Because the attacker, if killed, is
“deprived of his legal rights.” Izat so? That's what Huffington
Post thinks, anyway. Whoever wrote this is completely devoid of
knowledge of human rights (or anything else, for that matter). Human rights demand that we be able to
defend ourselves against an attacker, even if we kill him/her in the
process. It will be defined as “justifiable homicide.” He/she is
NOT “entitled to a fair trial if he/she gets killed in the process
of trying to victimize others. The fact that he/she threatens OUR
rights with his/her gun is reason enough to kill him/her WITHOUT a
trial. His/her threat with a gun is prima facie evidence he/she plans
to kill somebody, and deserves to be killed, him/herself. “ To
say this is probably one of the stupidest things I’ve ever read
would be an understatement.
It is certainly an indicator of how far the left will go in
it’s “reasoning” to deny you the use of a gun and your basic
right to self-defense. I said “basic” but self-defense is indeed
an inherent right. You need no one’s permission to exercise it
because you own your life and without protecting it, you would
obviously cease to exist.“ (Elm Tree Forge)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment