The Journal-Inquirer in Connecticut (where else but the North East?)
is pushing HARD for “gun control” in a letter to the editor from
a small-town mayor (who is probably a member of Bloomberg's “Mayors
Against guns.”). But all I hear is the same ol' same ol' when they
talk about what CONSTITUTES gun control in their minds, none of which
do ANYTHING to ACHIEVE gun control, but simply disarm HONEST people
and make them “easy targets” for ILLEGALLY-armed criminals, who
do not obey laws. They say our gun laws are “loose and varying,”
but that's a false generalization, as usual. Of course, this piece
immediately becomes a slam against Republicans and support for
Hillary and other Democrats when they say, “Not a single Republican
candidate for president has embraced common-sense reforms to curb gun
violence. I am forever thankful that our Democratic presidential
candidate, Hillary Clinton, since first announcing her campaign has
taken a leading role in the discussion of how to curb gun violence. “
Of course, Hillary has no real answers. Either. This mayor mentions
Sandy Hook, but fails to mention that Sandy Hook, as a school, was
already a “gun-free zone,”:which did NOTHING to stop the shooter
from coming in and killing a few children. I searched high and low,
but could not determine her political party. But I figure it must be
Democrat, since she “knocks” Republicans in her piece. Damn! It
used to be a REQUIREMENT for all things political about a political
figure include their party connection. But apparently no more.
(Journal-Inquirer)
Monday, July 27, 2015
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment