This article, by an anti-gun “researcher,” says that a gun in the
house is more likely to kill or wound a family member than an
intruder. What the hell is he SMOKING? If I were a druggie, I'd want
some. All the “stats” he cites are horse manure, as are the
conclusions he reaches. He gives a list of things that “block”
any “common sense solutions,” which is just a different tune
added to the same old words. He says most unwarranted gun deaths or
injuries are done by LICENSED individuals, which is a DIRECT LIE if
you believe REPUTABLE figures, not the phony ones cited by anti-gun
fools. The entire article is a collection of horse manure, as are
most articles put out by anti-gun fools. Law-abiding people do NOT
commit most gun crimes, as he claims. The “studies” he cites (but
does not name) have a questionable methodology, which is why he only
“refers” to them obliquely, without naming them. That way, we can't check
their accuracy or methodology. That's an old anti-gun fool trick.
(WBUR)
Friday, August 19, 2016
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment