"Emergency Powers"

The Pennsylvania governor is giving us a good example of Rahm Emanuel’s dictum: “Never let a good crisis go to waste.” He is contemplating using his “emergency powers” to literally ban firearms for the law-abiding, while doing nothing to stop the lawless from getting and using their guns. By so doing, he is DISARMING the law-abiding, making it easier for the lawless to victimize the law-abiding with their ILLEGAL guns. Can anybody show me where, in the Constitution it says a governor can violate the Constitution by invoking “emergency powers?” I don’t think it does. So if he goes ahead with that plan he is violating the Constitution, to which ALL LAWS must conform, or they are now laws at all, in the eyes of the courts. This is a good example of how a would-be dictators works: twist the law to suit yourself and defy anybody to oppose you. And if nobody opposes you, enforce your illegal laws until somebody does. This is also how liberals work. Liberals ARE “would-be dictators” and push things to the edge of the law every day. (MOM-AT-ARMS)