Why NOT Joe Biden?

Joe Biden is his own worst enemy. He hides in his basement, rather than campaign most of the time, and when he does venture out, he gives us one or two reasons NOT to vote for him. Raising taxes is a “death knell” for politicians, so most of them deny they will then, after they’re elected, raise taxes. Not Joe. He tells us frankly (and has done so many times) that he is not only going to repeal all of Trump’s tax reductions, he is going to raise taxes further. Other politicians promise not to mess with the Second Amendment. Again, not Joe. He is a classic anti-gun fool and has promised to “come for your guns.” And to prove it, he has promised to appoint Beto, a virulent anti-gun fool who actually said, “Yes, we’re coming for your guns.” as his “gun czar” to do it. And knowing the country wants nothing whatever to do with Barack Obama, the worst president in the history of America, he promised to appoint Obama to the Supreme Court.

Then he promises to destroy the oil industry, which is an essential industry to our survival, without anything viable to replace it. And, even though he has denied banning Fracking one day and saying he’s going to ban it the next, it is something the WILL do, since banning fracking is a Dumbocrat “wet dream.” He has also promised to destroy the coal industry, another industry essential to our survival—which also means the destruction of the electric power industry, which uses coal to generate electricity. He picked the worst possible running mate in picking Kamala Harris, the most corrupt and furthest left woman in government. A woman who slept her way ton the top and is probably still doing it (leopards don’t change their spots and what works works). Lastly, he is too old. He likely won’t live to finish his first term Kamila will see to it, and we’ll get that corrupt strumpet as out first woman president. ‘Nuff said. (Just common sense)

New "Study" Touts Racism Theory

They had a “Study” in Australia and came up with the same old crap that other “studies” have claimed: that whites fear blacks and want guns to use on them. the TRUTH is, the whole idea of GUN CONTROL was started by the wish to kill blacks in the 1800s. But it isn’t any longer. They can make false claims all they want, but the wish to “keep and bear arms” IS simply the wish to be able to defend ones self against criminals, WHATEVER color they may be. To deny that is to reveal massive ignorance. The fact, however, that blacks commit MORE VIOLENCE than whites, and are far more apt to BE criminals can be used in such specious “studies” to CLAIM that pro-gun people just want to kill blacks.( Just as such people think that, since there are more blacks in prison than whites, that we are somehow putting more blacks in prison for some nefarious purpose. The fact is, more blacks commit crimes and so are over represented in prison).Likewise they think our only reason for wanting to have a gun is to kill blacks. Not so; they just want to DEFEND themselves against ALL criminals. The REAL racists here are the people who try to find racism where it does not exist.(Liberty Alliance)

Biden Knows It all

Stupid Joe Biden thinks he’s an expert in everything. Especially guns. But he’s not. Three times now he has made silly, stupid suggestions about guns. And when people take his advice, they get in trouble. The first was to take a shotgun and fire a warning shot. A man did it and got himself arrested for a “dangerous discharge of a firearm.” Next, he recommended that if somebody comes to your door and you’re afraid it’s a home attack, just shoot through the door. Now that WILL get people killed, and the shooter some prison time, or worse. Now he’s telling cops not to shoot to kill, but shoot the suspect in the leg. That’ll get some cops killed, because a leg wound does not end the threat from an armed suspect who is trying to kill you. Biden’s incompetence on these matters is legendary. And if he gets elected, he’s going to send people after your guns. As usual, he targets the guns, not the gunner. You can take the gun away from a bad guy and he will find something else to use in victimizing people. I’ve said before that crime did not originate with the invention of the gun. Criminals will use anything they can, including knives, machetes, clubs, etc. You don’t ban cars because they kill people. The car is not at fault, the driver is. Likewise, the gun is not the problem, it is the shooter mishandling it. (Conservative Brief)

"Gun-Free Zone"

What’s a one-word description of a “gun-free zone?” STUPID! I can’t be more specific than that? A “gun-free zone” tells criminals they will meet no resistance there, so they can come in and shoot the place up without worrying about anybody there with his own gun to oppose them. I can’t think of a more idiotic situation. Like the anti-gun fools’ idea that the way to self defense is to DISARM yourself, the very idea is STUPID. But then, we expect stupidity of the anti-gun fools. Just as we expect stupidity of the elite liberals who usually find some way to make our laws. They tell us the cops can protect us, but the cops would be the first to tell you they can't. All they can do its "write it up" after the crime has been committed, dispose of the body or bodies and (maybe) catch the criminal--later. (Gun-Free Zone)

Over and Over

We keep trying to get through the cement that seems to surround the reasoning part of the brains of the anti-gun fools with the truth that none of their anti-gun laws do anything like what they’re supposed to do, and end up butting out heads against the concrete. Then in places like Oakland, California, Los Angeles, and Chicago, just to name a few—all of which have tight anti-gun laws, shootings and murders continue to get worse, in spite of those laws—and they ignore that, too. They keep making their stupid laws—which do exactly the opposite of what they’re supposed to do. They disarm the honest, law-abiding people, making them “easy targets” for the law-breakers and their illegally-gotten guns. They can’t be unaware of this, but they act like they are. I fail to see what their real purpose is; it can’t be “gun control,” so it must be “people control.” They use the gun control excuse to make laws that control people. It’s a continuing power grab by politicians we need to remove from office at the next election—while refusing to elect anybody who even hints at being in favor of gun control. That’s the only way we’re going to get rid of the onus of gun control fools, and we need to do it, Now, not later. (Bearing Arms)

Stupid Professors

In yet another demonstration of the STUPIDITY of some of the “professors:” who are teaching our impressionable children who don’t know better than to listen to them, yet another “professor of LAW in Texas now says “The constitution is outdated and the Second Amendment should be repealed.” Why? So we can turn the United States over to the criminals, who will always be able to get their guns, no matter whether or not WE can? This kind of “professor” is only PROFESSING to be intelligent. We need to get rid of such people before they pollute the minds of our youth. But in many cases, we can’t. They have “tenure,” which means we can’t fire them, no matter what SLOP they put in our kids’ brains. (Info Wars)

Clarification of Gun Laws

Some time ago I posted an item entitled, “Gun Control Is A Crime.” The article listed clarifies the laws that have been made and is worth reading. But I notice the early emphasis is on the age of people buying guns. Yes, children don’t need guns today as they did 150 years ago. Then, just about every child from about age 9 had a rifle https://gunforest.com/blog/how-old-do-you-have-buy-a-handgun taller than he (or she) was. And that child could “bark a squirrel from a long way off. It was necessary then because they were expected to supply food for the table. They did not go out and “shoot up the landscape” just because they had a gun. That is not needed today, so children are not allowed to have guns. But my objection is that the anti-gun fools want to make children completely gun ignorant. They want to eliminate ALL references to guns in a child’s knowledge. This is a mistake. Ignorance breeds curiosity. A child who knows absolutely nothing about real guns will be curious about them and they WILL find them. That’s how children kill other children. Through ignorance and curiosity. I remember when I was a child finding my dad’s gun in his closet, taking it out, and playing with it like it was a cap gun.

I didn’t know any better. fortunately he didn’t keep it loaded so I didn’t accidentally kill anybody. But had I KNOWN about guns that would never have happened. I say gun laws are criminal because most of them are designed to make them impossible to get into action fast enough to deal with a criminal and his ILLEGAL gun—which gets people killed. They all are in violation of the Second Amendment, since all of them INFRINGE upon that constitutionally guaranteed right. And they can ONLY apply to LEGAL guns, not the millions of ILLEGAL guns already out there. The key is education, which the anti-gun fools want to prevent—and that’s my main objection. Real “common sense laws” I have to objection to, but most of them are NOT “common sense,” since they don’t work the way they’re supposed to work. They prevent NO “gun crime.” They only get people killed by disarming the law abiding in the face of the threat from ILLEGAL gun owners. (Gun Forest)

Gun Control: Wrong Answer

Individuals, and politicians with limited intelligence keep blaming guns for “gun crime,” when they should be blaming the HOLDER of the gun for the crime, and trying to figure out something to do about that, instead of pursuing their futile quest to make all millions of guns (only the legal ones) in existence disappear, ignoring the millions of ILLEGAL guns in the hands of those with criminal intentions. There isn’t a single “gun control law” that has done ANYTHING, ever, to stop, or even slow down “gun crime,” because those with criminal intent do not get their guns legally, nor do they stand for background checks. Waiting periods and “safe storage” laws only get innocent people killed, since criminals do not recognize them, and come with their guns ready. Gun buybacks are also futile, since the criminals bring in old, unserviceable guns, then take the money and buy newer, serviceable guns, with which to victimize the law-abiding, who obey such laws, knowing they don’t accomplish anything. Therein lies the futility in these laws. They only serve to disarm the law-abiding, while the law-breakers take advantage of that in committing their “gun crime.” I’ve written this many, many times, and the anti-gun fools ignore me and keep on making these useless laws while people of intelligence shake their heads, as long as they have them before some criminal shoots their head off with his illegal gun. (Just common sense)

Right Delayed, Right Denied

The Constitution is very clear in the Second Amendment: It says plainly: “[T]he right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The organized militia” is moot, since none existed at the time of the writing. That government considered ALL AMERICANS to be the “organized militia” to be called up when needed. And that government, not being “awash in money” as is the current one, wanted them to bring their own guns. So ANY LAW limiting or licensing the purchase and use of guns is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. In many states, the issuance of “gun permits” lies in limbo as bureaucrats “drag their feet” in approving them so as to limit the number of guns that can be sold and/or used—which is an “infringement.” The delay is but a further infringement by the infringement of the law, itself. According to the Constitution, to which EVERY LAW made MUST CONFORM, no government, state or federal, can MAKE a law stopping American citizens, in any way, from buying, owning, using, or carrying a gun without any license or permit allowed. Governments have a way of ignoring that and, since there is no punishment specified in the Constitution, they get away with it until somebody spends enough money to bring it to the Supreme Court, where that law should be declared unconstitutional and reversed. But by the time that happens, the damage has been done. People jailed, fined, spent time in prison, based on an UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW. (Bearing Arms)

Fire Anti-Gun Politicians

In Chambersburg, Pennsylvania, they FIRED their mayor when he signed up to be one of Bloomberg’s anti-gun cities. He swore to UPHOLD the Constitution and the RIGHT to keep and bear arms is a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT. In Colorado, we “fired” TWO anti-gun politicians and are in the process of firing another. Our governor, who has signed a LOT of anti-gun legislation, is no longer safe from firing. It is no longer politically “safe” to be an “anti-gun politician.” More and more the people are “rising up” and getting RID of politicians who think they can violate the terms of the Constitution they swore to uphold. I don’t know what these politicians are SMOKING, but it must be potent. But not to worry. They’ll soon be gone. Let this be a lesson to ALL politicians: defend the Constitution or be GONE! (Capitalism Institute)

Proving Our Point

The anti-gun fools keep wondering why we want to keep our constitutional right to “bear arms” for self defense against criminals, with their millions of illegal guns. Then we spend our evenings in front of our televisions while scenes of looting, violence, and burning o the property belonging to innocent people. We see instances of innocent bystanders being violently attacked by ANTIFA goons, BLM fools, and others while the cops stand by and watch, under orders from their weak-willed, liberal politician bosses, their hands effectively tied fill the screen. We see stories of prosecutors refusing to prosecute rioters who were looting, stealing property not theirs, releasing them to loot some more, violently attacking anybody who opposes them. We see this kind of chaos increasing, every day, and still the anti-gun fools want to keep the law-abiding unarmed, while the criminals, crazies, and Islamic terrorists run wild, unchecked by citizens, who can do nothing to oppose them because their politicians not only keep them unarmed, but tie the hands of the cops and the prosecutors to bring a stop to it. That leaves it up to the citizens to put a stop to it, but, being unarmed, they cannot. Which just proves our point that every American should be armed, for self defense. (Bearing Arms)

Another Lie Disproved

Anti-gun fools are fond of telling us there is no way the Founders could have envisioned guns that could fire more than one shot at a time. They try to use that to discredit the Second Amendment, Well, they did know. One inventor told them about his new invention that could fire 8 balls, one after the other. So the Founders ordered a bunch of them to “test” against their current enemies. Of course the whole idea that they couldn’t have envisioned multi-round firing weapons is beside the point, since the Second Amendment did not mention ANY sort of a gun. It merely guaranteed us the inalienable RIGHT to “bear arms.” No kind of “arms” were mentioned. This is s prime example of how the anti-gun fools twist things to suit themselves in trying to take away this guaranteed RIGHT. They know they can’t just BAN guns, so now they’re trying all the ways they can to make the guns we have useless. One way is making bullets (which they say aren’t covered by the Second Amendment) hard, or impossible to find, making guns just blocks of metal, useless for anything. Of course, the whole idea of targeting guns is silly and stupid. But when this is pointed out, they ignore it, and go right on pushing their stupid, unenforceable laws. They’re really stupid that way. (Truth About Guns)

More Guns, Less Crime

Noted pro-gun researcher has published comparative statistics on guns that prove conclusively that the more legal guns out there, the less crime accompanies them. There’s a simple and clear reason for that: legal gun owners usually don’t commit the crimes. Holders of ILLEGAL guns DO. And every “gun control” law that has ever been made applies ONLY to the law-abiding, LEGAL gun owners, completely ignoring those who buy their guns illegally, or just steal them. Making guns illegal to own is an incompetent response to a “gun crime” committed BY an illegal gun owner because that law goes after the wrong target. Something we can’t seem to get those anti-gun fools who make those laws understand. I don’t know if they’re stupid, or just don’t care. Why they keep making such laws, KNOWING they never do anything to stop, nor even slow down gun crime is a mystery, to me. I do understand why some politicians are against legal gun ownership; they’re afraid of the people who put them into office. They know that the best bar to a “police state” is an armed citizenry. They plan to usurp people’s rights and take their property, and don’t want to meet a gun in the hand of their intended victims, if possible. What mystifies me is why the non-government anti-gun fools wish to deny us the right, guaranteed by the Constitution, to self defense, and to own and us the means to that, a gun, to counter the millions of ILLEGAL guns in existence. (Truth About Guns)

Making Excuses

I get tired of hearing the city of Chicago blaming “lax gun laws in other states” for their major “gun crime” problem. The fact is EVERY big city could likewise blame guns coming from other states because, unless those guns were manufactured IN Chicago, they came in from other states. Not just the ones with what Chicago calls “lax gun laws. Making this claim excuses them from their own responsibility in the burgeoning “gun crime” rate in their city, which stems from not only their own lax enforcement of gun carry laws on their own books but their refusal to prosecute illegal gun carrying. They have recently confiscated 10,000 guns from criminals, and prosecuted them rarely. Usually waiving prosecution to gain convictions in other crimes. That’s just lax law enforcement, generally. There are other ways to get convictions other than “looking the other way” about illegal gun carrying. Their very tight gun laws also have an effect, by disarming the law-abiding, making it easy for the law-breakers to victimize them. If they allowed the law-abiding to be armed in self defense, they would get rid of a lot of illegal gun carriers when they killed them as they tried to victimize a “concealed carrier.” But they will never hear of that. They aren’t intelligent enough. (WBBM)

Trump's "Scare Tactics?"

The Charlotte News & Observer ran an editorial claiming the massive increase in gun sales is due to President Trump’s “scare tactics.” Really? They noted: “Firearm sales surged when the pandemic forced a shutdown in March. Now sales are rising again as President Trump warns of U.S. cities being overrun by looting mobs while police are left helpless to respond for lack of funding and respect.” Trump didn’t make that up. That is really happening, all over the country. People are dying, property destroyed by “looting mobs” while the cops have their hands tied by gutless liberal politicians who should not be allowed to make rules for them.” Is the person who wrote this ignorant article living in a cave far away from “civilization,” or what? The surge I violence is NOT a “Trump pipedream.” This is really happening, and to deny that it is, is idiotic. Yet they allowed this article to be published, KNOWING it was false, and only the opinion of the writer. All Americans with any degree of intelligence at all are “in fear for their lives” and want to have the ability to defend themselves. Is that too hard to understand for this writer? (Bearing Arms)

England Gun Violence Doubles

Anti-gun fools constantly cite Great Britain as an example of “good gun laws lowering violence,” but it’s not true. It has NEVER been true, except for a short time after their almost complete BAN on guns in the UK went into effect. Now the instances of gun violence there has DOUBLED. In some areas it has increased FIVE FOLD. Will the anti-gun fools take note? Not likely. They make a practice of NOT noticing ANYTHING that will hurt their “cause. Now they have cops armed with MACHINE-GUNS doing routine policing. Are the “unarmed cops” in Britain GONE? “To the media and Democrats, it simply doesn't mater that gun control isn't working in England or Chicago or anywhere else. And it sure doesn't matter if gun control might be emboldening criminals to commit gun crime because they know the public isn't armed. All that matters is defeating the NRA and handing Obama another win.” This is a point of FACT. Nothing takes the place of winning a battle for Obama. Not even LOGIC. (Breitbart)

Gun Controlers: Blithering Idiots

Their laws don’t work. They have to know that. But they insist on making more and more of them, while criticizing those of us who know and recognize the truth and oppose them. Their ideas will NEVER stop “gun violence.” Nor will it even slow it down, because the law-breakers who do the dirty work do not normally buy their guns legally and thus don’t stand for a background check. Their guns are usually not on record anywhere, until after the crimes they commit with them. And then it’s too late. And the first thing they do after getting out of prison is go out and buy or steal another illegal gun, which is, again, not on record anywhere until they have used it in a crime and have gotten caught. If the anti-gun fools really want to stop gun violence, they’ll find a way to deal with the facts as they are, not how they wish they were. What is it that is the very definition of insanity? It’s doing the same things over and over again and expecting a different result. That perfectly describes an anti-gun fool who thinks he can eliminate guns entirely, and that will stop violent crime. Yet even the more intelligent can’t seem to “rein them in,” and they continue to disarm honest people, making them “easy targets for the Illegal gun owners while wasting a lot of time, and millions of dollars in taxpayer money. (Just common sense)

Ridiculous Gun Control

In Bedford, Massachsetts, they again demonstrated their stupidity, not only by holding a “gun buyback,” but also getting mostly BB guns, and they’re still very happy about it. Never mind the only real guns that get turned in are old unreliable guns that are more likely to blow up in the person’s hand. Or guns that have been used in a crime and were destined for the deep lake or a river, anyway. These events are always “no questions” events, where no questions are asked of those turning them in. I remember a “Blue Bloods episode where a couple of cops noticed that one of the guns being turned in had been used in a murder and got in trouble for pursuing it. Never mind that money is fungible, and that gained at these events will most likely be spent to obtain newer, working guns to use in victimizing the law-abiding. Gun buyback programs are like “gun-free zones.” They are a good place to “dump” a “dirty gun” because the cops are restrained from pursuing charges against those turning in “dirty guns.” In gun-free zones, criminals freely bring their guns in and victimize people, being pretty sure none of the law-abiding there will be armed, and able to fight back. They SEEK OUT such areas for that reason. Gun buybacks are just a good way to get rid of “dirty guns” and those that are no longer reliable to get money to buy newer, better ones. Anti-gun fools don’t know this, just like they don’t know their other laws are USELESS, and unenforceable. (Bearing Arms)

Not What They Wanted

Supreme Court nominee Amy Conley Barrett was asked if she could rule fairly on Second Amendment issues, since she owns a gun. She answered,”Yes.” Then liberal minds exploded. That was not what they wanted. They wanted her to say she could not. They wanted to promote the silly idea that gun ownership negates anything a person could say about the Second Amendment. Never mind that most of the anti-gun fools (for us, not them) themselves own guns. Sen. Feinstein does. So does Gabby Giffords and many other anti-gun fools. Barrett has pledged to rule, based on what the Constitution says, which is simply what she is mandated to do. The Second Amendment GUARANTEES our right to “bear arms,” so her rulings are predetermined. But the anti-gun fools want her to rule otherwise, and she will not. So they whine and moan. They carry their own guns, but they want to deny us the same right, even though the Constitution mandates our right to be armed, and they rail against a Justice who would rule against their wishes. They think their wishes should be paramount, and they whine and moan, and scream when they are not. (Bearing Arms)

Colo "Gun Fight" Not Over

Those who think the fight over gun rights in Colorado is over are doomed to be disappointed. Yes, we got rid of two of the most noticeable anti-gun fools when we voted to recall TWO state legislators because of their votes FOR gun control. But we’re looking at others, now. “A coalition of gun-control supporters who rallied on Capitol steps Monday asked the Democratic state Legislature not to revisit last session’s gun-control package, which included expanded background checks and a limit on ammunition magazines.” Do they really think they can defeat us with such actions? Gun control will again be a prime topic in the 2014 legislature in Colorado. We’ll be watching closely, and ANY legislators who support gun control will not last out their terms. In addition, we’re looking at one more legislator AND the governor for what happened THIS year. Voting for anti-gun measures WILL end many careers. I guarantee it. (CBS Denver)

Don't Elect Anti-Gun Fools

That’s our biggest problem in maintaining our constitutional right, guaranteed by the Constitution, to “bear arms.” The Second Amendment couldn’t be more clear, unless you’re an ignorant liberal, who tries his best to twist the meaning of the words used by the Founders in writing that august document. Anti-gun fools continue to insist that the reference to an “organized militia” meant that ONLY members of that “militia” could be armed. Not true. When the Constitution was written, there was NO SUCH THING in existence, and they considered ALL THE PEOPLE to be an “organized militia” should they be needed. And, that government, not being awash in money as this one is, wanted them to bring their own guns. Further, self defense was recognized as an “absolute right in those days and they thought gun ownership was essential to staying alive. It still is. Ergo, they wanted no impediment to them doing so by limiting those who may own such tools. This country has existed as a free country for 300 years due to two things: The existence of the Second Amendment, and the free market, which made America the “destination of choice” for oppressed people from all over the world. Most anti-gun fools running for office usually telegraph that stance, one way or another, sometimes by vehemently denying it. Just don’t vote for them. They’re “the enemy.” (Just common sense)

Mental Health Laws Kill

One of the reasons for the apparent increase in the number of “mass shootings” like the one at the theater in Aurora, Colorado is the almost complete LACK of proper treatment for KNOWN mental health sufferers. Some years ago lawmakers made it possible to CLOSE most mental health facilities in favor of smaller, more “personal” facilities that could give more personal treatment for patients. Unfortunately, those smaller treatment facilities did not materialize while the larger facilities still closed. Meanwhile MOST “mass shooters” are KNOWN to have mental problems that have been DIAGNOSED. But since there’s nowhere to send them, they’re turned loose on society and people die. Such is true in the case of the state senator’s son who almost killed the senator and DID kill himself, HOURS after being set home from the hospital after being diagnosed as a danger to society because there were “no beds.” This is a TRAVESTY! Will lawmakers do something about it? Maybe—but it will take them an unconscionable amount of time to do it, while more people die. (TIME Magazine)

Are They Just Stupid?

Or what? The anti-gun fools CAN’T be unaware that none of their anti-gun laws have ever done a thing to stop, or even reduce “gun crime,” as long as they target the gun, rather than the criminal using it. Moreover, their laws only apply to the law-abiding, who mostly are NOT the problem. It is the law BREAKERS who are. And they can’t get to them with their silly little laws. They just ignore them. And that the laws they do make simply make it easier for those criminals to victimize the law-abiding by disarming them. Background checks are useless because, like all their other laws, they only apply to the legal gun buyers, and not those with illegal guns. The single deadly flaw in their thinking is that ALL their laws can ONLY apply to the law-abiding, who are not, and never will be, the problem. You can try, and try, and try to convince these anti-gun dolts of this, but you’re talking to a brick wall. They’re just not listening. They just want to disarm the populace, for whatever reason. We need to remove these fools from office and elect intelligent replacements. (Just common sense)

Nazi Gun Control

Do the gun control tactics of Obama’s government sound familiar? There’s a good reason for that. They’re the Same tactics used by Hitler to find and “confiscate” guns owned by citizens in Nazi Germany before WWII. They use the same tactics on us iver and over and we fall for it every time. “The perennial gun-control debate in America did not begin here. The same arguments for and against were made in the 1920s in the chaos of Germany’s Weimar Republic, which opted for gun registration. Law-abiding persons complied with the law, but the Communists and Nazis committing acts of political violence did not.” With the Jews it was easy. Their culture kept them from owning guns so they were “fair game.” And you know what happened to them, no matter how much anti-Jew organizations deny it. But similar things galso happened to regular Germans after Hitler took their guns away and made them defenseless—just like Obama is trying to do to us today. If you’re smart, you’ll keep your guns. If you don’t have any, get some. It may keep you alive in the future. (National Review Online)

Making Self Defense Illegal

I see a pattern developing in the “anti-gun” fight. That pattern is the disarming of the LEGAL gun owners while denying them the right guaranteed to them by the Second Amendment to the Constitution, to “bear arms” for self defense. I know self defense is not mentioned, but it is implied by the very existence of the Second Amendment. Look at recent history, if you will. In one place, a teenager was physically attacked by rioters, who promised to kill him for daring to try and defend a business from their violence. They were trying hard to kill him when he shot two of them to death, and wounded a third, saving his own life and the lives of many others in the process. So what did the local “authorities” do? They charged him with two counts of murder and one of attempted murder. Whether or not those charges will be thrown out of court depends on whether or not he goes before a liberal, or conservative judge. In St. Louis, a homeowner showed his guns to a mob of rioters who had promised to kill him and his wife, and burn down his house. He knew they were serious because they had already damaged part of his property while trespassing. Did the “authorities” charge the rioters with anything? No! They are charging the homeowner with “menacing” charges for “displaying a dangerous weapon,” completely ignoring the deadly provocation. Again, their future depends on what kind of a judge they get. Or maybe the Supreme Court will throw both cases out of court, IF Trump manages to get his candidate confirmed. (Just common sense)

Mexico Has Gun Control

Is it working? Not on yer tintype! Mexican drug cartels practically RULE in Mexico, and they shoot up the landscape, pretty much at will. All with illegal guns. They’re illegal because Mexican law makes it practically impossible to get a gun legally—unless you’ve got a lot of money to use in bribing some bureaucrat into issuing you a “gun permit.” But the cartels don’t bother with that. They just get their guns illegally, and “buy off” the bureaucrats and other politicians to “look the other way.” when that fails, they just come in and shoot the place up. They did that in the town of Villa Union, just about an hour’s drive south of Eagle Pass, Texas. They “Rolled in” like a victorious army. Like they “owned the joint,” which they do, mostly. The cops objected, and an hour-long gunfight ensued between the cartel “troops” and the cops, in which four cops were killed, as well as any number of cartel members. This in gun-controlled Mexico. Does gun control work? Not a bit, apparently. Everywhere it is in force, gun crime persists. Mexico and Chicago is proof of that. But do the anti-gun fools listen? Again, not a bit. The other day, nobody got killed by a gun in Chicago, and that was big news. That speaks volumes. (Steadfast Daily)

Another Honest Justice

Only a liberal hack will deny that the Supreme Court has been dominated by liberal justices for years, and that has resulted in some strange “rulings” over the years. One of those is “Roe v. Wade,” where the liberal court twisted the language of the Constitution to cause the murders of millions of innocent, helpless babies, before they get a chance to take their first breath. It has also resulted in many other strange rulings, including the one making same sex marriage legal. Liberal justices have “legislated from the bench,” and one even based a ruling on something he found in FOREIGN law, which was so obviously illegal it doesn’t even require mentioning by intelligent people. The Supreme Court has ONE JOB. To look at laws made by the legislatures and decide if they CONFORM to the Constitution, something ALL laws made must do. Part of their mandate is NOT to “make laws” themselves. Just make sure all laws made conform to the Constitution. Trump's new justice WILL follow that rule, and rule ONLY based on what the Constitution says—and not on the twisted meaning of its words, as the liberal justices have done, in the past. Her confirmation doesn't guarantee better rulings for gun interests, but I'd bet it does.(Just common sense)

"Wild West Atmosphere"

That’s a favorite claim from anti-gun fools when they talk about places like Oklahoma, where anybody who owns a LEGAL gun can carry it without a license being required. Unfortunately for them, it hasn’t happened. There have been (with ONE exception) only reports of legal gun owners coming to the defense of non-carriers who are in trouble. As in the case of a man who pulled his legally-carried gun on a couple of major shoplifters who were about to kill a couple of Best Buy employees in a parking lot without having to fire a shot. He saw the murder about to happen and aimed his gun at the would-be murderer, who quickly “got gone” without killing those people. Had this happened in a state where carrying a gun is largely discouraged by law, those people would now be dead. Anti-gun laws make it easier for law-breakers to victimize honest people by disarming them. How many people these laws have KILLED, is uncountable. One can only surmise those responsible for these laws have an ulterior motive in getting them passed. What it may be is obvious. Certain corrupt politicians and bureaucrats plan to come for your property in the future, and want to meet as few guns as possible when they do. (Bearing Arms)

They're So Righteous

They think, in their ignorance, that they have “the answer” to “gun violence. The anti-gun fools are constantly ripping people for “inaction on gun control,” completely ignoring the fact that there ISN’T any action they can take, as long as they target the gun, and not the holder of the gun, that will do ANYTHING about “gun violence. They criticize Corey Gardner for not being in favor of background checks when background checks on LEGAL gun buyers completely ignore the ILLEGAL gun buyers—while it is the ILLEGAL gun buyers who are the problem, not those who stand for a background check. Those who intend to use their guns for crime do not stand for background checks because they don’t want to give the “authorities” a way to identify them after they use it. All their other anti-gun fool laws are similarly s useless because potential criminals just ignore them. They have to find a way to get to the illegal guns the criminals buy or steal, but they don’t have time for that. They’re too busy harassing legal gun buyers. (Just common sense)

Calif. Sheriff Denied A Gun

Sheriff John Lopey, duly elected and certified law officer, applied to buy an M1 Garand rifle through the Civilian Marksmanship Program (CMP) and was refused. He was told he failed to pass the National Criminal Investigation Service (NCIS) background check. This is a county sheriff! Prior to being sheriff he spent 35 years with the California Highway Patrol and before that was an Army Colonel with top security clearance. And he was REFUSED? Does this tell you anything about the competence of the systems they are going to use to keep track of YOUR gun ownership and your right to carry a gun after they get their phony laws made? (Breitbart)

Still Not Guns' Fault

“Ready, fire, aim!” That has always been how the anti-gun fools operate. “See a crime, blame the gun!” Never mind the gun is useless until it is in the hands of a law-breaker. Until a human being picks it up and uses it for evil purposes, it’s just a “lump of steel,” incapable of hurting anybody. Like fire, a gun can be used for good or evil. But is anybody talking about banning fire? No. The number of guns legally sold recently has increased markedly, while violent crime has gone down noticeably during the same period. That pretty blows the anti-gun fool notion that guns are to blame for violent crime out of the water, doesn’t it? Yet they still maintain, in their abysmal ignorance, that banning guns would “solve the violent crime problem.” It will NOT. And they have to be aware of that. But they ignore it in their zeal to disarm honest people, leaving the field wide open to those who own those millions of ILLEGAL guns. And it is those illegally-owned guns that are used to commit almost ALL violent crime. Instead of figuring out how to handle that, they go after legal guns, hoping that will reduce violent crime. It will NOT. It will only increase it by making honest people defenseless against the millions of illegal guns out there. It’s a futile endeavor, but they persist in it. (NSSF)

We Are At War

And we don’t even know it. I watched the video of the mob attack on Sen. Rand Paul and thought to myself as they pushed and shoved the police security detail, “Why don’t they return it in kind?” If a “demonstrator” hits a cop, that cop is ENTITLED to hit him back under regular human rights. If that rioter SHOOTS at a cop, that cop is entitled to shoot him back, If that kills him, so be it. They call their “demonstrations” peaceful. And there ARE some actual peaceful demonstrations. But way too many “peaceful demonstrations” are “taken over” by ANTIFA and BLM thugs and become violent. And the violence is escalating. Soon, rioters are not going to be satisfied with just assaulting people. The guns are even now beginning to come out, as represented by the shootings of cops in St. Louis and Chicago—and elsewhere. The killing of cops from ambush is escalating, and is going to get worse. It’s time the cops “returned fire” and showed those rioters pretending to be peaceful demonstrators what war is really like. We need to start calling these fools what they are, and treat them the way they should be treated--ignore their ubiquitous cell phone cameras. When a cop sees one aimed at him from that crowd, he needs to slap it out of the rioter’s hand and punch the holder in the teeth. These insurrectionists, pretending to be demonstrators, pretending to be rioters DEPEND on the cops NOT returning it in kind. They need to be taken down—NOW--before they become strong enough to really accomplish something. Something they’re definitely working toward—and that’s the takeover of this government. (Just common sense)

I Just Don't Understand

The anti-gun fools have to know their laws do not work, so why do they keep on making them? Are they stupid, or are they just in it for the money they can con out of the gullible people who buy their BS? The entire idea that they can reduce or eliminate crime by eliminating guns is ludicrous. Crime preceded guns. Before guns there were swords and knives, and clubs. Criminals will always come up with weapons to use on their intended victims. The idea that you CAN eliminate guns is silly. There are millions of illegally-owned guns already out there and they will never be able to even FIND them, much less be able to take them away from criminals. So they content themselves with taking away guns from legal owners so they will be “easy targets” for those with illegal guns. Now, THAT’S really stupid. They think background checks on legal gun sales will reduce crime, but the very act of submitting to it indicates a degree of honesty that belies their concern. Criminals don’t submit to a background check when they buy their guns illegally or just steal them. So their “arrow” misses the target, completely. “Safe gun storage” laws only make it hard for honest people to get their guns into action fast enough to defend themselves against the illegal guns owned by criminals. They have not come up with a single law that will do anything to reduce crime, and only increase it by disarming the intended victims. Their entire law-making industry is counter-productive, so why do they pursue it? There has to be an ulterior motive here, somewhere. Is it that those politicians intend to come after us in the future ad don’t want to get shot when they do? In any case, a politician who wants to become a dictator first will disarm the population. Hitler did it. So did Lenin and Stalin, and Castro. Then they proceeded to murder millions of their people as they took power. We don’t want that here, and the only thing that will stop it is an armed populace. (Just common sense)