AR-15 Not Included

District Judge Catherine C. Blake has ruled that “certain firearms” like the AR-15 and AK-style weapons as well as other magazine-fed, semi-auto rifles with certain features “fall outside the Second Amendment protection” as “dangerous and unusual weapons.” They do NOT! Where the hell does she get that? The first, and main purpose of the second Amendment is to allow us to keep guns for self-defense, even against our own government!. What if the opposition HAS such weapons? We would be at a distinct disadvantage in defending ourselves against that. Further, the Founders never could have envisioned such guns, let alone dis-include them, and to them, the TOP self-defense gun was a “flintlock rifle.” Seems to me this judge is “writing her own version of the law,” which she is not allowed to do. You can’t DEFINE a law in such a way as to allow unconstitutional decisions. Apparently, she isn’t smart enough to know that. (The Federalist Papers)