"No Weapons of War"

Joe Scarboro (“Morning Joe” on MSNBC) says the Second Amendment “doesn’t cover weapons of war.” Hey Joe! Yes, it DOES. It isn’t limited to covering flintlocks, either, as some anti-gun fools say. They say it only covers the weapons that were in use when the Constitution was written. Wrong again! It covers weapons “in common use.” Not those in common use when the Constitution was written, but those in common use, NOW. Furthermore, it doesn’t cover weapons, at all. It covers our RIGHT to be armed, with whatever. This is just another feeble attempt by an anti-gun fool to DILUTE the meaning of one of the shortest, and simplest, easily understood sections. It mentions NO KIND of gun, but guarantees that Americans will always be able to be ARMED, in self defense. What doesn’t Joe understand about that? Liberals are constantly trying to dilute the meaning of constitutional limits on their actions by purposely misunderstanding the wording. It hasn’t worked in the past, and it ain’t gonna work in the future. The Second Amendment does not protect certain GUNS. It protects our right to defend ourselves, and to be able to buy and use the TOOLS for that. Be that a gun, or a ray-gun, in the future. Whatever kind of defensive weapon that is in “common use” in the future. (Breitbart)