That’s what the sign shown posted
at a school
really is saying. It actually says, “Carrying Firearms Is
Prohibited On This Property.” That
tells potential mass killers there will most likely be no law-abiding
people on the property who are armed, so it is safe for him to come
in and kill a few students, and maybe a few teachers and other staff.
Anti-gun fools really think posting such signs will stop a potential
mass killer from coming onto the property with a loaded gun. Or they
pretend they think so, anyway. But “gun control” is not about
controlling guns. It is about controlling PEOPLE.
It’s
about the POWER to tell people what they can, and cannot do. They
don’t want to keep guns out of the hands of the law breakers. They
want to keep them out of the hands of the VICTIMS. They want fewer
guns in the hands
of their own intended victims when they come to “legally” take
what is yours. Don’t believe that? Take a look at what they now
do
under the current RICO Laws. They put little strips into all your
paper dollars that
they can scan as you walk by so they’ll know if you are carrying
enough cash to make you worthwhile to rob.
Each
bill will report its denomination and presence so they can count your
money before stopping you.
Then they stop you and take your money, saying it “might” have
been gotten illegally. NO proof required, only the OPINION of the
thief that you “might” have gotten it illegally. You CAN sue to
get some of it back, IF
you can afford the lawyers after
they’ve taken all your money. You CAN get some of it back if you
agree to let them keep most of it. They originally passed those laws
to deprive rich drug dealers of the money
they needed to “have their day in court.” That’s what they
claim, anyway. But the net effect is the enrichment of the “cop
shops” and the individual cops, who can apply for, and receive a
percentage of “the take.”
I
remember one ranch owner who refused
to sell his ranch to the local sheriff for a new sheriff’s office.
So the sheriff sent in many armed men to raid him on false drug
charges. When he was awakened by the noise and came down with a gun
in his hand to defend against what
he thought (rightfully) was a “home invasion,” they killed him.
Later, they “bought” the ranch at a very nice price (for them)
from his widow. Now they have a very nice new office property. (Guns)
No comments:
Post a Comment