This famous singer thinks laws don't apply to him, as does Hillary
Clinton. Her lawbreaking is a little different than his, though. She
“has people” to do for her the things this guy does for himself.
The only laws she personally breaks are those regarding her political
life. Such as having a private e-mail server as Secretary of State
when doing so is, if not completely illegal, it is unethical. Then
there's her actions in allowing Islamic terrorists to murder her
diplomats in Benghazi when some of them could have been saved if
she'd just gotten off her considerable rear end and sent some people to
do so. Instead, she sent out a "stand down" order, which was IGNORED by many. This guy likes to do things himself. Which is why he has been
charged, many times, with violence against the women in his life,
always getting off with “slaps on the wrist.” But he IS a felon,
which begs the question of how he was able to have the gun he
threatened one of his girls with when she admired some jewelry he
though she shouldn't. There are LAWS against felons having guns,
especially in California, where he lives. Looks like those laws
aren't obeyed very well by guys with a lot of money. Which makes them
pretty useless. Even if he is not guilty of the crime of which she
accused him, how did he get the gun with which he allegedly
threatened her? (NBC News)
Friday, September 2, 2016
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment