It's okay to use the death of a woman while waiting for permission to
buy a gun to promote the “anti-gun” movement, but according to
nj.com, using it to illustrate how gun control laws as they are known
today KILL PEOPLE, it's “disgusting! How twisted ARE people in the
New England area? They used a lot of “if onlies” in their effort
to try and convince people that she COULD have (maybe) defended herself
WITHOUT a gun (none of which she did successfully), none of which would have worked. One of the stupidest
things they said: “Various aspects of how New Jersey’s gun-permit
laws work in real time are a legitimate topic for discussion.
But the Senate president bears no responsibility for the death of
Carol Bowne, and to say otherwise shamefully exploits a tragedy.”
In fact they DO. Without her own gun she was COMPLETELY defenseless.
Even a bad shot would have a chance, whether or not they think so.
She could have at least scarfed him away. Their arguments are twisted
and imbecilic. (The Truth About Guns)
Friday, June 12, 2015
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment