Then the Fourth Circuit Court says, “We don't have the power to
“extend” the Second Amendment protection to weapons of war.”
But that's faulty thinking on the part of the judges. They don't have
the authority NOT to “extend” it to “weapons of war.” A gun
is a gun, and the Constitution clearly states that Americans will NOT
have their right to be armed abridged! And that included 'weapons of
war.” The Constitution did NOT exclude “weapons of war” from
its guarantee. So no matter how you figure it, this ruling is NOT
correct, and is a good example of how the courts are the enemies of
the right of Americans to be armed. This is why there needs to be a
way to reverse ignorant rulings and punish the judges who make them.
(National Review)
Sunday, February 26, 2017
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment