The federal district court recently ruled that requiring applicants
provide a “good reason” before being issued a carry permit is in
violation of the Constitution—which is absolutely right. The
Constitution clearly states that the right to be armed “shall not
be abridged” for ALL Americans. Requirements such as this ARE an
“abridgment” to that right. Back when I applied for a permit in
Indiana (back when dinosaurs roamed the Earth), they
had that requirement, which I easily met. But I shouldn't have had to
meet it. Being non-political then, I didn't realize how my rights
were being violated, as it is with most people who “pay no
attention to politics.” But it is still a violation of citizen's
rights, and Washington DC should realize that more than anywhere
else. They'll probably appeal that decision, because anti-gun
politicians aren't too bright, But they'll probably lose, in the long
run. Anti-gun politicians usually do because theirs is a MINORITY
position, as it should be. (Washington Times)
Tuesday, August 1, 2017
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment