Or it should be. Some lawyers in Canada are “reporting” their
clients for owning guns. I don’t know how the ethics rules are
written in Canada, but such an action should be a violation of every
ethic lawyers should observe. Even if not, it begs the question: to
whom do they “report” their gun-owning clients, and what are they
expected to do about someone owning a legal object, under what law?
Seems like an anti-gun overreaction on the part of those lawyers, and
they should lose their law licenses for cause, since such “reports”
are against the interests of the clients, while lawyers are supposed
to be FOR their clients, or they’re useless as lawyers. The
whole idea of a lawyer is to be an advocate for their clients, not a
conduit for their fool anti-gun ideas. People are going completely
bananas these days, over NOTHING, just because they buy the anti-gun
fool notions. And that’s a pity, when otherwise intelligent people
display ignorance on one subject. I seriously question the
intelligence of those lawyers, who are alienating their clients by
their actions. (Canada Free Press)
Monday, June 3, 2019
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment