The
anti-gun fools keep telling us that private citizens with their own
guns never stop the shooters who shoot places up because they never
read about it in the news. There's a good reason for that. The
liberal media doesn't report it when it happens. Only the
“alternative (conservative) media" reports it, and those fools only
read New York Times and Huffington Post. So they miss stories like
the one where an Uber driver who had a carry permit in Chicago (a
rarity) shot and wounded a shooter who opened fire on a crowd of
people, saving many lives. Of course, Uber, when they heard, made a
rule to keep their drivers from being armed. But they couldn't
enforce it because all Uber drivers own their own cars. Then there's
the Philadelphia barber shop where a fool opened fire on a shopful of
customers and was immediately dispatched by another man in the shop
who had a carry permit.
In a hospital NEAR Philly, a man shot two
people and was looking around for more victims when he was shot by
another hospital visitor. In Plymouth, PA, a man shot another man in
a bar and was approaching the bartender, who had a carry permit and
shot him. That's just three of many I know about because I read more
than the liberal rags. And notice ALL these shootings happened where
guns are prohibited. The men who shot the shooters were “breaking
the rules (not laws),” too. But if they hadn't, more people would
have died The liberal fools who tell us a civilian shooter in these
cases would just mean more bullets in innocent people as they go
about wildly shooting in all directions show a complete ignorance
about well-trained and legal gun owners. Which is common among them,
and predictable. (Town Hall)
No comments:
Post a Comment