Washington Post claims they have found 29 cases where a concealed
weapon holder committed “mass murder.” But their definition of
“mass murder” is “iffy,” at best. Even the FBI requires that
FOUR people be killed to qualify for mass murder status. A majority
of people on this list killed no more than THREE, and many who DID
have a “concealed carry permit” were NOT concealing their weapon.
In many cases, the gun used was a rifle, or they just BEAT people to
death. Which makes their CC permit irrelevant. If even the FEW
people on the list who DID qualify mean anything, it is that the laws
now on the books, as well as the ones they insist on passing, DO
NOTHING to prevent ANY kind of gun murders. So who needs 'em? What
I'm saying is that NONE of their current laws would stop ANY gun
violence, so why do they insist on continuing to make the same
useless laws, over and over, when they don't work? I'd be first in
line to support a law that WORKED, but nobody has figured out how to
make one, yet. The guy who wrote the article in the Washington Post
is a KNOWN “anti-gun activist” and has been found to be lying on many
occasions. In this case, he used “data” from the violently
anti-gun Violence Policy Center as the basis for his lying article.
(Bearing Arms)
Tuesday, October 27, 2015
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment