Making It Harder

Seems to me the bulk of the ‘laws” that the anti-gun fools make aren’t designed to make it harder on the criminals to victimize the law-abiding. They are designed to make it harder for the law-abiding to defend against the law-breakers. Why is that, do you think? Gun-free zones, for instance, don’t affect the criminal in the least because they just bring their guns in, while the law-abiding usually do not. So the criminals can be pretty sure those law-abiding souls will be following the law and will not be armed. So the criminal, who doesn’t obey laws, can do as he wishes to them because they are defenseless. Safe storage laws that cause delay in getting legally-owned guns it action when threatened by the holder of an ILLEGAL gun just make it easier (again) for the criminal to victimize the law-abiding person who obeys the law, while the criminal does NOT. Background checks merely let the cops find and prosecute a shooter IF he bought his gun legally and stood for one—which criminals do NOT. They know the law can find them if they do, and then commit a crime with their gun, so they get it illegally. They either buy it out of the trunk of a car in a back alley somewhere, from another criminal, or just steal it. I could go on and on, but I won’t. You can look at the laws and easily see what I do, now you’re alerted. (Just common sense)