, because those who want to use them WILL get them, illegally. You cannot defend yourself by DISARMING yourself. That's something the anti-gun fools have never learned, and never WILL learn, in their ignorance. (Bearing Arms)

I'm Getting Sick of It!

Every time a mass shooting occurs, MINUTES later the anti-gun fools are blaming the guns, and demanding more and more of their USELESS gun laws to be made. Laws that do NOTHING to put an end to these things. Today I'm watching news coverage of the Broward County, Florida school shooting, in which supposedly (we don't know yet at this writing, since I'm writing this while events arre still unfolding) large numbers of people have been killed or injured when a "troubled" former student came in and started shooting at everybody in sight. One local politician was heard to whine about a recent bill to stop TERRORISTS from being able to buy guns being voted down, as if that was something that would have stopped this former student from shooting up that school.

Of course, he ignores the fact that terrorists don't obey ANY laws, so what good would this law do even if the shooter was a terrorist, instead of a "troubled ex-student?" Of course, they're going to blame the guns. They're making a "big thing" about this kid being "obsessed with guns," as if that had anything to do with it. It is obvious that he is mentally disturbed, and was KNOWN to be. One student even said so on live TV. If he was that well known to be a troublemaker, why wasn't somebody doing something about it? The anti-gun fools always look in the wrong direction whenever something like this happens, and insist that their actions are doing something to reduce gun violence, which they are NOT. Maybe one day they will "wise up" and look in the RIGHT direction and actually get something done. But I don't look for it to happen soon, since these people just aren't too bright. (Fox News)

What's Happening to Us?

Before Columbine, we didn't hear much about mass shootings, let alone school shootings. But now we almost hear about such things on a weekly, sometimes daily basis. Why is that? What has happened in our society that has caused the proliferation of such things happening? Anti-gun fools will say it is the "availability of guns," but that's patently WRONG. It's not guns. It is the MINDSET of a human being that causes him to go into a school and kill a bunch of CHILDREN. In Las Vegas recently, it wasn't even school students. The shooter there was a rich man, and he opened up on a concert with multiple guns, and might have even had help. We don't know much about that, because LV "authorities" seem to be covering it up, for some reason, even to the medical examiner releasing a phony autopsy report on the shooter, after refusing to release it at all, previously, even defying a court order. But what changed in our society after Columbine? What drives unstable people to murder innocent CHILDREN? They need to find out the answer to that question, or we're going to have a lot more such shootings, in schools, and elsewhere. It's not legal access to guns. They are becoming less and less easy to buy every day, while easy access to ILLEGAL guns is still rife--which we will never change by making new laws. But they need to find the MENTAL key to the THINKING that leads them to commit such atrocities. (Just common sense)

Shutting Down 60 Minutes

60 Minutes recently ran a 20 minute segment on national reciprocity that was patently an anti-gun propaganda piece, and soon were handed their heads by people a little smarter than they are. One of the more obvious drawbacks is the identity of the person who was asked to comment on the Second Amendment. It was a staffer for "MOMS Against Guns (or something like that)." Could they be more obvious? She told them that the Second only covered owning guns AT HOME, and didn't mean being able to carry guns on your person OUTSIDE the home. WRONG! The Second says we have the unalienable right to be armed for SELF DEFENSE. It says NOTHING about WHERE we can be armed for self defense. And do they think the need for self defense is diminished OUTSIDE the home? One wag said that, where he worked, if everybody carried a loaded gun it would be only a couple of months before somebody got shot. A thought that shows a depth of IGNORANCE that is an abomination. If the people he works with hate each other so much, they don't need guns to kill each other. The response was so COMPLETELY negative it "gob-smacked" the producers and directors. (Liberty Park Press)