They don’t have any meaningful arguments
to support “gun control,” so they just demonize their opposition.
So it is with the Washington
Post,
who recently, without any kind of proof of anything, compared gun
sanctuaries to slavery. What kind of fool thinking is responsible for
that, I don’t know. Nobody’s being forced to do anything in those
“gun sanctuaries.” They have only been designated as
such
by a majority
of the people who wish to maintain their right to be armed for self
defense, and not DISARMED by stupid politicians, and
made to be defenseless.
They
know that each and every anti-gun law is unconstitutional
for a
simple reason: The second Amendment is very simple and easy to
understand if you’re not a fool. It says, “The Right of the
people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Of course
the anti-gun fools try and misunderstand it because of the preceding
words about am “organized militia,” which did not even exist at
the time of the writing pf the Constitution, and really have no
meaning, since at the time, they included ALL THE PEOPLE in any such
“organized militia,” if one was to be organized. The
government, at that time, was not “flush with money” as it is
now, and wanted them to bring their own guns when called up. In any
case, there is no real comparison with any kind of slavery in those
“sanctuaries.” Those laws are unconstitutional because they
“infringe” upon those rights. (Washington Examiner)
Friday, January 31, 2020
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment