We recently commented about a liberal news source (Gawker) saying
elderly people shouldn't be allowed to have guns because they're too
“old and weak” to use them. But don't try to tell that to the guy
who was trying to break into this elderly gentleman's home. Oh. I
forgot. You can't. He's dead. This “old guy” fired a “warning
shot” that killed him. So much for “old folks” not being able
to properly use guns for self defense. The other two bad guys are
probably still running. “Gawker alert!” You were wrong, and your
article showed age discrimination. That makes you bigots. But you can
tell the “bad guys” this “old guy” properly handled his gun
if you ever find them in the “tall and uncut,” where they were
headed when last seen. That should be a warning to burglars who want
to “target” old folks because of that Gawker article—DON'T. Not
if you want to stay alive. And don't bring a baseball bat to a
gunfight. Not if you want to go home tonight. The “authorities”
are wondering why this old guy had a gun near at hand. But the answer
is simple: to deal with such as those three thugs. Or any others that
might show up. And, being old, he might not have been able to get to
his gun fast enough if it was hidden away in the “gun safes” some
laws require. Or if it was secured by a “gun lock.” (Bearing Arms)
Monday, April 11, 2016
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment