A gunman came into a convenience store and pointed a gun at the head
of the 63-year-old clerk. He probably confidently thought he had an
easy target in this little old lady—until she pulled out her own
gun and shot him to death. He probably hadn’t considered that as a
possibility. Now it’s too late. He’s dead. Again I say: this
happens so often, I hesitate to report on all of them, lest it bore
you. And I don’t want to bore you. But, contrary to what anti-gun
fools tell you, having a gun made that little old lady the equal to
that 48-year-old thug, to his dismay. And this woman protected not
only herself, but also others I the store, all of whom would have
been defenseless if she had not been armed, and willing to shoot. No
liberals have yet criticized this little lady, but I’m sure that’s
because the liberal media has avoided reporting on it, for the most
part—except for local coverage. But I’m sure their criticism will
come, because they’re that stupid. I notice this article mentioned
that she had a LEGAL gun, but makes no mention of the legality (or
lack thereof) of the robber’s gun. They’ll
probably use that old saw, “Robbing a store shouldn’t carry a
death penalty for the robber.” But neither does BEING robbed, which is what he threatened.
(Conservative Tribune)
Thursday, January 31, 2019
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment