One of the things Obama did was to attempt to strip the Second
Amendment right from elderly people who ask for others
to handle their finances. He translated this into a means to take
their guns away, even though just asking for help with their finances
do NOT cause them to be "mentally unstable," as Obama's new
rule suggested. That this is an OBVIOUS unconstitutional act goes
without saying, and it should not have taken a LAW to undo
this outrage. But
thankfully, there is now one, if President Trump signs it, now that
the House has passed it--which is what it will take. Anybody want to
take a bet on whether or not he will sign it? Under Obama's rule, all
it took for their constitutional right to be denied was approval of
an unelected bureaucrat. And it required a long and expensive appeal
process for it to be reversed--something a person in the "evening
of their life" can ill afford, as a rule.
This Obama rule was "elder abuse." But I guess he figured
that he abused everybody else, so why not them? (Washington Examiner)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment