This Chief Gets It

Many police chiefs are for gun control, even though gun control does NOTHING to stop, or even slow down “gun crime.” But this police chief gets it. San Antonio, Texas Police Chief William McManus was quick to go public with the fact that he just doesn’t support the “gun buyback program” that the City Council advanced, because they just don’t work. I don’t know how he feels about the other silly anti-gun laws that are usually passed into law by stupid politicians, but I suspect he feels the same about them. He strikes me as being of superior intelligence to other police politicians who believe in those ineffective, unenforceable anti-gun laws. Gun buyback programs only spend a lot of taxpayer money stupidly while doing nothing to solve the problem. Yes, they do get a few guns off the streets. Mostly old, unreliable guns the criminals want to gt rid of so they can get newer,,better guns. Many such programs are “no questions asked,” and often allow murderers to go unpunished. All he would have to do is turn in the gun he used to murder someone, and the cops are stopped from asking him any questions, so he then goes free on that murder charge. That’s even more stupid that gun buyback programs, themselves. (KSAT Channel 12)

Democrats: "Shut Up!"

Dumocrats can’t answer us, so they just want to shut us up. They previously passed an unconstitutional law to stop organizations like NRA from endorsing a candidate within 60 days of an election. That’s a violation of the First Amendment, which guarantees freedom of speech. Thankfully, the Courts declared it unconstitutional. Future failing presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg wants to limit the ways organizations like NRA can spend their money. In other words, stop them from championing the Second Amendment by violating the First Amendment. That’s the Dumocrat way: If you can’t answer criticism, just shut the criticizer up. They know their laws do nothing but get the law-abiding killed, by disarming the law-abiding, making them defenseless against the ILLEGAL guns in the hands of criminals. But they want to keep making them, without opposition from the NRA, or any other organization. So they want to de-fund the NRA by limiting the ways they can spend their own money. I’ll say again, that if they ever came up with a law that actually WORKED, I’d be right there with them. But there ISN’T one, so they never will. (America’s First Freedom)

They Just Don't Care

Two congressmen pointed out several fallacies in “gun control” laws, but will that cause the anti-gun fools to rethink their position? Not likely. One thing they pointed out was that background checks did NOTHING to stop the most recent mass killings. That the perpetrators, who were not felons at the time, PASSED their background checks when they bought their guns. They pointed out that the famous “Red Flag Laws” so loved by politicians, are patently unconstitutional, and will ultimately be struck down, after the damage has been done, and people have died. Many anti-gun fools think we should be able to license gun owners like we do car owners. They forget the fact that driving a car is a PRIVILEGE, not a right. What the anti-gun fools are too stupid to know is that owning and using a gun for self defense is a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT. As is self defense. But they’re not after “gun safety.” they’re after control. They want to be able to tell us what we can, and cannot do. And gun control is just the vehicle for that. One thing they forget is the fact that, of they can’t get their guns legally, they will simply get them ILLEGALLY, on the black market. And there is no controlling that. (Liberty Park Press)

Protecting You With Signs

There are signs posted in many places saying, “Gun-Free Zone. No Guns Allowed!” And that’s supposed to stop people from bringing their guns into that “zone.” It does. The law-abiding, that is, but they are not the problem. The problem is presented by the criminals and mass killers, who couldn’t be less concerned with their signs. They PREFER to do their dirty work in gun-free zones, because they can be pretty sure the law-abiding will not be armed there, and will thus be unable to defend themselves. The concept of a gun-free zone is just plain stupidity. And pro-gun people like me have been telling the anti-gun fools that for years, presenting unalterable truth to prove it. But they are “tone deaf” to that proof. They just ignore us and go right on creating “gun-free zones.” They should call them “killing zones,” because that’s what they are. 89% of mass shootings have occurred IN gun-free zones.” That should tell them something, but it does not, They are too stupid. Maybe schools should put up signs banning bullies. That ought to stop all the bullying. Yeah. Or maybe they could post signs on all the highways and streets saying, “No Crashes.” That’d probably completely eliminate them, huh? (Just common sense)

Deluded Biden

There’s a lot to be recommended about Joe Biden, but none of it says he could, or should become president. His gaffes are legendary, and reflect a “slippage of the mind.” He thinks things that are NOT. Chief among them is that the gun control law he helped write actually reduced gun crime. It did not, and WOULD not. First of all, it was an assault weapon ban, while the guns that are most often represented in “gun crime” are hand guns. Assault weapons are very rarely used in gun crime, and banning them would reduce only a small part of what is called “gun crime.” Secondly, there is NO kind of a gun ban that would have ANY effect on “gun crime” because criminals would, and DO, get their guns illegally. They’re criminals, after all, and they get that name by disobeying laws. There have actually been “studies” that show criminals don’t obey laws. As if they needed a “study” to figure that out. A criminal is a criminal because he doesn’t obey ANY laws. So when he goes about violating other laws, why would he bother about a silly little anti-gun law? (Daily Caller)

Disarming America

I just can’t understand the thinking of the anti-gun fools. It is obvious to intelligent people that, when a criminal threatens you with his illegal gun, being disarmed is NOT the way to go. Disarming the law-abiding is the best way to get them killed, as 8 people (in including two “moms” who were standing up for “stopping gun crime” without gun control) found out in “gun controlled” Chicago recently. They have to know that the ONLY answer to “gun crime” is to allow the law-abiding to be armed, so they can defend themselves. But NO! These “paragons of smart” just won’t hear of that. They just want to take away our guns, and that’s it. Their minds are made up, so don’t confuse them with facts. I can’t even count the number of victims of their short-sighted and ignorant approach to preventing gun crime. They just ban guns everywhere they can, and the criminals and mass killers flock into the areas with the tightest anti-gun laws to do their “dirty work” because they know they can be pretty sure the law-abiding people there will not be armed, and thus will be defenseless against their ILLEGAL guns. The anti-gun fools have to know this, but they just keep on making their ignorant, unenforceable laws while people get killed because of them. New York has actually made a law to prevent, specifically, allowing teachers to be armed. (Arms and the Law)

More Guns Than Humans!"

“Beto” O’Rourke says, “America has more guns than than beings.” And he’s right. But most of them are illegally-owned, and used by criminals and crazies. What he thinks a LAW will do about that, I don’t know. And I don’t think he does, either. He’s just grandstanding, which is all he can do because there is NOTHING that can be done with a law to change things. Criminals don’t obey laws. That’s a given. That’s why we call them criminals. So no amount of law-making is going to have any effect on their activities. Beto thinks if he becomes president (a forlorn hope for him) he can confiscate all our legal guns, leaving the millions of ILLEGAL guns still out there. But then there’s that “sticky old” Second Amendment that liberals (Dumocrats) have been trying for years to get rid of with no success that he has to contend with before he can do that. And if he successfully gets rid of it, there’s the revolution that will follow as Americans, who are used to being able to be armed for self defense, kick him out of office. That’s what WILL happen if he is ever successful in taking our means to self defense. He will be “slapped down,” and slapped down HARD. (Breitbart)

"It's All White Males"

Actress and great political commentator Rosanna Arquette says, “All mass shooters have been white males.” Not true, but she could be forgiven in her ignorance because MOST of them are while males. But mass shooters are only a small part of the “gun crime” statistics. The biggest part contributing to the “gun crime” are the teenage gang members in the big cities, most of whom are black or Latino. So what? All are criminals. White, black, or Latino. You look at the killings every day, and the shooters cross all spectrums of race and nationality. But the biggest bunch are the black gang members, who go about illegally-armed, killing each other for nothing more important than being in the wrong place. And they don’t care if their poorly-aimed bullets kill some innocent people. That’s just “collateral damage.” Maybe if these not-so-smart Hollywood types would think a little before they speak, we might listen to them. But they don’t. They just listen to the liberal media and spout ignorant things. (Truth About Guns)

Disarming America

Stupid politicians in America have a “knee-jerk reaction” to any use of a gun to kill innocent people: make it easier for those using their illegal guns to kill innocent people by BANNING the use of guns in self defense. Think about it. In the old West, if a gunman comes into town wanting to kill somebody, make sure that somebody is unarmed, and defenseless. That would be stupid, unless you hated that someone and WANTED him to be killed. So why do today’s politicians (mostly Dumocrats, of course) want to make sure that potential victims of mass killings are defenseless against the shooters? That’s what they’re doing in Douglas County, Colorado. A Douglas County charter school is allowing their teachers and other staff to be armed in the school, so the Douglas County School District is telling them tho “get out.” That’s knowing that schools are prime targets for potential mass shooters since they are “gun-free zones,” a KNOWN draw for such killers. They can’t figure out how to keep such killers from killing their students, so they want to make it easier for them, by making absolutely sure there will be no defensive guns there to stop them, so they can kill our children at will, without worrying about someone with a gun opposing them until the cops (finally) arrive, with their guns. It’s a stupid policy, but one they insist on continuing. (The Denver Channel)

Gun Grabbers Kill "Moms"

In “Murder City,” Chicago, it’s dangerous to be against gun control and for “crime control.” In a recent weekend in “Murder City,” thugs shot 43, and 8 of them died (not very good shots). Included in the deaths were two moms who were trying to “fight crime” and were steadfastly against “gun control.” That must have made the illegally-armed thugs so mad. So they killed them. It should be pointed out that these “moms” were unarmed, by law. But the thugs who killed them had no trouble getting their guns illegally, of course. Those “moms” were trying to stop “gun violence” as part of an organization called, “Moms Against Senseless Violence.” And senseless violence was their death knell. The mothers were “standing on a street corner” in an attempt to stop gun violence. Now it’s not too smart to stand on a street corner in some places in Chicago, for any reason. They were murdered in a “drive-by shooting.” Again there was a call for “somebody to do something.” But WHAT should we do? Maybe if the residents in those neighborhoods would cooperate with the cops, they could reduce crime where they live. I don’t know. Passing more anti-gun laws isn’t going to work because the thugs just ignore them and get their guns illegally. As usual. Maybe allowing the residents to be armed for self defense will allow them to “thin the herd” of Illegal shooters. But, of course, the anti-gun fools will not allow the victims to be armed and able to defend themselves. (Truth About Guns)

They Don't Know Anything

Every Dumocrat presidential candidate out there wants to take away your right to self defense, and to own and use the means to that, a gun, but they just don’t know how to do it. They amazingly think that making a law against using guns for crime will somehow make CRIMINALS stop using guns. Every time some fool decides to go out and kill a bunch of innocent people. They go after the gun rights of the law-abiding. That will NOT stop them fro doing that. If the law prevents them from getting that gun they plan to use in killing people, they’ll just buy it ILLEGALLY, or steal it—as at least one mass killer did—he stole the gun from his mom. You don’t go after the rights of the law-abiding to stop people from committing crimes. It just doesn’t work that way. People who want to commit a horrendous crime such as spewing thousands of bullets into a crowd to kill a bunch of people are not going to be concerned about violating one small law that says they can’t have the gun they plan to use. They’ll just ignore that law, as they pretty much all have done. Regular criminals ignore those laws, too, as witness the dope dealer and convicted felon in Philadelphia who was not allowed to have a gun—but put six cops in the hospital with an AR-15 before surrendering so the cops wouldn’t kill him. (Just common sense)

Dems Debate Gun Control

Why? There is no such thing as “gun control.” Yes, they might be able to disarm the law-abiding, but they aren’t the ones that need to be “reined in.” There are millions of ILLEGAL guns out there, with more being sold and stolen every day. The law-abiding don’t usually use their guns for crime. Law breakers DO. And they just IGNORE all those silly, useless, unenforceable anti-gun laws. So what’s the use in passing even more of them? All they do is make it easier for those illegal gun holders to victimize the law-abiding by DISARMING the law-abiding, making them “easy targets” for those law breakers. Dumocrats are, almost to a man (or woman) damned fools enough to believe they can “control guns” by making these laws. They cannot. The proof of that is in every big city that is run by Dumocrats, where all their stupid laws are in effect, Chicago, for instance, is one such city and it has predictably high gun crime rates. Baltimore is another. It’s so predictable it would be funny if it weren’t so tragic. Anti-gun fools keep calling for more laws. But what laws CAN they pass that WILL “control guns?” None. The only answer is to allow the law-abiding to be armed for self defense, but the anti-gun fools will not hear of it. The article linked here is from a California newspaper, in a state run by Dumocrats, with tight anti-gun laws. But they still have a LOT of “gun crime.” Predictably. (Sacramento Bee)

His Last Mistake

A robber came into a Family Dollar Store intending to rob it. So he pointed his gun at the clerk and demanded money. While the clerk was handing him money, he failed to notice the customer walking back from the rear of the store. That customer was a “concealed carrier” and he pulled out his gun and shot the robber to death. Big mistake. When robbing someone you gotta know what’s going on around you. If you don’t, it just might be the end for you, as it was for this robber. Or maybe not try to rob that store in the first place. With the increase in concealed carrier permits being issued, the chances of there being someone there with his own gun is increased, and that’s a danger to the robber. The guy who shot this robber “reduced gun crime,” one criminal at a time. As the shootings of would-be robbers increases, crime will go down. It’s a given. But anti-gun fools will not recognize this truth, which is why “fools” is a part of their name, for me. They think the answer is to “get rid of guns, entirely.” That’s not gonna happen. Second Amendment aside, there are just too many millions of illegal guns in existence, and they aren’t going to go away. Maybe one of these days they’ll figure it out. ...Naaahhh! They’re too dumb for that. (The Blaze)

They Need A "Study?"

Why otherwise intelligent people need a “study” to know that criminals do not obey laws, I don’t know. Maybe the people who do these “studies” aren’t as smart as they are painted to be. You don’t need a “study” to know that criminals do not obey laws. Just look toward the City of Chicago, where anti-gun laws are rife, while all kinds of crime, and especially gun crime, is like a plague. Meanwhile, anti-gun fools continue to disarm the law-abiding, making them “easy targets” for those criminals, with their illegally-owned guns. They have to know that’s what they’re doing, but they keep doing it, making me think they have an ulterior motive in disarming honest people. That motive is that a certain kind of politician, mostly found in the Dumocrat Party, want to be able to “run roughshod” over the people and they want to run into as few guns in the hands of their victims as possible. They don’t worry about the millions of illegal guns in the hands of criminals because they view them as “kindred souls.” Logically, disarming the law-abiding only is stupid. It’s counter productive. It gets honest people killed by making them “easy targets” for the law breakers, who predictably ignore laws that limit their ability to victimize the law-abiding. (Daily Caller)

Is Trump A Dictator?

The left loves to paint President Trump as a dictator, or dictator wanna-be. But Trump has displayed none of the actions of a dictator while the left HAS. If you listen to their rhetoric, you can see the “strains” of a dictatorship that plans to limit free speech and imprison enemies. Even now they want to make doubting that global warming swindle a criminal offense that can put “deniers” in prison. It’s only a step away from making it an executable offense. They want to make is a crime to disagree with the left’s position on all things—and they are not even in power. They daily call President Trump all kinds of foul names and they do not go to prison. They sponsor gatherings, where all kinds of plots designed to “topple” him are discussed, and those gatherings are not “raided” by jack-booted thugs with badges. The “jack-booted thugs with, and without badges” belong to the left. Trump is solidly for the Second amendment, which was put into the Constitution specifically to stop would-be dictators by making a “takeover” more expensive than they would like by citizens being able to “shoot back” if they’re fired upon, by whomever. The Japanese, in WWII would not invade the mainland “because there would be a gun behind every blade of grass.” Taking away gun rights is one of the first things a wanna-be dictator does, and President Trump refuses to do it. (American Thinker)

Disarming Americans

Because of the Second Amendment to the constitution of the United States, the very BASIS or ALL our laws, politicians can’t simply ban all guns in the hands of citizens. So they make the guns we have impossible to use. A gun is of no use without ammunition, and certain politicians argue that the Second Amendment does not apply to ammunition so they can ban ammunition of make ammunition impossible to obtain. In California you now must pass a background check to buy ammunition. A certain kind of politician wants desperately to disarm their citizens so they can “run roughshod” over them. So they “chip away” at our constitutional right to own and use a gun for self defense against those ILLEGAL guns in the hands of those who would do us ill. The basic flaw there is they are disarming the law-abiding, who are not the problem, while doing nothing about all the millions of ILLEGAL guns already out there. You do not disarm yourself in the face of an armed attack. Ask any military man to disarm and you’ll get a big laugh, because he knows the “other side” will not reciprocate, and will then “walk all over him.” The same is true in civilian life. As is being proved in Chicago every day, where some of the tightest anti-gun laws are in effect, gun crime is the highest in the nation, and growing. (80% Lowers)

"Trump Lost Interest"

After showing an initial interest in certain kinds of gun control following a recent mass shooting, sources say President Trump is “losing interest” in gun control. He must have looked at the whole idea of gun control and rightly figures out that there is no gun control law that can actually do the job of reducing “gun crime,” so he has lost interest in it. Trump’s a smart guy, unlike all the ignorant politicians who think they can reduce gun crime by making guns harder to get legally, by the law-abiding. He is smart enough to realize that gun control is a “forlorn hope” in reducing gun crime, so why bother? Just to make it look like you’re doing something? Very revealing is the call to “pass something,” heard in Congress, and legislatures everywhere. They have no idea what will work, but they just “pass something” so it will LOOK like they’re doing something. Trump rightly doesn’t want to join those ignorant politicians in “passing something” that will do nothing to solve the problem. Of course, that will earn him the scorn of those ignorant politicians, when he doesn’t join them in their ignorance. (Twitter)

Can Government Protect You?

No. Not a chance. They even admit it. At least, some “in the trenches” do, while the “top politicians” confidently tell you they CAN protect you while the evidence proves they are LYING to you. The cops—who are your first line of defense, are minutes, hours, even DAYS away, can only “clean up the scene” after the crime has been committed. They can remove any bodies created by the crime, and maybe—MAYBE find the persons responsible, and charging them, convicting them, and imprisoning them. But that doesn’t protect you. It only gives you some measure of satisfaction that your loss is ameliorated. The cops cannot be everywhere at once. They will be the first to admit that. But you can. That’s why Americans will never give up their right to be armed for self defense. Not entirely. If the government ever gets a law passed to ban all legal guns, there will be a revolution, and those politicians who did it will be removed—and depending on the circumstances, they may go to prison, and some may even be executed. The ONLY answer is to arm YOU. Then you can take care of yourself. You are THERE when the crime is being committed, and you can fight back during those minutes that pass until the cops can get there. But the anti-gun fools will not hear of that. They don’t think you are responsible enough to not endanger YOURSELF with a gun in your possession. They are WRONG. But they won’t go away until you MAKE them. (Just common sense)

End Gun-Free Zones

They say we should end gun-free zones on campus. I agree fully. But why limit it to campus? Gun-free zones are deadly. They are an open invitation to potential mass shooters and other kinds of criminals to come in and shoot people without opposition from the law-abiding, who DO obey anti-gun laws, even if they know they are stupid. Convicted mass shooters have told us that they SEARCH OUT gun-free zones for their “dirty work” because they can be pretty sure the law-abiding there will not be armed, and thus will be defenseless while they kill them. Why are schools such good targets for mass shooters? Because they are known gun-free zones. The gun-free zone is the biggest mistake the anti-gun fools ever made, and they’ve made a lot of them. Their first mistake is believing that if they make a law against something, criminals and crazies will obey it. Their second mistake is in thinking they can “get rid of all guns” by making laws against them. And that doing that will eliminate “gun crime.” Criminals and crazies will still get their guns. All their laws only limit the right of the law-abiding people to be able to defend themselves against the millions of ILLEGAL guns out there. Criminals are all staunch supporters of anti-gun laws because they know they only make it easier for them to use their illegal guns to victimize people. (Washington Examiner)

Mexico Gun Control

Mexico has almost perfect “gun control.” Then why were 3,000 people killed, just in June? In Mexico, you can only legally buy a gun at ONE gun store. And that store is run by the government. Their “gun control laws” are very tight. It’s almost impossible for the average Mexican citizen to legally buy a gun. So, of course, they get them ILLEGALLY. There is a flourishing black market in guns in Mexico, as there is everywhere, especially where gun laws are tight. Yes, there are laws about that, but the bad guys just ignore them and go ahead and get their guns illegally, then go out and kill somebody with them. Anti-gun laws only apply to the law-abiding, who aren’t usually the ones who go out and kill people. They cannot stop the bad guys from getting their guns, and do not. Where the anti-gun laws are the tightest, gun crime is at its highest. The anti-gun fools have to know this, but they persist in making more and more unenforceable, useless laws that only get the law-abiding people killed because they DO obey the laws, even if they think they’re stupid. I get very tired of writing these words, but as long as the anti-gun fools keep trying to disarm the law-abiding, making them “easy targets” for those who ignore them, I will continue. (Bearing Arms)

"Shot In the Back!"

That’s the claim from demonstrators, who are demonstrating because the cops “shot a teenager” who was reaching for his own gun when being confronted by the cops in a robbery investigation. He is known to the cops, and was out on bail for THREE felonies, including sexual assault on a child by a person in a position of trust, according to the records. One of the things often ignored by the liberal media in cases like this is the possibility that this “teenager” was a gang member. They ignore it because the liberal media is “anti-gun,” and they want to promote events like this to advance their narrative. Later evidence will tell if this kid was “shot in the back,” but that won’t likely convince those “demonstrators,” whose minds are usually made up, so they don’t want us to confuse them with facts. I’ve seen way too many of these events, where people blatantly LIE to promote an anti-gun narrative. One of the most egregious example of that occurred in Ferguson, Missouri, where a giant “teenager” was shot by cops when attacking a much smaller cop. The cop shot him as he advanced on him in a threatening fashion, but biased “witnesses” said he was “moving away with his hands up.” Which was a blatant LIE, but the crowd rioted, and did much damage before order was restored. Even so, that cop’s life was ruined, for just doing his job and reacting to the fear for his own life when this GIANT, who had just “strong-armed” a shop owner and was “dancing down the middle of a street” when asked to stop by the cop, who was then attacked. But the media didn’t deign to notice that. (Denver Post)

Gun Control Is Futile

I’ve probably written that very headline several times in the past, but it’s the only one that fits what I’m about to write. Gun control is truly futile because it doesn’t exist, no matter how hard the anti-gun fools try and convince you it does. Yes, they might be able to stop the law-abiding from getting guns in some instances. But their anti-gun laws are useless in keeping guns out of the hands of people who want to use them for evil purposes. There are already millions of ILLEGAL guns out there, and more are being sold in the black market every day.

The only thing that will do anything about it is to allow the law-abiding to have their own guns for self defense. But they will not even entertain that idea. They laugh at you and call you stupid for even suggesting it. Mass shooters can be described as “mentally unstable.” They’re not necessarily insane, although some are fully insane. You have to be mentally disturbed to want to kill a bunch of innocent people. Potential mass killers give off signals about what they contemplate, and the authorities need to acknowledge that and pay more attention when they do. I can give you many examples of this, based on the mass shootings that have occurred. Blaming the gun is never going to work. You have to recognize and act on those “signals” potential mass shooters send up.

As to simple criminals, there is nothing that can be done except to keep them in prison longer, to keep potential shooters off the streets, while “cracking down” on street gangs, most of whose members regularly carry illegal guns and if the stupid politicians will allow “stop and frisk” nationally, the cops can do something about that. It made me sick the other day to see those kids dousing cops with water and hitting them in the head with empty buckets. They could have been shooting those cops just as easily. I’d bet most, if not all of the kids doing the dousing were armed illegally. And the buckets could be filled with cement, so as to kill the cops. (Just common sense)

Stabbings In California

California is a place here it’s hard to get “permission” to have a gun for self defense. California is one big gun-free zone. So this guy decided to go o a “stabbing spree” and killed enough people for his atrocity to be called “mass murder.” But don’t look for much about this in the liberal media because he didn’t use a gun. You have to use a gun in your killings nowadays to get noticed by the liberal media. Of course, all of this proves (again) that anti-gun laws don’t stop those bent on mass murder. In fact, they make it worse, by disarming this guy’s potential victims. Think of the number of FEWER people who would die if this guy had run into a citizen who was armed and could put a couple in his head before he killed any more people. Anti-gun laws are USELESS because they only apply to LEGAL gun owners, completely ignoring those fools who simply get them ILLEGALLY. But anti-gun fools ignore this and continue to insist on getting more and more useless, unenforceable, counterproductive anti-gun laws passed. Laws that only disarm potential victims. Many innocent people have died because of this, but anti-gun fools just don’t care. All they want to do is disarm as many law-abiding, honest Americans as possible, for some stupid reason.(Flag & Cross)

What to Write About

I have to come up with at least two meaningful items each day for the “Unarmed Citizen” blog, but it’s hard to find anything I haven’t written about multiple times while being ignored by the anti-gun fools. I find myself “preaching to the choir” repeatedly. Then they come up with an article like this one in the Los Angeles Times, where they blame everything on the Congress for “not coming up with a solution and doing nothing about gun crime.” As if there was something they COULD do to stop gun crime. They’ve tried everything they can think of, and none of the anti-gun laws they have passed work worth a damn to “stem gun violence.” That’s because their laws only apply to the law-abiding, who are NOT the problem while doing nothing to stop ILLEGAL gun sales to criminals and terrorists and mass killers. Instead, they just make things worse by disarming the law-abiding, making them “easy targets” for the criminals, with their ILLEGAL guns. People insist that Congress should come up with something, and I say why don’t the PEOPLE come up with some suggestions as to just what Congress SHOULD do instead of just griping and telling somebody else to “do something” without giving them any suggestions. (Los Angeles Times)

"We Must Pass Something!"

That’s the cry from legislators all over the country, and in DC. Anti-gun fools are demanding it. They don’t know what, if any laws will actually work, but they want them to “pass something” so they can say they’re doing something, even though they’re not. There is not a single law that will stop gun violence that I know of, and neither do they. But they “flail around” insisting that the legislatures “pass something,” ANYTHING they can use to say they’re “doing something” about gun violence. Meanwhile, the unintended consequences of those laws gets law-abiding people killed, because it disarms them in the face of the millions of ILLEGAL guns, already out there. When a criminal comes at you with his illegal gun, unless you have a gun to use in opposing him, you’re dead. But the anti-gun fools don’t care about that. They just want to eliminate all guns from existence. An impossible dream, but that’s what they want. They even want to disarm the cops! The only people who are standing between us and the criminals, with their illegal guns. IF they can get there in time, that is. The anti-gun fools tell us the cops can protect us, and they’re WRONG. And the cops will be the first to agree. They can’t be everywhere at once, and in the sometimes few minutes it takes for them to arrive, a shooter can kill a lot of people. That is a given. If somebody there has a gun, you don’t have to wait for the cops to arrive with their guns. As an example, in one of the latest mass shootings, the cops were there in seconds, and the shooter still killed four people. They we not protected. (Lexington Herald-Leader)

Many Dastardly Plots

The Dumocrats are running so many dastardly plots against this government and this president, there isn’t enough room here to list them all. Gun control (disarming the populace) is one of them, but the biggest is the plot to overwhelm our borders while flatly refusing to provide enough money to handle the influx, Then bi-ch and gripe, and lie and moan about “conditions” in the “camps” that should have never been necessary. Then go down to the border to “inspect” those camps, get lied to, then spread those lies without bothering to check to see if they are true. AOC went down there and somebody told the LIE that they were told to drink out of toilets for lack of water and AOC, that gullible bimbo former bartender pretending to be a congresswoman, swallowed it, hook, line, and sinker.

There is plenty of water there, and basic necessities they SHOULD have brought with them ARE provided—as much as we can afford. Somebody, in several South American countries, “spread the word” hat they would pay people to go to America, where the “streets were paved with gold.” I won’t name these people because I don’t know who they are, but they have lots of money and I’m sure are connected with the Dumocrats. Unfortunately, not enough to provide the barest necessities like toothbrushes to these dupes for their trip, depending on the United States Border Control to provide them once they arrived, or give the Dumocrats something to gripe about and use against President Trump, which is what this is all about.

The idea is to send so many people that the border is overwhelmed, and that causes many problems, some of which the Border Control hasn’t enough money to provide. The Dumocrats see to that. The “immigrants” “tell a tale of woe,” which is, for most of them, a lie, and bring children they have “rented” for the purpose. Claiming them as their own. They claim asylum, are given a court date and released into the country. And they are never seen, nor heard from again, which is art of the plot. Dumocrats gripe about a crisis THEY created, and blame Trump for it. And this is just ONE of the many dastardly plots they are running. (NY Post)

Unarmed Cops? No Chance!

There’s a growing number of fools who want to disarm the cops in America. There’s NO CHANCE of that ever happening in this country, if our politicians are in any way intelligent. An unarmed cop is a useless cop, and nobody knows this better than the cops. Yes, there are unarmed cops in other countries. England and France, for instance. They are the “first responders,” and unfortunately, when a suspect pulls a gun and starts shooting, they either die, or cower behind cover until the armed cops arrive, just like the unarmed civilians do. There is no better example of that than what happened in Riverside, California, the other day. The Highway Patrol tried to stop a truck and the driver pulled out a rifle and started shooting, killing one cop and wounding several others. Fortunately, the other cops WERE armed, and killed the man before he could kill any more cops. Cops are in a dangerous business. As they go about doing their jobs, at any time somebody could pull a gun and start shooting. If they have no guns, they can only cower behind cover as those unarmed cops in France did while a couple of armed terrorists killed 11 people at a satire magazine, until the armed cops finally arrived. Eleven people dead, because the “first responders” were unarmed, and useless. It is instructive to note that the shooter, a convicted felon, was not allowed to have a gun in gun-controlled California, but he did. Surprise, surprise! (NBC News)

Why Gun-Free Zones?

I just can’t understand why politicians all over the country continue to create more and more “gun-free zones,” everywhere you go when they are demonstrably USELESS in stopping, or even slowing down “gun violence,” Instead INCREASING it by disarming the law-abiding, making them DEFENSELESS against the millions of ILLEGAL guns, already out there, in the hands of “bad guys,” who only want to do us harm. Not a one of their highly vaunted anti-gun laws does ANYTHING to stem gun violence, but they continue to make them in the face of solid evidence they do not work, and only make it easier for criminals to victimize the law-abiding. Gun-free zones are just about the WORST offender, since they only keep guns out of the hands of the law-abiding, making them “easy targets” for criminals, who just IGNORE their laws. Each and every mass shooting thus far has happened IN a gun-free zone. Something intelligent politicians ought to take notice of, but which they do not. How many more innocent people have to die before our politicians notice that their laws don’t work? I know they’re not stupid, even though they act like they are. I think they have an ulterior motive of disarming as many people as possible so they can later victimize them, themselves, under the color of the law. (The Hill)

Democrats Want You Helpless

Their most recent action proves the fact that it’s not the guns, it’s the self defense itself that Dumocrats want to eliminate. I recently saw some ads for “bullet-proof backpacks” for students to wear, in order to defend themselves in case of a mass shooting at their school. So Dumocrats have jumped right on it with an attempt to “regulate” those bullet-proof backpacks (translation: ban them), even though they present no danger to anybody. Dumocrat Chuckie Schumer says he will introduce a bill to “regulate” body armor as soon as he can, which means bullet-proof backpacks. He really wants school children to have NO protection against mass killers who come to their school to kill a few of them. Already, all schools are “gun-free zones,” meaning teachers and other staff are prohibited from bring their legally-carried guns to school so they could stop a mass shooter if he starts shooing in their schools. The stupid anti-gun fools still think if they are allowed to bring their guns to school, it will be them who start shooting students—a really stupid idea. But they believe it. They’re too stupid not to. Their biggest stupidity is their sincere belief that all they have to do is pass a law against something and people who break laws for a living will somehow, obey it. (The Hill)

Just Blame the Cops

Chicago’s new mayor is saddled with a city drowning in the blood of gun victims, in spite of the fact that they have just about all the anti-gun laws in existence in effect there. So what does she do? She blames the cops. The “easy way out.” Never mind that none of those laws do a damned thing to stop, or even slow down “gun crime,” and that fact makes it impossible for it to be the fault of the cops. Yet the politicians all “jump on the bandwagon” to falsely blame the cops for what the politicians have done, and for which they refuse to take responsibility. Their biggest gun problem is gang violence. Gang members, most of whom are too young to even be ALLOWED to have a gun, ALL have guns, and they don’t hesitate to use them, sometimes for nothing more than being “on their turf.” the very fact that NONE of the guns they use are legally purchased or owned speaks volumes in proving the new mayor’s words to be a political LIE. Something said to escape responsibility for something that IS the responsibility of the government, and the mayor. And instead of actually DOING something about it, she blames the cops—an “easy target.” (Truth About Guns)

"Good Guy With Gun"

The anti-gun fools keep saying that a “good guy with a gun” can never stop a determined mass shooter from killing people. And then a “good guy with a gun” does just that, and they ignore it. It happened the other day when a damned fool was “inspired” by that shooting in an El Paso WalMart and decided to copy it. So he put on a bullet-proof vest, and took his guns to a local WalMart, and was going to do his own mass killings. Unfortunately for him, he ran into a “good guy with a gun,” who confronted him and held him for the cops, who arrived within three minutes. Minutes that could have been deadly for several people had that guy not intervened. The stories emphasize the fact that the “good guy” was a firefighter, but that really makes no difference. He was a citizen, with a “carry permit,” and he used it to put a stop to this fool’s ambitions to kill a few people because he was “inspired” by the killings in El Paso. I don’t know what his motives were beyond being “inspired,” but that doesn’t make a lot of difference, either. It only matters that he wanted to kill some people and was stopped by a “concealed carrier.” That we need to have many more “armed citizens” to keep other fools from killing people is obvious to intelligent people, but not to the anti-gun fools, who poo-poo the obvious answer to “gun crime.” (Conservative Alliance)