Those are the two most frequent
causes of “gun violence,” with gang activity being the most
prevalent. Suicide is a horrible thing, but I fail to see how any law
would stop someone who truly wishes to kill himself from doing it.
How are you going to punish him/her? He/she is dead. Gang activity is
responsible for 80% of “gun crime.” Gang members are already
breaking the law, so what do they care about breaking one more law?
One that says they can’t be armed when they commit their other
crimes? So at
whom
are all those anti-gun laws aimed? The law-abiding, of course. But
the law-abiding don’t commit crimes, as a rule. Any that do are an
exception. So how do all those anti-gun laws expect to stop “gun
crime” by limiting the right to be armed for the law-abiding, while
the lawless go right on getting their guns illegally? So why do
gullible politicians succumb to the behest of the anti-gun fools and
make more and more unenforceable, useless anti-gun laws? The only
purpose I can see it that these politicians are either stupid or they
are dictator wannabes who are frightened by an armed populace. They
are “hedging their bets” for later, when they hope to come for
what isn’t theirs, and they want to meet as few guns in the hands
of their potential victims as possible. (Truth About Guns)
Monday, May 18, 2020
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment