As usual, they get it wrong. USA
Today
says, “It’s Terrifying That Churchgoers Should Protect Themselves
With Guns.” No. It’s not. It’s actually terrifying that
churchgoers SHOULD have to protect themselves with guns because some
fool is likely to come in and kill a few of them. USA
Today
is like all the other anti-gun fools, in that they think banning the
very existence of guns in certain places will keep the fools who just
want to kill some people out. It will NOT. It will just tell those
fools that these places are “soft targets,” and they are free to
“come in and kill a few of us.” The way to self defense is NOT to
make yourself defenseless. The way to self defense is to make
yourself a HARD target that might shoot back before a shooter can
kill a lot of people. But the anti-gun fools aren’t smart enough to
realize that. They think if they take away all LEGAL guns, they’ll
be safe from those who get their guns ILLEGALLY. The United States
government knows that, which is why they continually improve our
defenses. They know that, if they get rid of their defenses, some
damned fool country will overrun them and “take them over,”
killing a lot of people. They just don’t think that works for the
individual, even though the Founders did. Which is why they included
the Second Amendment in the Constitution. I just don't understand the stupid people who are afraid of legal guns, but not illegal ones. (PJ Media)
Thursday, June 11, 2020
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment