It's too bad there isn't a “board” or “committee” somewhere
to approve of the veracity (truth) of what is written about guns in the
liberal media. There are too many fools who know absolutely NOTHING
about guns, who write these pieces that contain many lies and
misrepresentations. It's hard for the average person to “filter
out” the lies, and see what's true. They preach the same old crap
they've read in other liberal publications without questioning it, so
as to notice the contradictions in what is preached. Like the idea
that the Second Amendment is NOT an “individual right,” but a
recognition that an “organized militia” needed to be armed. Which
is a “flight of fancy,” as the amendment itself makes clear,
since there was NO such thing as an “organized militia” at the
time, so they HAD TO mean that ALL THE PEOPLE must have the right to
be armed, so THEY could be “called up” in an emergency, and would bring their own guns. And
that's just ONE of the lies and misrepresentations, just in this one
article, linked here. Another is the fiction that it only covered
MUSKETS, which were the guns in general use at the time it was
written. Today, the guns in general use are the automatic and
semi-automatic weapons in use by the military and by the cops and
government agents. It did NOT say specifically muskets. (The Dana Show)
Friday, September 2, 2016
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment