This writer says he is still alive because the mass shooter at
Virginia Tech had an unsilenced gun. Hearing
the shots gave
him time to go out a window and fall 19 feet, to break his leg in two
places, but he is still alive. All
well and good, but why not consider what would have happened if he
had had a legal gun and a carry permit. Instead of taking the
coward's way out and breaking his leg, he could have shot
the shooter
to death as he came
in the classroom door and saved a bunch of lives--everybody
that shooter killed after coming into his classroom, including a
classmate and his professor. But no! Anti-gun fools, which is what
this fool seems to be, will never even consider allowing the average
law-abiding person to have and use a gun for self defense. He
thinks--wrongly--that that person will "go nuts" and shoot
somebody over a trifle, while running away leaves others to die by
being shot by a gun (legal or illegal) in the hands of a mass shooter
while he splits.
It's incomprehensible to me why people like this keep trying to
violate the Constitution by INFRINGING on a RIGHT guaranteed by that
Constitution. I guess they're just that stupid. (USA Today)
Thursday, October 5, 2017
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment