To hear the anti-gun fools tell it, only the cops are qualified to
have guns. But two recent cases show the fallacy of that statement.
The first is the case of the female cop who somehow got into her
neighbor’s apartment and shot and killed him, thinking she was in
her own apartment, and he was an interloper. She got ten years for
that, and her entire life is ruined after that. Her neighbor is dead.
And then the Dallas cops sent a rookie on a “welfare check”
because someone told them a door was open when it shouldn’t be. He
came, saw, and mistook the woman who lived there for a burglar and
panicking, without waiting, shot and killed her. He has now resigned,
just ahead of his firing, and has been charged with murder. He is now
out on a six-figure bail. Where he got that kind of money is in
question, but that’s one for another time. This doesn’t show that
cops are generally not qualified to have guns. Only that, like most
of society, there are even some cops who shoot first, and ask
questions later—if there’s anybody left alive to question.
They’re human beings
too. That destroys the arguments of the anti-gun fools, and shows
that there is really no reason to keep the law-abiding from having
guns to defend themselves from the millions of ILLEGAL guns out there
in the hands of criminals, crazies, and Islamic terrorists. But
so far, that’s true with all their arguments, and then laws they
pass do NOTHING to stop “gun crime.” (CNN)
Tuesday, October 29, 2019
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment