Shannon Watts, kingpin of "MOMS Against
Guns" (or something like that) thinks background checks could
have stopped the Las Vegas shooting. But what if the shooter has not
committed a crime before? Other anti-gun fools say "gun-free
zones" could stop it. the Mandalay Bay Hotel WAS a "gun-free
zone." So how did that affect this killing spree? Word is the
shooter
had numerous guns in his room at that hotel. How did he get them into
his room at a hotel that was a "gun-free zone?" The same
applies to all the silly laws about "safe storage."
Somebody bent on a mass killing spree isn't interested in "safe
storage" of his guns, and couldn't care less about these
piddling little laws. He's scheming to commit a crime much worse than
violating a piddling little law that says he has to store his guns a
certain way. It isn't known yet if this guy got his guns legally,
bought them from another criminal in a back alley somewhere, or stole
them. It makes no difference. Laws did NOTHING to stop him from his
deadly purpose. It's STUPID to think otherwise, but the anti-gun
fools do. That's why I call them FOOLS. (Mandalay Bay Security)
Monday, October 2, 2017
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment