It’s a fact. If a criminal applies for a background check and lies
to obtain it, there’s no penalty applicable. They can apply as many
times as they want, hoping for an overworked, underpaid bureaucrat
misses something and they get approved. When it is found they lied,
their application is just rejected. They aren’t punished for lying
on their application. Of course, this means nothing to the real
criminals, who buy their guns illegally, or just steal them. Anti-gun
laws only apply to people who actually buy their guns legally and
have to pass a background check. What those fools who write stories
about “gun crime” never talk about is whether or not the gun used
was obtained legally. It is always assumed it was obtained legally,
and their myriad anti-gun laws will somehow stop a criminal from
getting a gun. They
will not. A criminal always knows where to get a gun illegally, and
he usually does. I
say “he” because just about all criminals involved in “gun
crime” are men. If that’s sexist, tough. Then we talk about the
laws already on the books to add time to prison sentences for using a
gun to commit the crime. They are usually “bartered away” to get
confessions to other crimes. We need to start enforcing them. (Daily Caller)
Friday, September 20, 2019
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment