As usual, the stupid laws anti-gun fools come up with
failed again. There's a good reason for that. Does anybody know of a
“mass shooting” that happened in OTHER than a gun-free zone? I
know of one. Some time ago a fool tried to "shoot up” a GUN
STORE. Damned fool! The only guy who got shot (except for the clerk) was the
“shooter.” Why? Because almost everybody (including the clerk)
had a gun and made “Swiss cheese” out of him. He won't rob another gun store. Not because he learned a lesson, because he's dead. Gun registrations
don't work. That's another “flight of fancy” by the gun-grabbers.
Yes. MAYBE a shooter can be identified by his (or her) name being on
such a list, IF he/she bothers to get on one. People who plan on
doing “bad things” with guns usually don't get their guns
legally. Even so, all those lists do is (maybe) tell you who did the
shooting AFTER the killing happens. AFTER the crime has “gone
down.” The cops can't stop them because they're usually MINUTES
away. The cops in the Oregon shooting got there quickly and put an
END to the shooter, but not until AFTER he had killed NINE students and wounded 7 others.
GREAT! Now they can “document” the crime, remove the bodies, and
figure out, in exquisite detail, what happened. But NINE PEOPLE are
still dead. In Chicago, they have some of the tightest “gun laws”
anywhere, but they also have one of the highest violent crime rates
in the nation. The courts routinely throw some out for being “too
tight.”
Then they go out and
quickly make almost identical laws and enforce them until the courts
declare them unconstitutional, too. That's because there's NO
PUNISHMENT for lawmakers who violate the Constitution, except for the
law being thrown out. What's WRONG with these people? They make laws
that simply DISARM honest, reliable people (they're the only ones who
OBEY their laws) and make of them “sitting ducks” for people who
don't care about breaking the law. The answer is simple. Let
innocent, reliable people arm themselves. When enough lawbreakers are
killed by their intended victims, other lawbreakers (who are
basically cowards) will go into less violent crime. As the number of
killers decreases, and there are fewer armed criminals, problem solved. Then ENFORCE the laws that ADD
TIME to a sentence for a crook who uses a gun in the commission of a
crime, instead of using those laws as “bargaining chips” to get
convictions in other crimes. Then, instead of "lazy law enforcement,
they MIGHT keep illegal shooters off the streets for a longer periods
of time. Meanwhile, people might just “take notice” of “red
flags” that result in such shootings. In most of these shootings,
there WERE such “red flags,” but they were ignored. (NBC News)
No comments:
Post a Comment